Memorandum from the Deputy Attorney General
Page2
Subject: Chokeholds & Carotid Restraints; Knock & Announce Requirement
Chokeholds and Carotid Restraints
The use
of
certain
ph
ysical restraint techniques - namely chokeholds and carotid restraints - by
some law enforcement agencies to incapacitate a resisting suspect has too often led to tragedy.
Chokeholds apply pressure to the throat
or
windpipe and restrict an individual's ability to
breathe.
The
carotid restraint technique restricts blood flow to the brain causing temporary
unconsciousness.
It
is important that Department law enforcement components have an
articulated policy in this area because these techniques are inherently dangerous.
It
is a long-standing Department policy that "[l]aw enforcement officers and correctional officers
of
the Department
of
Justice may use deadly force only when necessary, that is, when the officer
has a reasonable belief that the subject
of
such force poses an imminent danger
of
death
or
serious physical injury to the officer
or
to another person." Policy Statement Use
of
Deadly
Force, Approved by the Attorney General July 1, 2004. Given the inherent dangerousness
of
chokeholds and carotid restraints, and based
on
feedback from
our
law enforcement components
on
these techniques, Department law enforcement agents and correctional officers are hereby
prohibited from using a chokehold or a carotid restraint unless that standard
of
necessity for use
of
deadly force is satisfied. Accordingly, Department law enforcement components will revise
their policies to reflect this guidance prohibiting the use
of
chokeholds
or
carotid restraints by
Department law enforcement agents and correctional officers, including federal task force
officers, unless deadly force is authorized. Component heads will also ensure that personnel
receive notice
of
this policy and that it is appropriately incorporated into training.
"No Knock" Entries
Federal agents are generally required to "knock and announce" their identity, authority and
purpose, and demand to enter before entry is made to execute a warrant
in
a private dwelling.
U.S. Const., amend. IV;
18
U.S.C. ยง 3109; see Hudson v. Michigan, 547 U.S. 586 (2006). Once
that announcement is made, agents must wait a reasonable amount
of
time based
on
the totality
of
the circumstances to permit the occupant to open the door before making entry into a
dwelling. See United States v. Banks, 540 U.S.
31
(2003). The Supreme Court has recognized,
however, that there are certain situations where
it
is not constitutionally necessary to "knock and
announce" before entering a dwelling- namely, where the officer has reasonable grounds to
believe that knocking and announcing would create a threat
of
physical violence, likely result in
destruction
of
evidence, or be futile. See Hudson, 547 U.S. at 589-90. Because
of
the risk posed
to both law enforcement and civilians during the execution
of
"no knock" warrants, it is
important that this authority be exercised only in the most compelling circumstances.