CHAPTER 21
COST RELATED TO PATIENT CARE
Section
General
Principle ...................................................................................................................... 2100
Definitions................................................................................................................... 2102
Reasonable Costs .................................................................................................. 2102.1
Costs Related to Patient Care ................................................................................ 2102.2
Costs Not Related to Patient Care ......................................................................... 2102.3
Donations to a Provider of Produce, Supplies, Space, Etc ................................... 2102.4
Prudent Buyer ............................................................................................................. 2103
Costs Not Allowable
Unallowable Costs Related to Patient Care ................................................................ 2104
Ambulance Service ............................................................................................... 2104.1
Private-Duty Personnel ......................................................................................... 2104.2
Luxury Items or Services ...................................................................................... 2104.3
Dental Services ..................................................................................................... 2104.4
Vocational and Scholastic Training Expense........................................................ 2104.5
Unallowable Costs Not Related to Patient Care ......................................................... 2105
Noncompetition Agreement Costs ........................................................................ 2105.1
Cost of Meals for Other Than Provider Personnel ................................................ 2105.2
Cost of Reserving Beds or Services ...................................................................... 2105.3
Costs of Unsuccessful Beneficiary Appeals ......................................................... 2105.4
Costs of Management Employee Meals ................................................................ 2105.5
Costs of Employee Travel ..................................................................................... 2105.6
Costs of Gifts or Donations................................................................................... 2105.7
Costs of Entertainment .......................................................................................... 2105.8
Costs of Employees’ Personal Use of Motor Vehicles ......................................... 2105.9
Costs of Fines or Penalties .................................................................................... 2105.10
Costs of Spousal or Dependents Education .......................................................... 2105.11
Telephone, Television, and Radio Costs
Costs of Telephone, Television, and Radio ................................................................ 2106
General .................................................................................................................. 2106.1
Combination Purpose Systems ............................................................................. 2106.2
Parking Lot Costs
Parking Lot Costs ........................................................................................................ 2107
General .................................................................................................................. 2107.1
Treatment of Parking Revenue ............................................................................. 2107.2
Provider-Based Physician Services
Reimbursement for Services by Provider-Based Physicians ...................................... 2108
Professional and Provider Components ................................................................ 2108.1
Compensation Arrangements ................................................................................ 2108.2
Methods Used to Determine the Reasonable Charge of Provider-Based
Physicians........................................................................................................... 2108.3
Schedule of Charges.............................................................................................. 2108.4
Rev. 454 21-1
COSTS RELATED TO PATIENT CARE
Section
Effect of Physician's Assumption of Operating Costs (Lease or Concession
Arrangement) ...................................................................................................... 2108.5
Duties and Responsibilities of Provider and Intermediary in the Area of
Provider-Based Physician Reimbursement ........................................................ 2108.6
Retroactive Adjustment of Certain Provider-Based Physician Payments ............. 2108.7
Reimbursement for Provider-Based Physicians' Administrative, Teaching, and
Direct Medical Care Services Where the Physicians Have Changed Their
Compensation Arrangements With the Provider ............................................... 2108.8
Reimbursement for the Services of Provider-Based Physicians Compensated
Through the Provider and the Provider Bills the Program Under Combined
Billing (on Forms SSA-l453 or l483) or on Form SSA-l554 ............................. 2108.9
Treatment of Provider Costs Related to the Provision of Physician Services
to Nonprovider Patients ..................................................................................... 2108.10
Exhibits - Provider-Based Physicians ................................................................... 2108.11
Emergency Department Services
Reimbursement of Hospital Emergency Department Services When Physicians
Receive Compensation For Availability Services.................................................... 2109
General .................................................................................................................. 2109.1
Definitions............................................................................................................. 2109.2
Allowability of Emergency Department Physician Availability Services Costs .. 2109.3
Methodology for Determining Allowable Emergency Physician Availability
Service Costs ...................................................................................................... 2109.4
Billing Costs
Billing Costs................................................................................................................ 2110
Contract Billing Services ...................................................................................... 2110.1
Treatment of Income Derived From Interest, Finance Charges, and
Penalties on Delinquent Accounts Receivable................................................... 2110.2
Treatment of Income Derived From Billing Charges Imposed on Suppliers of
Services Furnished Under Arrangements........................................................... 2110.3
Physician Billing Costs ......................................................................................... 2110.4
Nonphysician Anesthetists' Services
Nonphysician Anesthetists' Services as Hospital Services ......................................... 2112
Home Health Services
Home Health Coordination (or Home Care Intake Coordination) Costs - General .... 2113
Home Health Coordination Activities .................................................................. 2113.1
Patient Solicitation Activities ............................................................................... 2113.2
Discharge Planning-Type Activities ..................................................................... 2113.3
Education and Liaison Activities .......................................................................... 2113.4
Home Health Coordination in the Provider-Based HHA ...................................... 2113.5
Visiting Costs of HHAs .............................................................................................. 2114
Nonowners Compensation .................................................................................... 2114.1
Transportation Costs ............................................................................................. 2114.2
Treatment of Medical Supply Costs in HHAs ............................................................ 2115
Non-Visiting Costs of HHAs ...................................................................................... 2116
Contracted Services Purchased by HHA ..................................................................... 2117
21-1.1 Rev. 454
COSTS RELATED TO PATIENT CARE
Section
Services Furnished under Arrangements
Cost of Services Furnished Under Arrangements ...................................................... 2118
Payment to the Provider ....................................................................................... 2118.1
Services Furnished Under Arrangements for
Medicare Beneficiaries Only ............................................................................. 2118.2
Cost of Drugs and Related Medical Supplies ............................................................ 2119
Services of Interns and Residents
Reimbursement for Costs of Interns and Residents ................................................... 2120
Taxes
Taxes .......................................................................................................................... 2122
General Rule ........................................................................................................ 2122.1
Taxes Not Allowable as Costs ............................................................................. 2122.2
Employment-Related Taxes - Provider-Based
Physicians.......................................................................................................... 2122.3
Franchise Taxes ................................................................................................... 2122.4
Unemployment Compensation Insurance Costs for
Nonprofit Providers Under Public Law 91-373 ................................................ 2122.5
Self-Insurance Program for Unemployment
Compensation and Worker's Compensation
Insurance Using a Reserve for Funding ............................................................ 2122.6
Review of Reasonable Costs, Including Taxes…………………………………… 2122.7
Oxygen
Oxygen ....................................................................................................................... 2124
Blood
Blood .......................................................................................................................... 2125
Utilization Review Costs
Utilization Review ..................................................................................................... 2126
Utilization Review in Hospitals ........................................................................... 2126.1
Utilization Review in Skilled Nursing Facilities ................................................. 2126.2
Community-Based Utilization Review Committee ............................................. 2126.3
Utilization Review Cost; Provider Payment to
Physicians for Rendering Utilization Review Services .................................... 2126.4
HHA Advisory Group
Home Health Agency Advisory Group of Professional Personnel ............................ 2127
Training Costs
Orientation and On-the-Job-Training......................................................................... 2128
Insurance Premiums
Life Insurance Premiums ........................................................................................... 2130
Rev. 448 21-1.2
COST RELATED TO PATIENT CARE
Section
Start-Up Costs
Start-Up Costs ............................................................................................................ 2132
General ................................................................................................................. 2132.1
Applicability......................................................................................................... 2132.2
Cost Treatment for Medicare Reimbursement ..................................................... 2132.3
Sale of Institution ................................................................................................. 2132.4
Withdrawal From Program .................................................................................. 2132.5
Effect on Equity Capital ....................................................................................... 2132.6
Organization Costs
Organization and Other Corporate Costs ................................................................... 2134
Organization Costs - General ............................................................................... 2134.1
Cost Treatment of Organization Costs
Under Medicare................................................................................................. 2134.2
Amortization Period of 60 Months ...................................................................... 2134.3
Amortization Period Less Than 60 Months ......................................................... 2134.4
Amortization Period Greater Than 60 Months .................................................... 2134.5
Sale of Institution ................................................................................................. 2134.6
Withdrawal From Program .................................................................................. 2134.7
Effect on Equity Capital ....................................................................................... 2134.8
Stockholder Servicing Costs ................................................................................ 2134.9
Reorganization Costs ........................................................................................... 2134.10
Transfer of Assets to a Corporation ..................................................................... 2134.11
Purchased Management and Administrative Support Services
Purchased Management and Administrative Support Services ................................. 2135
General ................................................................................................................. 2135.1
Evaluation of the Need for Purchased
Management and Administrative Support
Services ............................................................................................................. 2135.2
Determination of the Reasonable Cost of
Purchased Management and Administrative
Support Services ............................................................................................... 2135.3
Factors to Be Considered in Determining
Reasonable Cost of Purchased Management
and Administrative Support Services ................................................................ 2135.4
Documentation to Support Purchased
Management and Administrative Support Services .......................................... 2135.5
Advertising Costs
Advertising Costs - General ....................................................................................... 2136
Allowable Advertising Costs ............................................................................... 2136.1
Unallowable Advertising Costs ................................................................................. 2136.2
Membership Costs
Membership Costs - General ..................................................................................... 2138
Professional, Technical, or Business Related Organizations ............................... 2138.1
Civic Organizations ............................................................................................. 2138.2
Social, Fraternal, and Other Organizations .......................................................... 2138.3
21-1.3 Rev.448
COST RELATED TO PATIENT CARE
Section
Reasonableness of Provider's Participation in
Approved Membership Activities ..................................................................... 2138.4
Political and Lobbying Activities
Political and Lobbying Activities............................................................................... 2139
Provider Political Activities ................................................................................. 2139.1
Provider Lobbying Activities ............................................................................... 2139.2
Organization Dues Related to Lobbying and Political
Activities ........................................................................................................... 2139.3
Deferred Compensation
Deferred Compensation ............................................................................................. 2140
Definition ............................................................................................................. 2140.1
Foreword .............................................................................................................. 2140.2
Formal Plan .......................................................................................................... 2140.3
Requirements to Fund Plan .................................................................................. 2140.4
Reimbursement of Hospital-Based Physician
Patient Care Services ........................................................................................ 2140.5
Guarantee Arrangements for Physician Emergency Room Services ................... 2140.6
Defined Contribution Deferred Compensation Plans
Defined Contribution Deferred Compensation Plans ................................................ 2141
Definition ............................................................................................................. 2141.1
Foreword .............................................................................................................. 2141.2
Formal Plan .......................................................................................................... 2141.3
Requirements to Fund Plan .................................................................................. 2141.4
Reimbursement of Hospital-Based Physician Patient Care Services ................... 2141.5
Guarantee Arrangements for Physician Emergency Room Services ................... 2141.6
Effective Date ...................................................................................................... 2141.7
Pension Plans
Pension Plans ............................................................................................................. 2142
Definition ............................................................................................................. 2142.1
Section number reserved for future use……………………………………………. .. 2142.2
Section number reserved for future use ............................................................... 2142.3
Section number reserved for future use ............................................................... 2142.4
Pension Costs ....................................................................................................... 2142.5
Allowability of Payments ..................................................................................... 2142.6
Section number reserved for future use ............................................................... 2142.7
Fringe Benefits
Fringe Benefits ........................................................................................................... 2144
Definition ............................................................................................................. 2144.1
Purpose ................................................................................................................. 2144.2
Requirements for Recognition of Fringe Benefits ............................................... 2144.3
Fringe Benefits Includable as Provider's Cost ..................................................... 2144.4
Fringe Benefits Includable in Determining
Provider-Based Physician's Compensation ....................................................... 2144.5
Specific Costs Not Classified as Fringe Benefits……………………………… ...... 2144.6
Rev. 461 21-1.4
COSTS RELATED TO PATIENT CARE
Section
Accounting for Fringe Benefits ............................................................................ 2144.7
Sick Leave ............................................................................................................ 2144.8
All-Inclusive Paid Days Off ................................................................................. 2144.9
Cost of Meals for Provider Personnel ........................................................................ 2145
Vacation Costs
Vacation Costs ........................................................................................................... 2146
Definition ............................................................................................................. 2146.1
Reimbursement for Costs of Vacation ................................................................. 2146.2
Exception to the Requirement to Account for
Vacation Costs on the Accrual Method ............................................................ 2146.3
Conversion from Cash Method to Accrual Method
for Vacation ...................................................................................................... 2146.4
Bilingual Service Costs
Bilingual Services ...................................................................................................... 2147
Cost of Physicians' Services in Teaching Hospitals
Reimbursement for Physicians' Services Rendered
in a Teaching Hospital by Physicians on the
Hospital Staff and Reimbursement for Services Rendered
in a Teaching Hospital by the Faculty of a Medical
School or Organization Related Thereto - General ................................................. 2148
Reasonable Cost of Direct Medical and
Surgical Services Rendered by Physicians
on the Hospital Staff in the Care of
Individual Patients (Including Supervision
of Interns and Residents Rendering Such
Services) ............................................................................................................ 2148.1
Reasonable Costs Incurred by a Teaching
Hospital for the Services Rendered by a
Medical School or Related Organization in the Hospital ................................. 2148.2
"Salary Equivalent" Payments for Direct
Medical and Surgical Services in the Care
of Individual Patients (Including Supervision of
Interns and Residents Rendering Such Care) by
Physicians on the Voluntary Staff of the
Hospital (or Medical School or Organization Related Thereto) ....................... 2148.3
Allocation of Compensation Paid to
Physicians in a Teaching Hospital .................................................................... 2148.4
Election to Receive Medicare Reimbursement
on a Reasonable Cost Basis .............................................................................. 2148.5
Home Office Costs
Home Office Costs - Chain Operations ..................................................................... 2150
General Limitation on Allowability of Costs ....................................................... 2150.1
Determination of Allowable Costs ....................................................................... 2150.2
Allocation of Home Office Costs to Components
in Chain ............................................................................................................. 2150.3
21-2 Rev. 461
COSTS RELATED TO PATIENT CARE
Section
Home Office Equity Capital .............................................................................................. 2152
Computation ................................................................................................................. 2152.1
Exclusions .................................................................................................................... 2152.2
Allocation of Home Office Equity Capital .................................................................. 2152.3
Reporting of Home Office Costs and Equity Capital......................................................... 2153
Planning Costs
Planning Costs ................................................................................................................... 2154
General ......................................................................................................................... 2154.1
Definitions.................................................................................................................... 2154.2
Planning Costs Where Facility is Completed .............................................................. 2154.3
Planning Costs Where Plans are Abandoned ............................................................... 2154.4
Abandonment of Construction
Abandonment of Construction-In-Progress ....................................................................... 2155
Support Services Furnished to Governmental Providers
Allowable Costs of Governmental Support Services to
State and Local Governmental Providers ........................................................................ 2156
Unallowable Central Service Costs ............................................................................. 2156.1
Allocation Bases .......................................................................................................... 2156.2
Reporting Requirements .............................................................................................. 2156.3
Losses (Other Than From Sale of Assets)
Losses Arising from Other Than Sale of Assets ................................................................ 2160
Net Operating Losses ................................................................................................... 2160.1
Liability Losses ............................................................................................................ 2160.2
Theft Losses ................................................................................................................. 2160.3
Minor Losses ................................................................................................................ 2160.4
Casualty Losses - General ............................................................................................ 2160.5
Insurance Costs .................................................................................................................. 2161
Cost of Protection Against Malpractice Liability
Provider Costs for Malpractice and Comprehensive
General Liability Protection, Unemployment
Compensation, Workers' Compensation, and Employee
Health Care Insurance ..................................................................................................... 2162
Insurance with a Deductible or Coinsurance Provision ............................................... 2162.1
Insurance Purchased from a Limited Purpose
Insurance Company ................................................................................................... 2162.2
Self-Insurance .............................................................................................................. 2162.3
Allowability of Actual Losses Related to
Deductibles or Coinsurance ...................................................................................... 2162.5
Losses in Excess of Coverage ...................................................................................... 2162.6
Conditions Applicable to Self-Insurance ..................................................................... 2162.7
Expenses Related to Losses Paid Out of Self-
Insurance Fund .......................................................................................................... 2162.8
Rev. 406 21-2.1
COSTS RELATED TO PATIENT CARE
Section
Reimbursement Principles Where a Provider
Has Self-Insurance .................................................................................................... 2162.9
Treatment of Excess Reserves ..................................................................................... 2162.10
Effective Date and Retroactive Application ................................................................ 2162.11
Buy-Out Cost to Convert From a State- Administered Fund to a Self-Insurance
Fund for Unemployment Compensation or Workers' Compensation Insurance....... 2162.12
Absence of Coverage ................................................................................................... 2162.13
Governmental Providers .............................................................................................. 2162.14
Post-Termination Administrative Costs
Administrative Costs Incurred After Provider Terminates Participation in Program ........ 2176
Allowable Direct Administrative Costs To Be Included in Final Cost Report ............ 2176.1
Allowable Direct Administrative Costs Incurred After Final Cost Report Is Filed ..... 2176.2
Costs Related to Union Activities
Reimbursement for Costs Incurred in Relation to Union Activities .................................. 2180
Labor Union Organizing Activities .............................................................................. 2180.1
Collective Bargaining .................................................................................................. 2180.2
Unallowable or Allowable But Not Reasonable Costs in Relation to
Union Activities ........................................................................................................ 2180.3
Physician Services Furnished in Providers
Services of Physicians in Providers ................................................................................... 2182
General ......................................................................................................................... 2182.2
Allocation of Physician Compensation ........................................................................ 2182.3
Conditions for Reasonable Charge Payment for "Physicians' Services" to
Patients in Providers ................................................................................................. 2182.4
Determining Reasonable Charges for "Physicians' Services" in Providers ................. 2182.5
Conditions of Payment for Costs of Physicians' Services to Providers ....................... 2182.6
Conditions for Payment of Charges - Anesthesiology Services .................................. 2182.7
Determining Reasonable Charges for Anesthesia Services ......................................... 2182.8
Conditions for Payment of Reasonable Charges - Radiology Services ....................... 2182.9
Determining Reasonable Charges for Radiology Services .......................................... 2182.10
Conditions for Payment of Charges - Physician Laboratory Services ......................... 2182.11
Blood Gas Studies ........................................................................................................ 2182.12
Exhibits ........................................................................................................................ 2182.13
Appendix
Maximum Allowable Cost Limitation (MAC) Determinations for Drugs ........................
21-2.2 Rev. 406
09-12 COSTS RELATED TO PATIENT CARE 2102.3
2100. PRINCIPLE
All payments to providers of services must be based on the reasonable cost of services covered
under title XVIII of the Act and related to the care of beneficiaries or, in the case of acute care
hospitals, the prospective payment system (PPS). (See Chapter 28 on PPS.) Reasonable cost
includes all necessary and proper costs incurred in rendering the services, subject to principles
relating to specific items of revenue and cost.
2102. DEFINITIONS
2102.1 Reasonable Costs.--Reasonable costs of any services are determined in accordance with
regulations establishing the method or methods to be used, and the items to be included.
Reasonable cost takes into account both direct and indirect costs of providers of services,
including normal standby costs. The objective is that under the methods of determining costs,
the costs for individuals covered by the program are not borne by others not so covered and the
costs for individuals not so covered are not borne by the program.
Costs may vary from one institution to another because of scope of services, level of care,
geographical location, and utilization. It is the intent of the program that providers are
reimbursed the actual costs of providing high quality care, regardless of how widely they may
vary from provider to provider, except where a particular institution's costs are found to be
substantially out of line with other institutions in the same area which are similar in size, scope of
services, utilization, and other relevant factors. Utilization, for this purpose, refers not to the
provider's occupancy rate but rather to the manner in which the institution is used as determined
by the characteristics of the patients treated (i.e., its patient mix - age of patients, type of illness,
etc.).
Implicit in the intention that actual costs be paid to the extent they are reasonable is the
expectation that the provider seeks to minimize its costs and that its actual costs do not exceed
what a prudent and cost-conscious buyer pays for a given item or service. (See §2103.) If costs
are determined to exceed the level that such buyers incur, in the absence of clear evidence that
the higher costs were unavoidable, the excess costs are not reimbursable under the program.
In the event that a provider undergoes bankruptcy proceedings, the program makes payment to
the provider based on the reasonable or actual cost of services rendered to Medicare beneficiaries
and not on the basis of costs adjusted by bankruptcy arrangements.
2102.2 Costs Related to Patient Care.--These include all necessary and proper costs which are
appropriate and helpful in developing and maintaining the operation of patient care facilities and
activities. Necessary and proper costs related to patient care are usually costs which are common
and accepted occurrences in the field of the provider's activity. They include personnel costs,
administrative costs, costs of employee pension plans, normal standby costs, and others.
Allowability of costs is subject to the regulations prescribing the treatment of specific items
under the Medicare program.
2102.3 Costs Not Related to Patient Care.--Costs not related to patient care are costs which are
not appropriate or necessary and proper in developing and maintaining the operation of patient
care facilities and activities. Costs which are not necessary include costs which usually are not
common or accepted occurrences in the field of the provider's activity.
Such costs are not allowable in computing reimbursable costs and include, for example:
o Cost of meals sold to visitors;
o Cost of drugs sold to other than patients;
o Cost of operation of a gift shop;
Rev. 454 21-2.5
2103 COSTS RELATED TO PATIENT CARE 09-12
o Cost of alcoholic beverages furnished to employees or to others regardless of how
or where furnished, such as cost of alcoholic beverages furnished at a provider picnic or
furnished as a fringe benefit;
o Cost of gifts or donations;
o Cost of entertainment, including tickets to sporting and other entertainment
events;
o Cost of personal use of motor vehicles;
o Cost of fines or penalties resulting from violations of Federal, State, or local laws;
o Cost of educational expenses for spouses or other dependents of providers of
services, their employees or contractors, if they are not active employees of the provider or
contractor;
o Cost of meals served to executives that exceed the cost of meals served to
ordinary employees due to the use of separate executive dining facilities (capital and capital-
related costs), duplicative or additional food service staff (chef, waiters/waitresses, etc.),
upgraded or gourmet menus, etc.; and
o Cost of travel incurred in connection with non-patient care related purposes.
2102.4 Donations to a Provider of Produce, Supplies, Space, Etc.--If a provider receives a
donation of produce, supplies, the use of space owned by another organization, etc., the provider
may not properly impute a cost for the value of the donations and include the imputed cost in
allowable costs. If an imputed cost has been included in the provider's costs, that amount is
deleted in determining allowable costs. If the provider and donor organization are both part of a
larger organizational entity, such as units of a state or county government, costs related to the
donations are includable in the allowable costs of the provider. For example, if a county home
health agency is given space to use in the county office building, costs related to that space may
be included in the agency's costs, e.g., depreciation, costs of janitorial services, maintenance and
repairs.
21-2.6 Rev. 454
09-12 COSTS RELATED TO PATIENT CARE 2103
2103. PRUDENT BUYER
A. General.--The prudent and cost-conscious buyer not only refuses to pay more than the
going price for an item or service, he/she also seeks to economize by minimizing cost. This is
especially so when the buyer is an institution or organization which makes bulk purchases and
can, therefore, often gain discounts because of the size of its purchases. In addition, bulk
purchase of items or services often gives the buyer leverage in bargaining with suppliers for other
items or services. Another way to minimize cost is to obtain free replacements or reduced
charges under warranties for medical devices. Any alert and cost-conscious buyer seeks such
advantages, and it is expected that Medicare providers of services will also seek them.
B. Application of Prudent Buyer Principle.--Intermediaries may employ various means for
detecting and investigating situations in which costs seem excessive. Included may be such
techniques as comparing the prices paid by providers to the prices paid for similar items or
services by comparable purchasers, spot-checking, and querying providers about indirect, as well
as direct, discounts. In addition, where a group of institutions has a joint purchasing arrangement
which seems to result in participating members getting lower prices because of the advantages
gained from bulk purchasing, any potentially eligible providers in the area which do not
participate in the group may be called upon to justify any higher prices paid. Also, when most of
the costs of a service are reimbursed by Medicare (for example, for a home health agency which
treats only Medicare beneficiaries), examine the costs with particular care. In those cases where
an intermediary notes that a provider pays more than the going price for a supply or service or
does not try to realize savings available under warranties for medical devices or other items, in
the absence of clear justification for the premium, the intermediary excludes excess costs in
determining allowable costs under Medicare.
Rev. 454 21-2.7
2102.4 COSTS RELATED TO PATIENT CARE 09-12
C. Examples of Application of Prudent Buyer Principle.--
1. Provider A consistently purchases supplies from supplier R and makes no effort to
obtain the most advantageous price for its supplies.
21-2.8 Rev. 454
07-96 COSTS RELATED TO PATIENT CARE 2104.1
Supplier W sells identical or equivalent supplies at a lower cost and is also convenient to A.
Unless the provider can clearly justify its practice of purchasing supplies from R rather than W,
the intermediary excludes any excess of R's charges over W's charges.
2. Supplier L supplies drugs to skilled nursing facility B and rents space from B to
store the drugs to be used there. The rental paid by L to B for the space would generally
constitute an indirect discount on the cost of drugs and must be reflected as a reduction of the
cost of drugs supplied.
3. Dr. C, a hospital-based radiologist, purchases radiology equipment which he then
leases to the provider where he is a staff member. Costs to the provider in this case are higher
than if the equipment had been leased through competitive bidding from an outside source. The
intermediary reimburses the provider only for those costs which a prudent and cost conscious
buyer would pay. Therefore, those costs which the provider pays for the equipment leased from
the staff radiologist which are in excess of costs for equivalent equipment obtained through
competitive bidding are denied.
4. Provider B purchases cardiac pacemakers or their components for use in replacing
malfunctioning or obsolete equipment, without asking the supplier/manufacturer for full or
partial credits or payments available under the terms of the warranty covering the replaced
equipment. The credits or payments that could have been obtained must be reflected as a
reduction of the cost of the equipment supplied.
2104. UNALLOWABLE COSTS RELATED TO PATIENT CARE
2104.1 Ambulance Service.--Ambulance service is covered under Part B of the Medicare
program. A provider may furnish ambulance service directly or it may furnish the service under
arrangements with a supplier of ambulance services. The cost the provider incurs to furnish am-
bulance service is paid by Medicare on a reasonable cost basis.
If a provider furnishes ambulance services with its own equipment and staff, the cost it incurs
(depreciable cost of equipment, supplies, employee compensation, overhead, etc.) is its cost of
the service for Medicare payment purposes. If it furnishes the service under arrangements, the
charge to the provider by the ambulance company becomes the provider's direct cost of furnish-
ing the service.
Medicare Part B carriers have established reasonable charge screens for a wide range of
ambulance services furnished by suppliers of ambulance services for which claims are billed to
the carriers. Medicare expects that the costs incurred by a provider for ambulance services
furnished under arrangement with a supplier of ambulance services will not exceed the amount a
carrier would pay the ambulance supplier for the same service. Therefore, if a provider furnishes
ambulance service under arrangements, to the extent the provider's total costs of the services,
direct costs and any indirect costs, exceeds what a carrier would pay a supplier of ambulance
services for the same services in the same locality, the costs are unreasonable and cannot be paid
by the provider's intermediary.
The next page is 21-3.2
Rev. 395 21-3
1-76 COSTS RELATED TO PATIENT CARE 2104.3
EXAMPLE:
Facts
A 300-bed hospital provides 50 private luxury room accommodations which are twice the size
per bed as the size per bed of the remaining private accommodations. In addition, the luxury
rooms are equipped with special beds, balconies, ceiling-to-floor length picture windows, color
television sets, stereo equipment, and lavish baths. The hospital also offers special food service
to patients occupying the luxury rooms.
Determination of Allowable Costs
Where a determination has been made that a provider furnishes luxury items or services, a single
nonreimbursable cost center entitled "Luxury Routine Accommodations" must be established and
the excess direct and indirect cost luxury items should be determined and eliminated through cost
finding. However, where the intermediary determines that overhead costs applicable to the
excess costs of luxury routine accommodations would be minimal, the adjustment to eliminate
the excess costs need not be accomplished through cost finding. Also, the total costs of such
items as the color television and stereo would be eliminated from allowable costs since they are
for the sole personal comfort of the patients (§ 2l06.l).
D. Effect on Medicare Program Charges.-- For the purpose of establishing proper interim
reimbursement, program charges should not reflect the excess costs applicable to luxury routine
accommodations. Rather, the portion of charges applicable to these excess costs should be billed
as noncovered charges.
E. Effect on Other Provisions of Law.-- (l972 Amendments - Public Law 92-603, Section
223 and 233.) Where a provider furnishes luxury items or services to all patients in the facility,
the provisions of this section do not apply. Rather, the provision dealing with limitations on
coverage of costs (section 223) must be applied to such a provider. Also, for purposes of
applying the limitation of program reimbursement to the lower of reasonable costs or customary
charges (section 223), reasonable costs do not include the excess costs of luxury items or services
and customary charges do not include the portion of the charges applicable to the excess costs of
luxury items or services.
2l04.4 Dental Services.-- Compensation paid to a dentist for services to or for an individual
patient are not allowable provider costs and are nonreimbursable to the provider. The costs,
however, of consultative services furnished by an advisory dentist to a provider are allowable
costs, subject to the usual rules concerning reasonable costs incurred
21-3.3 Rev. l39
03-85 COSTS RELATED TO PATIENT CARE 2105.3
by providers. Consultative services may include, for example, participating in the staff
development program for nursing and other personnel and recommending policies relating to oral
hygiene or dietary matters. For a detailed explanation of the coverage of inpatient services in
connection with dental procedures, see §2l0.7 of the Hospital Manual (HCFA Pub. 10).
2l04.5 Vocational and Scholastic Training Expense.-- The costs attributable to vocational,
scholastic, or similarly oriented training activities conducted by providers on behalf of patients
are not allowable costs. For example, costs incurred by a psychiatric facility in operating an
elementary or secondary school for patients are unallowable costs.
2l05. UNALLOWABLE COSTS NOT RELATED TO PATIENT CARE
2l05.l Noncompetition Agreement Costs.--Amounts paid to the seller of an ongoing facility
by the purchaser to acquire an agreement not to compete are considered capital expenditures.
Where the agreement covers a stated number of years and the provider amortizes the amount paid
over the agreed number of years, the amortized costs for such agreements are not allowable costs
under the program.
2l05.2 Cost of Meals for Other Than Provider Personnel.--The cost of meals for other than
provider personnel, whether served in a cafeteria, coffee shop, canteen, etc., is unallowable under
the program because it is not related to patient care. (See §2l02.3) Providers must maintain
adequate cost data in order to determine the cost of these meals. (See §2300ff.)
2105.3 Cost of Reserving Beds or Services.--
A. Provider Making Payment to Reserve Beds or Services.--Providers may incur costs
pursuant to a reserved bed agreement with another health care facility under which the provider
receives guaranteed or priority placement for its discharged patients. For example, a hospital
may pay a skilled nursing facility (SNF) to set aside a certain number of beds for the hospital's
discharged patients. The cost incurred by a provider under a reserved bed agreement is not
related to that provider's care of its patients and, therefore, is not an allowable cost.
B. Provider Receiving Payment for Reserving Beds or Services.--The revenue received by
a provider for reserving its beds or services is not considered related to patient care. Therefore,
the payments received are not required to be offset against the provider's operating costs.
C. Payment-In-Kind for Reserving Beds or Services.--If, under the terms of the
agreement, a provider agrees to compensate another facility for reserving its beds by providing
free or discounted services rather than by cash payments, neither the provider furnishing the
services nor the provider receiving the services as payment-in-kind, is entitled to be reimbursed
by Medicare for the cost of the services. (See §2328 F.)
Rev. 322 21-3.4
2105.3(Cont.) COSTS RELATED TO PATIENT CARE 03-85
D. Types of Agreements and Illustrations.--Providers are permitted to enter into reserved
bed agreements, as long as the terms of that agreement do not violate the provisions of the statute
and regulations which govern provider agreements which (1) prohibit a provider from charging
the beneficiary or other party for covered services; (2) prohibit a provider from discriminating
against Medicare beneficiaries, as a class, in admission policies; or (3) prohibit certain types of
payments in connection with referring patients for covered services. A provider may jeopardize
its provider agreement or incur other penalties if it enters into a reserved bed agreement that
violates these requirements.
The following examples illustrate different types of reserved bed agreements and explain how
each would be treated in terms of the provider agreement and reimbursement.
Illustration 1
A SNF reserves 10 beds for the exclusive use of a hospital's discharged patients. The hospital
agrees to pay $75.00 per day per bed for each day a reserved bed is held vacant.
This agreement does not violate the SNF's provider agreement. The hospital cannot include the
cost it incurs to reserve the SNF beds in its allowable costs. The SNF does not reduce its
allowable costs by the payment received from the hospital in determining program
reimbursement.
Illustration 2
A SNF reserves 10 beds for the exclusive use of a hospital's discharged patients. The hospital
agrees to pay $75.00 per day per bed for each day a reserved bed is held vacant. The hospital
further agrees to pay the difference between $75.00 and the Medicare reimbursement rate of
$60.00 to the SNF for each day a reserved bed is occupied by one of the hospital's discharged
Medicare patients.
This agreement violates the SNF's provider agreement. The additional payment of $15.00 per
day paid by the hospital is a prohibited charge imposed by the SNF on another party for services
that are covered by Medicare.
Illustration 3
A SNF agrees to reserve 10 beds for the exclusive use of a hospital's discharges. The hospital
agrees to provide the SNF, without charge, a full-time registered nurse.
The agreement does not violate the SNF's provider agreement since the full-time nurse is
provided for all patients and without regard to whether a Medicare patient is receiving services
from the SNF. The hospital's reimbursement would not be affected except that any costs incurred
by the hospital in providing the nurse should be adjusted out of the hospital's allowable costs for
purposes of determining reimbursement for any services which are reimbursed on a reasonable
cost basis. (See §2328F.) The adjustment is necessary because the nursing cost is not related to
patient care of hospital patients. On
21-3.5 Rev. 322
06-98 COSTS RELATED TO PATIENT CARE 2105.4
the other hand, the value of the nursing service received by the SNF is not considered revenue
that is offset against its allowable costs in determining reimbursement. Similarly, the SNF may
not impute the cost of the nursing services received for inclusion in its costs.
Illustration 4
A SNF agrees to reserve 10 beds for the exclusive use of a hospital's discharges. There is no
charge for holding the beds vacant, although the hospital agrees to provide the SNF, without
charge, a registered nurse for each of the three shifts whenever any of the reserved beds are
occupied by a Medicare covered patient.
This agreement violates the SNF's provider agreement because the nursing services are provided
only when a Medicare patient is in a reserved bed and, therefore, the services of the nurse are
considered to be a payment-in-kind for providing services covered under Medicare.
Illustration 5
A SNF agrees to hold at least 5 beds on a priority basis for a hospital's discharges. The hospital
agrees to provide, under arrangements, pharmacy, laboratory and radiology services for all of the
SNF's patients. The agreement specifies no charge for laboratory and radiology services and
provides a 30 percent discount for pharmacy.
The agreement does not violate the provider agreement of the SNF since free or discounted
services are provided to all patients and without regard to whether a Medicare patient is receiving
services from the SNF. The cost of providing free or discounted services is not an allowable cost
for purposes of determining hospital reimbursement. Therefore, to assure that Medicare hospital
patients do not share in the cost of the free or discounted services, the charges of the ancillary
service centers are to be grossed-up to reflect the services provided to SNF patients. (See
§2314.B.) There is no effect on the reimbursement of the SNF as a result of the free or
discounted services furnished by the hospital. That is, the SNF may not impute any costs for the
free services for inclusion in its cost report; it may only include the discounted charges (if
reasonable) in its allowable costs for the discounted services.
Illustration 6
A SNF agrees to accept a hospital's "complicated care" patients on a priority basis. In return, the
hospital agrees to provide free in-service education to the SNF's staff.
This agreement does not violate the SNF's provider agreement. The hospital's reimbursement is
not affected except that any costs incurred by the hospital for providing the in-service training is
adjusted out of the hospital's allowable costs for purposes of determining reimbursement for any
services which are reimbursed on a reasonable cost basis. (See §2328.F.) The adjustment is
necessary because the training cost is not related to patient care of hospital patients. On the other
hand, the value of in-service training received by the SNF is not considered revenue that is offset
against its allowable costs in determining reimbursement. Similarly, the SNF may not impute the
cost of training received for inclusion in its costs.
2105.4 Costs of Unsuccessful Beneficiary Appeals.--Costs incurred by providers of services on
or after October 21, 1986, representing beneficiaries in unsuccessful appeals are not allowable
costs. Conversely, costs incurred by providers of services representing beneficiaries in
successful appeals are allowable to the extent they are otherwise reasonable.
Rev. 404 21-3.6
2105.5 COSTS RELATED TO PATIENT CARE 06-98
2105.5 Costs of Management Employee Meals.--Costs incurred by providers for meals served
to executives or management employees in excess of the costs of meals served to ordinary
employees are not allowable costs. Excessive costs of executive or management employees'
meals are attributable to the use of separate dining facilities, duplicative or additional food
service staff, and/or upgraded or gourmet menus. Conversely, the unrecovered costs related to
meals served to executives or management employees from common menus in common
employee dining facilities are allowable to the extent that they are otherwise reasonable.
2105.6 Costs of Employee Travel.--Costs incurred by providers in conjunction with employee
travel are generally allowable to the extent that they are patient care related and reasonable.
However, travel costs incurred in conjunction with non-patient care related employee travel are
not allowable. Foreign travel costs are allowable only where the provider can clearly substantiate
the reasonableness and patient care relatedness of the travel costs to the satisfaction of the
Medicare fiscal intermediary.
