18
Updated: 7/21/2014
In general, dual coverage (i.e., both FTCA and private malpractice insurance covering the same activities) is not
permitted. However, it is recognized that some health centers may have purchased malpractice insurance for
health care practitioners with differing policy expiration dates as a means to stagger required tail insurance
expenditures. In these situations, temporary dual coverage is allowable.
The combined use of FTCA and gap coverage (i.e., private insurance for activities not subject to FTCA coverage) is
allowable. This can be accomplished by purchase of a policy for discrete activities or as a wrap-around (gap) policy
that clearly delineates that coverage is only for activities not subject to FTCA coverage.
H.2 Subrogation
The U.S. Government may subrogate claims (i.e., pursue its right to receive payment for claims from private
insurers) in instances where the covered entity has private coverage and a payment is made under FTCA for a
covered activity (see Section I: C. Covered Activities). Upon payment of an FTCA claim, the U.S. Government is
entitled to the extent of the payment covered under private insurance.
H.3 Gap Coverage
It is recognized that health centers may engage in non-covered activities (see Section I: C. Covered Activities) or
may employ or contract with non-covered individuals (see Section I: B. Covered Individuals), thus creating gaps in
malpractice protection for services/activities outside the Federal section 330 scope of project. Examples are
services provided on behalf of the health center by volunteers or part-time contracted dentists. In these cases,
covered entities may want to consider gap or wrap-around coverage to provide private insurance for activities not
subject to FTCA coverage. Please note that while non-covered individuals are not covered under FTCA, the health
center is still covered by FTCA as long as the activities are within the health center’s scope of employment, which
includes the scope of project. Non-covered individuals should be encouraged to secure insurance to cover
activities not covered by the FTCA.
There are no restrictions on gap or wrap-around policies. However, covered entities should make sure that
these policies clearly state that they do not cover activities approved for coverage under FTCA. This protects the
health center from being in a situation of dual coverage for the same activity.
H.4 Other Insurance Considerations
FTCA provides protection only for personal injury, including death, resulting from the performance of medical,
surgical, dental, or related functions, which constitute medical malpractice for purposes of this
Manual. Consequently, even with FTCA coverage, covered entities will continue to need other types of insurance,
such as non-medical/dental professional liability coverage, general liability coverage, director’s and officer’s
liability coverage, automobile and collision coverage, fire coverage, and theft coverage.
SECTION II. CLAIMS AND LAWSUITS
I. Operation of FTCA for Health Centers
As previously discussed in this Manual, under FSHCAA, a section 330-funded health center, as well as its officers,
directors, employees, and certain contractors, may be considered deemed to be Federal employees for the
purpose of medical malpractice coverage under the FTCA (see Section I: B. Covered Individuals). As such, they are
immune from personal liability for claims of medical malpractice arising from their deemed employment, contract
for services, or duties as an officer or director of the deemed health center. Should they be sued in State courts for
actions arising within the scope of this deemed employment, they should ensure prompt notification of the
litigation to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) so that the action may be removed to
Federal district court and the United States substituted as the named defendant. The covered entity and covered
individuals will not be financially liable for any claims arising from their covered activities. However, this immunity
does not preclude related actions by Federal, State and other licensing and certifying bodies. For example,
immunity under FSHCAA will not preclude reporting of claims payments to the National Practitioner Data Bank or
reporting to the applicable State licensing board, which may act to suspend or revoke a license to practice.