2105.7 Costs of Gifts or Donations.--Costs incurred by providers for gifts or donations to
charitable, civic, educational, medical or political entities are not allowable.
2105.8 Costs of Entertainment.--Costs incurred by providers for entertainment, including
tickets to sporting or other events, alcoholic beverages, golf outings, ski trips, cruises,
professional musicians or other entertainers, are not allowable. Costs incurred by providers for
purposes of employee morale, specifically, for an annual employee picnic, an annual Christmas
or holiday party, an annual employee award ceremony or for sponsorship of employee athletic
programs (bowling, softball, basketball teams, etc.), are allowable to the extent that they are
reasonable.
2105.9 Costs of Employees’ Personal Use of Motor Vehicles.--Costs incurred by providers
related to the personal use of provider vehicles are not allowable.
2105.10 Costs of Fines or Penalties.--Costs incurred by providers for fines or monetary
penalties imposed for violations of Federal, State, or local laws are not allowable.
2105.11 Costs of Spousal or Dependents Education.--Costs incurred by providers related to the
education of spouses or other dependents of owners or officers of providers of services, provider
employees and provider contractors are not allowable when they are not active employees of the
provider or contractor.
2106. COST OF TELEPHONE, TELEVISION, AND RADIO
2106.1 General.--The full costs of items or services such as telephone, television, and radio
which are located in patient accommodations and which are furnished solely for the personal
comfort of the patients (full costs include costs both directly associated with personal comfort
items or services plus an appropriate share of indirect costs) are not includable in allowable costs
of providers under the Medicare program. To illustrate, the full costs of telephones used solely
for the personal comfort of patients include not only costs directly associated with these
telephones, such as the rates billed by the public utility, but also an appropriate share of indirect
telephone costs, e.g., operators' salaries, equipment, space-related costs of switchboard and other
equipment, etc., as well as any other overhead that may be applicable thereto. The costs of
television and radio services are includable in allowable costs where furnished to the general
patient population in areas of providers other than patient accommodation, e.g., day rooms,
recreation rooms, waiting rooms, etc.
The cost of a nurse-patient communication system that has no capability for other than
communications between patient and nurse (or other facility employees) are includable in
allowable costs. Similarly, cost of closed circuit television monitoring systems used by providers
for surveillance of patients or for security, teaching, or demonstration programs which serve
purposes of patient care or which are otherwise needed for the provider's operations and have no
capability beyond these stated purposes are includable in allowable costs.
21-4 Rev. 404
06-98 COSTS RELATED TO PATIENT CARE 2107.2
The cost of television and radio located in lounges and other areas designated for the use of
provider employees is includable in allowable costs.
2106.2 Combination Purpose Systems.--Some nurse-patient communication systems based on
closed circuit television are used in part for bringing in outside entertainment. Likewise, some
patient communication systems operate through the telephone line and such a system may also be
used, in part, by the patient for making or receiving outside calls.
Where providers use the combined systems, the basic cost of the components designed and used
for patient care communication is an allowable cost. Any incremental costs attributable to the
additional components or capability for providing the patient's entertainment or convenience are
not allowable and must be excluded. Where this distinction cannot be clearly made, particularly
as it applies to maintenance, the intermediary may approve an allocation covering these
incremental costs (usually nominal) based on an equitable sharing.
Occasionally, nurse call systems which do not provide closed circuit television for patient care
services are tied by some adjunct linkage into the audio component of a television set. In such
instances, the cost of the set and maintenance of the equipment providing the television
capability is not an allowable cost, except to the extent the provider can demonstrate and the
intermediary approves an equitable share (usually nominal) attributable directly to costs arising
out of the adjunct linkage and use of the set for nurse call.
2107. PARKING LOT COSTS
2107.1 General.--The cost incurred for provider-owned or rented parking facilities, parking
lots, and/or garages are allowable costs provided the parking facilities are for the use of patients,
visitors, employees, and other provider purposes. Examples of allowable costs for a provider-
owned parking facility include depreciation on the surface and structure (excluding land), interest
on related loans, and other operating expenses. Costs related to the preparation of the land such
as demolition of existing structures, clearing, and grading costs are added to the cost of the land
and are unallowable.
The allowable costs for provider-rented parking facilities are limited to the reasonable rental paid
on which the provider has a legal obligation to pay. Where the rental is paid to a lessor related to
the provider through common ownership or control, the guidelines set forth in Chapter 10, "Cost
to Related Organizations," are applicable.
2107.2 Treatment of Parking Revenue.--Where a provider receives no revenue from parking
lots, the allowable costs recognized under §2107.1 are reimbursed, subject to apportionment.
Where, however, a provider elects to charge a fee for the use of these facilities, such revenue is
treated under Medicare as follows:
A. Parking Revenue from Persons Other Than Employees and Physicians.--Where parking
revenue is received from persons other than employees and physicians, the revenue is offset
against parking lot costs attributable to such persons. If parking revenue exceeds the related
costs, the excess revenue is not used to reduce employee and physician parking costs (or other
provider costs) so long as the provider can demonstrate a reasonable and equitable basis for
allocating parking costs between (1) employees and physicians, and (2) other persons. Where
such an allocation is not determinable, the total allowable cost of provider-owned or rented
parking facilities is reduced by all parking facility revenue.
B. Parking Revenue from Employees or Physicians.--Revenue from employees and
physicians for parking must be used to reduce related allowable parking costs. If employee and
physician parking revenue exceeds related costs (i.e., parking costs for employees and
physicians), any excess revenue is applied against other parking costs, but not against other
allowable costs.
Rev. 404 21-4.1
7-75 COSTS RELATED TO PATIENT CARE 2l08.l
2l08. REIMBURSEMENT FOR SERVICES BY PROVIDER-BASED PHYSICIANS
A. General.-- These instructions apply where physicians perform services in a provider setting
and have a financial arrangement under which they are compensated by or through a hospital (for
both inpatient and outpatient services, or by or through a skilled nursing facility, a home health
agency, clinic, rehabilitation agency, or public health agency. These physicians may also be
receiving compensation from medical schools or other organizations which have arrangements with
the provider for the services they render to provider patients (see § 2l08.2D2).
Further, these instructions apply where modifications of previously existing arrangements between
providers and provider-based physicians permit the provider and physician to bill patients separately
for their respective services. Such modifications may permit the physician to assume all or part of
the departmental operating costs. These instructions do not apply to the services of interns and
residents; their services are reimbursable to the provider on a reasonable cost basis. (See § 2l20.)
B. Noninterference by Federal Government.-- It is not the function of the health insurance
program established under title XVIII of the Act to determine the arrangement into which a provider
and provider-based physicians may enter for the compensation of the physicians, or to specify or
influence the provisions of the contract or arrangement between the provider and provider-based
physicians. The provider and physicians can continue to negotiate all aspects of their arrangement to
their mutual satisfaction.
2l08.l Professional and Provider Components.--
A. Identification of Types of Services for Program Payments.-- Many providers retain
physicians on a full-time basis in, for example, the fields of pathology, physyiatry, anesthesiology,
and radiology, and in many instances (especially in teaching hospitals) in other fields of medical
specialization as well. Any one of these physicians may be engaged in a variety of activities
including teaching, research, administration, supervision of professional or technical personnel,
service on hospital committees, and other hospital-wide activities, as well as direct medical services
to individual patients. The provider's arrangement may be with a single physician or with a group of
physicians who assume joint responsibility for discharging agreed-upon duties.
To make payments under the health insurance program, it is necessary to distinguish between the
medical and surgical services rendered by a physician to an individual patient, which are
reimbursable under Part B on
Rev. l28 2l-5
2l08.l (Cont.) COSTS RELATED TO PATIENT CARE 7-75
a reasonable charge basis, and provider services (including a physician's services for the provider)
which are reimbursable on a reasonable cost basis, generally under Part A. This is necessary because
the payments are made from different trust funds, both fiscal intermediaries and carriers are involved
in handling the claims, and the method of determining the payments for Part A benefits differs
materially from those under Part B.
B. Distinguishing Between Professional and Provider Components.-- The services of
provider-based physicians (e.g., those on a salary, or percentage arrangement, lessors of departments,
etc., whether or not they bill patients directly) include two distinct elements, the professional
component and the provider component.
l. Professional Component.-- The professional component of provider-based physician's
services pertains to that part of the physician's activities which is directly related to the medical care
of the individual patient. It represents remuneration for the identifiable medical services by the
physician which contribute to the diagnosis of the patient's condition or to his treatment.
2. Provider Component.-- The portion of the physician's activities representing services
which are not directly related to an identifiable part of the medical care of the individual patient is
the provider component. Reimbursement for provider component services can be made only to a
provider on the basis of its allowable reasonable costs. Provider services include teaching, research
conducted in conjunction with and as part of patient care (to the extent that such costs are not met by
special research funds), administration, general supervision of professional or technical personnel,
laboratory quality control activities, committee work, performance of autopsies, and attending
conferences as part of the physician's provider service activities. Reimbursement for such services
will always be made on a reasonable cost basis under Part A where they relate to inpatient services.
Reimbursement is under Part B for outpatient services and for certain inpatient ancillary services
where Part A coverage has been exhausted.
3. Allocation of Compensation.-- Ordinarily the compensation paid to the physician is
for all services he performs, in proportion to the time he devotes to each activity. It is a primary
obligation of the provider and provider-based physician to mutually agree upon the allocation of
compensation for the provider-based physician to the time he spends in his various activities, and to
communicate this information with supporting material to the provider's intermediary. The
supporting material should include a written explanation of the basis for the allocation agreement.
Where, however, the agreed-upon allocation is not consistent with similar arrangements between
providers and provider-based physicians, the intermediary will obtain more detailed information, as
necessary. Generally,
21-6 Rev. 128
7-75 COSTS RELATED TO PATIENT CARE 2108.1(Cont.)
the remuneration a physician receives from a provider under an arrangement represents
compensation for his services to the provider as well as for direct patient services.
C. The Provider-Physician Agreement as to Compensation Allocation.- In some institutions a
physician may spend the bulk of his time in duties which benefit the entire patient population and a
relatively small part of his time in performing services for individual patients. In other situations, the
converse may exist. The arrangement between a provider and a provider-based physician does not
generally support a 100 percent allocation of compensation for direct patient services. The allocation
in each instance must be based on the facts of the individual case. Each case must be sufficiently
documented to support the necessary determination, and should include a written agreement signed
by both the provider and physician. (See Exhibit I.) If the allocation does not appear "reasonable"
additional supporting documentation, such as the results of time studies, must accompany the signed
agreement.
D. A Statement of Understanding Between the Provider and Physician.- There may be
instances where a provider and the provider-based physician may be in substantial agreement as to
the allocation of compensation between professional and provider services, but the physician is
reluctant to sign a formal statement containing specific details about his compensation. In such
cases, the provider's administrator may prepare a document outlining his own approximation of the
time and activities of the physician and ask him to sign it as a "statement of understanding" regarding
their mutual relationship. This "statement of understanding" may be accepted in lieu of the usual
"physician agreement," where the Part A intermediary and Part B carrier are satisfied that it would
not differ materially from the agreement itself.
E. Where an Agreement or Understanding Cannot Be Reached.- When a provider and
physician are unable to reach an understanding as to the allocation of compensation between
provider services and direct medical services, the intermediary and carrier will jointly try to resolve
this question be meeting with the parties involved, suggesting methods for determining the allocation
(e.g., time studies), and otherwise assisting the parties in reaching an accord. If the provider and
physician fail to reach agreement within 30 calendar days after this meeting, the intermediary and
carrier will jointly establish the required allocation based on their combined experience in
comparable provider facilities. The parties will then be advised the (1) this allocation will be the
basis for establishing a schedule of charges for the physician's professional services to the provider's
patients for all prior and current billings, and (2) they have 30 calendar days to submit an agreement
which more accurately reflects the required allocation. If an agreement is submitted within that time,
and it is reasonable, it may be used for establishing a schedule of charges for current and prior
billings.
Rev. 128 21-7
2108.2 COSTS RELATED TO PATIENT CARE 7-75
2108.2 Compensation Arrangements.-- There are a variety of arrangements between providers and
provider-based physicians, the more typical being the fixed compensation arrangement and the
variable compensation arrangement. There are also many arrangements under which the physician
assumes all or part of the costs of operating the provider department (e.g., lease or concession).
Under any of these arrangements, the agreement could stipulate that the physician may bill through
the provider for all or part of the services he renders, or that the physician and provider will bill
separately for their respective services. It is necessary, therefore, in order to determine the
appropriate amount of reimbursement for the services of a physician, to choose the appropriate
method to develop the schedule of charges, establish the proper compensation base, and identify
which elements of compensation are reimbursable under Part A and which are reimbursable under
Part B.
A. The Fixed Compensation Arrangement.-- The fixed compensation, usually called a salary
or stipend, consists of a specific dollar amount unrelated to volume. It generally covers the
physician's provider services as well as his direct medical services to patients. When the computation
is carried out, the physician is shown to receive an actual dollar amount which can be determined in
advance.
In some cases, this compensation arrangement may be expressed in terms of a percentage of charges
or collections reduced by a variety of actual or estimated costs of operation or other factors. When
the intermediary and carrier evaluate a contract stated in these terms, they are to treat it as a fixed
compensation contract where, in fact, it spells out a method for arriving at a fixed remuneration for
the physician's services.
Regardless of the method of billing, the schedule of charges should be computed in the same manner
as where the physician receives a fixed salary. Where there is a question as to the amount of
compensation, the intermediary will refer to the provider records to ascertain the actual amount of
compensation paid by the provider to the physician. However, such payment should be related to
total departmental billing, not collections, in establishing program liability.
B. The Variable Compensation Arrangement.-- Under this type of arrangement, the provider
and physician agree that the physician's compensation will be a percentage of departmental gross
charges or of net collections. The actual compensation received by the physician will vary in
proportion to the number of procedures performed and to the total charges made by the provider.
The total compensation cannot be determined until the close of the accounting period. The
percentage of the combined provider's charge represents the provider's reimbursement to the
physician for all services he renders. (Where a physician has a variable income and chooses to use a
uniform optional percentage as his schedule of charges, it is not necessary to translate his correct
percentage amount into a fixed dollar amount before establishing the optional percentage. The
physician's contract percentage multiplied by the professional component allocation will yield the
optional percentage. See Exhibit IIA.)
21-8 Rev. 128
2-78 COSTS RELATED TO PATIENT CARE 2108.2(Cont.)
C. Where Arrangements Are Modified to Permit the Physician to Bill Separately for His
Professional Services.-- The objective in determining reasonable charges where a provider-based
physician modifies his former compensation arrangements to permit him to bill directly is expressed
in the regulations, i.e., ". . . to bring about as little change as possible (in the normal case) in the
compensation the physician receives for his services in the hospital." Therefore, where
modifications are made in an arrangement between a provider and physician, the customary charges
for the physician's professional services should be related to his compensation prior to the
modification. Also, where such contract changes permit the physician to independently bill
Medicare patients only, the Part B carrier will ensure that the reasonable charges determined for the
services rendered to Medicare beneficiaries are no higher than the charges generally made to the
provider's other patients for similar services.
D. Additional Elements of a Provider-Based Physician's Compensation.-- The following are
examples of elements which should be considered in determining the amount of compensation
received by a physician for the purpose of establishing a schedule of charges:
1. Fringe Benefits.-- When fringe benefits inure to the benefit of the physician himself,
they may be included as part of the physician's compensation. For example, group hospitalization
and health insurance premiums paid or incurred by the provider for the benefit of the physician may
be included in computing the physician's total compensation. However, is the provider is self-
insured, the fringe benefit would accrue to the physician only to the extent of the cost incurred by the
provider when health care is furnished. In this case, there would be no fringe benefit inuring to the
physician if he receives no health care services from his self-insured employer. On the other hand,
where a provider establishes a retirement plan for the benefit of its employees and supplements
employee contributions to the fund, if any, with specific amounts that are assignable to individual
employees, such amounts may be included in ascertaining the physician's compensation. (See §§
2122.3 and 2144FF.)
2. Compensation from Other Sources.--Some providers have arrangements with
medical schools or other organizations under which a physician receives compensation from such
organizations for services which the physician renders to the provider patients.
The remuneration of a physician from such sources may be included in determining the total
compensation he receives and in establishing the schedule of charges. This remuneration must be
allocated between the professional and provider activities of the provider in the same manner as the
compensation received from the provider. That portion of remuneration related to teaching or
research activities at the medical school itself is not reimbursable under Medicare.
Rev. 197 21-9
2108.3 COSTS RELATED TO PATIENT CARE 2-78
3. Bad Debts.-- Bad debts are not to be reflected in determining reasonable charges
under the supplementary medical insurance program. The Medicare program reimburses 100 percent
of the reasonable charges for inpatient hospital radiology and pathology services provided by a
physician in the fields of radiology and pathology and 80 percent of the reasonable charges for all
other medical services after the deductible has been met. The coinsurance amount and the deductible
are considered liabilities of the beneficiary for physicians' services and the provider does not incur
bad debts because of its failure to collect these amounts. (See §302.5.) Therefore, where a contract
stipulates that the physician will receive a percentage of collections (charges minus bad debts),
program liability should be determined as described in § 2108.9.
2108.3 Methods Used to Determine the Reasonable Charge of Provider-Based Physicians.-- The
amount of the physician's compensation representing the provider component will be reimbursed to
the provider on the basis of reasonable costs by the Part A intermediary. The Part A intermediary
will also reimburse the provider for medical services to individual patients, i.e., outpatient hospital
services (except psychiatric) and inpatient radiology and pathology services where the physician and
provider agree to use the combined method of billing. In all other situations, where direct physicians'
services to patients are billed on forms SSA-1554 and SSA-1490, the Part B carrier will determine
the amount of reimbursement.
A. Consideration Given to Customary and Prevailing Charges.-- Reasonable charges for the
professional services of provider-based physicians will be determined for other physicians and
suppliers. Consideration will be given to the customary charges of the provider-based physician for
each item of service he renders (see the following sections for an explanation of how such customary
charges should be determined) and the prevailing charge in the locality for similar services rendered
a provider setting.
B. Where Providers Separately Identify Physicians' Charges.-- Where provider has
customarily identified a physician's charges separately from charges for provider services, the
physician's charges so established will be considered the customary charges for his professional
services,
21-10 Rev. 197
7-75 COSTS RELATED TO PATIENT CARE 2108.4
and will afford the basis for determining the reasonable charges for such services. In such cases, the
physician's remuneration will not be a factor in establishing customary charges. It will still be
necessary, however, to allocate the physician's compensation to professional and provider
components so that proper cost payments can be made. (See § 2108.1B.)
C. Where Providers Do Not Separately Identify Physicians' Charges.- Where, under an
existing arrangement between a provider and physician's services and charges for provider services, a
schedule of charges will need to be developed based on the physician's professional component. This
schedule of charges will form the basis for establishing the customary charges for direct medical
services to patients by the provider-based physician.
2108.4 Schedule of Charges.-- The schedule of charges must be designed to yield, in the
aggregate, as nearly as may be possible, an amount equal to the portion of the physician's
compensation represented by the professional component. There are several methods by which a
schedule of charges may be developed based on the provider-based physician's professional
component. Principally, these are the "optional," "item-by-item," and "per diem" methods. A
variation from any of these methods is acceptable as long as it achieves the same results, i.e., it will
yield in the aggregate an amount equal to or approximating the portion of a physician's compensation
attributable to direct medical services to patients. Each provider department may use the method it
finds most applicable (e.g., the use of the item-by-item method by one department does not prevent
the use of the optional method or the per diem method by another department). Where there is more
than one hospital-based physician rendering services in a single department, the schedule of charges
should be developed for the department as a whole on the basis of the aggregate amount of
compensation attributable to the professional components and the aggregate volume of procedures
which all physicians in the department are expected to render. For establishing the professional
component in a given department, see Exhibit II. To develop the schedule of charges, see Exhibits
III, IV, and V.
A. The Optional Method.-- The optional method for establishing the physician's customary
charges is appropriate for provider departments that perform a high volume of low cost procedures,
often rendered by technicians or by automated equipment, and find the item-by-item method neither
feasible nor practical from an administrative viewpoint. Under the optional method, the schedule of
charges for the physician's direct services to patients is determined by applying a uniform percentage
to each charge made by a particular department. Exhibit III shows the development of the uniform
optional percentage. (Where a hospital-based physician has a variable compensation arrangement
and wishes to use the uniform optional percentage, see § 2108.2B and Exhibit IIA.)
Rev. 128 21-11
2108.5 COSTS RELATED TO PATIENT CARE 7-75
B. The Item-by-Item Method.-- This method can be implemented by using an appropriate
relative value schedule and conversion factor assigned to unit values will result in reimbursement not
in excess of the professional component of the physician's compensation arrangement, the first step
in developing the data needed to establish the schedule of charges under the item-by-item method is
to determine the amount of the provider-based physician's compensation attributable to direct patient
services, reimbursable under Part B. (See Exhibit II.) The next step is to determine the total relative
value units representing various procedures by particular provider departments. (See Exhibit IV.)
C. The Alternate Item-by-Item Method.--An alternate means for establishing a schedule of
charges on an item-by-item basis is to assign to each procedure, on the basis of the time spent by the
physician in performing the procedure, a percentage of the total amount of the physician's
compensation on a departmental basis (see Exhibit V).
D. The Per Diem Method.-- The per diem method may be used where providers furnish health
care services at an all-inclusive rate, or where there is no charge structure. It is most frequently, but
not exclusively, applicable in long term or governmental facilities where both institutional and
physician services are furnished at a fixed amount without regard to variations in the number and
type of services the individual patient may receive and without distinction between the provider
services and physician services furnished. Some providers use the per diem or per visit method only
in connection with the services of certain departments (e.g., physyiatry, outpatient) while charging on
a fee-for-services basis in others. Establishing a schedule of charges through the perdiem (or other
units, such as per visit) method is limited to institutions or departments which make an identifiable
uniform charge that constitutes the total expense the patient incurs for both provider and physician
services. For detailed application of the per diem method, see Exhibit VI.
2108.5 Effect of Physician's Assumption of Operating Costs (Lease or Concession Arrangement).-
A. Where the Physician Bills Patients Directly.--
1. Basis of Reimbursement.-- Where a provider initially pays some or all of the
operating expenses of a department (e.g., salaries of nonprofessional personnel, supplies and
equipment), such operating expenses are reimbursable as reasonable costs to the provider even
though the provider is subsequently reimbursed by the physician for the use of those items or
services. Such operating expenses are not to be reflected in the reasonable charges of the physician.
Any payments received by the hospital under an arrangement where the physician leases a
department should be treated as a reduction of allowable costs for purposes of reimbursement
21-11.1 Rev. 128
7-75 COSTS RELATED TO PATIENT CARE 2108.5(Cont.)
under the hospital insurance program. The application of this offset is not limited to the allowable
costs for a single department. If the Medicare portion of the income realized by a hospital exceeds
the Medicare portion of allowable costs of such department, any remaining income should be applied
as a reduction of Medicare reimbursable costs for the other departments of the hospital.
Where a provider-based physician, himself, bears some or all of the costs of operation of a
department, the costs which he bears may be reflected in his customary charges and considered in
determining reasonable charges under supplementary medical insurance. However, these costs will
need to be adjusted upward or downward where the provider has been bearing a cost significantly
more or less than its own share of the proceeds of such charges, and the determination of reasonable
charges should consider such adjustments.
2. Determination of Reasonable Charges.--
a. The customary charges of a physician who enters into a lease or similar
arrangement with a provider, under which the physician assumes the costs of operating a department
and bills patients directly, should be based upon: (1) the remuneration he received for his
professional services to patients immediately prior to the leasing arrangement; and (2) his reasonable
costs of operation, taking into account the provider's cost experience in providing such services.
References to the remuneration formerly received by the physician from the provider are required
because consideration must be given to the customary charges generally made by the physician for
similar services. If, at the time the lease or similar arrangement became effective, the physician had
no pattern of customary charges for his professional services to provider patients other than the
compensation he received from the provider, such compensation serves to establish his customary
charges.
b. Where a provider has been receiving, as its portion of the receipts for services
rendered by a department, significantly more or less than the costs the provider has incurred in
providing these services, this excess or shortage should not be transferred from the provider to the
physician merely because he decided to bill directly. Such transfer would alter the total cost of
patient hospital and medical care, a result which would conflict with the intent of the Medicare
legislation.
c. Prevailing charges in nonprovider laboratories may be taken into account in
determining reasonable charges for the services of a physician who has entered into a lease or
concession arrangement with a provider. However, such charges should not be used as guides for
determining reasonable charges in situations where they would produce an unreasonable result. The
conditions found in a provider setting are frequently unique in that services are performed in large
volume and consequently at low unit cost.
Where the Part A intermediary and the Part B carrier fail to agree as to the acceptability of the data
supplied by the provider and its physicians, they will jointly submit a report to the health insurance
regional office for clarification of outstanding issues.
Rev. 128 21-11.2
2108.6 COSTS RELATED TO PATIENT CARE 7-75
B. Where Billing Is By or Through the Provider.-- Where a physician enters into a lease or
concession arrangement and bills through the provider, the services of nonphysicians aiding the
physician are reimbursable to the provider on a reasonable cost basis. The amount attributable to the
physician's services to the patient is compensable under the supplementary medical insurance
program. When submitting a bill to the provider for services rendered, the physician should
separately identify in the bill the amounts representing the respective provider and physician
components of his services.
2108.6 Duties and Responsibilities of Provider and Intermediary in the Area of Provider-Based
Physician Reimbursement.--
A. Provider Responsibility.-- The effective implementation of provider-based physician
reimbursement requires the closest coordination between the provider and its Part A intermediary.
The provider is responsible for making available on a timely basis data on the financial and billing
arrangements (including contracts, agreements, and other written documentation) it has with its
provider-based physicians. This information is necessary to ensure that: (l) Medicare
reimbursement for the services of these physicians is made form the appropriate trust funds; (2) the
Medicare program does not make duplicate payments for the same service, once as a provider cost
and again as a reasonable charge; and (3) the Part B reasonable charge properly reflects any
deductible and coinsurance liability of the beneficiary. On a regular basis, the provider should
supply the intermediary with any new or revised data which would affect the original reasonable
charge determination.
B. Intermediary Responsibility.--
l. Whether reimbursement policies and guidelines are effectively implemented depends
in large part on detailed information that the Part A intermediary obtains from providers. By signing
section l866 agreements to participate in the program, providers have consented to furnish all
information which the intermediary and carrier require to make proper payments under the Act.
2. The Part A intermediary will obtain from the provider not only all data needed to
determine reimbursable hospital costs, but also the data needed by the Part B carrier for establishing
and reviewing the schedules of charges it will use to make reasonable charge determinations. Both
the Part A intermediary and Part B carrier need to know:
a. The contents of agreements between provider-based physicians and providers.
(Specific responsibilities of intermediaries in obtaining and reviewing these agreements are stated in
§ 2l08.l.)
b. The billing methods selected by the physicians and the detailed items of
information pertaining to the specific method selected, shown in Exhibits I-VI. This information
will need to be obtained in all
2l-ll.3 Rev. l28
7-75 COSTS RELATED TO PATIENT CARE 2l08.6(Cont.)
situations where physicians have a financial arrangement with a provider, whether or not they bill
independently.
c. Where a laboratory director in a provider leases the department or has a
concession arrangement, information will be needed to ascertain the portion of the operating costs to
be reimbursable as provider costs to the provider, and the portion of the costs to be reimbursable as
provider costs to the provider, and the portion of the costs to be reflected in the reasonable charge
determination by the Part B carrier.
d. The circumstances under which physicians' services such as diagnostic and
therapeutic X-rays, EKG's, and laboratory tests are rendered to the provider's patients, especially by a
physician who is not associated with the provider's medical staff, to ensure that the provider is
complying with regulations and policies concerning purchased services "under arrangement," so that
Medicare reimbursement will be made from the appropriate trust fund. (The professional component
of such services, except laboratory services obtained from an independent laboratory or from the
laboratory of a hospital meeting at least the definition of emergency hospital, must be reimbursed
under Part B.)
3. Where a hospital and its provider-based physicians have agreed to use the combined
billing procedure, the Part A intermediary will need to assure that it has obtained all information
necessary to support its reasonable charge determination (§ 2l08.l) and that the provider has on file a
current "Physician's Authorization for Hospital Billing" (see Hospital Manual, § 400.3).
4. When the physician is based in a nonparticipating institution, the carrier will assume
the responsibility for obtaining the data needed to make the determination of the reasonable charge
for the physician's service.
C. Review of Schedules of Charges.-- Charges for physician services in provider departments
(e.g., radiology, pathology, outpatient) can be billed to the program using either the combined billing
procedure or form SSA-l554. Billings under either method are subject to year-end adjustments.
When the combined billing procedure is used, there is no need to schedule a regular review of the
schedule of charges for the provider-based physicians' Part B services. In form SSA-l554 cases there
is no need to schedule a regular review of schedules of charges unless it is considered advantageous
to the Medicare program to do so (e.g., the provider does not file timely cost reports, and Part B
reimbursement for the physicians' services seems to be overstated). Where the provider-based
physician bills the patient directly on form SSA-l490, regular reviews of the estimated factors used to
develop schedules of charges are required whenever compensation-related charges are the basis for
reimbursement. In these cases, the Part A intermediary will obtain from the provider at least
quarterly a report disclosing the actual amount of departmental charges to date, the total
reimbursement the schedule of charges was intended to
Rev. l28 2l-ll.4
2l08.7 COSTS RELATED TO PATIENT CARE 7-75
produce, and information necessary to permit a decision as to the accuracy of the estimates and
projections. This report should provide the appropriate data pertaining to all factors on which the
schedule of charges was based, whether the recording and billing method used is the item-by-item
method, the uniform optional percentage or the per diem method. Copies of this material will be
submitted to the Part B carrier servicing the physicians so that any required adjustments in the charge
schedule can be made during the year.
2l08.7 Retroactive Adjustment of Certain Provider-Based Physician Payments.-- With respect to
cost accounting periods which began after June 30, l97l, and any earlier periods where the need for
adjustment actions was identified, the Part A intermediary will take the action indicated in B below
regarding retroactive adjustments of certain provider-based physician payments.
A. Applicability.-- Where a provider has been overpaid or underpaid for the patient care
services of a provider-based physician, the Part A intermediary will make an appropriate adjustment
as part of the provider's final cost settlement where:
l. The provider billed on form SSA-l554, and
2. The charges were based on the physician's compensation. (Where the combined
billing method is used, Hospital Manual, §§ 400ff. apply.)
B. Procedure.-- Where there has been incorrect Part B reimbursement for the provider-based
physician's services, i.e., carrier payments for patient care services differ from Medicare's
proportionate share of the total costs for such services, the adjustment referred to above will be based
on the Part A intermediary's review of the hospital's cost report, an examination of the factors used in
establishing the professional component charges, and a review of the provider's record of SSA-l554
billings for the cost report period. Overpayments and underpayments will be corrected by the Part A
intermediary by making an adjustment in the cost report in the same manner as it would adjust for
any other incorrect payment. Whenever an overpayment or underpayment adjustment is made, or
where total reimbursement was proper but inaccurately allocated to the trust funds, the Part A
intermediary will prospectively adjust the factors it uses in making payment, and notify the Part B
carrier of the adjustment by forwarding the new data on which the carrier is to base reimbursement (§
2l08.6C).
Each intermediary will furnish worksheets to be used by provider for the purpose of identifying
incorrect payments for provider-based physician's services. Exhibit VII contains a sample format
where the uniform optional percentage methodology is used.
2l-ll.5 Rev. l28
2-78 COSTS RELATED TO PATIENT CARE 2l08.9
2l08.8 Reimbursement for Provider-Based Physicians' Administrative, Teaching, and Direct
Medical Care Services Where the Physicians Have Changed Their Compensation Arrangements with
the Provider.-- Situations may arise where physicians previously employed to perform both
administrative and direct medical care services have terminated their employment relationship with
providers and have organized and entered into arrangements with the providers to render
administrative and teaching services at a greater level of compensation than was formerly received in
the employment relationship for such administrative and teaching services. These organizations bill
directly for the patient care services of their member physicians and such billings may exceed the
estimated portion of the previous salary attributable to such services.
Where a provider which previously employed physicians on a salary basis to render administrative
and/or teaching services as well as direct medical care services changes its arrangement to purchase
only the administrative and/or teaching type services, program reimbursement to the provider would
be limited to the cost previously incurred for such administrative and/or teaching services on a salary
basis. An exception to such limitation could be granted where the provider demonstrates that, due to
extraordinary circumstances, it is no longer able to engage physicians at the previous level of
compensation to render the full range of services. Merely showing that the physicians previously
employed were no longer willing to provide their services on this basis would not demonstrate that
the provider is no longer above to engage physicians at the previous level of compensation. For the
new financial arrangement to be accepted by the intermediary as reasonable costs, the provider would
also have to demonstrate that, due to some new and special circumstances, it was no longer feasible
to recruit replacements at the previous level of compensation.
Reasonable charges for the physicians' direct patient care services should initially be related as
closely as possible to the portion of the compensation they received for such services prior to the
change in the financial arrangement. These charges are subject to any applicable prevailing charge
ceiling and will serve as the basis for program payment until: (l) the physician has established a
pattern of customary charges which are billed to all patients and collected from the majority of his
nonMedicare patients; and (2) the carrier has accumulated at least 3 months of charge data from the
same base year used to establish reasonable charges for other physicians. When these criteria are
met, the physician's reasonable charge will be determined in the same manner as other fee-for-service
physicians. (Where a group of physicians uses a common schedule of charges, reasonable charges
should be determined in this manner for the group.)
2l08.9 Reimbursement for the Services of Provider-Based Physicians Compensated Through the
Provider and the Provider Bills the Program under Combined Billing (on Forms SSA-l453 or l483)
or on Form SSA-l554.-- For the purpose of determining a provider's Medicare reimbursement based
on
Rev. l97 2l-ll.6
2l08.9(Cont.) COSTS RELATED TO PATIENT CARE 2-78
provider-based physicians' compensation where physicians are compensated through the provider,
the intermediary must look to the actual amount of compensation received and retained by the
physicians, i.e., the amount that the physicians have agreed to accept for their full range of services.
Where a provider-based physician agrees with the provider, whether in writing, orally, or in any way
implied, to receive a reduced compensation or to remit a portion of his gross compensation back to
the provider (other than amounts for the sole benefit of the physician, such as for a pension fund or
health benefits plan), only the net amount received and retained by the physician represents the
aggregate compensation, i.e., for both provider services and professional medical and surgical
services, to be used in computing Medicare reimbursement to the provider. Clearly, the Medicare
program does not intend for a provider to be reimbursed on a basis of gross compensation while
effectively paying out a lesser amount. As an exception, a bona fide, voluntary contribution made by
a physician to the provider is not a reduction of the physician's compensation for the purpose of
computing Medicare reimbursement to the provider. A bona fide, voluntary contribution cannot
exist where it is based on an agreement between the provider and physician whether in writing,
orally, or in any way implied. The bona fide nature of the contribution must be established on the
basis of all circumstances surrounding the contribution.
EXAMPLE: A contract provides that a provider-based pathologist will receive 30 percent of gross
departmental charges less 5 percent of the gross charges for bad debts and courtesy allowances.
During the provider's Medicare cost reporting period, the department had $200,000 in gross charges.
The provider retains $6,000 of the pathologist's compensation for the physicians' pension fund. Of
the amount received from the provider, the pathologist agreed to return $4,000 ($2,000 for the
provider's equipment fund and $2,000 to be used for general purposes). In addition, the intermediary
verified that the pathologist made a bona fide, voluntary contribution of $5,000 to the provider.
Calculation of Physician's Compensation to be Used in Computing Medicare Reimbursement to the
Provider:
$50,000 - Compensation received by the pathologist, including the $6,000 retained by the
provider for the sole benefit of the pathologist ($200,000 in gross departmental
charges x 25 percent 30 percent of gross departmental charges less 5 percent of
the gross charges for bad debts and courtesy1).
- 2,000 - Returned to provider by agreement for restricted fund of provider.
2l-ll.7 Rev. l97
2-78 COSTS RELATED TO PATIENT CARE 2l08.l0
- 2,000 - Returned to provider by agreement for unrestricted use of provider.
$46,000 - Net amount received and retained by the pathologist to be used in computing the
provider's Medicare reimbursement (to the further distinguished as to the amount
representing professional medical and surgical services and the amount representing
provider services).
The amount of the bona fide, voluntary contribution ($5,000) is not deducted from the pathologist's
compensation for the purpose of computing Medicare reimbursement to the provider. However, to
the extent that any of the contribution was designated by the pathologist to pay for specific operating
expenses of the provider, such amount must be deducted from those specific operating expenses.
2l08.l0 Treatment of Provider Costs Related to the Provision of Physician Services to Nonprovider
Patients.-- Where direct medical services are rendered by a physician to nonprovider patients, all
direct and indirect provider costs incurred by the provider in connection with the provision of such
services should be identified and deducted from provider costs in arriving at allowable costs for
Medicare purposes. Where the costs for rendering these services cannot be identified, reasonable
estimates must be made of the costs incurred by the provider. Where the provider receives revenue
that is related to such services, such estimated costs may not be less than such revenue.
Rev. 197 21-11.7A
7-75 COSTS RELATED TO PATIENT CARE 2108.11
2108.11 Exhibits - Provider-Based Physicians.--
Exhibit I - Hospital-Based Physician Allocation Agreement
Exhibit II - Determination of Amount of Provider-Based Physician Compensation
Reimbursable Under Part B
Exhibit IIA - Determination of Uniform Optional Percentage
Exhibit III - The Uniform Optional Percentage
Exhibit IV - Item-by-Item Method - Relative Value Schedule
Exhibit V - Alternate Item-by-Item Method
Exhibit VI - Per Diem or Per Visit Method
Exhibit VII - Calculation of Reimbursement Settlement for Professional Services
Rendered to Medicare Beneficiaries by Provider-Based Physicians Not
Using Combined Billing
Rev. l28 2l-ll.8
EXHIBIT I
HOSPITAL-BASED PHYSICIAN ALLOCATION AGREEMENT
The following schedule represents the distribution of time and activities of the physicians in the
_________________________ department:
l. Activity, other than direct patient services Percent of Time
(a) Teaching 5
(b) Research (including attendance at lectures, etc.) l0
(c) Administration l0
(d) Supervision of technical and other personnel 20
(e) Hospital service (committees, etc.) 5
(f) Services of general benefit to patients
(quality control, etc.) 25
Total 75
2. Activity, direct personnel services to individual patients 25
The allocation of time by activity as shown above was based on
(select one of the following):
l. Time study 2. Estimate 3. Other (attach explanation)
Signed ___ Administrator of Provider
Signed ___ _______ Physician(s)
2l-ll.9 Rev. l28
EXHIBIT II
Determination of Amount of Provider-Based Physician Compensation
Reimbursable Under Part B
1
2
3
4
5
6
Department
Physicians
Compensation
Professional
Component
Allocation
Part B
Amount
Approved
Carrier
Inter-
Mediary
Pathology
SMITH
JONES
GREEN
$22,000
20,000
18,000
20%
25%
30%
Total-
$4,400
5,000
5,400
14,800
The method for determining the Part B component of the physician's compensation is demonstrated
in Exhibit II. The data in each of the columns is as follows:
Column l - DEPARTMENT-- Indicate a single provider department with one or more
provider-based physicians rendering a significant volume of professional
services to Medicare beneficiaries.
Column 2 - PHYSICIANS-- List the name of each physician in this department rendering
direct patient services.
Column 3 - COMPENSATION-- Show the annual remuneration for each physician
receiving a fixed compensation. (Where a physician changed to direct billing
subsequent to June 30, l966, the compensation amount for the year prior to the
change should be obtained and used. See § 2l08.2C.)
Column 4 - PROFESSIONAL COMPONENT ALLOCATION-- List the percentage of
compensation attributable to direct patient services. (See § 2l08.l and Exhibit
I.)
Column 5 - PART B AMOUNT-- Multiply Column 3 (Compensation) by Column 4
(Professional Component Allocation) to obtain the portion of each physician's
salary attributable to Part B services.
Column 6 - APPROVED-- By initialing and dating their action, the intermediary and
carrier show approval of the determination.
Rev. l28 2l-ll.l0
EXHIBIT II A
Determination of Uniform Optional Percentage
(Compensation Arrangement Stipulates Percentage of
Gross Charges or Collections)
1
2
3
4
5
6
Department
Physician
s
Contract
Percentage
Professional
Component
Allocation
Uniform
Optional
Percentage
Approved
Carrier
Intermediary
Pathology
SMITH
35
20
7.0
Where a physician has a variable compensation arrangement (see § 2l08.2B for exception) and
wishes to use the uniform optional percentage, enter the appropriate data in the columns of Exhibit II
A as follows:
Column l - DEPARTMENT-- Indicate a single provider department with one or more
provider-based physicians rendering a significant volume of professional
services to Medicare beneficiaries.
Column 2 - PHYSICIANS-- List the name of each physician in this department rendering
direct patient services.
Column 3 - CONTRACT PERCENTAGE-- Show the contract percentage.
Column 4 - PROFESSIONAL COMPONENT ALLOCATION-- List the percentage of
compensation attributable to direct patient services (see § 2l08.l and Exhibit I).
Column 5 - UNIFORM OPTIONAL PERCENTAGE--Multiply Column 3 (Contract
Percentage) by Column 4 (Professional Component Allocation) for each
physician. This amount (rounded to the nearest one-half percent) is the
uniform optional percentage. The physicians' Part B charge for each service is
derived by applying this uniform optional percentage to the provider's
established charge for each service.
Column 6 - APPROVED-- By initialing and dating their action, the intermediary and
carrier show approval of the determination.
2l-ll.ll Rev. l28
EXHIBIT III
The Uniform Optional Percentage
1
2
3
4
5
6
Departme
nt
Part B
Amount
Contract
Percentage
Estimated
Gross
Department
Charges
Uniform
Optional
Percentage
Approved
Carrier
Intermediary
Pathology
$14,800
35
$200,000
7.5%
After completing Exhibit II, where a physician has a fixed compensation and desires to use the
uniform optional percentage, enter additional data in the appropriate columns of Exhibit III as
follows:
Column l - DEPARTMENT--Show one provider department with provider-based
physicians who render identifiable direct patient services.
Column 2 - PART B AMOUNT--The Part B amount was derived in Exhibit II, Column 5.
Enter that amount in this column.
Column 3 - ESTIMATED GROSS DEPARTMENT CHARGE--Enter the estimated gross
departmental charges for the year.
Column 4 - UNIFORM OPTIONAL PERCENTAGE--Divide Column 2 (Part B Amount)
by Column 3 (Estimated Gross Department Charges) to obtain the uniform
optional percentage. This percentage is applied to all departmental billings,
and will yield in the aggregate an amount equal to the Part B Amount (Column
2). (This percentage may be rounded where such action will not result in
reimbursement of an amount appreciably different from the amount in Column
2.)
Column 5 - APPROVED-- By initialing and dating their action, the intermediary and
carrier indicate approval of the determination.
Rev. l28 2l-ll.l2
EXHIBIT IV
Item-by-Item Method - Relative Value Schedule
Pathology (Department)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
Procedu
re
Provider
’s
Establish
ed
Charge
Percent
Physicia
n’s
Service
Relative
Numeric
al
Value
Estimate
d
Procedu
res
(Annual
)
Total
Unit
s
Convers
ion
Factor
Part
B
Charg
e
Approved
Carri
er
Inter-
media
ry
U
V
W
X
Y
Z
$ 5.00
10.00
15.00
20.00
25.00
30.00
50%
3
20
10
80
10
2.5
3.0
2.0
20.00
3.0
2,000
1,800
2,500
200
3,500
5,00
0
5,40
0
5,00
0
4,00
0
10,0
00
14,800
29,900
=
5
1.25
1.50
1.00
10.00
1.50
After completion of Exhibit II, in order to determine the Part B charge for the various procedures
performed in a provider department, enter the appropriate data in the column of Exhibit IV as
follows:
Column l - PROCEDURE--List each procedure with significant physician involvement
performed in the provider department.
Column 2 - PROVIDER'S ESTABLISHED CHARGE--Show the provider's charge for
each procedure shown in Column l.
Column 3 - PERCENT - PHYSICIAN'S SERVICE--For each procedure show the
percentage which represents the extent of physician involvement in rendering
direct patient services. (Examples: For procedure "U" it is estimated that 50
percent of the provider charge represents physician involvement each time the
procedure is performed. For procedure "V" physician involvement is
negligible and the procedure is not used in obtaining the Part B charge.)
2l-ll.l3 Rev. l28
EXHIBIT IV (CONT.)
Column 4 - RELATIVE NUMERICAL VALUE--Multiply Column 2 (Provider's
Established Charge) by Column 3 (Percent - Physician's Service) to obtain the
Relative Numerical Value.
Column 5 - ESTIMATED ANNUAL PROCEDURES--Show the estimated number of
times each procedure will be rendered during the year.
Column 6 - TOTAL UNITS-- The total relative value units for each procedure represent
the estimated aggregate value of the physician component for each procedure
and are obtained by multiplying Column 4 (Relative Numerical Value) by
Column 5 (Estimated Procedures--Annual). The total units for each procedure
are added to obtain the aggregate number of units for the department.
Column 7 - CONVERSION FACTOR-- Divide the Part B Amount (Exhibit II, Column 5)
by the aggregate number of units, Column 6 (Total Units). (Round the answer
to nearest tenth.)
Column 8 - PART B CHARGE-- Multiply Column 7 (Conversion Factor) by Column 4
(Relative Numerical Value) to obtain the Part B component charge for each
procedure.
Column 9 - APPROVED-- By initialing and dating their action, the intermediary and
carrier indicate approval of the determination.
NOTE: If an existing relative value schedule is to be used, complete Column l, and omit
Columns 2 and 3. Enter in Column 4 the appropriate relative numerical value for
each procedure as indicated in the existing relative value schedule. Complete
Columns 5 through 7 as described in the instructions for Exhibit IV.
Rev. l28 2l-ll.l4
EXHIBIT V
Alternate Item-by-Item Method
Pathology (DEPARTMENT)
1
2
3
4
5
6
Procedur
e
Professional
Component
Percentage
Part B
Compensation
Estimated
Procedures
(Annual)
Part B
Compone
nt
Charges
Approved
Carrier
Intermediary
M
N
O
P
Q
R
S
T
15%
10
5
20
25
5
10
10
(100%)
Total =
$ 2,220
1,480
740
2,960
3,700
740
1,480
1,480
$14,800
1,100
200
55
300
1,700
100
150
200
$ 2.00
7.50
13.50
10.00
2.00
7.50
10.00
7.50
After completing Exhibit II, where the physicians in a single provider department elect to use the
alternate item-by-item method, enter the following data in the appropriate columns:
Column l - PROCEDURE-- List each procedure performed in the department with
significant physician involvement.
Column 2 - PROFESSIONAL COMPONENT PERCENTAGE-- Show the percentage of
time which the physicians collectively spend performing each procedure. (The
total time spent should equal l00 percent of the time devoted to direct patient
services.)
Column 3 - PART B COMPENSATION-- Multiply the amount shown in Exhibit II,
Column 5, by each percentage in Column 2.
Column 4 - ESTIMATED ANNUAL PROCEDURES-- Estimate the number of times each
procedure will be performed in the coming year.
Column 5 - PART B COMPONENT CHARGES-- The physician Part B charge is derived
by dividing Column 3 (Part B Compensation) by Column 4 (Estimated
Procedures--Annual) rounded to nearest 50 cents.
Column 6 - APPROVED-- By initialing and dating their action, the intermediary and
carrier indicate approval of the determination.
2l-ll.l5 Rev. l28
EXHIBIT VI
Per Diem or Per Visit Method
THE METHOD - TABLE A
1 2 3 4
Department
Total
Physician
Compensatio
n
Division of Compensation
Inpatient-Compensation
for
Direct Patient Services
Outpatient
Inpatient
Radiology
Pathology
Anesthesiology
Internal – Med.
Surgery
$ 52,000
40,000
42,000
150,000
155,000
50%
35
10
35
30
$26,000
14,000
4,200
52,500
46,500
50%
65
90
65
70
$26,000
26,000
37,800
97,500
108,500
60%
40
85
90
90
$ 15,600
10,400
32,130
87,750
97,650
Total - $143,200 Total - $243,530
INPATIENT RATE - TABLE B
Direct
Patient
Service
Dept.
Part B
mount
Inpatient
Days
Per Diem Rate
Approved
Carrier
Intermediary
HOSPITAL
RADIOLOG
Y
PATHOLO
GY
$ 26,000
100,000
(26) 25
ALL
OTHER
DEPARTM
ENTS
217,330
100,000
(2 18) 2 20
ALL OTHER
PROVIDER
SETTINGS
ALL
DEPTS.
243,530
100,000
OUTPATIENT RATE - TABLE C
1 2 3 4 5
Direct Patient
Service Dept.
Part B
mount
Inpatient
Days
Per Diem Rate
Approved
Carrier
Intermediary
ALL
PROVIDER
SETTINGS
ALL DEPTS
$143,200
41,000
(3 49) 3 50
Rev. l28 2l-ll.l6
7-75 EXHIBIT VI(Cont.)
In developing the per diem (or per visit) method of reimbursement, enter the pertinent information in
the appropriate columns in Exhibit VI. Separate tables are presented to show the basic data
necessary (Table A) and its utilization in deriving the inpatient rate (Table B) and the outpatient rate
(Table C).
Under this method, only compensation paid to physicians who normally render services to Medicare
patients should be included in the computation. Thus, the compensation of obstetricians,
pediatricians, and other physicians who do not normally render services to Medicare beneficiaries
should not be included. In addition, the patient days attributed to the departments of the institution
which do not usually provide services for Medicare patients should also be excluded from the per
diem computation.
It should also be noted that some physicians who render services to Medicare patients also render
services that are not covered under the program. For example, dentists and podiatrists provide
covered services as well as noncovered services to beneficiaries. In such cases, the physicians'
compensation allocated to those noncovered services should be omitted from the per diem
computation.
Table A The Method
Column l DEPARTMENT-- List each provider department in which a significant
number of services for Medicare patients are rendered.
Column 2 TOTAL PHYSICIAN COMPENSATION--On a departmental basis show the
total physician compensation.
Column 3 DIVISION OF COMPENSATION--On a departmental basis show the
percentage and amount of the total physician compensation (Column l)
attributable to outpatient and inpatient services, and enter the aggregate total
for outpatient services in the space provided in Column 3.
Column 4 INPATIENT - COMPENSATION FOR DIRECT PATIENT SERVICES--Of
the inpatient compensation (Column 3) show the percentage and amount
attributable to direct patient services to inpatients. Enter the aggregate total
compensation attributable to inpatient direct patient services in the space
provided in Column 4.
2l-ll.l7 Rev. l28
EXHIBIT VI (Cont.) 7-75
Table B The Inpatient Rate
Column l DIRECT PATIENT SERVICES - DEPARTMENT--In the hospital setting it is
necessary to separate the radiology and pathology department compensation
from other compensation because the direct patient services of these specialty
departments are reimbursable without application of the coinsurance and
deductible provisions. In other provider settings, all departments are
considered together.
Column 2 PART B AMOUNT--This item corresponds to the total of Table A, Column 4.
In the hospital setting the amount attributable to the radiology and pathology
departments must be shown separately.
Column 3 INPATIENT DAYS--Indicate the estimated total number of inpatient days for
the year.
Column 4 PER DIEM RATE--The rate is obtained by dividing Column 2 (Part B
Amount) by Column 3 (Inpatient Days) and rounding to the nearest multiple of
$.05.
Column 5 APPROVED--The carrier and intermediary will signify their approval of the
determination by initialing and dating their action.
Table C The Outpatient Rate
Column l DIRECT PATIENT SERVICES - DEPARTMENT--No differentiation among
departments is necessary.
Column 2 PART B AMOUNT--This item corresponds to the total of Table A, Column 3
(Outpatient).
Column 3 OUTPATIENT VISITS--Indicate the estimated total number of outpatient
visits for the year.
Column 4 PER VISIT RATE--Divide Column 2 (Part B Amount) by Column 3
(Outpatient Visits) and round to the nearest multiple of $.05.
Column 5 APPROVED--The carrier and intermediary will signify their approval of the
determination by initialing and dating their action.
Rev. l28 2l-ll.l8
RESERVED FOR EXHIBIT VII
2l-ll.l9 Rev. l28
RESERVED FOR EXHIBIT VII (Cont.)
Rev. l28 2l-ll.20
2109 COSTS RELATED TO PATIENT CARE 05-85
2109. REIMBURSEMENT OF HOSPITAL EMERGENCY DEPARTMENT SERVICES
WHEN PHYSICIANS RECEIVE COMPENSATION FOR AVAILABILITY SERVICES
2109.1 General.--Wide variations can occur in the utilization of hospital emergency department
services and hospitals cannot always schedule physician staffing at a level commensurate with the
actual volume of services rendered. As a result, emergency department physicians may spend a
portion of their time in an availability status awaiting the arrival of patients. Alternatively, hospitals
may need to arrange for emergency department physician coverage for evenings, weekends or
holidays, when staff or community physicians are not available. Since these periods frequently
generate inadequate physician revenue through charges for professional services due to lower
utilization, hospitals may have to offer physicians supplemental compensation or minimum
compensation guarantees to secure coverage of emergency departments.
When emergency department physicians are compensated on an hourly or salary basis or under a
minimum guarantee arrangement (§2109.2E) providers may include a reasonable amount in
allowable costs for emergency department physician availability services subject to limitation
through the application of Reasonable Compensation Equivalents (RCEs). Availability costs will be
recognized only in the emergency department of a hospital, and only as described in this section.
2109.2 Definitions.--
A. Physician Availability Services.--Physician availability services consist of the physical
presence of a physician in a hospital under a formal arrangement with the hospital to render
emergency treatment to individual patients as and when needed.
B. Reasonable Compensation Equivalent .--A Reasonable Compensation Equivalent (RCE) is
the limitation on the cost which a provider can claim for compensation of services furnished by
physicians to providers. At present, the RCEs apply only to services which are reimbursable on a
reasonable cost basis. The limitation is expressed as a dollar amount for a full work year of 2080
hours ("work-year hours"), and is published in the Federal Register. It is differentiated by physician
specialty with variations for rural areas, metropolitan areas of less than 1,000,000 population, and
metropolitan areas of greater than 1,000,000 population. Details on the RCE limitation are provided
in §2182.6, Conditions of Payment for Costs of Physicians' Services to Providers.
C. RCE Base.--The RCE base is the physician compensation amount that the program will
recognize for provider services and availability services, whether compensation for availability
services is calculated under an hourly rate or salary arrangement, or based on a minimum guarantee
amount calculated for a specified number of direct patient care service hours under a minimum
guarantee arrangement. The RCE base is determined by applying the RCE limitation to the provider
services, availability services or direct patient care services hours specified in the applicable
provider/physician allocation agreement.
D. Adjusted RCE Base.--The RCE base amount may be adjusted to reflect the addition of
allowances for the costs of physician membership in professional associations,
21-11.21 Rev. 326
05-85 COSTS RELATED TO PATIENT CARE 2109.3
continuing medical education and malpractice insurance. The allowance for membership in
professional associations and continuing medical education is limited to the lesser of actual cost or 5
percent of the applicable RCE base amount. The allowance for malpractice insurance is limited to
the proportionate share of actual reasonable physician malpractice insurance cost attributable to the
provider services, availability services or direct patient care services hours (under a minimum
guarantee arrangement) subject to the RCE limitation.
E. Minimum Guarantee Arrangement.--A minimum guarantee arrangement is a financial
arrangement between a physician or a group of physicians and a provider where the physician(s) is
(are) guaranteed a minimum level of compensation (the minimum guarantee amount) for availability
services. The physician(s) may receive more than the minimum amount guaranteed if they generate
charges for services to individual patients in excess of the minimum guarantee amount. If the
charges fall short of the minimum guarantee amount, the provider is obligated to pay the physician(s)
the difference to make up the guaranteed amount. A minimum guarantee arrangement may also
contain provisions for compensating physicians for performing provider services such as supervision
of the emergency department, administration, etc.
F. Unmet Guarantee Amount.--An unmet guarantee amount is the amount by which the
minimum guarantee amount exceeds total physician charges for services to individual patients during
the cost reporting period. Total physician charges include imputed charges for services performed
but not billed. Total physician charges, not collections, must be included in the computation.
2109.3 Allowability of Emergency Department Physician Availability Services Costs.--Emergency
department physician availability services costs will be allowable only in special circumstances, as
follows:
A. No Feasible Alternative Way to Obtain Physician Coverage is Available.-In order for
physician availability services costs to be allowable, the provider must demonstrate that it explored
alternative methods for obtaining physician coverage but was unable to do so. An alternative might
include negotiating a straight fee-for-service arrangement. Evidence of such an effort could consist
of advertisements for emergency physicians, to be compensated on a fee-for-service basis, placed in
appropriate professional publications. It is not necessary for a provider to demonstrate that it
explored alternative methods for obtaining emergency physician coverage annually. The requirement
is applicable prior to the renegotiation of expiring arrangements or the initiation of new arrangements
for physician coverage of the emergency department.
B. Physicians Provide Immediate Response to Life-Threatening Emergencies.-The physician
must be on the hospital premises in reasonable proximity to the emergency department. The
physician cannot be "on call."
C. Documentation.--A claim for Part B hospital costs or Part A and Part B hospital costs must
be supported by the following data maintained by the hospital:
Rev. 326 21-11.22
2109.4 COSTS RELATED TO PATIENT CARE 05-85
1. A signed copy of the contract between the hospital and the physician(s).
2. A written copy of the allocation agreement and supporting data depicting the
distribution of the physician's time between services to the provider, services to individual patients
and services not reimbursable under Medicare.
3. A permanent record of payments made to the physician(s) under the agreement.
4. A record of the amount of time the physician was physically present on the hospital
premises to attend to emergency patients.
5. A permanent record of all patients (Medicare and non-Medicare) treated by the
physician, copies of all physician bills generated for such services and a record of imputed charges
for services for which no billing was made by the hospital or physician.
6. A schedule of physician charges.
7. Evidence that the provider explored alternative methods for obtaining emergency
physician coverage before agreeing to physician compensation for availability services.
2109.4 Methodology for Determining Allowable Emergency Physician Availability Service Costs
--
A. General.--When a provider compensates emergency physicians for being available to
render physician services to individual patients in the emergency department, the provider may be
reimbursed Medicare's share of the allowable costs incurred by the provider to the extent that the
costs are determined reasonable. Provider reimbursement will be based on the lesser of the actual
compensation paid to the physician or the reasonable compensation determined through the
application of the RCE limits to the hours of emergency department availability stipulated in the
approved provider/physician allocation agreement. If the required allocation agreement does not
specify the availability services hours for which the provider compensates the physician, availability
services costs will not be allowable unless the conditions of §2109.4 C. are met with respect to
minimum guarantee arrangements.
The limit on allowable cost for a physician's services to the provider is calculated by dividing the
total hours of services to the provider (including both availability and provider services) by 2,080
"work-year hours" and multiplying the result by the applicable RCE limit to determine the RCE base.
The RCE base may be increased by the lesser of actual costs or 5 percent of the RCE base to reflect
costs incurred by the provider for emergency physicians' membership in professional associations
and continuing medical education. Additionally, the RCE base may be increased to reflect an
allowance for the proportionate share of actual reasonable physician malpractice insurance cost
incurred by the provider.
21-11.23 Rev. 326
05-85 COSTS RELATED TO PATIENT CARE 2109.4(Cont.)
Emergency physician availability services costs are reimbursable under Part A if attributable to
inpatient services and Part B if attributable to outpatient services in the emergency department. Both
are processed by the Part A intermediary. The costs should be included in the emergency department
cost center. The portion of the cost attributable to emergency physician services rendered in the
inpatient routine areas should then be reclassified from the emergency department cost center to the
inpatient routine cost center on the cost report. The allocation to the inpatient routine cost center is
accomplished by dividing emergency department physician charges for inpatient routine emergencies
by total emergency department physician charges and applying the result to allowable availability
services cost as follows:
Emergency Department
Physician Charges for
I/P Routine Areas X Allowable Availability Services Cost = Inpatient Availability
Total Emergency Services Costs
Department Physician
Charges (Billed and
Imputed)
When a contract requires the physician to render duties other than direct patient care services, such as
teaching, administrative, supervising technical personnel, which are of general benefit to all patients,
and the hospital incurs allowable physician compensation costs for such activities, these costs will be
allocated between the Part A and Part B programs in the same ratio that the inpatient charges and the
outpatient charges for the emergency department bear to total charges. Where the hospital is
reimbursed under the prospective payment system, the Part A inpatient costs are reimbursed on the
basis of the DRG payment.
B. Allowable Availability Service Costs Under Hourly Rate or Salary Arrangements.--Where
the agreement between a provider and emergency physician specifies that payment for availability
services will be made on an hourly rate or salary basis, the provider will be reimbursed Medicare's
share of incurred physician availability services costs subject to the RCE limitation. The following
illustration demonstrates the methodology for determining allowable emergency physician
compensation costs when the physician is compensated on an hourly rate or salary basis for
availability, supervisory and administrative services.
ILLUSTRATION
Dr. A agrees to work in the emergency department of XYZ Hospital providing general emergency
department physician services on weekends, holidays and evenings. The hospital agrees to
compensate Dr. A at the rate of $20 per hour for emergency physician availability services,
supervisory and administrative duties. The hospital also agrees to pay $250 towards the cost of Dr.
A's membership in professional associations, $1,500 for continuing medical education costs and
$4,000 of Dr. A's annual malpractice insurance cost. Dr. A bills and retains all professional fees. He
has agreed not to bill for services rendered to hospital inpatients and employees. The allocation
agreement developed by XYZ Hospital and Dr. A indicates that Dr. A will expend his time, for
which he is compensated by the hospital, as follows:
Rev. 326 21-11.24
2109.4 (Cont.) COSTS RELATED TO PATIENT CARE 05-85
Percentage
Availability Services 50%
Supervision and Administrative Services 50%
TOTAL l00%
During the year Dr. A renders 300 hours of supervisory, administrative and availability services, bills
$29,000 in professional fees, furnishes the equivalent of $1,000 in emergency services to hospital
inpatients and $2,000 in emergency services to hospital employees, is compensated $3,000 for
supervisory and administrative services, and receives additional compensation of $3,000 for
availability services. The compensated hours worked by Dr. A are allocated as follows:
Hours
Availability Services (50% of 300) 150
Supervisory and Administrative Services (50% of 300) 150
TOTAL 300
The reasonable cost of the supervisory, administrative and availability services time is computed as
follows:
1. Determine the Applicable RCE Base
Total Hours (Supervisory,
Administrative and
Availability Services) RCE = RCE Base
Work Year Hours (2080)
X
(for illustrative purposes
we selected the 1983 RCE/
Total figure for non-
metropolitan areas)
300 X $87,600 = $12,635
2080
2. Determine the Limit on the Allowance for Membership
in Professional Associations and Continuing Medical Education
RCE Base X .05 = Limit
$12,635 X .05 = $632
21-12 Rev. 326
05-85 COSTS RELATED TO PATIENT CARE 2109.4 (Cont.)
3. Provider Payments for Membership in
Professional Associations and Continuing = $1,750
Medical Education
($250 Membership in Professional Associations + $1,500 Continuing Medical Education)
4. Malpractice Insurance Expense = $4,000
5. Adjusted RCE Base = $17,267
(Sum of #1 ($12,635) + the Lesser of #2 or #3 ($632) + #4 ($4,000))
6. Actual Provider Payments
Supervision and Administration $ 3000
Availability 3000
Membership in Professional Associations 250
Continuing Medical Education 1500
Malpractice 4000
$11,750
7. Amount Includable in Allowable Costs = $11,750
(Lesser of #5 or #6)
8. Allocation of Allowable Costs
Billed Charges (Emergency Department) $29,000
Imputed Employee Charges 2,000
Total Outpatient Charges $31,000
Imputed Inpatient Charges 1,000
Total Charges $32,000
Outpatient Charges X Allowable Provider = Allowable Part B
Total Charges Costs Costs
31,000 X $11,750 = $11,383
32,000
Inpatient Charges X Allowable Provider = Allowable Part A
Total Charges Costs Costs
1,000 X $11,750 = $367
32,000
Rev. 326 21-12.1
2109.4 (Cont.) COSTS RELATED TO PATIENT CARE 05-85
C. Allowable Unmet Guarantee Amounts Under Minimum Guarantee Arrangements.--The
allowable cost of an unmet guarantee amount is determined by subtracting total charges for physician
services to individual patients from the lesser of (1) the minimum guarantee amount specified in the
provider/physician arrangement or (2) the reasonable compensation amount which is arrived at by
applying the RCE limits (as adjusted for any appropriate additional allowances) to the physician's
total hours allocated for individual patient care. The charges billed by or for the physician must be
appropriate to the patient care services rendered and not merely token charges. If the agreement
between the provider and physician restricts the physician from billing charges for designated groups
of patients (e.g., inpatients, provider employees), charges for such services must be imputed, and
included in the total physician charge figure. Total physician charges (billed and/or imputed) must
be used in this computation whether or not collected. When physicians are required to perform
services which are of general benefit to all provider patients, as well as direct patient care services,
under a minimum guarantee arrangement, the RCE limits are applied separately in determining the
allowable costs of the unmet guarantee amount and compensation for provider services such as
administration or supervision. If the provider also incurs costs for physician membership in
professional associations, continuing medical education and malpractice insurance premiums, such
costs are allocated between provider payments for unmet guarantee amounts and provider payments
for physician compensation for provider services on the basis of the respective ratios of allocated
direct patient care service hours and provider service hours to total hours worked. This allocation is
necessary in order to determine the provider's actual payments for unmet guarantee amounts and
physician compensation for provider services. Allowable unmet guarantee costs are reimbursable
under Part A if attributable to inpatient services and Part B if attributable to outpatient services in the
emergency department and are processed by the Part A intermediary. The costs for an unmet
guarantee amount should be allocated between Part A and Part B in the same manner as those for
availability services compensated under hourly rate or salary arrangements. (See §2109.4A.)
ILLUSTRATION
Dr. X contracts to work 1,000 hours during the year in the emergency department of ABC Hospital
providing general emergency department physician services on weekends, holidays and evenings.
ABC Hospital guarantees Dr. X $50,000 in charges for physician services to individual patients and
agrees to compensate Dr. X at the rate of $20 per hour for supervisory and administrative duties.
The hospital also agrees to pay $500 for the cost of Dr. X's membership in professional associations,
$2,500 for continuing medical education and $5,000 of Dr. X's annual malpractice insurance cost.
Dr. X bills and retains all professional fees. He has agreed not to bill for services he renders to
inpatients and employees of the hospital. The allocation agreement developed by ABC Hospital and
Dr. X indicates that Dr. X will expend his time as follows:
Percentage
Professional Services to Individual Patients 90%
(includes inpatients and employees) and Availability
Services
Supervision and Administrative Services 10%
TOTAL l00%
21-12.2 Rev. 326
05-85 COSTS RELATED TO PATIENT CARE 2109.4 (Cont.)
During the year Dr. X bills $29,000 in professional fees, furnishes the equivalent of $1,000 in
professional services to hospital inpatients and $2,000 in professional services to hospital employees.
Dr. X is compensated $2,000 for supervisory and administrative services, and $21,000 for an unmet
guarantee amount. The hours worked by Dr. X are allocated as follows:
Hours
Professional Services to Individual Patients and
Availability Services 900 (90% of 1,000)
Supervision and Administrative Services 100 (10% of 1,000)
TOTAL 1,000
Computation of Reasonable Allowable Cost for Supervisory and Administrative Duties
1. Determine the Applicable RCE Base
Total Hours (Supervisory
and Administrative
Services X RCE = RCE Base
Work Year Hours (2080) (for illustrative purposes
we selected the 1983 RCE/
Total figure for non-
metropolitan areas)
100 X $87,600 = $4,212
2080
2. Determine the Limit on the Allowance for Membership in Professional Associations and
Continuing Medical Education
RCE Base X .05 = Limit
$4,212 X .05 = $211
3. Determine Actual Provider Payment for Membership in Professional
Associations and Continuing Medical Education Applicable
to Supervisory and Administrative Services
Total Hours (Supervisory Total Payments
and Administrative for Membership in
Services) X Professional
Total Hours Worked Associations and
Continuing Medical
Education
100 X $3,000 = $300
1000
Rev. 326 21-12.3
2109.4 (Cont.) COSTS RELATED TO PATIENT CARE 05-85
4. Determine the Allowance for Malpractice Insurance
(Supervision and Administration)
Total
Supervisory and Administrative Hours X Payment for
Total Hours Worked Malpractice
Insurance
100 X $5,000 = $500
1000
5. Adjusted RCE Base for Supervision and Administrative
Services (Sum of #1 ($4,212) + the Lesser of #2 or #3 ($211) + #4 ($500)) $4,923
6. Determine Provider Payments Attributable to Supervision and
Administrative Services $2,800
Supervision and Administration (100 hours X $20) $2,000
Membership in Professional
Associations (100 X $500) 50
1000
Continuing Medical
Education (100 X $2500) 250
1000
Malpractice Insurance
Premiums (100 X $5000) 500
1000 $2,800
7. Amount Includable in Allowable Costs (Lower of #5 or #6) $2,800
Computation of Reasonable Allowable Costs for an Unmet Guarantee Amount
8. Determine the Applicable RCE Base
Total Hours X RCE = RCE Base
(Professional and (for illustrative purposes
Availability Services) we selected the 1983 RCE/
Work-Year Hours (2080) Total figure for non-
metropolitan areas)
900 X $87,600 = $37,904
2080
21-12.4 Rev. 326
05-85 COSTS RELATED TO PATIENT CARE 2109.4 (Cont.)
9. Determine the Limit on the Allowance for Membership in Professional
Associations and Continuing Medical Education
RCE Base X .05 = Limit
$37,904 X .05 = $1,895
10 Determine Actual Provider Payment for Membership in Professional
Associations and Continuing Medical Education Applicable to Professional
and Availability Services
Total Hours (Professional Total Payments
and Availability for Membership in
Services) X Professional
Total Hours Worked Associations and
Continuing Medical
Education
900 X $3,000 = $2,700
1000
11. Determine the Allowance for Malpractice Insurance
(Professional and Availability Services)
Total Hours (Professional
and Availability Total Payment for
Services) X Malpractice
Total Hours Worked Insurance
900 X $5,000 = $4,500
1000
12. Adjusted RCE Base (Sum of #8 ($37,904) + the Lesser of
#9 or #10 ($1,895) + #11 ($4,500)) $44,299
l3. Actual Minimum Guarantee Amount $50,000
l4. Reasonable Minimum Guarantee Amount $44,299
(Lower of #12 or #13)
15. Total Charges $32,000
Billed Charges $ 29,000
Imputed Inpatient Charges 1,000
Imputed Employee Charges 2,000
Rev. 326 21-12.5
2109.4 (Cont.) COSTS RELATED TO PATIENT CARE 05-85
16. Reasonable Unmet Guarantee Amount $12,299
(#14 Less #15)
17. Summary of Allowable Provider Costs *$15,099
Supervisory and Administrative Svcs $ 2,800
Reasonable Unmet Guarantee Amount 12,299
$ 15,099
*Total allowable provider costs of $15,099 are allocated between Part A and Part B in the same
manner as the preceding example.
21-12.6 Rev. 326
07-96 COST RELATED TO PATIENT CARE 2110.4
2110. BILLING COSTS
In the cost finding process, billing costs are generally allocated to the various cost centers as part of
administrative costs. Medicare then reimburses providers for its proportionate share of these costs as
determined in the apportionment of the costs of the various cost centers.
2110.1 Contract Billing Services.--Where a provider contracts for billing services to be performed
by another organization, the contract costs of such services are allowable costs subject, of course, to
the provisions of Chapter 10, Cost to Related Organizations. These costs are administrative costs
and are subject to cost allocation and apportionment even though the billings contracted out are
Medicare billings.
2110.2 Treatment of Income Derived From Interest, Finance Charges, and Penalties on Delinquent
Accounts Receivable.--Where a provider derives income from interest, finance charges, or penalties
on delinquent accounts receivable, the actual cash received must be used as a deduction from
allowable administrative and general costs. The provider may not remove the related costs of
preparing, billing, and collecting all accounts receivable balances, or costs of only those accounts
which generated the income, from allowable costs to avoid this income offset requirement.
2110.3 Treatment of Income Derived From Billing Charges Imposed on Suppliers of Services
Furnished Under Arrangements.--Where a provider imposes a charge for billing or any other
administrative services on a supplier of services furnished under arrangements, the amount of the
charge is treated, for Medicare purposes, as a discount for the services rendered. It may not be
considered as income from billing or other administrative services. Accordingly, the amount of
allowable cost for any service furnished under arrangements is the net amount paid by the provider.
2110.4 Physician Billing Costs.--If you incur costs providing billing services to provider-based
physicians for direct medical and surgical services rendered to individual patients, the physician
billing costs are generally not allowable. Physician billing costs incurred by you billing for direct
medical and surgical services rendered to individual patients by provider-based physicians are
recognized as allowable provider costs only when incurred on behalf of compensated provider-based
physicians for services rendered before January 1, 1992, and where payment for the services is made
to you by the carrier on a compensation related customary charge basis. Unallowable physician
billing costs must be identified by you and offset against your total direct and indirect billing costs.
Reasonable estimates of unallowable physician billing costs, inclusive of direct and indirect costs, as
well as a representative portion of overhead, are acceptable, subject to review and approval by your
servicing Medicare fiscal intermediary. Physician billing costs are best estimated if your billing staff
is segmented into provider and physician billing components. This facilitates the more exact
determination of direct physician billing costs and results in more accurate and, thus, more
acceptable overall estimates of physician billing costs. In situations where it is impractical to
segment the billing staff, estimates of physician billing costs may be based upon ratios of physician
bills processed to total bills processed by the billing staff applied to total billing costs. Acceptable
estimates of physician billing costs may also be based on time studies where the average processing
time for a physician bill is determined and that average time is multiplied by the number of physician
bills processed by the billing staff to determine total direct time expended on physician billing. The
ratio of direct physician billing time to total billing time may then be applied to total billing costs to
determine an acceptable estimate of physician billing costs.
Rev. 395 21-13
2112 COST RELATED TO PATIENT CARE 07-96
2112. NONPHYSICIAN ANESTHETISTS' SERVICES AS HOSPITAL SERVICES
When a nonphysician anesthetist is a salaried member of the staff of a hospital, the services
furnished by such an individual in connection with the administration of anesthetic agents are
covered in the same manner as the services of other nonphysician hospital employees. Such services
to hospital inpatients are covered under Part A as inpatient hospital services. When provided for
outpatients, these services are covered under Part B as hospital services incident to a physician's
services to outpatients. In either situation, reimbursement for the services furnished is made to the
hospital on a reasonable cost basis.
When a nonphysician anesthetist who is not a salaried member of the hospital staff provides services
to the hospital's inpatients on a fee-for-service basis, such services are covered in the same manner as
the services of a salaried nonphysician anesthetist, provided the following conditions are met. The
nonphysician anesthetist must be contractually authorized to furnish such services and the services
are made available under arrangements where payment to the hospital for the services discharges the
liability of the patient or any other individual to pay for the services. While the charges for
equivalent services of the anesthetist must be uniform for Medicare and non-Medicare patients,
billing practices of the nonphysician anesthetist need not be identical for both Medicare and non-
Medicare patients. Where the arrangement under which services are furnished meets the
requirements specified in guidelines published by HCFA, these services may be furnished for
Medicare beneficiaries even if the nonphysician anesthetist bills directly for non-Medicare
beneficiaries. Anesthetist services provided under arrangements by which the hospital bills for the
services will be reimbursed to the hospital on a reasonable cost basis. Services billed directly by a
nonphysician anesthetist to an individual patient are not covered under Medicare.
If a hospital imposes a charge for billing or other administrative services on a nonphysician
anesthetist who is not a salaried member of the hospital staff and who is furnishing services under
arrangements, the amount of such charge is a discount from the cost of the services. It may not be
treated as income by the hospital. Thus, the amount to be recognized as cost by the hospital is the
net amount paid to the non-physician anesthetist.
2113. HOME HEALTH COORDINATION (OR HOME CARE INTAKE COORDINATION)
COSTS - GENERAL
Home health coordination, also known as intake coordination, is intended to manage and facilitate
the transfer of patients from a hospital or skilled nursing facility (SNF) to the care of a home health
agency (HHA). This involves arranging for the uninterrupted continuing medical care of the patient
and assisting in the organization of family resources for the effective care of the patient, reducing the
psychological apprehensions inherent in returning the patient to his/her residence. These duties may
be performed at various locations; e.g., at hospitals or other health care institutions such as SNFs, or
on the HHA's premises. The costs of performing these services are allowable under Medicare as
described in §2113.1.
21-13.1 Rev. 395
07-96 COSTS RELATED TO PATIENT CARE 2113.1
However, the costs of services performed by HHA personnel which constitute patient solicitation
activities or activities duplicative of the institution's discharge planning responsibilities are not
allowable. These activities are described in §§2113.2 and 2113.3.
The following sections define home health coordination and these other activities so that the time
spent by HHA personnel in hospitals and SNFs can be divided among the various activities to
determine allowable costs. The fact that a service is performed in a hospital or SNF, rather than on
HHA premises, does not necessarily make the cost of that service unallowable, but such costs should
be carefully assessed to assure they are related to allowable services. HHAs must be able to produce
supporting records such as time logs to substantiate their statements pertaining to the time spent by
HHA personnel in the various activities.
2113.1 Home Health Coordination Activities.--The cost of coordination activities, which ease the
patient's transition from hospital or SNF to the home under the care of an HHA, are allowable.
Coordination activities take place once the patient's physician has determined that the patient
requires home health services as evidenced by the patient's medical record, and the specific HHA
that is to render the services has been chosen by the patient and/or his family (possibly with hospital
or SNF assistance). The cost of activities performed prior to the determination that home health
services are needed and the selection of one HHA to perform the services is not an allowable home
health cost since an agency cannot coordinate the care of a nonpatient. In some cases, generally
infrequently, a referred patient does not actually become a patient of the agency, either because of a
subsequent decision that home care is not needed or because the agency selected cannot meet the
patient's needs. In such cases, the cost of coordination activities would be allowable as if the patient
had been accepted by the HHA.
Coordination activities may be performed on the premises of the HHA, or in a hospital or SNF.
They may be performed by a nurse, medical social worker, or other health professional. For
example, coordination for a specific patient might be performed by the nurse who will provide
skilled nursing services to the patient once he/she is discharged. Coordination activities are of the
type listed below. They are allowable unless the activities are found to be unnecessary for patient
care or a duplication of services already properly performed by the hospital or SNF. To the extent
that coordination activities can be performed simultaneously with evaluation visit activities, separate
visits to the same patient would be excessive.
Coordination Activities
A. Explaining the agency's policies to patients and responsible family members following
referral.
B. Assisting in establishing a definitive home care plan prior to discharge, including
assessment of the appropriateness of the requested services, medical supplies, and appliances.
C. Assuring that the HHA is ready to meet the patient's needs at the time of discharge. This
entails making arrangements for any special medical supplies or appliances, making arrangements
for training agency personnel regarding unfamiliar procedures or problems pertaining to the patient's
care, and communicating information regarding the patient to agency personnel.
Rev. 395 21-13.1A
2113.2 COST RELATED TO PATIENT CARE 07-96
2113.2 Patient Solicitation Activities.--Costs incurred by a home health agency for personnel
performing duties in the hospital or SNF which are primarily directed toward patient solicitation are
unallowable costs for Medicare reimbursement purposes. (See HCFA Pub. 15-I, §§2136ff.) Visits
made by HHA personnel to patients which have not yet been referred to the HHA (as evidenced by
the patient's medical record) in order to persuade the patient to request the HHA's services are
considered patient solicitation, as would visits to physicians to obtain referrals. Obtaining referrals
by means of a cooperating hospital or SNF employee, or by reviewing patient records to identify
potential patients for the HHA, are also considered patient solicitation. Any costs incurred for these
activities are unallowable. These costs include not only the compensation and transportation costs of
the HHA personnel engaged in the activity, but also any costs the HHA incurs for meals,
entertainment, gifts, etc., given to influence these parties to refer patients to the HHA.
2113.3 Discharge Planning-Type Activities.--A hospital or SNF must perform discharge planning
for its patients as a part of the utilization review plan it is required to have in effect in order to meet
the Medicare conditions of participation. Since implementation of a utilization review plan is the
responsibility of the hospital or SNF, no cost attributable to this activity can be recognized as an
allowable cost of an HHA.
Therefore, the costs an HHA incurs because one or more of its employees performs patient discharge
planning activities cannot be recognized as an allowable cost to the HHA. For example, costs
incurred by an HHA to screen and review hospital files individually or during staffing or discharge
planning, for the purpose of determining the level of care a patient will require upon discharge, are
not allowable costs to the HHA regardless of whether the HHA employee performs this assistance at
the hospital or elsewhere.
Rather than having its own staff perform the required discharge planning activities, a hospital or SNF
could arrange to have these services provided by HHA employees and pay the HHA for these
services. These costs would be allowable to the hospital or SNF as discharge planning costs, and
would be reimbursable to them to the extent they are reasonable in amount and do not duplicate
services already provided by hospital or SNF staff. The HHA must specifically identify and deduct
the costs. However, if the costs cannot be determined, the HHA may deduct the revenue it receives
for these services from its costs.
2113.4 Education and Liaison Activities.--Education and liaison activities permit the HHA to
establish ties with the rest of the health care system. These activities are allowable to the extent that
they are necessary for patient care and do not duplicate services which are or should be performed by
the hospital or SNF. (See §§2136ff.) The activities include:
A. Serving as an educational resource to the hospital or SNF concerning home health services.
This includes conducting training for hospital or SNF staff and serving as a consultant to the hospital
or SNF for establishing home care policies and practices.
B. Educating physicians concerning the range of home care services available.
21-13.1B Rev. 395
08-92 COSTS RELATED TO PATIENT CARE 2114.2
2113.5 Home Health Coordination in the Provider-Based HHA.--In provider-based HHAs the
hospital or SNF and the HHA are part of the same complex, and the reasonable costs of discharge
planning services performed by HHA personnel are allowable when the costs are properly classified
as costs of the hospital or SNF and do not represent a duplication of services performed by other
personnel. Include the costs in the hospital's or SNF's discharge planning costs. Instruct the provider-
based HHA to maintain records to substantiate time spent in various activities.
2114. VISITING COSTS OF HHAS
Costs related to patient care visits are allowable HHA costs. Visiting costs are incurred when a staff
member of the HHA or others under arrangements made by the HHA make a personal contact to
provide a covered home health service to a beneficiary in his/her place of residence.
Costs related to outpatient visits made by a patient to a hospital, SNF, rehabilitation center, or
outpatient department affiliated with a medical school to receive covered HHA services are
allowable costs if:
o The HHA made arrangements for the services; and
o The services involve the use of equipment which cannot be made readily available to the
patient in his/her place of residence.
Visiting costs include all incurred costs related to making the visits, such as preparation for the visits,
telephone calls or conferences about the patients, maintaining the patients' records, travel to the
patients, and treating the patients.
2114.1 Nonowners Compensation.--Compensation paid to a nonowner employee, which is
computed under the procedural guidelines contained in Chapter 9, is included in the allowable costs
of the HHA. Following these procedural guidelines is necessary when applying the substantially out
of line test in §2102.1. This test determines whether the compensation costs are substantially out of
line with other institutions in the same area which are similar in size, scope of services, utilization,
and other relevant factors.
2114.2 Transportation Costs.--Transportation costs incurred by an HHA may be included in the
allowable costs of the HHA if the costs are reasonable (as defined in §2102.1), and necessary (as
defined in §2102.2). Generally, transportation costs are incurred for either the use of an employee's
vehicle or the use of the HHA's vehicle, whether owned or leased.
A. Use of An Employee's Vehicle: Include the amount paid to an employee for necessary
patient care transportation in the allowable costs of the HHA if it does not exceed either the amount
recognized under current IRS guidelines or the amount based on the standard GSA mileage rate (see
§1412.6). Classify any excess amount as a fringe benefit and include in the employee's
compensation.
Rev. 367 21-13.2
2114.2(Cont.) COSTS RELATED TO PATIENT CARE 08-92
B. Use of An HHA's Vehicle, Whether Owned or Leased: Reasonable costs of owned or
leased vehicles incurred by an HHA to render necessary patient care are included in allowable costs
of the HHA. When an HHA vehicle is used for personal and HHA patient care activities, the HHA
must maintain documentation of the number of miles that the vehicle is used for each purpose. Use
of the vehicle for commuting between the employee's place of residence and the HHA is considered
a personal activity. The costs of the vehicle attributed to personal activities (based on the ratio of
personal mileage to total mileage applied to the vehicle's costs) must be included in the employee's
compensation as a fringe benefit to the extent that the employee does not reimburse the HHA for the
costs.
2115. TREATMENT OF MEDICAL SUPPLY COSTS IN HHAs
All HHAs are expected to separately identify in their records the cost of medical supplies that are not
routinely furnished in conjunction with patient care visits and which are directly identifiable services
to an individual patient. Exclude the cost of medical supplies for which a separate charge is made, in
addition to the per visit charge, from the per visit costs if:
o The common and established practice of comparable HHAs in the area is to charge
separately for the item;
o The HHA follows a consistent charging practice for Medicare and non-Medicare patients
receiving the item;
o Generally, the item is not frequently furnished to patients;
o The item is directly identifiable to an individual patient and its cost can be identified and
accumulated in a separate cost center; and
o The item is furnished at the direction of the patient's physician and is specifically identified
in the plan of treatment.
Do not separately classify the cost of those minor medical and surgical supplies which are not
expected to be specifically identified in the physician's plan of treatment, or for which a separate
charge is not made. It must be included in the per visit cost. These supplies (e.g., cotton balls,
alcohol prep) are items which are frequently furnished to patients or utilized individually in small
quantities (even though these items in certain situations may be used in greater quantity). For proper
cost report treatment of medical supply costs in HHAs, see PRM-II, §404.
21-13.3 Rev. 367
108-92 COSTS RELATED TO PATIENT CARE 2116
2116. NON-VISITING COSTS OF HHAs
Non-visiting costs are not allowable costs under Medicare. Non-visiting costs are costs related to
activities of the HHA other than home visiting or visits by the patients as an outpatient to a hospital,
skilled nursing facility, rehabilitation center, or outpatient department affiliated with a medical
school for covered home health services. (See §2ll4.) These costs include costs incurred for the
operation of school visit programs, meals-on-wheels programs, well-baby clinics, etc.
2117. CONTRACTED SERVICES PURCHASED BY HHA
A. Applicable Contracts.--The contracts for services referred to in these instructions include
administrative services such as purchased management services and patient care services such as
purchased therapy services. They do not include contracts to purchase products such as medical
supplies or rental space even if a coincidental service (e.g., maintenance and repairs) is provided
under the contract.
B. Contracts Exceeding Five Years.--The total costs incurred by a HHA pursuant to a contract
entered into after December 5, 1980 for any services furnished on or after April 1, 1982 for, or on
behalf of, the agency are unallowable where the contract is entered into for a period exceeding 5
years. Included in this category are the following:
o Contracts with a stipulated term exceeding 5 years;
o Contracts with an initial term of 5 years or less, but which, in the absence of specific action
by the parties to the contract, are automatically renewable for a period(s) which together with the
initial term exceeds 5 years.
The following are not included in the category of contracts exceeding 5 years:
o Contracts with terms exceeding 5 years or potentially exceeding 5 years through automatic
renewals and which are subject to termination at any time by either party.
o Contracts which could exceed 5 years only through renewals requiring a specific election
by the HHA.
o Contracts of indefinite duration which, under applicable State law, are subject to
termination.
o Contracts which provide for an unspecific change in the amount of consideration at an
interval of 5 years or less, and which, under applicable State law, are construed as having a tenure
not exceeding the point in time when the change occurs.
Penalty or other fees incurred by a HHA to terminate a contract with a stipulated term exceeding 5
years (as explained), which was entered into after December 5, 1980 for any services furnished on or
after April 1, 1982 for, or on behalf of the agency, are unallowable.
Costs of a contract for services entered into after December 5, 1980 for services furnished prior to
April 1, 1982 are reimbursable to the extent that the costs are otherwise allowable and reasonable in
amount.
Rev. 367 21-13.4
08-92 COSTS RELATED TO PATIENT CARE 2118
C. Contracts Where Payment is on a Percentage Basis.--The total costs incurred by a HHA
pursuant to a contract entered into after December 5, 1980 for any services furnished on or after
April 1, 1982 and prior to September 3, 1982 for, or on behalf of, the agency where the amount
payable by the HHA under a contract is based on a percentage of the agency's reimbursement or
claim for reimbursement are unallowable. Included in this category are contracts where payment or
any portion of the payment by a HHA is based on a percentage of the agency's revenue or profit, a
percentage of the agency's Medicare, Medicaid or other third-party reimbursement, a percentage of
billed charges, or other similar arrangements. Costs of a contract for services entered into after
December 5, 1980 for services furnished prior to April 1, 1982 and on or after September 3, 1982 are
reimbursable to the extent that the costs are otherwise allowable and reasonable in amount.
D. Contracts Entered Into On or Before December 5, 1980.--Costs which are incurred by a
HHA pursuant to a contract for services entered into on or before December 5, 1980 may be
reimbursed to the extent that the costs are otherwise allowable and reasonable in amount. However,
a contract entered into on or before December 5, 1980 that is renewed subsequent to December 5,
1980 at the specific election of a HHA is subject to the provisions of §§2117 A, B and C.
E. Applicable HHAs.--These instructions apply to all free-standing HHAs. Provider-based
HHAs are also subject to these instructions where the contract applies only to the HHA component
of the health care complex. In this circumstance, the costs applicable to the HHA component must
be appropriately identified and disallowed by reason of the above stated conditions.
2118. COST OF SERVICES FURNISHED UNDER ARRANGEMENTS
The term under arrangements refers to a manner of furnishing services by a provider in which
payment to the provider for the services with respect to which the individual is entitled to have
payment made by the program discharges the individual's liability to pay for the services. Providers
may furnish services under arrangements with outside suppliers, including other providers. The
amount charged by the supplying organization and paid by the provider for the services rendered then
becomes a cost to the provider. This amount is includable in the provider's allowable cost for
Medicare purposes to the extent that the costs of such purchased services are determined to be
reasonable, subject to the provisions of Chapter l0, Cost to Related Organizations. The
reasonableness of the amount is determined by the going rate charged to others for such services
within the general community. The services are treated as though they were furnished directly to the
provider.
21-13.5 Rev. 367
01-82 COST RELATED TO PATIENT CARE 2119
2118.l Payment to the Provider.--Where services are provided "under arrangements," the supplier
bills, and is paid by, the provider for the services actually rendered. Under these circumstances, the
Medicare program cannot directly reimburse the supplier of services. Payment for such services is
made as a part of provider costs. Provider cost in this instance is limited to the net amount actually
paid the supplier. If the provider imposes a charge for billing services or other administrative
services on the supplier, such amount must be treated as a discount to the provider. It may not be
treated as income by the provider.
A. Routine Services.--(See §§ 2202.6, 2202.7, and 2203.1.) The costs of items purchased
under arrangements that are considered as a part of covered routine inpatient services are includable
in the provider's overall allowable cost for routine services. The costs of routine services will then
be apportioned over all patients in accordance with the apportionment method selected. The
provider should not bill the program for these purchased services on an individual patient basis, even
though the service is actually secured for a specific patient.
B. Ancillary Services.--(See §§ 2202.8 and 2203.2.) The supplier should bill the provider for
the services purchased under arrangements which are actually rendered, itemizing such services by
individual patient, the date of service, and, where appropriate, the related charge for each service and
the quantity of service provided. This bill then provides the supporting documentation for the cost to
be included in the provider's allowable cost. The detailed information is then used by the provider to
bill the Medicare program for the services provided to each Medicare patient.
2ll8.2 Services Furnished Under Arrangements for Medicare Beneficiaries Only.--While charges
for equivalent services of a supplier of services "under arrangements" must be uniform for Medicare
and non-Medicare patients, billing practices of such a supplier need not be identical for both
Medicare and non-Medicare patients. Where the arrangement under which services are furnished
meets the requirements specified in guidelines published by HCFA, these services may be furnished
for Medicare beneficiaries even if the supplier bills directly for non-Medicare beneficiaries.
Where a supplier furnishes services "under arrangements" only for Medicare beneficiaries and bills
directly for non-Medicare beneficiaries, the costs of such services should not be commingled with
other provider costs. Rather, the cost of such services should be included in total Medicare costs after
cost finding and apportionment. (See Part II, §§ 240.l and 340.l)
2119. COST OF DRUGS AND RELATED MEDICAL SUPPLIES
A. Reasonable Cost and Maximum Allowable Cost Limitation (MAC).--The cost of drugs and
related medical supplies furnished by providers to Medicare beneficiaries are reimbursed by the
program on a reasonable cost basis. To meet the test of reasonableness, the cost of the drug or
related medical supply may not exceed the amount a prudent and cost-conscious buyer would pay for
the same item.
Rev. 260 21-14.1
2119 (Cont.) COST RELATED TO PATIENT CARE 01-82
A reasonable cost limitation will be set on certain multiple-source drugs that involve the
expenditures of significant amounts of Federal funds and are purchased at significantly different
prices. This maximum allowable cost limitation, called the "MAC" for a particular drug, will be
based on the lowest unit price at which the drug is widely and consistently available to pharmacists
from any formulator or labeler, and the most frequently purchased package size. Final MAC
determinations will be published in the Federal Register. These MAC determinations are also
published as an appendix to this chapter. This appendix includes the MAC limitation and its
effective date, the generic name of the drug, and a listing of the most frequently purchased brand
names of the drug.
For purchases made on or after the effective date of the final MAC determinations, the allowable
cost for any multiple-source drug for which a MAC has been established may not exceed the lowest
of:
(l) the actual cost,
(2) the amount which would be paid by a prudent and cost-conscious buyer for the drug if
obtained from the lowest-priced
21-14.2 Rev. 260
7-78 COSTS RELATED TO PATIENT CARE 2119(Cont.)
source that is widely and consistently available within a provider's service area, whether sold by
generic or brand name, or
(3) the MAC.
B. Prescription Drugs
l. Drug Purchases.--Providers have their own pharmacy are expected to purchase drugs
in bulk, where possible, from manufacturers or recognized wholesale outlets to gain economies from
quantity purchasing.
Providers not having their own pharmacies generally purchase drugs under arrangements with local
pharmacies rather than from manufacturers or wholesalers. Where the drugs are purchased under
arrangements, the charges to the provider by the supplier become the provider's pharmacy costs. In
such cases, these providers should pay no more than the going rate for prescription drugs and, in
addition, should seek to minimize their pharmacy costs by obtaining discounts, either direct or
indirect, from the supplier. It is not expected that a provider will utilize the services of a higher
charge pharmacy for its normal prescription needs merely because the pharmacy provides 24-hour
emergency services. Of course, the Medicare program will recognize the costs of services when a
prescription is required at a time when the provider's normal source of prescription is not available,
even though this pharmacy may have higher charges than and may not be the same as the one with
which the regular prescription orders are placed.
2. Consultant Services.--A pharmacist's fee for consultant services should not be
included in the price of the prescriptions. If the extent of the consultant services is such that the
pharmacist believes it necessary to make a charge for these services, then it would be appropriate for
the pharmacist to make a separate charge to the provider. The charge for the consultant services may
be included in the provider's administrative costs, to the extent reasonable. The provider should
document the extent of these services received so that any payment for them may be evaluated under
the prudent buyer policy.
C. Exception to the MAC Limit.--The MAC limit for a particular drug will not apply where a
physician certifies that in his medical judgment a specific brand name drug is medically necessary for
a particular patient. The individual patient's name and the particular drug prescribed must be clearly
identifiable. This certification must be in the physician's own handwriting. Merely checking a box
on a form or stamping a prescription will not be considered an acceptable certification. Written
certifications must be retained in the provider's records.
Example of physician certification statement:
"This brand is medically necessary--dispense as written."
Rev. 205 21-14.3
2119(Cont.) COSTS RELATED TO PATIENT CARE 7-78
It is not necessary to forward the certification statement to the pharmacist. Written certifications may
be made on patient charts with the pharmacist receiving some form of notification on the drug order
that a properly executed physician certification is on file. This exception, however, does not waive
the requirement that the cost of the drug may not exceed the amount a prudent and cost-conscious
buyer would pay for the drug prescribed.
D. Charges to Beneficiaries.--If the amount determined to be allowable in accordance with
paragraph A is less than the amount charged the provider by an outside supplier, the beneficiary
cannot be charged for the excess. The provider's agreement with the Secretary prohibits charging the
Medicare patient for covered items and services (Section l866(a)(l)(A) of the Social Security Act).
E. Provider Record keeping Requirements.--In addition to maintaining the physician
certifications described in paragraph C, the provider, as part of its financial record keeping
responsibility under the program, must have on supplier invoices all needed cost verification
information--i.e., name, brand, quantity, form and strength of the drugs supplied and the provider's
actual cost. Otherwise, the intermediary, in accordance with section l8l5 of the Social Security Act
and section 405.453 of the regulations, will be required to deny charges for unlabled drugs because
of inadequate records. Any cost reductions received on drug purchases, such as discounts (cash,
trade, purchase and quantity), rebates, etc., must also be clearly reflected on the individual invoices
or related documentation.
F. Nonprescription Drugs and Medical Supplies.--Wherever feasible and to the extent
permitted by State law, providers should also purchase their nonprescription drugs and medical
supplies in bulk to get more reasonable prices and take advantage of quantity and other discounts.
(See § 2203.l concerning routine drugs in SNF's.)
G. Survey Results to Determine Scope of Audit.--The results of intermediary surveys for
evaluating the cost of drugs and other related medical supplies will be one of the factors considered
in the scope of audit determinations.
H. Audit Adjustments.--
l. Drugs Purchases from Manufacturers or Recognized Wholesale Outlets.--If a MAC
has been established for a drug that appears on an invoice reviewed by the intermediary, a
comparison will be made between the cost incurred by the provider in purchasing the drug and the
allowable cost based on the MAC limit. (See example.)
Adjustments to allowable costs will be made based on this comparison where the cost of one or more
drugs exceeds the applicable MAC limitation. Make such adjustments even if the provider has
purchased other drugs at costs below the
2l-l4.4 Rev. 205
7-78 COSTS RELATED TO PATIENT CARE 2ll9(Cont.)
limitation. An adjustment will also be made where the cost of a drug is below the applicable MAC
limitation yet exceeds the amount that would be paid by a prudent and cost-conscious buyer for the
drug if obtained from the lowest-priced source that is widely and consistently available, whether sold
by generic or brand name. If the provider has a substantial number of physician certifications (see
paragraph C) on file to justify the purchase of drug products priced above the MAC limit and above
the "lowest-priced source" limit, the audit adjustments described above may be waived. The
allowable cost for the higher-priced products may not, however, exceed the amount that would be
paid by a prudent and cost-conscious buyer for the same items.
Example:
Invoice shows the provider purchased from a recognized wholesale outlet a widely distributed brand-
name version of drug X as follows:
Assume the MAC for drug X, 250 mg. capsules, is set at 2.2 cents/capsule. 100 bottles, 100 capsule
size @$3.90 per bottle.
Total invoice price $390
Deduct:
Total maximum allowable cost
(2.2 cents x 100 x 100) -220
Excess = $170
The $170 excess above the MAC amount will be deducted from the provider's total allowable drug
costs.
2. Drugs Purchased under Arrangements with Local Pharmacies.--Drug surveys will be
conducted by the intermediary based on a sample review of Medicare billings (forms HCFA-l453)
and the supporting invoices. Where the total costs incurred by the provider for the sampled drugs
(which may include drugs for which a MAC has been established) are substantially in excess of the
"going price" for the drugs, as determined by the intermediary, and adjustment to reimbursable drug
costs will be made initially. If subsequent drug surveys indicate a pattern of substantially out-of-line
drug costs, adjustments to total allowable drug costs will be made based on the survey results. Initial
adjustments are made to reimbursable cost, rather than total allowable cost, because in the absence of
a pattern of substantially out-of-line drugs costs, it cannot be assumed that the results of a single drug
survey adequately reflect the provider's overall purchasing practices with regard to prescriptions
obtained from local pharmacies.
I. Appeals.--A provider may appeal the amount of program reimbursement made for drugs in
accordance with the requirements and procedures described in §§ 2425ff. However, the provisions of
§§ 2425ff do not apply to disputes concerning the inclusion of a specific drug on the published MAC
list or the MAC limitation established for a specific drug. For disputes involving these issues,
provisions of the Department's MAC regulations shall apply (45 CFR 19.6).
Rev. 205 21-14.5
2120 COSTS RELATED TO PATIENT CARE 7-78
2120. REIMBURSEMENT FOR COSTS OF INTERNS AND RESIDENTS
For information on coverage of services performed by interns and residents, refer to the appropriate
manuals listed below:
Hospital Manual - §§ 210.6, 237
Skilled Nursing Facility Manual - § 212.7
Home Health Agency Manual - § 206.4
A. Reimbursement under Part A.--The cost of services of interns and residents provided an
inpatient of a hospital with an approved teaching program or a skilled nursing facility with a hospital
approved program and a transfer agreement with the hospital are includable in allowable costs under
Part A. (See §§ 404 and 404.1 for an explanation of approved programs.)
Where home health services are furnished by residents or interns under approved teaching programs
of the hospital with which the home health agency is affiliated of under common control, the visiting
costs incurred by the interns or residents of the hospital for visits to home health beneficiaries are
included in the allowable costs of the home health agency.
B. Reimbursement Under Part B.--The following types of services performed by interns or
residents are reimbursable under Part B on a reasonable cost basis:
l. Services rendered to inpatients of hospitals by interns and residents not in approved
training programs,
2. Services performed for hospital outpatients,
3. Services which would otherwise be covered under Part A, but for which the patient
is not eligible under Part A (e.g., inpatient hospital benefit eligibility is exhausted),
4. Services performed for SNF patients which are not covered under Part A, and
5. Services performed for home health patients which are not covered under Part a
home health plan.
The cost of Part B residents' and interns' services to inpatients should be calculated on a per diem
basis by the hospital in consultation with the intermediary. The total cost of such services (including
fringe benefits, etc.) should be apportioned between inpatient and outpatient services on the basis of
the time spent on each. The inpatient per diem figure is then obtained by dividing the total annual
inpatient cost for these services by the estimated annual number of inpatient days for all patients.
21-14.6 Rev. 205
12-11 COSTS RELATED TO PATIENT CARE 2l22.l
For patients who are enrolled under Part B, as indicated by the Reply to the Notice of Admission, the
provider will be reimbursed for 80 percent of the cost of providing these services. The provider
should collect 20 percent of the per diem rate for the services of residents and interns covered under
Part B times the number of inpatient days provided. As long as the patient is entitled to Part A
benefits, no determination of the patient's deductible liability need be made for inpatient Part B
interns' and residents' services.
Patients not enrolled under Part B will be liable for the entire cost of Part B interns' and residents'
services. The provider must maintain a record of the inpatient days of these individuals so that this
cost may be excluded from the amount of program obligation at the time of retroactive cost
adjustment.
2l22. TAXES
2l22.l General Rule.--The general rule is that taxes assessed against the provider, in accordance
with the levying enactments of the several States and lower levels of government and for which the
provider is liable for payment, are allowable costs. Tax expense should not include fines and
penalties. Taxes are allowable costs to the extent they are actually incurred and related to the care of
beneficiaries.
Rev. 448 2l-l4.7
12-11 COSTS RELATED TO PATIENT CARE 2122.4
Whenever exemptions to taxes are legally available, the provider is expected to take advantage of
them. If the provider does not take advantage of available exemptions, the expenses incurred for
such taxes are not recognized as allowable costs under the program.
2122.2 Taxes Not Allowable as Costs.--Certain taxes which are levied on providers are not
allowable costs. These taxes include:
A. Federal income and excess profit taxes, including any interest or penalties paid thereon
(see § 1217).
B. State or local income and excess profit taxes (see § 1217).
C. Taxes in connection with financing, refinancing, or refunding operations, such as taxes on
the issuance of bonds, property transfers, issuance or transfer of stocks, etc. Generally, these costs are
either amortized over the life of the securities or depreciated over the life of the asset. They are not,
however, recognized as tax expense.
D. Taxes from which exemptions are available to the provider.
E. Special assessments on land which represent capital improvements such as sewers, water,
and pavements should be capitalized and depreciated over their estimated useful lives.
F. Taxes on property which is not used in the rendition of covered services.
G. Taxes, such as sales taxes, levied against the patient and collected and remitted by the
provider.
H. Self-employment (FICA) taxes applicable to individual proprietors, partners, members of a
joint venture, etc.
2l22.3 Employment-Related Taxes--Provider-Based Physicians.--Employment-related taxes, i.e.,
FICA, Workers' Compensation and Unemployment Compensation, which are paid by a provider on
behalf of a provider-based physician, are considered business expenses of the employer and not
fringe benefits (§ 2l08.3Cl). Hence, they are includable in their entirety as part of the administrative
cost of the provider, without allocation to the physician's professional component, and reimbursable
to the provider on a reasonable cost basis.
2l22.4 Franchise Taxes.--A franchise tax is a periodic assessment levied by a State or local taxing
authority on the operation of a business within the borders of that governmental entity. The basis
used to compute the amount of the franchise tax varies among taxing authorities. Where the amount
of the franchise tax is based upon the net income of the provider,
Rev. 448 2l-l5
2122.5 COSTS RELATED TO PATIENT CARE 12-11
with a minimum amount stated, the following criteria will be used to determine whether and in what
amount a franchise tax is an allowable cost:
A. Where a provider has no net income but is required to pay a minimum franchise tax, the
franchise tax is an allowable cost.
B. Where a provider realized net income which is not sufficient to incur a tax in excess of the
minimum tax and the minimum tax is levied, then only the difference between the minimum
franchise tax and the tax computed on net income is allowable cost. For example, if the minimum
tax is $500 and the tax computed on the net income is $400, then the $400 is an income tax and only
the excess ($500 - $400) or $100 is an allowable cost.
C. Where a provider has net income sufficient to incur a tax greater than the minimum
franchise tax, the entire tax is considered and income tax and no part of the tax is an allowable cost.
For example, if the minimum tax is $500 and the tax computed on income is $600, then the entire
$600 is a nonallowable cost.
D. Where the amount of the franchise tax is based upon several criteria, one of which is net
income, the amount of the franchise tax computed on net income is not an allowable cost. For
example, if the minimum tax is $500, the tax computed on net income is $400, and the tax levy on
capital stock is $600, then $400 remains an income tax and only the excess ($600 - $400) or $200 is
an allowable cost.
2122.5 Unemployment Compensation Insurance Costs for Nonprofit Providers Under Public Law
91-373.--
A. General.--Under PL 91-373, most nonprofit providers and State hospitals are required to
cover certain employees under their respective State unemployment compensation laws.
This Federal law also provides that each nonprofit provider must be permitted by State law the
option of (1) paying regular State unemployment compensation taxes, or (2) reimbursing the State
direct, on a dollar-for-dollar basis, for unemployment compensation benefits paid to former
employees attributable to service with the provider--a form of self-insurance. Those providers which
elect to pay benefits direct by self-insuring must also be allowed to participate in a joint program
with other nonprofit organizations to establish a pool for reimbursing the State. See § 2162ff for
provisions governing pool arrangements for unemployment compensation and workers'
compensation insurance coverage.
B. Payment of the State Tax.--Where a nonprofit provider elects to pay regular State
unemployment compensation taxes, such payments are recognized as an allowable cost.
21-15.1 Rev.448
12-11 COSTS RELATED TO PATIENT CARE 2122.7
C. Self-Insurance Program.--Where a nonprofit provider chooses to self-assure by establishing
its own reserve account, contributions to this reserve account are not allowable costs under the
Medicare program. Where a nonprofit chain organization (or related organization) centrally operates
an unemployment insurance reserve fund for some or all of its member (related) providers, the fund
is considered a self-insurance program and payments made to it by the participating providers are not
allowable costs under the Medicare program. This is because such a fund is simply an arrangement
among related providers with the chain maintaining control over the fund. Thus, payments to the
fund are not actually incurred costs, but rather a provision for establishing a central reserve from
which unemployment costs are met as they are incurred. Moreover, any income earned from
investment of the funds of the reserve account must be used to offset a provider's allowable interest
expense under the Medicare program.
Certain costs associated with a self-insurance program are allowable, whether paid from the fund or
directly by the provider. They are:
1. Any amounts paid to reimburse the State for unemployment compensation payments
actually made by the State to the former employees of the provider.
2. Any premium costs for the purchase of commercial insurance which protects against
catastrophic loss, provided the type, extent, and cost of coverage are not substantially out of line with
those of other similar institutions in the same area.
3. The fees paid to an outside individual or firm (if any) to administer the program, to
the extent such fees are considered reasonable for the services rendered. Such administration may
consist of completing the claims forms from the State unemployment office, representing the
provider at the appeals level, etc.
4. Any other reasonable administrative costs incurred by the provider in establishing
and administering the program.
These costs are allowable for a chain organization program to the extent the costs are properly
allocated among the providers which incurred them, e.g., unemployment compensation payments
should be directly allocated to the provider whose unemployed employees were paid. (See § 2l62ff
for other self-insurance provisions.)
2122.6 Self-Insurance Program for Unemployment Compensation and Workers' Compensation
Insurance Using a Reserve for Funding.--Where a provider or a group of providers, whether
proprietary or nonprofit and whether related or not, chooses to self-insure against unemployment
compensation and/or workers' compensation risks by establishing its own reserve account, the
provisions of preceding §2122.5C apply. See §2162.7, which explains the self-insurance
requirements that must be met before payments made into a trust can be included in allowable costs.
2122.7 Review of Reasonable Costs, Including Taxes. -- In general, reasonable costs claimed by a
provider, including taxes, must be actually incurred. While a tax may fall under a category that is
generally accepted as an allowable Medicare cost, the provider may only treat the net tax expense as
the reasonable cost actually incurred for Medicare payment purposes. The net tax expense is the tax
paid by the provider, reduced by payments the provider received that are associated with the assessed
tax. Contractors will continue to determine whether taxes and other expenses are allowable based on
reasonable cost principles set forth in the Medicare statute and regulations.
Rev. 448 21-15.2
10-80 COSTS RELATED TO PATIENT CARE 2125
2124. OXYGEN
Oxygen is classified as a medical supply under both Part A and Part B of the Medicare program, and
providers are reimbursed for it on the basis of reasonable cost. When oxygen is furnished to a
Medicare inpatient by a participating hospital or skilled nursing facility, or by another under
arrangements with such a provider, the cost of oxygen is an allowable Part A cost. Oxygen furnished
by a participating hospital is incident to physicians' services to outpatients is an allowable Part B
cost. For cost finding purposes, oxygen is classified as a medical supply, part of the ancillary
services furnished to inpatients under Part A.
The cost of oxygen furnished by a home health agency is covered under Part A or Part B as a home
health service. Under the provisions for rental or purchase of durable medical equipment this cost is
allowable only if oxygen is essential to the effective use of the durable medical equipment, it has
been prescribed by the beneficiary's physician, and the equipment, it has been prescribed by the
beneficiary's physician, and the equipment has been determined to be medically necessary for the
treatment of the patient's condition.
Oxygen is covered under Part B when administered in connection with ambulance services. When
the ambulance services are furnished by a provider, payment is made on a reasonable costs basis for
the costs of the oxygen in addition to the cost of the ambulance service.
2125. BLOOD
Blood Replacement Practices.--Implicit in the determination of the reasonable cost of blood is that
providers must afford Medicare patients the same opportunity as non-Medicare patients for reducing
or eliminating blood fees. In situations where the provider deals with an independent blood supplier,
the provider must assure itself that the blood supplier does not similarly discriminate by affording
non-Medicare patients greater opportunities to reduce or eliminate their blood fees than is possible
for Medicare beneficiaries. Thus, for example, providers (or their blood suppliers) must not limit the
number of replacement credits accepted for Medicare patients to an amount equal to the Medicare
blood deductible requirement while imposing no limitation on the number of replacement credits
accepted for non-Medicare patients. This nondiscrimination rule also applies in situations where the
provider (or its blood supplier) allows blood replacement credits to reduce or eliminate blood
derivative fees and blood processing fees.
There is an exception to this general rule, however. In situations where allowing full blood
replacement opportunity would diminish a beneficiary's blood reserve available for meeting future
blood deductible requirements, full replacement (i.e., replacement beyond the Medicare blood
deductible requirement) is not required. This occurs
Rev. 241 21-15.4
2125 COSTS RELATED TO PATIENT CARE 10-80
most often with beneficiaries who are members of blood plans that limit the number of replacement
credits available to the number of units deposited by (or on behalf of) the member. Because
providers typically deal with only one or two blood suppliers on a regular basis, providers are
expected to be familiar with the replacement credit policies (i.e., limited vs. unlimited) of the
suppliers with which they deal.
A refusal by providers (or their blood suppliers) to accept replacement blood from Medicare patient
not only increases the overall cost of blood to providers (because replacement blood must be
obtained elsewhere) but also disproportionately increases Medicare's share of the cost of blood.
Similarly, failure of a provider to accept medically sound replacement blood on behalf of Medicare
patients to reduce blood processing costs or blood derivative costs to the Medicare program is neither
a consistent nor a cost conscious practice. Therefore, if these discriminatory replacement practices
exist, the consequent excess provider costs for blood, blood derivatives, or blood processing must be
disallowed in the determination of Medicare reimbursement. The costs that are considered excess
are those costs that could have been reduced or eliminated had the provider sought and accepted all
available replacement credits. In addition to the cost adjustment, the provider must make
corresponding reductions in the charges billed for replacement blood which was rejected by the
provider or its blood bank.
B. Adjustments to Provider Charges for Blood Replaced and Blood Not Used.-Often, a
provider's blood supplier will not notify the provider of a patient's total blood replacement credits
until after the provider bills that patient's charges. This occurs, for example, when the patient
arranges for a donor(s) to replace blood at some time after the provider has already billed the charges
for blood unreplaced at the time of billing. In situations such as this, the provider must adjust its
charges to reflect credits for the blood replacement. Providers should follow current manual
instructions (Hospital Manual (HIM-10), $460 and Skilled Nursing Facility Manual (HIM-12), §417)
in submitting corrected bills to the Medicare program.
Another situation requiring blood credits occurs when a provider bills a patient's account for blood
prepared for transfusion but, for whatever medical reason, all or part of the blood is not transfused.
This occurs, for example, when a surgeon anticipates the need for five units of blood, which are
prepared for transfusion, and the patient's account is charged for the blood. The patient's medical
condition requires that only three units be transfused and the unused blood is returned to storage. In
situations such as this, the patient's account must be credited for the amount of unused blood,
because the blood was not furnished to the patient. However, any necessary crossmatch or
preparation fees may be charged to the patient's account even though the blood was not used. Blood
which cannot be returned to storage due to the addition of medication or thawing in preparation for
transfusion should not be charged to the patient's account. Rather, the cost of such blood should be
transferred to a blood processing, storing, and administration account to be shared proportionately by
all patients.
21-15.5 Rev. 241
10-80 COSTS RELATED TO PATIENT CARE 2125
Moreover, if the provider's blood supplier gives a larger credit for blood replaced by nonbeneficiaries
than it gives for blood replaced by beneficiaries, the larger credit will be applied to reduce provider
charges and costs for all patients. Of course, provider charges for blood must be uniformly applied
to beneficiaries and nonbeneficiaries.
C. Application of the Prudent Buyer Principle to Blood Procurement and Replacement
Policies.--Blood is unique among provider furnished items, because unlike other items, it can be
replaced by patients or by persons acting on the patients' behalf. The development of organizations
supplying blood to providers has been such that the charging practices of these organizations vary
not only nationwide, but also within limited geographical areas. For example, within a local
geographical area, one blood supplier may charge a provider both a processing fee and a charge for
the flood, while another supplier may charge only a processing fee. These circumstances require
careful application of the prudent buyer principle.
In applying the prudent buyer principle under these circumstances, the provider must look to the net
charge for the blood. For example, assume the following facts. A provider has a choice between
obtaining blood from Supplier A for a processing fee only of $30 per unit, or obtaining blood from
Supplier B for a processing fee of $10 and a charge for the blood itself of $25, a combined charge of
$35 per unit. Supplier A allows no credit for blood replaced; whereas, Supplier B allows a credit of
$25 for blood replaced on a unit-for-unit basis. The provider anticipates a usage of 2100 units of
blood for the upcoming contract period. Experience of local blood suppliers has shown an average
of one-third to be the prevailing replacement rate in the locality (i.e., on the average, one out of every
three units used is replaced). Putting all these facts together, the provider's anticipated blood costs
for the upcoming contract period would be $63,000 (2100 x $30) if obtained from Supplier A.
However, the provider's anticipated blood costs would be $56,000 (2100 x $10) plus (1400 x $25)1
if obtained from Supplier B. The provider, in seeking to minimize its costs under the prudent buyer
principle, would obtain the blood from Supplier B.
Moreover, if a provider enters into an arrangement with a blood supplier which precludes obtaining
blood from other sources at a lower charge, the provider could be found to be acting in violation of
the prudent buyer principle within the meaning of §2103, Prudent Buyer. However, such a
contractual arrangement would not necessarily violate the prudent buyer principle if the provider can
demonstrate to the satisfaction of the intermediary that the arrangement is absolutely compelling to
assure an adequate, reliable source of blood supply.
Rev. 241 21-15.6
2126.1 COSTS RELATED TO PATIENT CARE 10-80
Although the cost of whole blood is used in the above example, it would be appropriate for a
provider to consider the totality of its blood product needs in evaluating a purchase decision for
prudence. In addition, it is appropriate for a provider to consider nonfiscal (service) components,
such as physician consultation or 24-hour service, in evaluating the costs of blood from alternative
sources. Of course, for an occasional purchase, allowable blood cost may be higher than normally
incurred to meet an immediate medical need.
2126. UTILIZATION REVIEW
Utilization review is a provider function and reimbursement for utilization review can be made only
as a part of the provider's reasonable costs. No payment for utilization review can be made by the
program directly to physicians or to utilization review committees. (Section 2l26.3). Costs incurred
by the provider in connection with utilization review are includable in reasonable costs as set forth in
the following sections.
2126.l Utilization Review in Hospitals.--
A. Physicians' Services.--Where utilization review covers the entire patient population of a
hospital, payments made to physicians for their services on utilization review committees are
allowable as costs. Allowable costs are limited to payment of a reasonable compensation to the
physician. Such costs are then apportioned among all of the users of the hospital as part of
administrative costs. However, where utilization review covers only Medicare beneficiaries,
payments made to physicians for their services on utilization review committees are not allowable as
costs.
B. Costs Other Than for Physicians' Services.--All reasonable costs of utilization review other
than for physicians' services are allowable costs and are apportioned among all of the users of the
facility. Included in these costs are costs related to the services of professional personnel other than
physicians, report writing, etc. Utilization review costs other than for physicians' services are
allowable whether or not the utilization review covers the entire patient population.
21-16 Rev. 241
12-85 COSTS RELATED TO PATIENT CARE 2126.4
2126.2 Utilization Review in Skilled Nursing Facilities.--
A. Physicians' Services.--Payments made to physicians for their services on utilization review
committees are allowable as costs, whether or not the utilization review covers the entire patient
population of the skilled nursing facility. Allowable costs are limited to the payment of a reasonable
compensation to the physician.
Where utilization review covers only Medicare beneficiaries, compensation to physicians for their
utilization review services is reimbursable 100 percent by the Medicare program.
If the scope of a SNF utilization review committee's activity does not include all patients but does
extend to services furnished to patients under other health care programs--such as Medicaid--the
SNF's (or committee's) records of activities and compensation paid to the physician members of such
a committee should be sufficient to serve as the basis for a proper apportionment of these costs
between programs. Where, in the judgment of the intermediary, these costs are apportioned
correctly, Medicare should reimburse 100 percent of the portion allocated to the Medicare program.
However, where the utilization review committee activities apply to more than Medicare covered
services but a valid allocation between Medicare and the other programs is not supported by
documentation, all utilization review costs should be apportioned among all users of the skilled
nursing facility.
B. Costs Other Than for Physicians' Services.--Administrative costs related to utilization
review and costs of professional personnel other than physicians are allowable costs allocated as a
part of the administrative costs of the facility. Generally, these costs are apportioned among all the
users of the SNF, whether or not utilization review covers the entire patient population.
However, if the SNF is a distinct part of a larger facility (as defined in HCFA Pub. 12 §201.1) and
the utilization review is performed only for patients in the distinct part, the costs may be totally
charged to the distinct part if they are specifically identifiable (in accordance with §§2126.4 ff) to the
distinct part. The costs would then be apportioned among the users of the distinct part SNF.
2126.3 Community-Based Utilization Review Committee.--Community-based utilization review
committees are those which operate external to the SNF. They are formed primarily by local medical
societies or by the intermediary and furnish utilization review services to more than one SNF.
Where this is the case, the organization furnishing the services must bill the SNF for the services.
The SNF pays the committee and includes the payment to the committee in its allowable costs under
the program. The billing from the committee must be separated into two parts for services furnished.
One part should indicate the payment made to physicians for their services on the utilization review
committee; this part would be treated in accordance with §2l26.2A. The second part should cover all
other services and would be treated in accordance with §2l26.2B.
2l26.4 Utilization Review Cost; Provider Payment to Physicians for Rendering Utilization
Review Services.--Experience has indicated that many physicians rendering utilization review
services do not charge providers for such services. These physicians
Rev. 333 21-16.1
2l26.4 (Cont.) COSTS RELATED TO PATIENT CARE 12-85
view this activity as a community service, as part of a professional education responsibility, or as a
responsibility flowing from staff membership. However, where a charge is made by a physician,
providers utilize a variety of methods for compensating for these services. A substantial plurality of
providers use an hourly scale as the basis for such payment. Because of the statutory mandate to pay
reasonable cost (§l8l4(b) of the Act) it is necessary to have sufficient information to determine the
reasonable cost of utilization review in all cases where reimbursement is sought from Medicare.
A. Utilization Review Records Necessary to Establish Allowable Cost of Compensation.--
Section l8l5 of the Act states that a provider must maintain adequate records for reasonable cost
determination purposes. Consequently, for utilization review compensation received by physicians
or other persons to be recognized as an allowable cost, a provider must keep adequate records to
determine the reasonableness of its payments for services identified as being exclusively related to
utilization review activities. Only the actual time spent in rendering utilization review services
should be recorded. Time spent in travel to and from the point of review should be excluded from
the time calculation for reimbursement. The record-keeping requirement may be met in either of the
following ways:
l. Hourly Rate.--Where payment to a physician or other person by a provider for
utilization review services is based on an hourly rate, the provider should regularly record the name,
hourly rate, and number of hours of services rendered by the individual; or
2. Other Payment Base.--Where payment to a physician or other person by a provider is
based on some measure other than an hourly rate, the provider should prepare a schedule of
payments for each cost period for which reimbursement is claimed showing: the name, number of
hours of utilization review services rendered, and total payments made to each individual in the cost
period. The total payment should then be converted into an hourly rate for each individual. The
supporting data for this schedule should be available for verification by the intermediary.
B. Records of Provider Using Community-Utilization Review Group.--Where a community-
based group functions as the utilization review committee for more than one institution, each
provider must have in its records: (1) a description of the services furnished on its behalf, (2) an
explanation of the rationale for apportioning any costs among the various institutions using the same
community-based utilization review group, and (3) for each cost period for which such costs are
claimed by a provider, the total hours and cost for each significant category of service (e.g., physician
service, secretarial service, etc.), rendered to the provider by the utilization review committee so the
intermediary may determine whether the share of the community-based group's costs apportioned to
the provider is reasonable.
C. Retainer Fees.--Payments by a provider to a physician or other person to be available for
participation on a utilization review committee, such as retainer fees, are not allowable costs.
21-16.2 Rev. 333
12-85 COSTS RELATED TO PATIENT CARE 2126.4(Cont.)
D. Administrative Costs.--In hospitals and SNFs, the reasonable costs of administrative
services necessary for utilization review are allowable costs. These costs are apportioned among all
users of the institution (they are classified as administrative and general expenses on the cost report)
without regard to whether the plan applies only to Medicare beneficiaries. Examples of such
allowable costs are:
1. Expenses incurred for the purchase of data from organizations that compile statistics
and make profiles and studies of utilization of health care facilities and services.
2. Expenses incurred for clerical and other administrative services including the services
of nonphysician personnel.
3. Expenses incurred in traveling outside the individual's normal commuting area or in
traveling from institution to institution because of necessary and proper activities related to
utilization review, such as transportation expenses incurred by a physician in traveling to a provider
outside his local area to participate in utilization review activities.
E. Administrative Costs Related to Community-Based Utilization Review Committee.--
Payments for services obtained from a community-based utilization review group for administrative
duties pertinent to utilization review in such facilities (such as scheduling meetings, providing
coordination between the committee and providers, supervising maintenance of records, as well as
clerical, record keeping and associated activities described in D above) are allowable costs. The
measure of the reasonableness of such costs is the remuneration that would be paid an employee
performing comparable services in the area.
F. Studies.--Costs incurred by a provider in the purchase of data and statistics concerning
health care utilization that are necessary for the purpose of comparing them with other data related to
patients for whom the utilization committee is responsible are allowable costs.
The reimbursement mechanism under title XVIII of the Social Security Act, however, is not meant to
support studies in health care utilization beyond the requirements of §1861(k) of the Act or the
conditions of participation as set forth in §405.1035 and §405.1137 of Regulations No. 5 of the
Social Security Administration. Thus, costs related to evaluation by the committee of care furnished
patients under the purview of the committee are allowable costs. (Examples of such care are length
of stay, patterns of stay, patterns of care by diagnostic categories, and medical services or practices,
such as drug prescribing.) However, if a provider agrees to participate in studies extending beyond
the care furnished patients under the committee's purview, any costs incurred are not allowable.
Rev. 333 21-16.3
04-83 COSTS RELATED TO PATIENT CARE 2128
2127. HOME HEALTH AGENCY ADVISORY GROUP OF PROFESSIONAL PERSONNEL
A. General.--A home health agency participating in the Medicare program is required to have
a group of professional personnel to serve in an advisory capacity to the agency or organization. The
function of this advisory group is to approve and review on a regular basis the agency's policies
governing skilled nursing and other health care services.
Generally, the costs incurred by the home health agency in connection with advisory group services
are includeable in allowable costs and must be apportioned among all the users of the facility in
determining program reimbursement. Payments to physicians for their direct medical services to
individual patients are not allowable home health agency costs. No payment for advisory group
services may be made by an intermediary directly to any physician or other member of the advisory
group.
B. Costs for Services of Professional Personnel.--Where compensation is paid to a member of
the advisory group, including nonemployee professional personnel, the reasonable compensation is
includable in the allowable costs of the home health agency.
However, where a member of the advisory group is also an owner of the agency, any separate
compensation paid for participation in the advisory group meetings should be considered in
evaluating the reasonableness of his total compensation. For a determination to be made on the
reasonableness of the compensation paid to a physician or other professional person, the home health
agency must maintain adequate records. These records must contain the following minimum
information for each meeting of the advisory group: the date of the meeting, the name and
occupation of each participant to whom compensation is paid, the hourly rate or other payment base
for each of these individuals, and the number of hours of services rendered by each participant.
C. Administrative Costs.--The reasonable cost of administrative services incurred in
connection with the activities of the advisory group are also allowable costs. Examples of such
allowable costs are expenses for supportive clerical and other administrative services, and expenses
for purchase of necessary data and statistics on health care facilities and services.
2128. ORIENTATION AND ON-THE-JOB TRAINING
The costs of orientation and on-the-job training are recognized as normal operating costs and are
allowable. Ordinarily, such training would be imparted within the provider setting. If, however, the
training requires outside instructions, costs of such training are allowable.
Rev. 287 21-16.5
2130 COSTS RELATED TO PATIENT CARE 04-83
2130. LIFE INSURANCE PREMIUMS
In general, premiums related to insurance on the lives of owner(s), officer(s), key employee(s) and
provider-based physician(s) where the provider is a direct or indirect beneficiary are not allowable
costs. A provider is a direct beneficiary where, upon the death of the insured individual, the
insurance proceeds are payable directly to the provider. A provider is an indirect beneficiary when
another party receives the proceeds of a policy through an assignment by the provider to the party or
other legal mechanism but the provider benefits from the payment of the proceeds to the third party.
An exception to these requirements is permitted where (1) a provider as a requirement of a lending
institution must purchase insurance on the life of an owner(s), officer(s), key employee(s) or
provider-based physician(s) to guarantee the outstanding loan balance (2) the lending institution must
be designated as the beneficiary of the insurance policy, and (3) upon the death of the insured, the
proceeds will be used to pay off the balance of the loan. The insurance premiums allowable are
limited to premiums equivalent to that of a decreasing term life insurance policy needed to pay off
the outstanding loan balance. In addition, the loan must be related to patient care and meet the
necessary and proper requirements of section 200ff, Interest Expense. Where other than decreasing
term policies are purchased (e.g., whole life, or convertible term), only that portion of the premium
which can be equated to the premium for a similar face amount of a decreasing term life policy may
be included in allowable costs.
The life insurance premiums allowable are reimbursable for cost reporting periods beginning on or
after April 15, 1983.
Premiums related to insurance on the lives of owner(s), key employee(s) and provider-based
physician(s) where the individual relative(s) or his/her estate is the beneficiary are considered to be
compensation to the individual and are allowable costs to the extent such total compensation is
reasonable.
2132. START-UP COSTS
2l32.l General.--In the period of developing a provider's ability to furnish patient care services,
certain costs are incurred. The costs incurred during this time of preparation are referred to as start-
up costs. Since these costs are related to patient care services rendered after the time of preparation,
they must be capitalized as deferred charges and amortized over a number of benefiting periods.
Start-up costs include, for example, administrative and nursing salaries; heat, gas, and electricity;
taxes; insurance; mortgage and other interest; employee training costs; repairs and maintenance;
housekeeping; and any other allowable costs incident to the start-up period. However, any costs that
are properly identifiable as organization costs or capitalizable as construction costs must be
appropriately classified as such and excluded from start-up costs.
21-16.6 Rev. 287
04-83 COSTS RELATED TO PATIENT CARE 2132.2
Amortized start-up costs may be charged only to the "Administrative and General" cost center unless
these costs can be specifically identified with a cost center or component of a provider, in which case
the amortized costs must be directly assigned to the applicable cost center or component.
Unless otherwise specified herein, the provisions of this section are effective for providers after June
30, l976.
2132.2 Applicability--Start-up costs are incurred from the time preparation begins on a newly
constructed or purchased building, wing, floor, unit, or expansion thereof to the time the first patient,
whether Medicare or non-Medicare, is admitted for treatment, or, where the start-up costs apply only
to nonrevenue-producing patient care functions or non-allowable functions, to the time the areas are
used for their intended purposes. If a provider intends to prepare all portions of its entire facility at
the same time, start-up costs for all portions of the facility should be accumulated in a single deferred
charge account and should be amortized when the first patient is admitted for treatment. However, if
a provider intends to prepare portions of its facility on a piecemeal basis (i.e., preparation of a floor
or wing of a provider's facility is delayed), start-up costs should be capitalized and amortized
separately for the portion(s) of the provider's facility prepared during different time periods.
Moreover, if a provider expands its facility by constructing or purchasing additional buildings or
wings, start-up costs should be capitalized and amortized separately for these areas.
Start-up costs that are incurred immediately before a provider enters the program and that are
determined to be immaterial by the intermediary need not be capitalized, but rather, may be charged
to operations in the first cost reporting period. In the case where a provider incurs start-up costs
while in the program and these costs are determined to be immaterial by the intermediary, these costs
need not be capitalized, but may be charged to operations in the periods incurred.
For program reimbursement purposes, costs of the provider's facility and building equipment should
be depreciated over the lives of these assets starting with the month the first patient is admitted for
treatment, subject to the provider's method of determining depreciation in the year of acquisition or
construction (see §118). Where portions of the provider's facility are prepared for patient care
services after the initial start-up period, these asset costs applicable to each portion should be
depreciated over the remaining lives of the applicable assets. If the portion of the facility is a patient
care area, depreciation should start with the month the first patient is admitted for treatment. If the
portion of the facility is a nonrevenue-producing patient care area or nonallowable area, depreciation
should begin when the area is opened for its intended purpose. Costs of major movable equipment,
however, should be depreciated over the useful life of each item starting with the month the item is
placed into operation, subject to §118.
Rev. 287 21-17
2132.3 COSTS RELATED TO PATIENT CARE 04-83
2132.3 Cost Treatment for Medicare Reimbursement.--
A. Operations Begin Upon Entrance into the Program (Providers Entering Program After June
30, 1976).--
1. Where a provider prepares all portions of its facility for patient care services at the
same time and has capitalized start-up costs, the start-up costs must be amortized ratably over a
period of 60 consecutive months beginning with the month in which the first patient is admitted for
treatment.
2. Where a provider prepares portions of its facility for patient care services on a
piecemeal basis, start-up costs must be capitalized and amortized separately for the portions of the
provider's facility that are prepared for patient care services during different periods of time.
EXAMPLE:
Facts: On July 1, 1976, the provider entered the program with a new three-floor facility. The first
two floors of the facility were prepared and available for patient care services at the time the provider
entered the program; however, preparation of the third floor for patient care services was deferred
until July 1, 1977. The first patient was admitted to the first two floors on July 5, 1976, while the
first patient was admitted to the third floor on October 15, 1977. Start-up costs of $60,000 were
capitalized for the first two floors from the time preparation began on these floors for the rendition of
patient care services to July 5, 1976. Start-up costs of $25,000 were also capitalized for the third
floor from July 1, 1977 to October 15, 1977.
With the above facts, the provider would accumulate the start-up costs of $60,000 attributable to the
first two floors separately from the start-up costs of $25,000 attributable to the third floor. The start-
up costs of $60,000 would be amortized at the rate of $1,000 per month beginning in July 1976 and
ending 1981. The start-up costs of $25,000 attributable to the third floor would be amortized at the
rate of $417 per month from October 1977 to September 1982.
B. Operations Begin Prior to Entrance into the Program (Providers Entering Program After
June 30, 1976).--Where a provider enters the program more than 60 months after its first patient is
admitted for treatment, start-up costs unamortized at the time the provider enters the program will
not be allowable. However, where a provider enters the program within 60 months after its first
patient is admitted for treatment and has capitalized start-up costs, the portion of start-up costs
unamortized at the time the provider enters the program may be included in allowable costs using a
60-month amortization period starting with the month the provider admitted its first patient for
treatment. In these situations, if a provider chooses to include amortized start-up costs in its
allowable costs, the costs must be recomputed as follows:
EXAMPLE 1:
Facts: A provider enters the program on July 1, 1976, 30 months after it admitted its first patient;
start-up costs were capitalized in the amount of $30,000; and amortization is based on a 120-month
period.
21-18 Rev. 287
04-83 COSTS RELATED TO PATIENT CARE 2132.3(Cont.)
Per Books Medicare
Original amount of start-up costs to
be amortized $30,000 $30,000
Amount amortized as of July 1, 1976
( 30 x $30,000)
l20 $ 7,500
Unamortized start-up costs as of
July 1, l976 $22,500
Amount which would have been amortized
over 60 months
(30 x 30,000)
60 $15,000
Amount to be amortized under the
program over a 30-month period $15,000
EXAMPLE 2:
Facts: A provider enters the program on July 1, l976, 24 months after it admitted its first patient;
start-up costs were capitalized in the amount of $36,000; and amortization is based on a 36-month
period.
Original amount of start-up costs to
be amortized $36,000 $36,000
Amount amortized as of July 1, 1976
(24 x 36,000)
36 $24,000
Unamortized start-up costs as of
July 1, 1976 $12,000
Amount which would have been
amortized over 60 months
(24 x 36,000)
60 $14,400
Amount to be amortized under the
program over a 36-month period $21,600
Rev. 287 21-19
2132.3(Cont.) COSTS RELATED TO PATIENT CARE 04-83
If a provider enters the program within 60 months after admitting its first patient for treatment, start-
up costs may be capitalized retroactively (reduced for any periods already elapsed from the time the
first patient was admitted for treatment) where the provider did not initially capitalize start-up costs
(or has written off such costs in the period(s) incurred) before entering the program and the provider
can establish these costs to the satisfaction of the intermediary.
C. Providers Entering Program Before July 1, 1976.--Where a provider enters the program
before July l, l976, and capitalizes start-up costs incurred before July 1, l976, the provider may
continue to amortize the start-up costs ratably over a period of up to 60 consecutive months, but not
less than 36 consecutive months, beginning with the month the first patient is admitted for treatment
or, in the case of a nonrevenue-producing patient care area or nonallowable area, beginning with the
month the area is opened for its intended purpose. Where a provider enters the program before July
1, l976, and incurs start-up costs after June 30, l976, start-up costs must be treated in the manner
described in §2132.3A. Start-up costs that are considered to be immaterial by the intermediary may
be included in allowable costs in the cost reporting period(s) incurred.
2132.4 Sale of Institution.--Where a provider institution is sold before the expiration of the
amortization period, the portion of start-up costs amortizable through the month of sale is includable
in allowable costs. If the unamortized balance of start-up costs at the time of sale represents a value
reflected in the selling price to the purchaser and contained in the sales agreement, this value will be
limited to the lesser of the sales price attributed to the start-up costs or the unamortized balance of
start-up costs on the books of the seller. If the purchaser becomes a provider, the unamortized start-
up costs subject to the above limitation (reduced for any period in which the purchaser operates the
facility before becoming a provider, unless this period is represented by a delay in certification
caused by the program) transferred in the sale may be amortized and included in allowable costs over
the remaining portion of the period established for amortization by the seller-provider. If the
unamortized balance of the start-up costs at the time of sale is not identified in the sales price (the
sales agreement does not allocate a portion of the sales price to this unamortized balance), the seller-
provider may include the unamortized costs in its allowable costs for the last cost report submitted to
the program.
2132.5 Withdrawal from Program.--Where a provider withdraws from the program, start-up costs
amortizable through the month of withdrawal are includable in allowable costs. Unamortized start-up
costs adjusted through the month of withdrawal are applicable to services provided after the month
of withdrawal and, therefore, are not includable in allowable costs. However, where the provider
ceases to provide health care services on withdrawal from the program, the unamortized costs at
termination may be included in the provider's allowable costs for the last cost report submitted to the
program.
2132.6 Effect on Equity Capital.--Unamortized start-up costs allowable for program purposes are
includable in the equity capital of a provider.
21-20 Rev. 287
6-76 COSTS RELATED TO PATIENT CARE 2l34.2
2l34. ORGANIZATION AND OTHER CORPORATE COSTS
2l34.l Organization Costs--General.--Organization costs are those costs directly incident to the
creation of a corporation or other form of business. These costs are an intangible asset in that they
represent expenditures for rights and privileges which have a value to the enterprise. The services
inherent in organization costs extend over more than one accounting period and thus affect the cost
of future periods of operation.
A. Allowable Organization Costs.--Allowable organization costs include, but are not limited
to, legal fees incurred in establishing the corporation or other organization (such as drafting the
corporate charter and by-laws, legal agreements, minutes of organizational meeting, terms of original
stock certificates), necessary accounting fees, expenses of temporary directors and organizational
meetings of directors and stockholders, and fees paid to States for incorporation.
B. Unallowable Organization Costs.--The following types of costs are not considered
allowable organization costs: costs relating to the issuance and sale of shares of capital stock or other
securities, such as underwriters' fees and commissions, accountant's or lawyer's fees, cost of
qualifying the issues with the appropriate State or Federal Authorities, stamp taxes, etc.
Unless specified otherwise herein, the provisions of this section are effective for providers after June
30, l976.
2l34.2 Cost Treatment of Organization Costs under Medicare--.
A. Providers Entering Program After June 30, l976.--Allowable organization costs should
generally be capitalized by the organization. However, if in the opinion of the intermediary, these
costs are not material when compared to total allowable costs, they may be included in allowable
costs for the initial cost reporting period. Otherwise, allowable organization costs are amortized
ratably over a period of 60 months starting with the month the first patient is admitted for treatment.
If the provider enters the program after 60 months, starting with the month the first patient is
admitted for treatment, no organization costs are recognized. Organization costs can be capitalized
retroactively (reduced for any periods already elapsed from the time the first patient was admitted for
treatment) where a provider (l) did not initially capitalize organization costs (or has written off such
costs in the period(s) incurred) before entering the program; (2) can establish these costs to the
satisfaction of the intermediary; and (3) enters the program within 60 months after the first patient
was admitted for treatment.
Rev. l58 2l-20.5
2l34.3 COSTS RELATED TO PATIENT CARE 6-76
B. Providers Entering Program Before July l, l976.--Where a provider enters the program
before July l, l976, and capitalizes organization costs, the provider may continue to amortize the
organization costs ratably over a period of 60 consecutive months beginning with the date of
organization. However, if the organization costs were considered to be immaterial by the
intermediary, the costs may be included in the provider's allowable costs in the cost reporting
period(s) incurred.
2l34.3 Amortization Period of 60 Months.--Where a provider is newly organized upon entering
the program and has capitalized organization costs, these costs must be amortized ratably over a 60-
month period starting with the month the first patient is admitted for treatment. Where a provider
admitted its first patient for treatment within a 60-month period prior to entry into the program and
has capitalized organization costs using a 60-month amortization period, no change in the rate of
amortization is permitted. In this instance, the unamortized portion of organization costs is allowable
under the program and is amortized over the remaining part of the 60-month period.
2l34.4 Amortization Period Less Than 60 Months.--Where a provider has entered the program
within 60 months after the first patient is admitted for treatment, has capitalized organization costs,
but has used an amortization period of less than 60 months, an adjustment will be necessary if the
provider chooses to include amortized organization costs in its allowable costs. The unamortized
amount of organization costs must be recomputed using a 60-month period starting with the month
the first patient is admitted for treatment. The recomputed unamortized portion of organization costs
as of the month the provider enters the program is recognized as an asset under the program and may
be amortized over the remaining months of the 60-month period.
EXAMPLE: A provider enters the program 24 months after the first patient is admitted for
treatment; organization costs were capitalized in the amount of $l2,000; amortization is based on a
36-month period.
Per Books Medicare
Organization costs to be amortized
$l2,000 $l2,000
Amount amortized to date
(24 x $l2,000)
36 8,000
Book balance unamortized as of date
of entry into program
4,000
2l-20.6 Rev. l58
6-76 COSTS RELATED TO PATIENT CARE 2l34.5
Per Books Medicare
Amount which would have been
amortized on a 60-month basis
(24 x $l2,000)
60 4,800
Total amount to be amortized under
the program $ 7,200
2l34.5 Amortization Period Greater Than 60 Months.--Where a provider has entered the program
within 60 months after the month the first patient is admitted for treatment, has capitalized
organization costs, but used an amortization period longer than 60 months, an adjustment will be
necessary if the provider chooses to include amortized organization costs in its allowable costs. The
unamortized amount of organization costs must be recomputed as of the date of entry into the
program using a 60-month period starting with the month the first patient was admitted for treatment.
The unamortized amount so computed will be recognized for program purposes and may be
amortized over the remaining part of the 60-month period.
EXAMPLE: A provider enters the program 36 months after the first patient is admitted for
treatment; organization costs were capitalized in the amount of $l0,000; amortization is based on a
l20-month period.
Per Books Medicare
Organization costs to be amortized $l0,000 $l0,000
Amount amortized to date
( 36 x $l0,000)
l20 3,000
Book balance unamortized as of date
of entry into program
$ 7,000
Amount which would have been amortized
on a 60-month basis
(36 x $l0,000)
60 6,000
Total amount to be amortized under
the program $ 4,000
Rev. 158 21-20.7
2l34.6 COSTS RELATED TO PATIENT CARE 6-76
2134.6 Sale of Institution.--Where a provider institution is sold before the expiration of the
amortization period, the portion of organization costs amortizable through the month of sale is
includable in allowable costs. If the unamortized balance of organization costs at the time of sale
represents a value reflected in the selling price to the purchaser and contained in the sales agreement,
this value will be limited to the lesser of the sales price attributed to the organization costs or the
unamortized balance of organization costs on the books of the seller. If the purchaser becomes a
provider, the unamoritzed organization costs subject to the above limitation (reduced for any period
in which the purchaser operates the facility before becoming a provider, unless this period is
represented by a delay in certification caused by the program) transferred in the sale may be
amortized and included in allowable costs over the remaining portion of the 60-month period
established for amortization by the seller-provider. If the unamortized balance of organization costs
at the time of sale is not identified in the sales price (the sales agreement does not allocate a portion
of the sales price to the unamortized balance), the seller-provider may include the unamortized costs
in its allowable costs for the last cost report submitted to the program.
2l34.7 Withdrawal from Program.--Where a provider withdraws from the program, the portion of
organization costs amortizable through the month of withdrawal is includable in allowable costs. The
unamortized balance of organization costs is not allowable under the Medicare program but is
considered applicable to services provided after the month of withdrawal. However, where the
provider ceases to provide health care services on withdrawal from the program, the unamortized
costs at termination may be included in the provider's allowable costs for the last cost report
submitted to the program.
2l34.8 Effect on Equity Capital.--The unamortized portion of organization costs determined to be
allowable for program purposes is includable in the equity capital of the provider. Those
expenditures not considered allowable organization costs as described in §2l34.lB are excluded from
the computation of the return on equity capital.
2l34.9 Stockholder Servicing Costs.--The following types of costs relevant to proprietary and
equity interests of the stockholders, but not related to patient care, are excluded from allowable costs:
costs incurred primarily for the benefit of stockholders or other investors, including, but not limited
to, the costs of stockholders' annual reports and newsletters, annual meetings, mailing of proxies,
stock transfer agent fees, stock exchange registration fees, stockbroker and investment analysis, and
accounting and legal fees for consolidating statements for SEC purposes.
21-20.8 Rev. l58
12-95 COSTS RELATED TO PATIENT CARE 2134.11
2134.10 Reorganization Costs.--Within the scope of this section, reorganization costs are the types
of costs addressed in §2134.1A (impacting on, but not limited to ownership/equity, tax status,
financial structure, debt, assets, or asset valuation) with regard to recreating, reestablishing, or
otherwise rearranging an entity.
Reorganization costs are unallowable because they duplicate an entity's original organization costs.
Therefore, any costs of studies, surveys, etc., associated with or leading to a reorganization are also
unallowable. It is not the intent of the Medicare program to reimburse an entity, i.e., a provider or
provider component, more than once for its organization costs.
Costs not within the scope of this section include:
1. Costs associated with improving the efficiency of an entity by rearranging or reconfiguring
the management hierarchy (sometimes referred to as reengineering), but having no impact on
ownership/equity, tax status, financial structure, debt, assets, or asset valuation. These types of costs
are allowable. (See §§506 and 2102.2.) Therefore, to the extent that the provider can identify costs
of activities aimed at improving and making provider administration and operation more efficient
(see §506), i.e., costs outside the scope of this section, those costs are allowable.
2. Costs related to or associated with the initial organization of an entity, as covered in
§2134.1A.
2134.11 Transfer of Assets to a Corporation.--Costs connected with the transfer of assets to a
corporation must be capitalized as part of the cost of the asset. (See §104.10.) The acquisition of
capital stock of a provider does not constitute a transfer of assets to a corporation and, therefore,
costs associated with such a transaction are not allowable.
Rev. 388 21-21
11-82 COSTS RELATED TO PATIENT CARE 2135.2
2135. PURCHASED MANAGEMENT AND ADMINISTRATIVE SUPPORT SERVICES
2135.1 General.--Providers often purchase from other organizations various services which are
necessary for proper management and administrative operations. These services, depending on the
individual needs of the provider, may be used in lieu of, or support of, in-house staff in performing
their duties. Services may be purchased in a package from a single contractor or separately from
different contractors. One method of purchasing the services is through a full service management
contract in which the management contractor provides a complete package of services, has overall
day-to-day management responsibility for the operation of the provider, and is accountable only to
the governing board (or delegated representative) of the provider. Another method is through a
limited service management or administrative service contract in which a contractor provides certain
specific services to a provider and is responsible for only those specific services.
While these guidelines are primarily directed toward determining the reasonableness of the cost of
full service contracts, they are applicable to any contracted service. Their application must be
tempered by the circumstances and by the type of service purchased. For example, intermediaries
should not expect providers to routinely obtain competitive bids or maintain the level of
documentation contemplated in these instructions for all limited service contracts, particularly those
that are nominal in amount.
These guidelines are not intended to dissuade providers from seeking or utilizing alternatives to in-
house services. Rather, providers should always consider the most appropriate means for obtaining
services needed for the ongoing rendition of patient care. This requires an initial determination of
whether the services the provider needs can be obtained more effectively using in-house staff or
through outside contractors. After evaluating all factors, a provider should choose the most prudent
manner of performing the services. If the determination is made to purchase management and
administrative support services, the following sections provide guidelines for evaluating the
reasonableness of the costs incurred in purchasing these services. Other sections of the manual
provide general and specific guidance in evaluating the reasonableness of the cost of services
performed in-house.
2135.2 Evaluation of the Need for Purchased Management and Administrative Support Services.--
In claiming reimbursement for purchased management and administrative support services, a
provider must demonstrate its operational need and the cost effectiveness of its expenditures vis-a-
vis available alternatives for obtaining the necessary services. Factors to be considered include the
types and ranges of purchased services being offered; the need for improved quality of services; the
qualifications, experience and reputation for efficiency of available contractors; and the cost of
comparable services among contractors. Generally, a provider is prudent to solicit competitive bids.
Therefore, in the absence of competitive bidding which would otherwise be appropriate in the
circumstances, the provider must be able to demonstrate the manner in which it searched the
marketplace for the most appropriate and effective means of obtaining the services. (For general
guidance in evaluating comparable costs generated by in-house operations see §§2102 and 2103 or
the manual section pertaining to the cost in question, e.g., §2144 for fringe benefits or Chapter 9 for
evaluating compensation of owners.)
Rev. 270 21-21.2
2135.3 COSTS RELATED TO PATIENT CARE 11-82
A. Terms of a Contract.--A provider should be careful that it does not enter into a contract
containing any provision(s) which in any way prevents it from fulfilling its ongoing responsibilities
as a prudent buyer. While such provision(s) may have no immediate effect upon the provider's
reimbursement, it may subsequently affect reimbursement; e.g., a contract may have an extremely
punitive termination penalty which would result in nonreimbursable expenses.
The responsibilities and authority delegated to the contractor, and the parameters and limitations to
this authority, should be specified. Where control of the provider's policies and operations is not
retained by the provider, the contractor and provider may be found to be related organizations. (See
Chapter 10.)
The duration of the relationship between provider and contractor should be carefully considered.
Reimbursement is allowable only so long as the services are both necessary and effective for
provider operations. Although the duration of the relationship is determined by the provider based
on its particular needs, a provider should carefully consider the advantage of short term contracts to
allow it opportunity to renegotiate based on its most current requirements. A contract might include
a mutually protective termination clause to permit both provider and supplier to dissolve the
relationship upon specified conditions. However, the provider should bear in mind that if it is found
to be imprudent in continuing to incur a cost for services for which a need no longer exists, neither
the costs for such services nor excessive penalties can be included in allowable costs.
A contract should contain a detailed listing of services to be received and those which are available
on an as-needed or standby basis. The amount of the fee and the base upon which the fee is
computed should be specified and, for the services to be reimbursable, the intermediary must be
satisfied that the computation yields a reasonable fee for the services actually furnished by the
supplier.
B. Operations Under the Contract.--During the operational periods, the provider should
maintain records showing the services actually received and should document the continuing need
and cost effectiveness of the services. This documentation should include the assessment of the
provider's governing body or its delegated representative(s) on an annual or more frequent basis, as
incorporated into the Board minutes or other records.
2135.3 Determination of the Reasonable Cost of Purchased Management and Administrative
Support Services.--Generally, purchased management and administrative support service costs are
reasonable if the costs incurred are comparable with marketplace prices for similar services, or
provide for a total guaranteed cost equal to or less than the provider's current cost for such
department or service.
21-21.3 Rev. 270
09-95 COSTS RELATED TO PATIENT CARE 2135.3 (Cont.)
Factors which will be considered by the intermediary in its evaluation of the reasonable cost of
purchased management and administrative support services include:
A. Whether the contract results from competitive bids that are reasonable within industry norms
for similar services; and
B. Whether the contract is between unrelated parties (chapter 10); and
C. Whether the contract provides for services that are designed to accomplish within a
prescribed time frame clearly stated goals and objectives based on needs identified by the provider
(see §2135.2); and
D. Whether the provider maintains adequate documentation of the services rendered and the
status of the accomplishment of the stated goals and objectives.
Where the supporting evidence does not permit a presumption of reasonableness, the intermediary
will consider any factors, including those discussed below, and request any supporting
documentation (see §2135.5) to the extent it believes necessary to satisfy itself of the reasonableness
of the costs. In its evaluation, the intermediary will consider the circumstances and the needs of the
provider at the time the services were purchased.
1. Evaluation of Services Purchased.--The number and type of services furnished under a
contract will influence the manner in which the services are evaluated. The cost of contracts
providing for a package of services, such as a full service management contract, will be compared if
possible against a comparable package of services, including those which might have submitted
competitive bids. Where that is not feasible, or where the intermediary finds that this unilateral
approach is insufficient to determine whether the costs incurred were, in fact, reasonable, it may be
necessary to divide a package of services into separate components so that they can be evaluated with
comparable services provided in the marketplace.
Alternatively, where a package of services is essentially comparable among contractors bidding to
furnish the services, only those components which vary may need to be individually evaluated. A
unique or highly specialized service which does not lend itself to comparability in the marketplace
may be evaluated based on whether the service is at least as cost effective as could be furnished by
the provider in-house. The intermediary may, for example, encounter situations in which all bids
actually made seem to be very costly, given the nature of the actual services rendered. The objective
of evaluating individual components of a package is to provide the same assurance as can be
provided in other situations by a comparison of services in the aggregate, that the total cost of the
necessary services is not substantially out of line with services which can be purchased elsewhere.
Therefore, if certain individual components are more expensive than could be purchased elsewhere,
the unreasonable cost of these components will not be disallowed if the cost of the aggregate services
is not substantially out of line with a comparable package of services available in the marketplace.
Rev. 385 21-21.4
2135.3 (Cont.) COSTS RELATED TO PATIENT CARE 09-95
2. Standby Services.--A contract fee may provide for the availability of services on an as
needed or standby basis (e.g., access to national purchasing programs) which may or may not be
utilized. Ordinarily, costs for standby services will be recognized if reasonable in amount and related
to patient care.
3. Computation of Fee.--A supplier's fee may be computed in a number of ways, e.g., a
fixed periodic payment for a group of specific services or a separate fee for each service rendered, or
some other basis. Regardless of the computation method, the fees should be evaluated in relation to
the services furnished.
4. Evaluation of Fees Over More Than One Cost Reporting Period.--Reasonableness of
fees may in some cases be evaluated over more than one cost reporting period. For example, where a
provider is receiving purchased management and administrative support services under a contract
covering more than one cost reporting period, the provider's incurred costs based on the contractor's
fees during one period may be less than the value of the services actually received during the same
period. In this situation, where the provider can demonstrate that the costs incurred and the services
received are reasonable in total, the reasonable costs for such services can be recognized in a
subsequent cost-reporting period(s).
2135.4 Factors To Be Considered in Determining Reasonable Cost of Purchased Management and
Administrative Support Services.--Whether or not the presumption of reasonableness can be made,
intermediaries will consider the following factors in their reasonable cost determinations.
A. Preopening Services.--When a provider has purchased startup or preopening services such
as those related to establishing a provider and its facilities, the cost associated with these services
will be reviewed and treated separately from the cost associated with services for ongoing operations.
The reasonable cost is determined through comparison with marketplace prices for similar services
and will be capitalized and amortized in accordance with the Medicare principles of reimbursement.
B. Unallowable Costs.--Rights to a logo, noncompetition clauses or exclusive franchise rights
to a particular territory, promotion or sale of a franchise, etc., are not related to a provider's patient
care activities and, therefore, are not allowable. Non-covered Medicare services furnished under a
contract represent an unallowable cost to a provider. The cost of purchased management and
administrative support services which constitute duplication of services also furnished in-house is
not allowable. (This does not refer to situations where the purchased services augment, rather than
duplicate, the provider's activity.)
C. Costs of Terminating a Contract.--Where a contract is terminated prematurely, the provider
would normally incur expenses which are not directly related to the services or supplies received
under the contract. These costs generally include penalties, interest or lump sum payments to the
contractor. If the termination is disputed, the provider could also incur legal fees,
21-21.5 Rev. 385
09-95 COSTS RELATED TO PATIENT CARE 2135.5
accounting fees, court costs, and out-of-court settlement costs related to the arbitration of the dispute
between the provider and contractor. Those costs incurred to terminate a contract would be included
in allowable costs where they are reasonable in amount and incurred in an attempt to comply with the
prudent buyer guidelines. In assessing the reasonableness of the costs allowed, the intermediary will
consider the extent that the termination costs could have been avoided if the provider had been more
prudent in entering into the contract.
D. Recognition of the Fee as a Liability.--After a determination is made as to the
reasonableness of the fee for these services, Medicare's share of the fee is reimbursable, provided it
has been paid or, if an accrued liability, can reasonably be expected to be paid. Where a provider has
contested its liability and the intermediary therefore cannot be assured that accrued fees will actually
be paid, no amount can be included in the cost report for that cost reporting period. If only part of
the liability is contested, the uncontested amount may be included in the cost report. When the fee is
actually paid or the liability is no longer contested, the amount will be recognized as allowable. This
amount will be included in the appropriate cost centers of the current period cost report.
2135.5 Documentation to Support Purchased Management and Administrative Support Services.--
Records must be available which will support the cost of purchased management and administrative
support services. Such support could include some or all of the following, depending upon the scope
and type of contract:
A. A copy of the contract(s) and any amendments;
B. Periodic progress reports submitted by the management organization;
C. An analysis showing the efforts of the provider to comply with the prudent buyer principle
guidelines in assessing its needs, establishing the goals to be attained, evaluation of the available
alternatives, and choosing the terms of the contract (see §2135.2);
D. Board minutes or other documentation to show continued reassessment of the effectiveness
of the services (see §2135.2);
E. Detailed identification of the services actually received during the period (see §2135.2);
and
F. Any other documentation available such as visit or contact reports, minutes of committee
meetings, evaluations, cost/benefit analyses, etc., which would support the receipt of services and
substantiate the attainment of the goals and objectives which are desired and the reasonableness of
the fees paid.
Rev. 385 21-21.6
09-82 COSTS RELATED TO PATIENT CARE 2136.1
2136. ADVERTISING COSTS--GENERAL
The allowability of advertising costs depends on whether they are appropriate and helpful in
developing, maintaining, and furnishing covered services to Medicare beneficiaries by providers of
services. In determining the allowability of these costs, the intermediary should consider the facts
and circumstances of each provider situation as well as the amounts which would ordinarily be paid
for comparable services by comparable institutions. To be allowable, such costs must be common
and accepted occurrences in the field of the provider's activity.
2l36.l Allowable Advertising Costs.--Advertising costs incurred in connection with the provider's
public relations activities are allowable if the advertising is primarily concerned with the presentation
of a good public image and directly or indirectly related to patient care. Examples are: visiting hours
information, conduct of management-employee relations, etc. Costs connected with fund-raising are
not included in this category (see § 2l36.2).
Costs of advertising for the purpose of recruiting medical, paramedical, administrative and clerical
personnel are allowable if the personnel would be involved in patient care activities or in the
development and maintenance of the facility.
Costs of advertising for procurement of items or services related to patient care, and for sale or
disposition of surplus or scrap material are treated as adjustments of the purchase or selling price.
Costs of advertising incurred in connection with obtaining bids for construction or renovation of the
provider's facilities should be included in the capitalized cost of the asset (see Chapter I, §l04.l0).
Costs of advertising incurred in connection with bond issues for which the proceeds are designated
for purposes related to patient care, i.e., construction of new facilities or improvements to existing
facilities, should be included in "bond expenses" and prorated over the life of the bonds.
Costs of activities involving professional contacts with physicians, hospitals, public health agencies,
nurses' associations, State and county medical societies, and similar groups and institutions, to
apprise them of the availability of the provider's covered services are allowable. Such contacts make
known what facilities are available to persons who require such information in providing for patient
care, and serve other purposes related to patient care, e.g., exchange of medical information on
patients in the provider's facility, administrative and medical policy, utilization review, etc.
Similarly, reasonable production and distribution costs of informational materials to professional
groups and associations, such as those listed above, are allowable if the materials primarily refer to
the provider's operations or contain data on the number and types of patients served. Such materials
should contribute to an understanding of the role and function of the facility as a provider of covered
health care in the community.
Rev. 267 21-23
2136.1 (CONT) COSTS RELATED TO PATIENT CARE 09-82
Costs of informational listings of providers in a telephone directory, including the "yellow pages," or
in a directory of similar facilities in a given area are allowable if the listings are consistent with
practices that are common and accepted in the industry.
Costs of advertising for any purpose not specified above or not excluded below may be allowable if
they are related to patient care and are reasonable.
2l36.2 Unallowable Advertising Costs.--
Costs of fund-raising, including advertising, promotional, or publicity costs incurred for such a
purpose, are not allowable.
Costs of advertising of a general nature designed to invite physicians to utilize a provider's facilities
in their capacity as independent practitioners are not allowable. See section 2136.1 for allowability
of professional contact costs and costs of advertising for the purpose of recruiting physicians as
members of the provider's salaried staff.
Costs of advertising incurred in connection with the issuance of a provider's own stock, or the sale of
stock held by the provider in another corporation, are considered as reductions in the proceeds from
the sale and, therefore, are not allowable.
Costs of advertising to the general public which seeks to increase patient utilization of the provider's
facilities are not allowable. Situations may occur where advertising which appears to be in the nature
of the provider's public relations activity is, in fact, an effort to attract more patients. An analysis by
the intermediary of the advertising copy and its distribution may then be necessary to determine the
specific objective. While it is the policy of the Health Care Financing Administration and other
Federal agencies to promote the growth and expansion of needed provider facilities, general
advertising to promote an increase in the patient utilization of services is not properly related to the
care of patients.
2l38. MEMBERSHIP COSTS--GENERAL
Providers customarily maintain memberships in a variety of organizations and consider the costs
incurred as a result of these memberships to be ordinary provider operating costs.
2l-24 Rev. 267
12-95 COSTS RELATED TO PATIENT CARE 2138.4
Some of those organizations promote objectives in the provider's field of health care activities.
Others have purposes or functions which bear little or no relationship to this activity. In order to
determine for Medicare purposes the allowability of costs incurred as a result of membership in
various organizations, memberships have been categorized into three basic groups: (1) professional,
technical or business related; (2) civic; and (3) social, fraternal, and other.
2138.1 Professional, Technical, or Business Related Organizations.--The Medicare program
classifies organizations in this category if their functions and purposes can be reasonably related to
the development and operation of patient care facilities and programs, or the rendering of patient care
services. Memberships in these organizations, while not restricted to providers, are generally
comprised of provider, provider personnel, or others who are involved or interested in patient care
activities.
Costs of memberships in such organizations are allowable for purposes of program reimbursement.
These costs include initiation fees, dues, special assessments, and subscriptions to professional,
technical or business related periodicals. (See §2139.3 regarding lobbying activities.) Also included
are costs related to meetings and conferences, such as meals, transportation, registration fees and
other costs incidental to those functions, when the primary purpose of such meetings and conferences
is the dissemination of information for the advancement of patient care or efficient operation of the
facility.
2138.2 Civic Organizations.--These organizations function for the purpose of implementing civic
objectives. Reasonable costs of initiation fees, dues, special assessments, and subscriptions to
periodicals of civic organizations are allowable. (See §2139.3 regarding lobbying activities.) Also
allowable are those reasonable costs related to meetings and conferences, such as meals,
transportation, registration fees, and other costs incidental to these functions when the primary
purpose of such meetings and conferences is the promotion of civic objectives.
2138.3 Social, Fraternal, and Other Organizations.--Generally, these organizations concern
themselves with activities unrelated to their members' professional or business activities. Their
objectives and functions cannot be considered reasonably related to the care of beneficiaries.
Consequently, provider costs incurred in connection with memberships in social, fraternal, and other
organizations are not allowable.
2138.4 Reasonableness of Provider's Participation in Approved Membership Activities.--The
program looks to comparable providers, as well as to the justification by the individual provider, in
determining the reasonableness of the number of organizations in which the provider maintains
memberships and the claimed costs of such memberships.
Rev. 387 21-24.1
2139 COSTS RELATED TO PATIENT CARE 12-95
2139. POLITICAL AND LOBBYING ACTIVITIES
Provider political and lobbying activities are not related to the care of patients. Therefore, costs
incurred for such activities are unallowable.
2139.1 Provider Political Activities.--Costs of political activities are unallowable. These activities
include, but are not limited to, provider involvement with political parties, candidates/incumbents of
political parties, and political action committees or similar committees or associations. Likewise,
contributions made directly to political parties or candidates or contributions made indirectly, e.g.,
through other individuals, committees, or associations, are unallowable. (See §2139.3 regarding
dues to trade or other organizations related to such organizations' lobbying or political activities.)
2139.2 Provider Lobbying Activities.--
A. Lobbying Activities.--Lobbying is any activity whereby a directed effort is made to
influence legislation. Costs of lobbying activities are unallowable. The policy applies whether the
lobbying involves Medicare activities or activities unrelated to Medicare and whether the provider
lobbies with its own employees or engages others, directly or indirectly, to lobby on its behalf.
Government agencies other than HCFA have developed specific policies regarding lobbying. While
other agencies may apply their policies and procedures differently or use different nomenclature than
HCFA, e.g., in the case of the Internal Revenue Service (IRS), by means of nondeductible business
expenses rather than unallowable costs, the general intent behind policies of those agencies and of
HCFA is the same. Costs of lobbying are costs in which the government does not participate.
HCFA does not intend providers to be subject to varying rules on lobbying costs among government
agencies, resulting in nonuniform treatment of the costs and additional provider recordkeeping.
Therefore, if a non-HCFA agency, e.g., the IRS, has developed policies and procedures defining
lobbying activities and addressing the costs, HCFA does not expect providers to follow different
rules in determining Medicare payment. Rather, providers subject to rules of non-HCFA agencies on
lobbying can follow those rules in determining payment under Medicare to the extent such rules are
in accordance with Medicare policy which disallows any costs of lobbying activities.
B. Activities Which Are Not Lobbying.--Contacts by a provider with HCFA or other
government agencies with which it has business dealings is not lobbying unless the contacts are
determined to be directed toward influencing legislation. For example, if a provider, group of
providers, or provider trade organization comments on a HCFA proposal, that activity is not
lobbying. Or, if a provider disputes a point of Medicare policy or its application or has a suggestion
regarding policy, contact with HCFA or an intermediary by the provider or an organization to discuss
such issues is not lobbying.
2139.3 Organization Dues Related to Lobbying and Political Activities.--Trade or other
organizations and associations often engage in lobbying and political activities as part of their
activities. Therefore, in accordance with the policy in §§2139.1 and 2139.2, the portion of an
organization's dues or other payments related to these activities, including special assessments, is an
unallowable cost.
21-24.2 Rev. 387
03-08 COSTS RELATED TO PATIENT CARE 2140.2
For cost reporting periods beginning on or after January 1, 1996, this policy requires identification
and disallowance of the portion of dues related to lobbying and political activities. For prior periods,
the policy does not require identification but requires disallowance of any identified portion.
The policy in §2139.2 permitting providers to follow the rules of other government agencies on
lobbying activities in determining unallowable lobbying costs under Medicare applies also to dues.
In particular, for Federal income tax purposes, §13222 of the Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act of
1993 generally requires tax-exempt organizations to report to their members the nondeductible
portion of dues related to an organization's lobbying and political activities. The reporting required
under that provision satisfies Medicare's requirement for identification of the portion of an
organization's dues related to lobbying and political activities. If an organization is not required to
report to its members for tax purposes, for Medicare purposes, the portion of dues for lobbying and
political activities remains unallowable as if the organization were required to report. In such cases,
a provider will need to request the information from the organization in order to report for Medicare
purposes only the portion not related to lobbying and political activities.
In light of policy by CMS and other agencies requiring identification of the lobbying and political
activities portion of an organization's dues, CMS believes it unlikely a provider will be unable to, or
choose not to, identify such portion. However, if a portion is not identified for Medicare payment
purposes and the intermediary is aware of the organization's ongoing lobbying or political activities,
all costs associated with the provider's dues to the organization are unallowable unless the provider
can document the unallowable portion for lobbying and political activities.
This policy is not limited to dues incurred by a provider on its own behalf. It applies also to dues a
provider pays, as a business or fringe benefit expense, on behalf of its employees and officers in
professional, trade, or other organizations to which they belong, e.g., associations of nurses,
therapists, administrators, or accountants. Only the portion of the dues not related to lobbying or
political activities of the organizations is an allowable cost.
2140. DEFERRED COMPENSATION
2140.1 Definition.--Deferred compensation is remuneration currently earned by an employee but
which is not received until a subsequent period, usually after retirement. Accordingly, a deferred
compensation plan defers the receipt of income beyond the year in which it is earned. The type of
deferred compensation plan considered herein is not considered a qualified plan under Internal
Revenue Service requirements. (See subchapter D, Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, and
regulations thereunder.) Qualified deferred compensation plans that meet the definition of a defined
benefit pension plan are treated under §2142ff. Qualified deferred compensation plans that meet the
definition of a qualified defined contribution deferred compensation plan are treated under §2141ff.
2140.2 Foreword.--Provider contributions for the benefit of employees under a deferred
compensation plan are reimbursable when, and to the extent that, such costs are actually incurred by
the provider. Such costs are found to have been incurred only if the requirements of §2140ff. are
met. The requirements of this section are applicable not only to provider costs but also to direct
patient care services furnished by hospital-based physicians who receive their remuneration from the
hospital. (See §2140.5.) As a condition for provider reimbursement, deferred compensation plans
must be funded. Provider payments
Rev. 436 21-25
2140.3 COSTS RELATED TO PATIENT CARE 03-08
under unfunded deferred compensation plans are considered an allowable cost only when actually
paid to the participating employees, or their beneficiaries, and only to the extent considered
reasonable. Also, only where deferred compensation is funded is the deferred portion of the hospital-
based physician's total compensation included in determining a Part B reasonable charge for the
physician's services to patients.
2140.3 Formal Plan.--In order to establish a formal deferred compensation plan, the provider is
required to adequately communicate the proposed plan to all eligible employees, enabling them to
make an informed decision on whether to participate in the plan. A formal plan is one that is
provided for in a written agreement executed between the provider and the participating employees.
It is a permanent plan which:
o Prescribes the method for calculating all contributions to the fund established under the
plan;
o Is funded in accordance with the provisions of §2140.3B;
o Provides for the protection of the plan's assets;
o Designates the requirements for vested benefits;
o Provides the basis for the computation of the amount of benefits to be paid; and
o Is expected to continue despite normal fluctuations in the provider's economic experience.
A. Contributions.--Contributions to the plan may be made by the provider only, or by the
provider and the employee. The provider's contribution is established by the terms of the deferred
compensation agreement and made for the sole benefit of participating employees. An employee's
contribution is generally a voluntary contribution to the fund established under the plan in addition to
the provider's required contribution. For example, an employee may agree to a division of his
$15,000 salary so that $12,000 is received as immediate remuneration, $1,000 is designated as a
voluntary employee contribution, and the provider also contributes $2,000 to the deferred
compensation plan on behalf of the employee. Of course, the employee's total compensation
($15,000 in the example) must be reasonable in relation to the services rendered by the employee to
be allowable. Also, contributions by a provider to a deferred compensation plan on behalf of an
employee-owner of a provider are considered to be a part of the owner's compensation and are
subject to the test of reasonableness. (See §902.3.)
B. Funding of Deferred Compensation Plans.--
1. Provider Reimbursement for Deferred Compensation Plans.--A funded plan is one in which
contributions are systematically made as a specific provision of the plan to a funding agency for the
purpose of meeting retirement benefits. For Medicare purposes, a funding agency is a trustee, an
insurance company, or a custodial bank account which provides for the accumulation of assets to be
used for the payment of benefits under the deferred compensation plan. Accordingly, both provider
and employee contributions to the deferred compensation plan must be used either to purchase an
insured plan with a commercial insurance company, to establish a custodial bank account, or to
establish a trust fund administered by a trustee. Past service costs are allowed in accordance with the
provisions of §2142.5.
21-25.1 Rev. 436
07-96 COSTS RELATED TO PATIENT CARE 2140.3 (Cont.)
Regardless of the funding mechanism utilized, all provider and employee contributions to the fund
established under the deferred compensation plan and income therefrom must be used for the sole
benefit of the participating employees.
a. Commercial Insurance as a Funding Mechanism.--A provider's cost for a funded deferred
compensation plan is recognized when there is an actual expenditure of funds by the provider to a
commercial insurance company for the sole benefit of the participating employees. (See §2140.4.)
There are various types of insurance policies which are recognized as a funding medium for deferred
compensation plans. However, the purchase of an ordinary life insurance contract is not a deferral of
compensation and will not be recognized as a funding mechanism. Ordinary life insurance contracts
include whole life, straight life, and other permanent life insurance policies that provide life
insurance protection for the life of an employee and some accumulation of cash value in return for
regular premium payments. Nor will such a contract be recognized even though it is convertible at
the normal retirement date specified in the policy to an annuity payable over the remaining life of the
employee, because this arrangement is essentially a variation of life insurance rather than deferred
compensation.
(1) Retirement Annuity Contract.--A retirement annuity contract (which insurance
companies have given various names) is recognized as a funding medium for deferred compensation
plans. A retirement annuity contract generally provides for an accumulation of premiums and
interest less expenses to a predetermined date, usually the annuitant's retirement age. The amount
accumulated is used to purchase a contract in which annuity payments are made to the retired
employee or his survivor.
(2) Retirement Income Policy.--A retirement income policy (which insurance companies
have also given various names) is recognized as a funding medium for deferred compensation plans.
A retirement income policy usually combines the features of ordinary life and endowment policies.
Upon reaching a stipulated age (usually retirement age), the insured receives a pension for a period
of years consisting of periodic payments varying in amount dependent upon the principal sum of
insurance. This contract provides, as a secondary feature, a designated amount of insurance
protection during the lifetime of the insured.
(3) Deferred Group Annuity Contract.--A deferred group annuity contract is also
recognized as a funding medium for deferred compensation plans. Under this plan, a paid-up unit of
annual income at normal retirement age is purchased for each employee at the end of each year of
employment. The unit purchased is expressed as a percentage of the earnings of the employee in that
year. For example, an employee who has worked 30 years for a provider under a 1 1/2 percent
benefit plan receives an annual pension at retirement of 45 percent (i.e., 30 times 1 1/2 percent) of
his/her average annual salary.
b. Trust Fund as a Funding Mechanism.--When a provider establishes a trust fund for a
deferred compensation plan, the trustee(s) are appointed by the executive board or a committee of the
provider to protect the fund's assets and its distribution to the beneficiaries under the plan. The
trustee may be either a member of the provider's organization or a third party trustee.
c. Custodial Bank Account as a Funding Mechanism.--Generally, a custodial bank account
results from an administrative and custodial arrangement between a provider and a bank under which
the provider transfers deferred compensation amounts to the bank. As custodian of the deferred
compensation funds, the bank is responsible for the safekeeping of the funds. A custodial
Rev. 395 21-25.2
2140.3 (Cont.) COSTS RELATED TO PATIENT CARE 07-96
bank account may be an acceptable funding mechanism for deferred compensation plans provided
that: (1) all assets in the custodial account, including any annuity, endowment, and other insurance
policies, are registered and held in the name of the custodian until distributed to the participants
pursuant to the terms of the deferred compensation agreements, and (2) the terms of the custodial
contract specify that no part of the funds in the custodial account may be used for or diverted to
purposes other than for the exclusive benefit of the participating employees or their beneficiaries as
required by the deferred compensation agreement.
d. Trustee and Custodial Fees.--Reasonable trustee or custodial fees paid by the provider are
allowed as an administrative cost. However, the cost of such fees is not allowed to the provider
when the deferred compensation plan provides that they are paid out of the corpus or earnings of the
fund.
C. Plan's Assets.--
1. Transactions.--All transactions involving the deferred compensation fund must be
made under conditions comparable to arm's length transactions. The provider cannot transfer, either
by sale or exchange, its securities and other property to the deferred compensation fund at more than
adequate consideration. Likewise, a deferred compensation fund cannot sell its assets either to a
provider or a third party at less than adequate consideration. All assets accumulated by the plan must
be distributed exclusively to the participating employees or their beneficiaries.
2. Earnings.--The plan must specify that the interest, capital gains and losses, and
dividends earned from the investment of the fund's assets will be added to or deducted, as applicable,
from the corpus of the deferred compensation fund. Actuarial gains and losses, which are
adjustments need to reflect actual experience and to revise at intervals the actuarial assumptions to be
used in the future, should be utilized in a rational and consistent manner to adjust a provider's cost
for a deferred compensation plan.
3. Loans Made from the Deferred Compensation Fund.--The deferred compensation
fund may make a loan out of either corpus or income to a provider on the conditions that the fund
receive adequate security and a reasonable rate of interest on the loan. Adequate security means
something of value in addition to, and supporting, a promise to pay, which is so pledged to the
deferred compensation fund that it may be sold, subject to foreclosure, or otherwise disposed of in
default of repayment of the loan. It also requires that the asset pledged as security for the loan must
not be subject to prior and/or superior liens of other creditors in an amount which would negate the
value and liquidity of such security for the loan from the fund. Therefore a provider's evidence of
indebtedness, regardless of what the document is called, is, by itself, not security for a loan. Interest
paid by the provider on loan from the deferred compensation fund would be an allowable cost if the
necessary and proper requisites were met. (See §§202.2 and 202.3.) Whether a rate of interest is
reasonable would be determined by comparing it with the rates that would be charged by a bank or
other lending institution in the same community on a similar loan. To be similar, the loans should be
alike with respect to such factors as amount, duration, and security.
Since income earned on loans to the general fund of the deferred compensation fund is not income to
the provider, it will not be offset against a provider's allowable interest expense. (See §224.2.)
However, before such loans are made, the reasons for such loans should be carefully reviewed to
assure that the
21-25.3 Rev. 395
07-96 COSTS RELATED TO PATIENT CARE 2140.3 (Cont.)
deferred compensation plan is not serving any purpose other than that for which it was intended; i.e.,
for the exclusive benefit of participating employees. In addition, a loan from the deferred
compensation fund to a provider to meet a funding requirement (deferred compensation, pension, or
depreciation) would not be deemed proper under this section.
D. Vested Benefits.--The deferred compensation plan must specify the time and the manner in
which the benefits are to become vested; e.g., after a predetermined number of years of employment,
or after a specific age is attained, or some combination of the two. The schedule of benefits which
accrue to an employee or his survivors upon the employee's retirement, termination of services
because of disability, death, or other reasons, must be incorporated into the plan.
The immediate vesting of benefits is not required. However, the deferred compensation plan must
provide that vesting of provider contributions occur on or before the normal retirement age
established by the provider and defined in the plan.
The unconditional vesting of benefits will not be required. Unconditional vesting of benefits means
that once a participant's benefits are vested in accordance with the normal vesting schedule, there are
no conditions incorporated in the plan which would deprive the participant of such benefits.
Accordingly, the forfeiture of an employee's benefits for cause (as defined in the deferred
compensation plan) will be recognized provided that such forfeited amounts are used to reduce the
provider's subsequent contributions to the deferred compensation plan. However, employee
contributions to the deferred compensation fund are always nonforfeitable. If no subsequent
provider contribution are to be made to the plan, then other provider costs must be offset to the
extent of such forfeitures.
Employee benefits must become fully vested upon any of these occurrences: (a) the normal
retirement age established by the provider, (b) termination of the deferred compensation plan, (c)
complete discontinuance of contributions under the deferred compensation plan, (d) the termination
of the provider's participation in the Medicare program, or (e) change of ownership of the provider
where the successor provider is unwilling or unable to continue the deferred compensation plan or
alters the existing plan in any way. Should the provider decline to vest the provider contributions
upon the occurrence of any of these events, then the funds must be used to reduce the provider's
allowable costs.
Excess funds arising from the termination of a deferred compensation plan are to be recouped in the
year of the plan termination (or the year in which the actuarial surplus is determined, if later) only
against the cost center(s) in which the provider reported its deferred compensation plan
contributions, usually administrative and general (A&G). The recoupment of the excess funds is
treated on the cost report in the same manner for both cost reimbursed providers and prospective
payment providers, although the payment impact upon prospective payment providers is limited to
cost reimbursed activities. Excess funds exceeding the amount in the A&G (or other) cost center are
not further offset in the current or subsequent years. The date of the official notice to the provider
that the terminated plan has generated an actuarial surplus, e.g., notice by the Pension Benefit
Guaranty Corporation (PBGC), or similar entity, of the surplus amount, represents the year in which
the actuarial surplus is determined. The Medicare share of the reversion is based on the Medicare
utilization rate in the year the reversion occurs (or the year the actuarial surplus is determined), and
not Medicare's utilization in the years the
Rev. 395 21-25.4
2140.4 COSTS RELATED TO PATIENT CARE 07-96
contributions to the plan were made. Investment income earned on a fund after its termination but
prior to liquidation of the fund's assets and distribution to the provider is offset against the provider's
allowable interest expense, as provided in §202.2.
E. Benefits to be Paid.--If an employee terminates his participation in the deferred
compensation plan before his rights are vested, the applicable nonvested funds cannot be applied to
increase the benefits of the surviving participants, but must be applied to reduce the provider's
subsequent contributions to the plan. If subsequent provider contributions to the plan are not made,
then provider costs will be reduced to the extent of such nonvested funds. The plan may provide that
a refund of a terminated employee's contributions include interest. If an employee terminates his
participation after his rights are vested, then the final payment to the employee will be made
according to the terms of the plan.
2140.4 Requirements to Fund Plan.--A provider must make payment of its liability to the fund
established for the deferred compensation plan in accordance with the provisions covering
liquidation of liabilities established in §2305. This section requires full liquidation of the liability
within 1 year after the end of the cost reporting period in which the liability is incurred. An
extension, not to exceed 3 years beyond the end of the cost reporting period in which the liability was
incurred, may be granted by the intermediary for good cause if the provider, within the 1-year time
limit, furnishes to the intermediary sufficient written justification (based upon documented evidence)
for non-payment of the liability.
Payment to the deferred compensation fund in excess of the provider's incurred liability is not
includable in allowable costs, but may be carried forward and considered as payment against the
liability of a future period.
Payment must be made by check or other negotiable instrument, cash, or legal transfer of assets such
as stocks, bonds, real property, etc. Where payment is made by check or other negotiable instrument,
these forms of payment must be redeemed through an actual transfer of the provider's assets within
the time limit specified in this section. The valuation of stocks, bonds, real property, etc., transferred
to the deferred compensation fund would be determined as of the date of transfer by the provider.
2140.5 Reimbursement of Hospital-Based Physician Patient Care Services.--Contracts or
agreements between hospital-based physicians and hospitals involve a variety of arrangements under
which the physician is compensated by the hospital for the full range of his services within the
institution. The allocation of the hospital-based physician's compensation (including any portion
subject to deferment) between services benefiting the institution and direct patient care is subject to
the review and approval of the hospital's intermediary and the Part B carrier. (See §§2108.2C and
2108.2D.) Medicare will not, however, accept an allocation which attributes the physician's deferred
compensation entirely to one type of service and his current compensation to the other. The amount
deferred must be allocated in the same ratio that physician's total compensation is allocated between
the two types of service.
Where the arrangement between the physician and provider results in the provider reimbursing the
physician from its own funds, then a deferred compensation arrangement can occur which will be
recognized by Medicare. Recognition will require that all the provisions of §2140ff be met.
21-26 Rev. 395
03-08 COSTS RELATED TO PATIENT CARE 2140.6
Recognition of a deferred compensation arrangement does not mean that a provider will incur a cost,
which is allowable. For example, payments to a fund for a physician's direct patient care services are
not an allowable provider cost. However, where the arrangement is recognized by the program, and
the physician's compensation is determined to be reasonable in terms of the prudent buyer principles,
then deferred compensation can be included in the physician's total compensation in determining his
reasonable charge. However, if the deferred compensation is not recognized because it fails to meet
all provisions of §2140ff, e.g., it is not funded, then deferred compensation cannot be included in the
physician's compensation in determining his reasonable charge.
The Medicare program will not recognize an arrangement between the physician and the provider in
which the physician is reimbursed from patient charges, but the provider does the billing, as a
deferred compensation arrangement. For example, where the employment relationship between the
provider and the provider-based physician is such that the provider is merely acting as the billing
agent for the physician whose remuneration is derived from billing for his patient care services, the
Medicare program will not recognize a deferred compensation plan for such remuneration. In order
to be recognized as a deferred compensation plan, the compensation costs must be initially borne by
the provider, i.e., the funds must not be dependent upon patient billings. As an example, if the
hospital has agreed to pay a physician $30,000 for his services in the emergency room, the program
would recognize a deferred compensation plan which defers a portion of the $30,000. The difference
in recognition is that in the first example, the hospital is merely the conduit for a physician's billings
for patient care; whereas, in the second example, the hospital has to pay the physician $30,000
regardless of the number of patients he treats.
In all matters affecting provider-based physician reimbursement, close coordination between the
provider, the intermediary and the Part B carrier is necessary. The intermediary is responsible for
insuring that the provider complies with the overall requirements of this section and for providing the
carrier with data needed in determining reasonable charges.
2140.6 Guarantee Arrangements for Physician Emergency Room Services.--A provider may
agree to guarantee a physician a specified amount of compensation for rendering emergency room
services. Under the guarantee, the provider makes up any difference between the amount guaranteed
and the total amount of physician's charges to all patients for services actually rendered. (See
§2109.) Only the amount the provider pays to satisfy the guarantee is recognized as a provider cost.
Deferred compensation arrangements which are included in such guarantee arrangements are
recognized by Medicare when (1) the terms of both the guarantee arrangements and the deferred
compensation plan establish the amounts to be included at the beginning of the provider's accounting
period, (2) the amount of deferred compensation is included in the guaranteed amount, and (3) the
provider contributes to the fund established under the deferred compensation plan from its own
funds.
The amount of deferred compensation, which the program recognizes, however, is limited to the
amount by which the guarantee, including deferred compensation, exceeds the total billed by the
provider to all patients for the physician's patient care services. The amount recognized may not
exceed the amount of deferred compensation specified in the agreement. When the physician's
charges to all patients equal or exceed the amount guaranteed by the provider, the
Rev. 436 21-27
2141 COSTS RELATED TO PATIENT CARE 03-08
program does not recognize a deferred compensation payment because the funds are not provider
generated. (It is the physician's charges to all patients, not the collections, which measure the
guarantee.)
The following example illustrates how the amount of deferred compensation the program recognizes
under guarantee arrangements can be determined in the three situations presented.
Provider A has an arrangement with Dr. X guaranteeing him/her $25,000 per year for emergency
room patient care services. Under a deferred compensation agreement, up to $5,000 of the amount
paid to meet the guarantee is considered deferred compensation.
Situation A Situation B Situation C
Guaranteed Amount $25,000 $25,000 $25,000
Total Services Billed (by
physician or by provider) $20,000 $23,000 $30,000
Amount Recognized by Program
as Deferred Compensation $ 5,000 $ 2,000 ---
If the guarantee arrangements require the physician to render administrative services which are
recognized as provider costs under Medicare, then the deferred compensation must be apportioned
between Part A and Part B in the proportion that each bears to the total guarantee.
2141. DEFINED CONTRIBUTION DEFERRED COMPENSATION PLANS
2141.1 Definition.--Defined contribution deferred compensation plans include profit sharing,
stock bonus, and other such defined contribution deferred compensation plans that meet Internal
Revenue Service (IRS) or Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA) requirements as
qualified plans and have been so approved by the IRS. The plans provide for an individual account
for each participant and for benefits based solely upon the amount contributed to the participant's
account and any income, expenses, gains and losses, and any forfeitures of accounts of other
participants which may be allocated to the participant's account. These deferred compensation plans,
as well as the non-qualified deferred compensation plans described in §§2140ff, provide for the
deferral of remuneration currently earned by an employee until a subsequent period (usually after
retirement).
2141.2 Foreword.--Provider contributions for the benefit of employees under a defined
contribution deferred compensation plan are allowable when, and to the extent that, such costs are
actually incurred by the provider. Such costs may be found to have been incurred only if the
requirements of this section are met.
2141.3 Formal Plan.--In order to establish a formal deferred compensation plan, the provider is
required to adequately communicate the proposed plan to all eligible employees, enabling them to
make an informed decision on whether to participate in the plan. No provision of the plan may
discriminate in favor of certain employees, e.g., employees who are stockholders, supervisors, or
highly paid personnel. A formal plan is one that is maintained by the provider and is provided for in
a written agreement executed between the provider and the participating employees. It is a
permanent plan which:
21-27.1 Rev. 436
01-14 COSTS RELATED TO PATIENT CARE 2141.3
o Prescribes the method for calculating all contributions to the fund established under the plan;
o Is funded in accordance with the provisions of §2140.3B;
o Provides for the protection of the plan's assets;
o Designates the requirements for vested benefits;
o Provides the methods and procedures for payment to the employee of the amount in the
employee's account; and
o Is expected to continue despite normal fluctuations in the provider's economic experience.
A. Contributions.--The provisions of §2140.3A must be met.
B. Funding of Deferred Compensation Plans.--The provisions of §2140.3B must be met.
C. Plan's Assets.--
1. Transactions.--The provisions of §2140.3.C.1 must be met.
2. Individual Participant's Account.--The plan must provide for an individual account for
each participant and for benefits based solely upon the amount contributed to the participant's
account. This includes any income, expenses, gains and losses, and any forfeitures of accounts of
other participants which may be allocated to each participant's account.
3. Loans Made From Deferred Compensation Fund.--The provisions of §2140.3.C.3
must be met.
D. Vested Benefits.--The deferred compensation plan must specify the time and the manner in
which the benefits are to become vested, e.g., after a predetermined number of years of employment,
after a specific age is attained, or some combination of the two. The benefits that accrue to an
employee upon retirement, termination of services due to disability, or other reasons (or that accrue
to the employee's survivor in case of death) must be incorporated into the plan.
The immediate vesting of benefits is not required. However, the deferred compensation plan must
provide that vesting of provider contributions occurs on or before the normal retirement age
established by the provider and as defined in the plan.
The unconditional vesting of benefits is not required. Unconditional vesting of benefits means that
once a participant's benefits are vested in accordance with the normal vesting schedule, there are no
conditions incorporated in the plan which deprives the participant of such benefits.
Employee benefits must become fully vested upon any of these occurrences:
o The normal retirement age established by the provider;
o Termination of the deferred compensation plan;
Rev. 461 21-27.2
2141.4 COSTS RELATED TO PATIENT CARE 01-14
o Complete discontinuance of contributions under the deferred compensation plan;
o Termination of the provider's participation in the Medicare program; or
o Change of ownership of the provider when the successor provider is unwilling or unable to
continue the deferred compensation plan or alters the existing plan in any way.
Excess funds arising from the termination of a deferred compensation plan are subject to the
provisions of §2140.3.D.
2141.4 Requirements to Fund Plan.--The provisions of §2140.4 must be met.
2141.5 Reimbursement of Hospital-Based Physician Patient Care Services.-- Contracts or
agreements between hospital-based physicians and hospitals involve a variety of arrangements under
which the physician is compensated by the hospital for the full range of services within the
institution. The allocation of the hospital-based physician's compensation (including any portion
subject to deferment) between services benefiting the institution and direct patient care is subject to
the review and approval of the hospital's intermediary. Medicare does not accept an allocation,
which attributes the physician's deferred compensation entirely to one type of service and the current
compensation to the other. The amount deferred must be allocated in the same ratio that physician's
total compensation is allocated between the two types of service.
Arrangements between the physician and the provider in which the physician is compensated solely
from patient charges, although the provider, serving merely as a billing agent, does the billing,
cannot include a deferred compensation arrangement, which will be recognized by the program. In
order to be recognized as a deferred compensation plan, the compensation costs must be initially
borne by the provider.
2141.6 Guarantee Arrangements for Physician Emergency Room Services.--The provisions of
§2140.6 must be met.
2141.7 Effective Date.--The provisions of this section are effective for defined contribution
deferred compensation plans established in cost reporting periods beginning on or after March 1,
1976.
2142. DEFINED BENEFIT PENSION PLANS
2142.1 Definition.--A defined benefit pension plan is a type of deferred compensation plan, which
is established and maintained by the employer primarily to provide definitely determinable benefits
to its employees usually over a period of years, or for life, after retirement. Pension plan benefits are
generally measured by, and based on, such factors as age of employees, years of service, and
compensation received by the employees. This section applies only to defined benefit pension plans
which are qualified pension plans under Section 401 (a) of the Internal Revenue Code. A qualified
pension plan is for the exclusive benefit of employees or their beneficiaries and qualifies for special
tax benefits, such as tax deferral for employer contributions. Defined benefit pension plans which
are not qualified plans are treated as deferred compensation plans under §2140.
21-28 Rev. 461
01-14 COSTS RELATED TO PATIENT CARE 2142.5
2142.2 Removed and Reserved - Section content deleted and the section number is reserved for
future use.
2142.3 Removed and Reserved - Section content deleted and the section number is reserved for
future use.
2142.4 Removed and Reserved - Section content deleted and the section number is reserved for
future use.
2142.5 Pension Costs.—
A. Current Period Pension Cost.--The current period pension cost is the sum of the provider
contribution payments made to a defined benefit pension plan during the current cost reporting
period in accordance with §2142.6(A) plus any carry forward contributions determined in
accordance with §2142.5(E), such total for the current year may not exceed the pension cost
limitation described in §2142.5(B).
B. Pension Cost Limitation.--Except as provided in §2142.5(D), the current period pension cost
may not exceed 150% of the provider’s average contribution payments made to the plan during the
three (3) consecutive cost reporting periods out of the last five (5) consecutive cost reporting
periods (ending with the current reporting period) which produce the highest average.
(1) For purposes of determining the pension cost limitation, provider contribution payments
for each applicable cost reporting period shall be determined on a cash basis in accordance with
§2142.6(A), without regard to any pension cost limitation determined under §2142.5(B) for the
period during which the contributions were made, and excluding any contributions deposited in a
prior period and treated as carry forward contributions under §2142.5(E).
(2) The averaging period used to determine the pension cost limitation shall be determined
without regard to a provider’s period of participation in the Medicare program. Periods which are
not Medicare cost reporting periods (e.g. periods prior to the hospital’s participation in the
Medicare program) shall be defined as consecutive twelve month periods ending immediately prior
to the provider’s initial Medicare cost reporting period.
(3) The averaging period used to determine the pension cost limitation shall exclude all periods
ending prior to the initial effective date of the pension plan (or a predecessor pension plan in the
case of a merger as explained in 2142.5(C)).
C. Multiple Pension Plans and Successor Plans.--In general, the current period pension cost
and pension cost limitation shall be computed and applied separately for each defined benefit
pension plan offered by a provider. In the case of a plan merger, the contribution payments made by
a provider to a predecessor pension plan and reflected in the assets subsequently transferred to a
successor plan shall be treated as contribution payments made to the successor plan.
D. Request for Adjustment to Pension Cost Limitation.--A provider may request an adjustment
to the pension cost limitation otherwise determined under section §2142.5(B) for the current period
by submitting documentation, prior to the filing deadline for its current period cost report, to show
that all or a portion of the contributions in excess of the pension cost limitation are reasonable and
necessary to satisfy a current period’s actuarially determined pension liability. Examples of
situations when an adjustment to the pension cost limitation may be justified would include, but are
not limited to, excess contributions required by law or to avoid benefit restrictions under ERISA.
Requests for a limitation adjustment and any documentation should be sent to [email protected]
with a copy to the Medicare contractor. The CMS central office will approve or disapprove these
requests.
Rev. 461 21-29
2142.5 COSTS RELATED TO PATIENT CARE 01-14
(1) For purposes of determining the pension cost limitation, provider contribution payments for
each applicable cost reporting period shall be determined on a cash basis in accordance with
§2142.6(A), without regard to any pension cost limitation determined under §2142.5(B) for the
period during which the contributions were made, and excluding any contributions deposited in a
prior period and treated as carry forward contributions under §2142.5(E).
(2) The averaging period used to determine the pension cost limitation shall be determined
without regard to a provider’s period of participation in the Medicare program. Periods which are
not Medicare cost reporting periods (e.g. periods prior to the hospital’s participation in the
Medicare program) shall be defined as consecutive twelve month periods ending immediately prior
to the provider’s initial Medicare cost reporting period.
(3) The averaging period used to determine the pension cost limitation shall exclude all periods
ending prior to the initial effective date of the pension plan (or a predecessor pension plan in the
case of a merger as explained in 2142.5(C)).
C. Multiple Pension Plans and Successor Plans.--In general, the current period pension cost
and pension cost limitation shall be computed and applied separately for each defined benefit
pension plan offered by a provider. In the case of a plan merger, the contribution payments made by
a provider to a predecessor pension plan and reflected in the assets subsequently transferred to a
successor plan shall be treated as contribution payments made to the successor plan.
D. Request for Adjustment to Pension Cost Limitation.--A provider may request an adjustment
to the pension cost limitation otherwise determined under section §2142.5(B) for the current period
by submitting documentation, prior to the filing deadline for its current period cost report, to show
that all or a portion of the contributions in excess of the pension cost limitation are reasonable and
necessary to satisfy a current period’s actuarially determined pension liability. Examples of
situations when an adjustment to the pension cost limitation may be justified would include, but are
not limited to, excess contributions required by law or to avoid benefit restrictions under ERISA.
Requests for a limitation adjustment and any documentation should be sent to [email protected]
with a copy to the Medicare contractor. The CMS central office will approve or disapprove these
requests.
E. Carry Forward Contributions.--Carry forward contributions represent contributions made
in a prior cost reporting period which were not allowable pension costs in any prior cost reporting
period. Carry forward contributions may be included as a current period pension cost in
accordance §2142.5(A).
F. Data Required.--The provider must have available data to show the amount(s) and date(s)
of contribution payments made to a defined benefit pension plan during the current reporting period
and any applicable prior periods. If the pension costs included in the cost report for a period differ
from the pension contribution payments made during the reporting period (i.e. as a result of carry
forward contributions), the provider must also have data available to track and reconcile the
difference.
21-29.1 Rev. 461
01-14 COSTS RELATED TO PATIENT CARE 2142.5
Inserted blank page
Rev. 461 21-29.2
2142.6 COSTS RELATED TO PATIENT CARE 01-14
2142.6 Allowability of Payments.--
A. Payment Requirements.--Provider contribution payments made to a defined benefit
pension plan are allowable only to the extent that costs are actually incurred by the provider. Such
costs are found to have been incurred only if paid directly to participants or beneficiaries under the
terms of the plan or paid to a pension fund which meets the applicable tax qualification
requirements under Section 401(a) of the Internal Revenue Code.
Provider payments to a pension plan for a cost reporting period shall be measured on a
cash-basis without regard to §2305. Payment must be made by check or other negotiable
instrument, cash, or legal transfer of assets such as stocks, bonds, real property, etc. A contribution
payment shall be deemed to occur on the date it is credited to the fund established for the pension
plan, or for provider payments made directly to a plan participant or beneficiary, on the date the
provider’s account is debited.
B. Reasonable Compensation.--The payments made by the provider together with all
other compensation paid to the employee must be reasonable in amount.
2142.7 Removed and Reserved - Section content deleted and the section number is reserved for
future use.
21-30 Rev. 461
12-93 COSTS RELATED TO PATIENT CARE 2144.4
2144. FRINGE BENEFITS
2144.1 Definition.--Fringe benefits are amounts paid to, or on behalf of, an employee, in addition
to direct salary or wages, and from which the employee, his/her dependent (as defined by IRS), or
his/her beneficiary derives a personal benefit before or after the employee's retirement or death. In
order to be allowable, such amounts must be properly classified on the Medicare cost report, i.e.,
included in the costs of the cost center(s) in which the employee renders services to which the fringe
benefit relates and, when applicable, have been reported to IRS for tax purposes. Where claimed
items are in dispute, the provisions of §115 of the Provider Reimbursement Manual, Part II, apply.
2144.2 Purpose.--Fringe benefits inure primarily to the benefit of the employee. However, there
may also be some intrinsic benefit to the provider, such as increasing employee work efficiency and
productivity, reducing personnel turnover, or increasing employee morale. It is necessary to
recognize all costs which are properly classified as fringe benefits since the designation of a
particular cost as a fringe benefit could affect the computation of items such as the value of services
of nonpaid workers. However, see §2102.3 for items not related to patient care (specifically,
alcoholic beverages furnished as a fringe benefit).
2144.3 Requirements for Recognition of Fringe Benefits.--The costs of fringe benefits must be
reasonable, as defined in §2102.1, and related to patient care, as defined in §2102.2.
2144.4 Fringe Benefits Includable as Provider's Cost.--Following are examples of fringe benefits:
o Provider contributions to certain deferred compensation plans (see §2140ff);
o Provider contributions to certain pension plans (see §2142ff);
o Paid vacation (see §2146), paid holidays, sick leave (see §2144.8), all-inclusive paid days
off (see §2144.9), voting leave, court or jury duty leave, all of which generally are included in
employee earnings;
o Provider-paid educational courses benefiting the employee's interest;
o Provider's unrecovered cost of meals (see §2145) and room and board furnished employees
for the employees' convenience;
o Provider's unrecovered cost of medical services rendered to employees (see §332.1); and
o Cost of health and life insurance premiums paid or incurred by the provider if the benefits
of the policy inure to the employee or his/her beneficiary.
Rev. 375 21-31
2144.5 COSTS RELATED TO PATIENT CARE 12-93
2144.5 Fringe Benefits Includable in Determining Provider-Based Physician's Compensation.--
Fringe benefits for the personal benefit of the provider-based physician are includable as part of
his/her total compensation. (See §2108.2.D.1.)
2144.6 Specific Costs Not Classified as Fringe Benefits.--Fringe benefits do not include items
furnished to the employee for the convenience of the provider. These include items which advance
only the provider's interest, which may include the provider's cost of meals, payment of room and
board, perquisites (uniforms and laundry), operating day care centers for the children of employees,
and provider-paid educational courses. Although these costs are not classified as fringe benefits,
they may be included in a provider's allowable cost to the extent they are reasonable in amount as
defined in §2102.1 and related to patient care as defined in §2102.2.
2144.7 Accounting for Fringe Benefits.--Some providers' accounting systems are not designed to
currently accumulate on a departmentalized or cost center basis the various employee fringe benefits
incurred by the provider. Such providers may accumulate fringe benefits for all employees in one
account during the cost reporting period, usually the administrative and general account. If a
provider does not charge the cost of fringe benefits directly to the department or cost center where
the employee is assigned, then the cost reimbursement forms, which are used to determine Medicare
reimbursement, provide the mechanism for the allocation of fringe benefits to the appropriate cost
centers.
2144.8 Sick Leave.--
A. Reasonable Costs.--The reasonable cost of sick leave taken (or payment in lieu of sick
leave taken) by an employee of a provider is recognized as a fringe benefit and includable in
allowable cost in the cost reporting period when paid. If the sick leave is vested and funded,
contributions to the fund are allowed under the applicable provisions of §2140ff (deferred
compensation). However, where the provider's sick pay plan grants employees the right to demand
cash payment for unused sick leave at the end of each year, the pertinent accruals are includable in
allowable costs, without funding, in the cost reporting period when earned.
B. Conversion From Cash Method to Accrual Method for Sick Pay.--
1. General.--When a provider changes its sick pay cost accounting from a cash method
to an accrual method, the adjustments determined to be necessary solely because of such change
must be taken into account in order to prevent costs from being duplicated or omitted in computing
allowable costs for the cost reporting period in which the change is effected.
Allowable costs in the year of conversion include the accruable amount of costs for all sick pay
earned and not paid as of the end of the year of conversion (either funded
21-31.1 Rev. 375
01-83 COSTS RELATED TO PATIENT CARE 2144.8(Cont.)
under the applicable provisions of §2140ff, or not funded when employee has the right to demand
cash for unused sick leave at the end of the year), plus sick pay costs paid in the year of conversion
that were earned in both the year of conversion and in prior periods under Medicare. The accrual
must be based on the sick pay policy as established by the provider.
As part of the conversion, an adjustment will be made to Medicare reimbursable costs in the year of
conversion by subtracting the product of the amount of sick pay costs included in allowable costs in
the first year the provider entered the Medicare program that applied to prior periods and the
Medicare utilization in the year the provider entered the Medicare program.
2. Example.--A cash basis calendar year provider entered the Medicare program on
January 1, 1982, and files its first cost report for the period ended December 31, 1982. The provider
adopted the accrual method of accounting in accordance with regulations section 405.453(e), except
for sick pay benefits. However, in July and August 1982, the provider paid sick pay benefits in the
amount of $50,000 that were earned and properly accruable in prior periods. The provider included
this amount in allowable costs for the year ended December 31, 1982. Allowable costs were not
adjusted to exclude this amount, and the provider continued to include sick pay in allowable costs
when paid.
As of the end of 1983, the provider accrued sick pay costs in the amount of $100,000. The provider
also paid sick pay costs in the amount of $75,000 during 1983 that were earned in 1983 and in prior
periods under Medicare.
a. Accruable amount as of December 31, 1983, and
amounts paid in 1983 that were earned in both 1983
and in prior periods under Medicare $175,000
b. Amount paid or funded in 1982 that applied to
prior periods ($50,000 x 25% - percentage of
Medicare reimbursement to total allowable costs
for the period ended 12/31/82) $12,500
3. Notes to Example.--Item a. represents an element of allowable costs subject to
apportionment to Medicare in the year of conversion. Item b. represents an adjustment to Medicare
reimbursement in the year of conversion and, therefore, should be separated between Part A and Part
B costs and "included" (below the line on the settlement pages of the cost forms) with other
Medicare reimbursement determined through apportionment. The proportions of reimbursable
provider Part A costs and reimbursable provider Part B costs to the sum of both in the first year the
provider entered the Medicare program must be used as the basis to allocate between Part A and Part
B, with Part B reimbursed at 80 percent. This may be accomplished in the following manner:
Rev. 277 21-31.2
2144.8(Cont.) COSTS RELATED TO PATIENT CARE 01-83
Part A = Gross* Reimbursable Provider
Part A Costs X Sick Pay Cost
Gross Reimbursable Provider Adjustment
Costs (Part A and Part B)
Part B = Gross* Reimbursable Provider
Part B Costs X Sick Pay Cost X 80%
Gross Reimbursable Provider Adjustment
Costs (Part A and Part B)
* "Gross" refers to reimbursable costs before inclusion of deductible and coinsurance.
2144.9 All-Inclusive Paid Days Off (P.D.O.).--
A. Definition.--A formal plan under which all employees earn accrued vested leave -or
payment in lieu of leave taken - for an unallocated combination of occasions such as illness, medical
appointments, holidays, vacations, family bereavement, and taking care of a sick child, based on
actual hours worked. (Note: An approved P.D.O. replaces a provider's other vacation and sick pay
plans.)
B. Reimbursement.--The reasonable cost of P.D.O. is recognized as a fringe benefit and
included in allowable costs. The provisions contained in §2146.2ff relative to vacation costs are
incorporated by reference herein and adapted to all-inclusive paid days off by substitution of
"P.D.O." each place the term "vacation" appears.
2145. Cost of Meals for Provider Personnel.--Any reasonable unrecovered cost of a provider's
personnel meals is allowable when deemed a fringe benefit (see §2144.4E) related to patient care.
Also, any reasonable unrecovered cost of a provider's personnel meals when deemed solely for the
provider's benefit and related to patient care is allowable under the principle in §2102.2. An example
of the latter is the cost of meals served to selected personnel who must remain on call to provide
patient care on the provider's premises during mealtime and the cost of the meals is not deemed a
fringe benefit.
Where a provider maintains multiple food services, e.g., a coffee shop or restaurant, in addition to a
food service facility for provider personnel, and the additional food services are determined to be
unnecessary for such personnel, the applicable unrecovered cost is unallowable. Some conditions
under which the additional food services may be determined as necessary are the following:
1. The provider personnel food service facility (e.g., personnel cafeteria) has the
capacity for serving all provider personnel meals;
2. It would be economically feasible to extend the hours of the personnel food service
facility to serve meals to provider personnel on another work shift;
21-32 Rev. 277
01-83 COSTS RELATED TO PATIENT CARE 2146.2
3. The type of food services offered in the additional facility could be offered in the
provider's personnel food service facility.
On the other hand, where additional food service facilities are determined to be necessary to provide
personnel meals, the reasonable unrecovered cost of these meals is allowable when deemed to be a
fringe benefit or deemed to be for the provider's benefit, as explained above.
2146. VACATION COSTS
2146.1 Definition.--A vacation benefit is a right granted by an employer to an employee (a) to be
absent from his job for a stipulated period of time without loss of pay, or (b) to be paid an additional
salary in lieu of taking the vacation. (See §2144.9 for all-inclusive paid-days-off plans.)
2146.2 Reimbursement for Costs of Vacation.--Vacation costs must meet all of the following
conditions to be included in allowable costs:
A. These costs must be included in the cost reporting period in which they are earned by the
employee and must be computed from actual payroll records as related to each employee.
B. Where the provider's vacation policy is consistent among all employees, the vacation
must be taken - or, if the employee elects to be paid in lieu of taking a vacation, the payment must be
made - within the period consistent with the vacation policy established by the provider. Where the
policy is not consistent among all employees, the vacation must be taken - or payment in lieu of
vacation must be made - within 2 years after the close of the cost reporting period in which the
vacation is accrued.
If payment is not made within the required period of time or in those instances where the vacation
benefits accrued and included in allowable costs are forfeited by the employee for cause, the current
year cost report must be adjusted. However, the intermediary may require the provider to file an
amended cost report if necessary under our policy for amended cost reports. The time limitation in
this section for payment as part of owners' compensation made for either vacation taken or for
amounts in lieu of vacation taken supersedes the time limitation for payment specified in §906.4,
Unpaid Compensation, of Chapter 9, Compensation of Owners.
C. Amounts allowed for vacation benefits must be reasonable in themselves and, together
with other compensation, result in reasonable compensation for services rendered.
Employer payroll taxes applicable to vacation, such as F.I.C.A., must not be accrued in the period
when the vacation costs are accrued, but treated as a cost in the period when the vacation costs are
paid.
Rev. 277 21-32.1
2146.3 COSTS RELATED TO PATIENT CARE 01-83
2146.3 Exception to the Requirement to Account for Vacation Costs on the Accrual Method.--
Where a provider has been accounting for vacation costs on a cash basis and the intermediary
determines that using such a method for vacation costs will yield results reasonably equivalent to the
accrual method, a cash basis for vacation costs is allowed.
2146.4 Conversion from Cash Method to Accrual Method for Vacation.--
A. General.--When a provider changes its vacation cost accounting from a cash method to an
accrual method, the adjustments determined to be necessary solely because of such change must be
taken into account in order to prevent costs from being duplicated or omitted in computing allowable
costs for the cost reporting period in which the change is effected.
Allowable costs in the year of conversion will include the accruable amount of vacation costs for all
vacation earned and not paid as of the end of the year of conversion plus vacation costs paid in the
year of conversion that were earned in both the year of conversion and in prior periods under
Medicare. The accrual must be based on the vacation policy as established by the provider. No
accrual will be allowed where an employee forfeited a vacation under the provider's vacation policy
and for which the provider did not incur a liability. Moreover, in any event, the vacation accrual in
the year of conversion must be limited to those vacations consistent with §2146.2B above.
As part of the conversion, an adjustment will be made to Medicare reimbursable costs in the year of
conversion by subtracting the product of the amount of vacation costs included in allowable costs in
the first year the provider entered the Medicare program that applied to prior periods and the
Medicare utilization in the year the provider entered the Medicare program.
B. Example.--A cash basis calendar year provider entered the Medicare program on January
1, 1967, and filed its first cost report for the period ended December 31, 1967. The provider adopted
the accrual method of accounting in accordance with Regulations section 405.453(e) except for
vacation benefits. However, in July and August 1967, the provider paid vacation benefits in the
amount of $50,000 that were earned and properly accruable in prior periods. The provider included
this amount in allowable costs for the year ended December 31, 1967. Allowable costs were not
adjusted to exclude this amount, and the provider continued to include vacations in allowable costs
when paid.
As of the end of 1970, the provider accrues vacation costs in the amount of $100,000. The provider
also paid vacation costs in the amount of $75,000 during 1970 that were earned in 1970 and in prior
periods under Medicare.
1. Accruable amount as of December 31, 1970, and
amounts paid in 1970 that were earned in both
1970 and in prior periods under Medicare $175,000
21-32.2 Rev. 277
2-76 COSTS RELATED TO PATIENT CARE 2l46.4(Cont.)
2. Amount paid in l967 that applied to prior periods ($50,000 x 25% - percentage
of Medicare reimbursement to total allowable costs for the period ended l2/3l/67) $l2,500
C. Notes to Examples.--Item l represents an element of allowable costs subject to
apportionment to Medicare in the year of conversion.
Item 2 represents an adjustment to Medicare reimbursement in the year of conversion and, therefore,
should be separated between Part A and Part B costs and included (below the line on the settlement
pages of the cost forms) with other Medicare reimbursement determined through apportionment.
The proportions of reimbursable provider Part A costs and reimbursable provider Part B costs to the
sum of both in the first year the provider entered the Medicare program must be used as the basis to
allocate between Part A and Part B, with Part B reimbursed at 80 percent. This may be
accomplished in the following manner:
Part A = Gross* Reimbursable Provider
Part A Costs x Vacation Cost
Gross Reimbursable Provider Adjustment
Costs (Part A and Part B)
Part B = Gross* Reimbursable Provider
Part B Costs x Vacation Cost x 80%
Gross Reimbursable Provider Adjustment
Costs (Part A and Part B)
*"Gross" refers to reimbursable costs before exclusion of deductible and coinsurance.
Rev. l42 2l-32.3
8-79 COSTS RELATED TO PATIENT CARE 2l47
2l47. BILINGUAL SERVICES
The costs incurred for bilingual services are allowable provider costs to the extent that the costs are
reasonable both as to amount and in relationship to the extent of need for the services. They include,
but are not limited to, the costs of translators for communication between the provider and patients,
printed provider informational material distributed to patients, and special personnel recruitment
efforts designed to recruit bilingual employees. For purposes of Medicare reimbursement, the term
bilingual includes the ability to communicate with the deaf through sign language. Providers are
encouraged to make bilingual services available to patients wherever the services are necessary to
adequately serve a multilingual patient population.
Rev. 226 2l-32.4A
11-83 COSTS RELATED TO PATIENT CARE 2l48.2
2l48. REIMBURSEMENT FOR PHYSICIANS' SERVICES RENDERED IN A TEACHING
HOSPITAL BY PHYSICIANS ON THE HOSPITAL STAFF AND REIMBURSEMENT
FOR SERVICES RENDERED IN A TEACHING HOSPITAL BY THE FACULTY OF A
MEDICAL SCHOOL OR ORGANIZATION RELATED THERETO--GENERAL
Where the hospital exercises the election provided for in §2l48.5, direct medical and surgical
services, including supervision of interns and residents in the care of individual patients, rendered to
Medicare patients in a teaching hospital by physicians on the hospital staff will be reimbursed as a
provider service on a reasonable cost basis; and reasonable costs of direct medical and surgical
services, including supervision of interns and residents in the care of individual patients, rendered to
Medicare patients in a teaching hospital by physicians on the faculty of a medical school or
organization related thereto may be reimbursed to the hospital by the program. These services are
covered under Part A of the program when rendered to inpatients (unless Part A coverage has
expired or is not available; in such case the inpatient could be covered under Part B of the program)
and are covered under Part B of the program when rendered to outpatients.
Reasonable costs incurred by a medical school or organization related thereto in rendering other than
direct medical and surgical services to Medicare patients in the hospital may be reimbursed to the
hospital by the program . Reimbursement could also be made to a fund (see §2420) for physicians'
volunteer direct medical and surgical services, including supervision of interns and residents in the
care of individual patients, rendered on a regularly scheduled basis in a teaching hospital.
2l48.l Reasonable Cost of Direct Medical And Surgical Services Rendered by Physicians on the
Hospital Staff in the Care of Individual Patients (Including Supervision of Interns and Residents
Rendering Such Services).--Reasonable costs incurred by a teaching hospital in compensating
physicians for direct medical and surgical services to patients, including supervision of interns and
residents in the care of individual patients, are reimbursable by the program to the hospital. Such
costs are not subject to cost finding as described in Chapter 23. Rather, these costs are separately
accumulated and apportioned in accordance with the Aggregate Per Diem Method of apportionment.
(See §22l8.) For purposes of this section, reasonable costs are defined as the direct salary paid to
such physicians plus applicable fringe benefits. Other allowable costs incurred by the provider
related to the services described in this section are reimbursable subject to the requirements
pertaining to all other provider services, including cost finding.
2l48.2 Reasonable Costs Incurred by a Teaching Hospital for the Services Rendered by a Medical
School or Related Organization in the Hospital.--
A. Direct Medical and Surgical Services (Including Supervision of Interns and Residents in
the Care of Individual Patients).--Reasonable costs incurred by a teaching hospital for direct medical
and surgical services rendered by a medical school (or an organization related to the medical school)
in the hospital are reimbursable to the hospital by the program, provided that such costs would
be reimbursable if incurred
Rev. 303 21-32.5
2l48.2 (Cont.) COSTS RELATED TO PATIENT CARE 11-83
directly by the hospital rather than under such arrangement. In situations where the medical school
(or organization related to the medical school) and the hospital are related by common ownership or
control in accordance with Chapter l0, the costs of such services are allowable costs to the hospital
under the provisions of that chapter and the reimbursable costs to the hospital are determined under
the provisions of this section in the same manner as the costs incurred for physicians on the hospital
staff and without regard to payments made to the medical school by the hospital. For purposes of the
preceding sentence, the allowable costs to the medical school or organization related thereto is
defined as the physicians' direct salaries, applicable fringe benefits, employer's portion of FICA
taxes, Federal and State unemployment taxes, and workmen's compensation. Such costs are subject
to substantiation by the hospital with appropriate documentation showing that these costs are related
to the rendition of patient care services in the hospital.
The Medicare program will recognize additional costs only if necessary and directly related to the
rendition of the services; however, in the following situations, any costs incurred by the medical
school that would represent duplications of costs incurred by the hospital, would not be recognized
by the program, i.e., where: (l) the hospital maintains a medical library; (2) the hospital has its own
administrative structure; and (3) the hospital maintains physician office space and clerical support.
Such costs are also subject to substantiation by the hospital and/or medical school or organization
related thereto. The costs of the physicians' direct salaries plus applicable fringe benefits are not
subject to cost finding as required by Chapter 23. Rather, these costs are separately accumulated and
apportioned in accordance with the Aggregate Per Diem Method as described in §2218. Allowable
costs other than direct salaries and applicable fringe benefits are subject to the cost finding and
apportionment methods required for all provider services (excluding physicians' direct medical and
surgical services rendered to patients).
Where the medical school and the hospital are not related organizations, (see Chapter l0), and the
hospital makes payment to the medical school for the costs of direct medical and surgical services
rendered to all patients in the hospital by the medical school or organization related thereto,
reimbursement will be made by the health insurance program to the hospital for the reasonable costs
incurred by the hospital for its payments to the medical school for services to Medicare patients.
Costs incurred under such an arrangement must be allocated to the full range of services provided to
the hospital by physicians of the medical school on the same basis as provided for under §2l48.4 and
costs of physicians' direct salaries plus applicable fringe benefits so allocated to direct medical and
surgical services to hospital patients must be apportioned to Medicare patients in accordance with
§2204. Allowable costs other than direct salaries and applicable fringe benefits are subject to the
cost finding and apportionment methods required for all provider services.
21-32.6 Rev. 303
11-83 COSTS RELATED TO PATIENT CARE 2l48.2 (Cont.)
Where the medical school and the hospital are not related organizations (see Chapter l0) and the
hospital makes payment to the medical school for the costs of direct medical and surgical services
rendered only to Medicare patients, the allowable costs to the medical school may not exceed l05
percent of the sum of physicians' direct salaries, applicable fringe benefits, employer's portion of
FICA taxes, Federal and State unemployment taxes, and workmen's compensation paid by the
medical school or organization related thereto. Such allowable medical school costs must be
allocated to the full range of services rendered by the physicians of the medical school or
organization related thereto as provided in §2l48.4 and all the costs defined in this paragraph so
allocated to direct medical and surgical services to hospital patients must be apportioned to program
beneficiaries as provided in §2204. Such costs are reimbursable only where (l) there is a written
agreement between the hospital and the medical school or organization related thereto specifying the
types and extent of services to be furnished by the medical school and specifying that the hospital
must pay the medical school at least an amount equal to the reasonable costs (as defined in this
paragraph) of providing such services to Medicare patients, (2) such costs are paid to the medical
school by the hospital no later than the date on which the cost report covering the period in which the
services were rendered is due, and (3) payment for such services furnished under such arrangement
would be made by the program to the hospital had such services been furnished directly by the
hospital.
B. Reasonable Costs of Other Than Direct Medical and Surgical Services.-Reasonable costs
incurred by a medical school (or organization related thereto) in rendering other than direct medical
and surgical services in the hospital will be reimbursed by the program to the hospital in the same
manner as in paragraph A above except that where the medical school (or organization related
thereto) incurs costs for these services rendered to both Medicare and non-Medicare patients, these
costs are subject to the cost finding and apportionment methods for all provider services (excepting
physicians' direct medical and surgical services rendered to patients). Where the medical school (or
organization related thereto) incurs costs for these services rendered only to Medicare patients, then
the costs are not subject to cost finding and must not be included in the hospital's total allowable
costs. Nevertheless, Medicare's portion must be determined on the basis of the Medicare ratio(s)
used in the apportionment of all other provider costs (excepting physician's direct medical and
surgical services rendered to patients) applied to the allowable costs incurred by the medical school
(or organization related thereto) for the services rendered to all patients in the hospital. An example
of these services is supervisory laboratory services rendered by a member of the medical school
faculty.
Rev. 303 21-32.7
2l48.3 COSTS RELATED TO PATIENT CARE 11-83
2l48.3 "Salary Equivalent" Payments for Direct Medical and Surgical Services in the Care of
Individual Patients (Including Supervision of Interns and Residents Rendering Such Care) by
Physicians on the Voluntary Staff of the Hospital (or Medical School or Organization Related
Thereto).--Payments will be made to a fund for direct medical and surgical services rendered on a
regularly scheduled basis to Medicare patients by physicians on the unpaid voluntary medical staff of
the hospital (or medical school or organization related thereto under arrangement with the hospital)
provided that the conditions outlined in §2420 are met. Such payments represent compensation for
contributed medical staff time which, if not contributed, would have to be obtained through
employed staff on a reimbursable basis. Payments for volunteer services are determined by applying
to the regularly scheduled contributed time an hourly rate not to exceed the equivalent of the average
direct salary (exclusive of fringe benefits) paid to all full-time salaried physicians (other than interns
and residents) on the hospital staff, or where the number of full-time salaried physicians is minimal
in absolute terms or in relation to the number of physicians on the voluntary staff, to physicians at
like institutions in the area. This "salary equivalent" is a single hourly rate, covering all physicians
regardless of specialty, and is applied to the actual regularly scheduled time contributed by the
physicians in rendering direct medical and surgical services to Medicare patients including
supervision of interns and residents rendering such care. The amount applicable to program
beneficiaries and payable to a fund will be determined in accordance with the Aggregate Per Diem
Method (see §2218). (See §2420E on the use of benefits by a fund.)
A physician who receives any compensation from the hospital, or a medical school related to the
hospital by common ownership or control, for direct medical and surgical services rendered to any
patient in the hospital will not be considered an unpaid voluntary physician for purposes of this
paragraph. Where, however, a physician receives compensation from the hospital or related medical
school (or organization related thereto) only for services which are other than direct medical and
surgical services, a salary equivalent payment for his regularly scheduled direct medical and surgical
services to Medicare patients of the hospital may be imputed but such amount for volunteer services
when added to his actual compensation from the hospital and the related medical school (or
organization related thereto) may not exceed the amount that would have been imputed if all of his
hospital and medical school services (compensated and volunteer) had been volunteer services or at
the rate of $30,000 per year, whichever is less.
The following examples assume that the average salary equivalent hourly rate is equal to the hourly
rate for the individual physician's compensated services:
EXAMPLE l: Dr. Jones receives $3,000 a year from Hospital X for services other than direct
medical and surgical services to all patients, e.g.,
21-32.8 Rev. 303
l0-75 COSTS RELATED TO PATIENT CARE 2l48.4
utilization review, administrative services, etc. Dr. Jones also voluntarily rendered direct medical and
surgical services to Medicare patients. The imputed value of the volunteer services amount to
$l0,000 for the cost reporting period. The full imputed value of Dr. Jones' volunteer direct medical
and surgical services would be allowed since the total amount of the imputed value ($l0,000) and the
compensated services ($3,000) does not exceed $30,000.
EXAMPLE 2: Dr. Smith received $25,000 from Hospital X for services as a department head in a
teaching hospital. Dr. Smith also voluntarily rendered direct medical and surgical services to
Medicare patients. The imputed value of the volunteer services amounted to $l0,000. Only $5,000
of the imputed value of volunteer services would be allowed since the total amount of the imputed
value ($l0,000) and the compensated services ($25,000) exceeds the $30,000 maximum amount
allowable for all his services.
COMPUTATION
Maximum amount allowable for all services performed
by Dr. Smth for purposes of this computation $30,000
Less compensation received from Hospital X for
other than direct medical and surgical services
to individual patients $25,000
Allowable amount of imputed value for the volunteer
services rendered by Dr. Smith $ 5,000
EXAMPLE 3: Dr. Brown is not compensated by Hospital X for any services rendered in the
hospital. Dr. Brown voluntarily rendered direct medical and surgical services to Medicare patients
for a period for six months and the imputed value of these services amounted to $20,000. The
allowable amount of the imputed value for volunteer services rendered by Dr. Brown would be
limited to $l5,000 (6 months = 50% x $30,000).
l2 months
The amount of the imputed value for volunteer services applicable to Medicare patients and payable
to a fund will be determined in accordance with the Aggregate Per Diem Method described in §
2204.
2l48.4 Allocation of Compensation Paid to Physicians in a Teaching Hospital.--In determining
reasonable cost under this section, the compensation paid by a teaching hospital, to physicians in a
teaching hospital must be allocated to the full range of services implicit in the physicians'
compensation arrangements and for which they are not otherwise compensated. (However, see §
2l48.3 for the computation of the
Rev. l32 2l-32.9
l248.5 COSTS RELATED TO PATIENT CARE l0-75
"salary equivalent" payments for volunteer services rendered to patients.) Such allocation must be
made and must be capable of substantiation on the basis for the proportion of each physician's time
spent in rendering each type of service to such hospital and/or medical school or organization related
thereto.
2l48.5 Election to Receive Medicare Reimbursement on A Reasonable Cost Basis.-For cost
reporting periods beginning after June 30, l973, and before July l, l976, a teaching hospital may elect
to receive reimbursement on a reasonable cost basis for the direct medical and surgical services of its
physicians in lieu of any payment on the basis of reasonable charges which might otherwise be
payable for such services. A hospital may make this election to receive cost reimbursement only
where all physicians who render services in the hospital which are covered under the Medicare
program agree in writing not to bill charges for such services (or where all the physicians are
employees of the hospital and as a condition of employment they are precluded from billing for such
services).
A. Current or Future Periods.--Where the election to receive cost reimbursement is for a
current or future period, each physician who provides services to Medicare beneficiaries must agree
in writing (except where the employment restriction discussed above exists) not to bill charges for
services provided to Medicare beneficiaries. However, where each physician agrees in writing to
abide by all the rules and regulations of the medical staff or the hospital (and, as appropriate, the
fund), such an agreement will suffice if the agreement is required as a condition f staff privileges,
and the rules and regulations of the hospital or fund clearly preclude physician billing for the services
for which cost benefits are payable. A copy of the rules or regulations or a copy of the standard
agreement used by the hospital or fund should be furnished to the fiscal intermediary, and the signed
agreements must be maintained on file by the provider and are subject to periodic review by the
intermediary. The intermediary must advise the carrier, where a hospital elects cost reimbursement
for physicians' services, and supply the carrier with a list of all physicians who provide services in
the facility. These actions must be completed before any cost payments under this provision may be
made.
B. Past Periods.--Where an election to receive cost reimbursement for physicians' services is
made for a past period, it is not necessary to obtain the signed agreements discussed above.
However, the cost payment made by the intermediary will be reduced by an amount equal to the
aggregate reasonable charges applicable to any services reimbursed by the carrier during the period
in question. Since the period for filing claims for reasonable charge reimbursement differs
somewhat from the period for filing hospital cost reports, the hospital (or the fund, as appropriate) is
required to agree to further adjust if Part B claims are received and paid by the carrier subsequent to
the time for which cost payments are made.
2l-32.l0 Rev. l32
12-84 COSTS RELATED TO PATIENT CARE 2l50.l
2l50. HOME OFFICE COSTS--CHAIN OPERATIONS
A chain organization consists of a group of two or more health care facilities which are owned,
leased, or through any other device, controlled by one organization. Chain organizations include, but
are not limited to, chains operated by proprietary organizations and chains operated by various
religious, charitable, and governmental organizations. A chain organization may also include
business organizations which are engaged in other activities not directly related to health care. (See
§§l002.2 and l002.3 for definitions of common ownership and control.)
Home offices of chain organizations vary greatly in size, number of locations, staff, mode of
operations, and services furnished to the facilities in the chain. The home office of a chain is not a
provider in itself; therefore, its costs may not be directly reimbursed by the program. The
relationship of the home office to the Medicare program is that of a related organization to
participating providers. Home offices usually furnish central management and administrative
services such as centralized accounting, purchasing, personnel services, management direction and
control, and other services. To the extent the home office furnishes services related to patient care to
a provider, the reasonable costs of such services are includable in the provider's cost report and are
reimbursable as part of the provider's costs. Where the home office of the chain provides no services
related to patient care, neither the costs nor the equity capital of the home office may be recognized
in determining the allowable costs of the providers in the chain.
Very often the home office of a chain organization charges the providers in the chain a management
fee for the services the home office furnishes. Management fees charged between related
organizations are not allowable costs, except where §l0l0 is applicable, and such fees must be deleted
from the provider's cost report. However, where management fees between related organizations are
disallowed, the home office's reasonable costs for providing the services related to patient care are
includable as allowable costs of the provider. The instructions for preparation of a home office cost
statement containing schedules for the determination of home office costs and equity capital, and
their allocation, are set forth in §2l53.
Section 2l50 is not applicable to franchise fees (see §2135ff), management fees or fees for other
services paid by a provider where there is no common ownership or control between the provider and
the franchisor or other service organization, or where the exception to the related organization
principle applies (see §l0l0).
2l50.l General Limitation on Allowability of Costs.--Where a provider is furnished services,
facilities, or supplies from an organization related to it by common ownership or control, the costs
allowed are subject to the provisions of chapter l0. Thus, allowable cost is limited to the lower of (l)
allowable costs properly allocated to the provider, except as indicated in §l0l0, or (2) the price for
comparable services, facilities, or supplies that could be purchased elsewhere, taking account of the
benefits of effective purchasing that would accrue to each member provider because of aggregate
purchasing on a chainwide basis.
Rev. 315 2l-33
2l50.2 COSTS RELATED TO PATIENT CARE 12-84
2l50.2 Determination of Allowable Costs.--
A. General.--Home office costs directly related to those services performed for individual
providers which relate to patient care, plus an appropriate share of indirect costs (overhead, rent,
administrative salaries, etc.) are allowable to the extent they are reasonable (see §2l02.l). Home
office costs that are not otherwise allowable costs when incurred directly by the provider cannot be
allowable as home office costs to be allocated to providers. For example, certain advertising costs
(see §2l36.2), some franchise taxes and other similar taxes (see §2l22.4), costs of noncompetition
agreements (see §2l05.l), certain life insurance premiums (see §2l30), certain membership costs (see
§§2l38.3 and 2l38.4) or those costs related to nonmedical enterprises are not considered allowable
home office costs. In addition, where an owner of the provider, as defined in chapter 9, received
compensation for services provided by the home office, the compensation is allowable only to the
extent that it is related to patient care (see §902.2) and to the extent that it is reasonable (see §902.3).
B. Organization, Start-Up, and Other Corporate Costs.--
l. Organization Costs.--The organization costs of a home office (except those referred to
below) are considered allowable costs under the Medicare program and must be amortized in
accordance with the provisions in §2l34ff. Section 2l34.lB describes costs which are not considered
allowable organization costs. In addition, reorganization costs (see §2l34.l0) and stockholder
servicing costs (see §2134.9) are not allowable organization costs. These unallowable organization
costs are excluded from the computation of the home office equity capital.
2. Start-Up Costs.--Start-up costs of a home office are considered allowable costs under
the Medicare program and must be amortized in accordance with the provisions of §2l32ff.
3. Costs of Corporate Acquisitions.--Costs related to the acquisition of the capital stock
of a provider, whether or not such facilities are participating or subsequently will participate in the
Medicare program, are not allowable (see §2l34.ll). Additionally, costs connected with the transfer of
assets to a chain are not allowable as organization costs but instead must be capitalized as part of the
cost of the asset (see §l04.l0).
C. Interest on Loans Between Home Office and Components of Chain.--Where the home
office makes a loan to, or borrows money from, one of the components of the chain, the interest paid
is generally not an allowable cost and the interest income earned from such a loan is not used to
reduce allowable interest expense. (See §2l8 for the general rule and §§218.2 and 220 for exceptions
to the general rule.)
2l-34 Rev. 315
12-84 COSTS RELATED TO PATIENT CARE 2150.2(Cont.)
D. Interest on Loans From Unrelated Sources.--Interest expense (see §200ff) is allowable to
the extent that the proceeds of the related loan, mortgage, bond issue, etc., are used either to acquire
assets for use in patient care activities (capital related) or to provide funds for operations related to
patient care (noncapital related). The interest expense must be reduced by investment income as
defined in §202.2. For the allocation of interest expense and investment income, refer to §2150.3.E.
Where proceeds of a loan, mortgage, bond issue, etc., are used to acquire stock ownership (as
opposed to assets and liabilities) of additional facilities, the interest expense is not allowable.
E. Home Office Planning Costs.--This policy is effective for all cost reporting periods
beginning on or after June 1, 1976.
1. Expanding, Rebuilding, or Relocating Existing Providers.--When a home office
incurs planning costs as described in §§2154.1 and 2154.2 to purchase or construct a new facility, to
expand, rebuild, or relocate a provider which is a member of a chain organization, such costs are
allowable when:
a. They are reasonable and prudent as defined in §2103;
b. They have been included in the historical cost of the completed facility;
c. The facility has been certified to participate in the Medicare program; and
d. The facility has been approved under §1122 of the Social Security Act. (See
§2422ff.)
Any planning costs incurred to purchase land become part of the historical cost of the land and are
not included in the historical cost of the depreciable assets of the completed facility. If a home office
incurs planning costs for both land and a facility, and such costs cannot be specifically identified
with either the land or facility, the planning costs must be allocated between the land and facility
based on the cost of each to the total cost.
If a home office abandons plans, the abandoned planning costs are treated as provided for in §2154.4.
Any allowable abandonment costs must be directly allocated to the appropriate provider.
2. Expansion of the Chain Operation.--
a. Allowable.--If a home office incurs planning costs to construct a new facility or
to purchase an existing facility (excluding land) to expand a chain organization and not to expand an
existing provider, such costs are recognized when the requirements enumerated in subsection 1.
above are met.
b. Nonallowable.--If a home office abandons plans described in a. above, the costs
of the abandoned plans are considered an investment loss and are not allowable. Also, where plans
involving the acquisition of land are abandoned, the costs of such plans are not allowable.
Rev. 315 21-35
2150.2 (Cont.) COSTS RELATED TO PATIENT CARE 12-84
F. Malpractice and Comprehensive General Liability, Unemployment and Workers'
Compensation Insurance Coupled with Second Injury Coverage.--Payments by a home office of a
chain for its providers, or individually by members of a chain to an independent fiduciary for
malpractice and comprehensive general liability insurance coverage, as well as unemployment and
workers' compensation, coupled with second injury coverage, will be recognized if made to a fund
established in accordance with the requirements in §2162ff.
2150.3 Allocation of Home Office Costs to Components in Chain.--
A. Procedure.--Starting with its total costs, including those costs paid on behalf of providers
(or other components in the chain), the home office must delete all costs which are not allowable in
accordance with program instructions. The remaining costs (total allowable costs) will then be
identified as capital-related costs and noncapital-related costs and allocated as stated below to all the
components--both providers and nonproviders--in the chain which received services from the home
office.
Where the home office incurs costs for activities not related to patient care in the chain's
participating providers, the allocation bases used must provide for the appropriate allocation of costs
such as rent, administrative salaries, organization costs, and other general overhead costs which are
attributable to nonpatient care activities, as well as to patient care activities. All activities and
functions in the home office must bear their allocable share of home office overhead and general
administrative costs.
B. Costs Directly Allocable to Components.--The initial step in the allocation process is the
direct assignment of costs to the chain components. Allowable costs incurred for the benefit of, or
directly attributable to, a specific provider or nonprovider activity must be allocated directly to the
chain entity for which they were incurred. For example, where such costs are paid by the home
office, interest expense is allocated to the facility for which the loan was made; salaries are allocated
to the facility to whose employees they apply; etc. Home offices may simplify the allocation of costs
to the chain components in the cost finding process by transferring the costs which are directly
allocable to the components through the intercompany accounts. The transfers should be made at the
time the costs are incurred.
C. Costs Allocable on a Functional Basis.--The allowable home office costs that have not
been directly assigned to specific chain components must be allocated among the providers (and any
nonprovider activities in which the home office may be engaged) on a basis designed to equitably
allocate the costs over the chain components or activities receiving the benefits of the costs. This
allocation must be made in a manner reasonably related to the services received by the entities in the
chain. Chain home offices may provide certain centralized services, such as central payroll or central
purchasing, to the chain components. Where practical and the amounts are material, these costs must
be allocated on a functional basis. For example, costs of a central payroll operation could be
allocated to the chain components based on the number of checks issued; the costs of a central
purchasing function could be allocated based on purchases made or requisitions handled. Any
residual allowable home office costs remaining after a functional cost allocation has been completed
must be included as pooled costs and allocated as described in subsection D. below. The functions,
or cost centers used to allocate home office costs,
21-35.1 Rev. 315
12-84 COSTS RELATED TO PATIENT CARE 2150.3(Cont.)
and the unit bases used to allocate the costs, including those for the pooled costs described in
subsection D., must be used consistently from one home office accounting period to another.
However, if the home office wishes to change its allocation bases and believes the change will result
in more appropriate and more accurate allocations, the home office must make a written request,
with its justification, to the intermediary responsible for auditing the home office cost for approval of
the change no later than 120 days after the beginning of the home office accounting period to which
the change is to apply.
The intermediary's approval of a home office request will be furnished to the home office in writing.
Where the intermediary approves the home office request, the change must be applied to the
accounting period for which the request was made, and to all subsequent home office accounting
periods unless the intermediary approves a subsequent request for change by the home office. The
effective date of the change will be the beginning of the accounting period for which the request was
made.
D. Pooled Costs in Home Office.--In each home office there will be a residual amount, or
"pool," of costs incurred for general management or administrative services which cannot be
allocated on a functional basis. For home office accounting periods beginning before November 1,
1976, these costs may be allocated to the components in the chain on the basis of beds, bed days, or
other basis, provided the basis used equitably allocate such costs. Revenues are not generally
appropriate for distributing these costs. Where the home office cannot determine its costs by
functions and allocate them on a functional basis, the home office must allocate its costs as one cost
center of pooled costs.
1. For home office accounting periods beginning on or after November 1, 1976, but
beginning before January 1, 1983, the pooled costs of the home office must be allocated to the chain
components in accordance with the following:
a. Where the chain consists solely of health care facilities, the pooled costs must be
allocated to the components based on either inpatient days or total costs. If inpatient days are used,
each facility would share in the pooled costs in the same proportion that its inpatient days bear to the
total inpatient days of all the facilities in the chain. The basis of inpatient days can be used only if
the entire chain consists solely of inpatient health care facilities. If the chain consists of both
inpatient and noninpatient type of facility, total costs must be used as the basis of allocation. If total
costs are used, each facility would share in the pooled costs in the same proportion that its total costs
(excluding home office costs) bear to the total costs of all facilities in the chain. Total costs are costs
before Medicare adjustments are made.
b. Where the chain consists of health care facilities and organizations carrying on
other types of activities, such as pharmacies, construction companies, etc., the pooled costs may be
allocated to the health care facilities and nonhealth care organizations on an appropriate basis,
depending upon the organization of the chain. The
Rev. 315 21-35.2
2150.3 (Cont.) COSTS RELATED TO PATIENT CARE 12-84
intermediary would be responsible for reviewing and approving the basis used. After this initial
allocation, the pooled costs allocated to the health care facilities must then be allocated to each
separate facility as set forth in a. above.
2. For home office accounting periods beginning on or after January 1, 1983:
a. Pooled home office costs must be allocated on the basis of inpatient days,
provided the entire chain consists solely of comparable inpatient health care facilities (e.g., the entire
chain is composed solely of short term inpatient hospitals). Where this situation exists, each facility
in the chain would share in the pooled costs in the same proportion that its total inpatient days bears
to the total inpatient days of all the facilities in the chain.
b. Pooled home office costs must be allocated to chain components on the basis of
total costs if the chain is composed of either unlike health care facilities (e.g., a combination of short-
term hospitals, long-term hospitals, and home health agencies) or a combination of health care
facilities and nonhealth care facilities (i.e., facilities engaged in activities other than the provision of
health care). Under this basis, all chain components will share in the pooled home office costs in the
same proportion that the total costs of each component (excluding home office costs) bear to the total
costs of all components in the chain. Total costs are costs before Medicare adjustments are made.
Where a chain consists of health care facilities and organizations carrying on other types of activities,
pooled costs can be initially allocated to the health care facilities and nonhealth care facilities on an
appropriate basis depending upon the organization of the chain, subject to intermediary approval as
explained in the following paragraph. After this initial allocation has been performed, the pooled
costs allocated to the health care facilities must then be distributed to these chain components in
accordance with the requirements of paragraphs a. or b. above, as appropriate.
If evidence indicates that the use of a more sophisticated allocation basis would provide a more
precise allocation of pooled home office costs to the chain components, such basis can be used in
lieu of allocating on the basis of either inpatient days or total costs. However, intermediary approval
must be obtained before any substitute basis can be used. The home office must make a written
request with its justification to the intermediary responsible for auditing the home office cost for
approval of the change no later than 120 days after the beginning of the home office accounting
period to which the change is to apply.
The intermediary's approval of a home office request will be furnished to the home office in writing.
Where the intermediary approves the home office request, the change must be applied to the
accounting period for which the request was made, and to all subsequent home office accounting
periods, unless the intermediary approves a subsequent request for change by the home office. The
effective date of the change will be the beginning of the accounting period for which the request was
made.
E. Allocation of Interest Expense and Investment Income of Chain Operations.--Interest
expense incurred by the home office must be appropriately assigned and/or allocated in accordance
with subsections 2150.3.A-D. As required in §2150.3.A., interest expense must be separately
identified between capital-related and noncapital-related.
21-35.3 Rev. 315
12-84 COSTS RELATED TO PATIENT CARE 2l50.3(Cont.)
Similarly, all home office investment income which is subject to offset (see §202.2) against
allowable interest expense must be appropriately assigned and/or allocated in accordance with the
methodology of subsections 2150.3.A-C, and separately identified between capital-related and
noncapital-related. Any investment income which cannot be allocated in accordance with
subsections A-C must be allocated in the same proportion that the total capital related or noncapital
related interest expense of each component bears to the total interest expense of all components in
the chain. The net amount of capital-related interest expense and investment income (whether
positive or negative) so determined, at the home office level for each chain provider, must be
appropriately included with that chain provider's costs as described in F. below. Also, the net
amount of noncapital-related interest expense and investment income (whether positive or negative)
so determined at the home office level, for each chain provider, must be appropriately included with
that chain provider's costs as described in F., below.
F. Inclusion in Provider Costs.--Home office costs directly allocated to the chain providers
should be included in each appropriate account in the provider's trial balance and then allocated
through the provider's cost-finding process. The provider's share of the home office's allowable costs
is included in the provider's adjusted trial balance with the provider's own allowable costs. This
amount, like other costs, must be allocated between patient care and nonpatient care activities.
The provider's share of the net amount of home office capital-related interest expense and investment
income is subject to offset by the provider's own capital-related investment income and included
with the provider's capital-related costs. If the provider's share is a negative amount, it should be
added to the provider's capital-related investment income and the combined amount used to reduce
the provider's capital-related interest expense.
The provider's share of the net amount of home office noncapital-related interest expense and
investment income is subject to offset by the provider's own noncapital-related investment income
and included with the provider's Administrative and General costs. If the provider's share is a
negative amount, it should be added to the provider's noncapital-related investment income and the
combined amount used to reduce the provider's noncapital-related interest expense.
Although the share of the home office costs allocated to each provider may thereby become
allowable costs under the program, the allowed costs of providers in a chain should not exceed the
cost allowed for similar institutions not so affiliated. Thus, the costs of a chain provider (including
any allowable home office costs) are not recognized or allowed to the extent they are found to be out
of line with similar institutions in the same area. (See §2102ff.)
G. Interperiod Allocation of Home Office Costs.--When the home office accounting period
differs from the cost reporting period of a chain provider, the allowable home office costs of the
provider for the period covered by the home office cost statement should be included in the
provider's cost report as indicated above and then allocated through the cost-finding process. An
amount of allowable home office costs and equity capital for the provider for the portion of its
reporting year not covered by the home office statement will be tentatively projected at a rate not in
excess of the previous year's home office costs and equity capital as set forth in the applicable home
office cost statement.
Rev. 315 21-35.3.a
2150.3(Cont.) COSTS RELATED TO PATIENT CARE 12-84
Example:
The home office has an accounting year ending August 31, 1974. For that year, home office costs of
$120,000 were allocated to Provider A and $84,000 to Provider B. Provider A's reporting year ends
on December 31; Provider B's reporting year ends on March 31.
Of the $120,000 costs allocated to Provider A, $40,000 applies to its reporting year ended 12/31/73,
covering the period from 9/1/73 to 12/31/73; and $80,000 applies to its reporting year ending
12/31/74, covering the period from 1/1/74 to 8/31/74. Therefore, in its cost report for the year
ending 12/31/74, Provider A may include home office costs of $40,000 projected for the period
9/1/74 to 12/31/74, which is not covered by the home office cost statement ($10,000 per month x 4
months).
Of the $84,000 allocated to Provider B, $49,000 applies to its reporting year ending 3/31/74,
covering the period from 9/1/73 to 3/31/74; and $35,000 applies to its reporting year ending 3/31/75,
covering the period from 4/1/74 to 8/31/74. Therefore, in its cost report for the year ending 3/31/75,
Provider B may include home office costs of $49,000 projected for the period 9/1/74 to 3/31/75,
which is not covered by the home office cost statement ($7,000 per month x 7 months).
A similar procedure would be followed for projecting an amount of home office equity capital.
Then, the following year, when actual costs and equity capital are determined, the projected amounts
will be adjusted to agree with the actual amounts, and appropriate adjustments made to the provider's
reimbursement.
21-35.3.b Rev. 315
12-84 COSTS RELATED TO PATIENT CARE 2152.2
2152 HOME OFFICE EQUITY CAPITAL
2l52.l Computation.--Where a chain provider received services from the home office and the
program recognizes the costs of such services for reimbursement purposes (see § 2l50.l), the provider
must include in its equity capital computation its proportionate share of the equity capital of the
home office which is related to patient care as defined in § l202.l. In the determination of home
office equity capital, assets and liabilities not related to patient care activities are excluded in the
computation.
The equity capital of the home office is computed generally in the same manner as for providers (see
chapter l2). That is, a calculation is made at the end of the home office's accounting period to
analyze the equity capital and changes therein during the period and to determine the amounts of
home office equity capital at the end of each month in the period. However where a negative amount
is shown in the home office equity capital balance for any month, the actual negative amount of
equity capital is included for that month in the provider's cost reports to determine the provider's
average equity capital.
2l52.2 Exclusions.--
A. Loans and Other Intercompany Transfers.--Loans to (or from) the home office or other
components of the chain from (or to) the provider cannot be considered as assets or liabilities in
computing the equity capital of the home office or of the provider where interest payments are not
allowable (see § l2l0). In addition, amounts due to (or from) the home office or other component in
the chain from (or to) the provider as a result of transfers of assets between the components of the
chain or as a result of other intercompany transactions are not includable in computing the equity
capital of the home office or of the provider.
B. Assets Leased from Home Office.--Where assets are leased by the provider from the home
office (or other related organization) and the owner's equity in the leased assets is included in the
equity capital of the provider under §l2l2, the owner's equity in the asset may not be included in the
equity capital of the home office. The equity in the leased asset must be computed and included in
the provider's equity capital in the same manner that home office equity capital is included; that is,
on a month-by-month basis with negative amounts, if any, carried over to the provider from the
home office. (See § 2l52.l.)
C. Investment in Capital Stock of Provider.--The home office's investment in the capital stock
of the provider or of any other component in the chain and loans made to finance the purchase of
such investments are not includable in the equity capital of the home office.
Rev. 315 21-35.3c
COSTS RELATED TO PATIENT CARE 2152.3
2l52.3 Allocation of Home Office Equity Capital.--After the home office equity capital is
determined in accordance with §§ 2l52.l and 2l52.2, the home office equity capital must be allocated
to the providers and other components in the chain (including nonhealth care areas) which receive
services from the home office. Any assets and liabilities on the financial records of the home office,
and includable in equity capital of the home office, which are directly attributable of a particular
provider or other entity in the chain, must be allocated directly to the particular provider or other
entity in the chain and included in that entity's equity capital. For example, where the equity in the
equipment must be directly allocated to that provider. In the same manner, if the home office
borrowed funds to finance the purchase of the equipment, the liability must also be allocated directly
to the provider and included in the provider's equity capital computation.
Where borrowed and internally generated funds are transmitted by the home office to the providers
or other entities in the chain and the funds have become so commingled as to preclude separate
identification, the liability for the borrowed funds is allocated to the providers and other entities in
the chain in the proportion that the funds received by that provider or other entities bear to total funds
disbursed.
The equity in those assets and liabilities which are directly allocable to a particular provider must be
included in the computation of the average equity capital of the provider on a monthly basis./ The
effect of this would be the same as if the provider itself owned the assets and owned the liabilities.
Home offices can simplify the computation of home office equity capital and the allocation of equity
capital to the chain components in the cost finding process by transferring the assets and liabilities
which are directly allocable to the components through the intercompany accounts. The transfers
should be made at the time the assets and/or liabilities become directly allocable.
The remaining home office equity capital, or "pooled" equity capital, related to patient care and
computed under § 2l52 must be allocated to each provider and other entity in the chain. The basis
used for the allocation of pooled equity capital is the ratio that the portion of home office costs
allocated to each provider or other entity bears to total home office costs. Home office costs which
are directly allocable to a provider or other component in the chain (see § 2l50.3B) should be
excluded from the allocation base used to allocate "pooled" equity. The ratio developed for the
allocation of home office equity capital must be applied to the amount of equity capital computed at
the end of each month in the computation of average equity capital of the home office. In effect the
home office equity capital is considered as a group of net assets used to provide services to the
providers and other entities in the chain.
Rev. 2l-35.4
2l52.3(Cont.) COSTS RELATED TO PATIENT CARE
The costs of these services allocated to the providers are considered to be a measure of the degree to
which the related equity capital is used for the benefit of the providers. Each provider must include
its
2l-35.5
9-76 COSTS RELATED TO PATIENT CARE 2l53
allocated share of the pooled equity capital of the home office at the end of each month in the
computation of its total equity capital for each respective month to determine its combined average
equity capital upon which the return on equity capital is based.
2l53. REPORTING OF HOME OFFICE COSTS AND EQUITY CAPITAL
Each intermediary servicing a provider in a chain must be furnished with a detailed home office costs
statement as a basis for reimbursing the provider for home office costs and equity capital. The home
office cost statement must be prepared as of the end of the home office accounting year, setting forth
home office costs and equity capital for the accounting year then ended. Only one copy of the cost
statement is required for each intermediary regardless of the number of providers in the chain the
intermediary is servicing. The home office cost statement may be obtaining either from the chain
provider or from the chain home office.
The home office cost statement constitutes the documentary support required of the provider to be
reimbursed for home office costs and equity capital in the provider's cost report. The financial
records of the home office, in turn, are the necessary support for the data in the home office cost
statement. Preparation of, and furnishing, the home office cost statement then is a home office
responsibility. If a provider or the home office does not furnish a home office cost statement to the
intermediary, the intermediary will not have adequate data to support payments for home office costs
and equity capital and must delete home office costs and equity capital allocations from
reimbursement. Corresponding changes would be made to interim rates of reimbursement affected
by the deletion of home office costs.
Since the intermediary must have an acceptable home office cost statement before it can reimburse
the provider for home office costs and equity capital, the cost statement should be furnished to the
intermediary within 90 days after the close of the home office accounting year. Timely furnishing of
the home office cost statement will facilitate the intermediary's settlement of the provider's cost
report and reimbursement for the home office costs and equity capital.
To be acceptable, the home office cost statement must be prepared in a format which contains
detailed schedules of the determination of home office costs and equity capital and their allocation.
A. Home Office Costs.--The determination of allowable costs of the home office should begin
with the total costs of the home office, by cost centers, as shown by the home office general ledger
trial balance; should show the reductions for those costs which are not allowable; and should then
show the adjusted trial balance of total allowable costs. The reductions for unallowable costs should
be identified and explained on a supporting schedule.
Rev. l67 21.35.6
2153 COSTS RELATED TO PATIENT CARE 9-76
A schedule (or schedules) for the allocation of the allowable costs to all of the entities serviced by
the home office must be included showing each related entity in the chain and the amount of home
office costs allocated to each related entity, based on the procedures set forth in section 2l50. Where
services are provided by the home office to nonrelated entities, such as to hospitals serviced under
management contracts, the allocations of costs for these entities may be consolidated on the cost
statement. However, detailed working papers should be maintained by the home office to support
the allocations of costs consolidated on the statement. The costs allocated to each provider would
then be included in the provider's cost report for reimbursement by the Medicare program.
B. Home Office Equity Capital.--The determination of home office equity capital should be
made on a schedule similar to Supplemental Worksheet F, Part I, Form SSA-2552G, Return on
Equity Capital of Proprietary Providers. The equity capital is determined based on the assets,
liabilities, and capital account balances as set forth in the home office's balance sheet as of the end of
its accounting year. Those assets and liabilities which are not includabel should be deleted to arrive
at an adjusted balance sheet for equity capital purposes under Medicare. The adjustments made to
delete assets and liabilities not includable in equity capital should be identified and explained on an
attached schedule. An adjusted balance sheet for the determination of equity capital for Medicare
purposes must be made for both the beginning and end of the first year in the program, and at the end
of each accounting year, thereafter.
A schedule similar to Supplemental Worksheet F, Part II, FormSSA-2252G, must be prepared to
calculate the monthly balance of the home office equity capital, in accordance with section 2l52. The
monthly balances of equity capital must the be allocated to the providers and other entities in the
chain. The amounts of home office equity capital allocated to each provider for each month in the
accounting period must be combined with the provider's own equity capital for the corresponding
month in its own calculation. Where negative amounts of home office equity capital have been
computed, the actual negative amounts of home office equity capital have been computed, the actual
negative amounts are brought forward to the provider's cost report for inclusion in its computation.
C. Bases for Allocations.--a statement must be included explaining the various home office
allowable costs. Where the home office has departmentalized its home office costs by functions, i.e.,
accounting, personnel, purchasing, etc., and allocates such costs on an appropriate unit basis, the
home office cost statement should contain a full explanation of the unit basis used in each case.
Also, where specific items of home office assets and liabilities are allocated directly to a particular
provider or other entity, the statement should contain an
2l-36 Rev. l67
11-95 COSTS RELATED TO PATIENT CARE 2154.1
explanation for, and the basis of, such direct allocation. The intermediary responsible for the home
office audit will determine the appropriateness of the method of allocation used, in addition to the
appropriateness of the bases of allocation used.
However, where "pooled" home office costs and equity capital are concerned, the bases for allocating
such amounts are limited to specific ratios. (See §§ 2150.3D and 2152.3.)
Where the chain provider has a cost reporting period ending date extending beyond the ending date
of the home office's accounting year, the home office costs and equity capital included in the
provider's cost report for a portion of the reporting period will not be supported by a cost statement.
In such cases, the intermediary may reimburse the provider tentatively for amounts of home office
costs and return on equity capital projected at a rate not in excess of the previous year's home offices
costs and return on equity capital as set forth in the related home office cost statement. When the
current year's home office cost statement is submitted, the projected amount will be adjusted to the
actual amounts which should be included.
2154. PLANNING COSTS
2154.1 General.--When a provider plans for any physical plant construction or plans to purchase
an existing facility or land to expand, rebuild, or relocate its present facility, it generally incurs
planning costs. The planning costs may include feasibility studies, engineering studies, architect
fees, finder's fees, etc., and usually involve the provider's staff and/or the use of outside consultants.
The planning may either be initiated by a provider or required by an area planning agency.
Planning costs generally become part of the historical cost of a completed facility. (See §2l54.3 for
specifics.) However, where a provider abandons its plans, the abandoned planning costs are
allowable where the provider had planned to expand its present facility by adding new wings,
departments, or buildings, which would have been included under its present certification, and such
costs were reasonable.
On the other hand, where a provider plans to open a new facility which would be separately certified
under the program, while continuing to perform services at the present location, it would not be
expanding its facility, but would be investing in a capital asset which would not be related to patient
care until the new facility was certified. Consequently, the costs of any abandoned plans would not
be allowable under the program. This policy is effective for all cost reporting periods beginning on or
after June l, l976.
Rev. 386 21-36.1
2154.2 COSTS RELATED TO PATIENT CARE 11-95
2154.2 Definitions.--
A. Expand.--To increase the size of a provider's facility. This includes the purchase or
construction of wings, departments, and/or buildings that will be included in a provider's existing
certification.
B. Rebuild.--To make extensive improvements; to restore to a previous state; to make
extensive changes, to remodel; to tear down an existing provider's facility and build a new facility in
the immediate proximity of the old facility.
C. Relocate.--To move an existing provider to a new location and close the old provider.
2154.3 Planning Costs Where Facility is Completed.--These costs are recognized under Medicare
when:
A. They are reasonable and prudent as defined in § 2l03,
B. They become part of the historical cost of the completed facility, and
C. The facility is certified to participate in the Medicare Program.
Any planning costs incurred to purchase land become part of the historical cost of the land and are
not included in the historical cost of the depreciable assets of the completed facility. If a provider
incurs planning costs for both land and a facility, and such costs cannot be specifically identified
with either the land or facility, the provider must allocate the planning costs between the land and the
facility based on the cost of each to the total cost.
2154.4 Planning Costs Where Plans Are Abandoned.--
A. Allowable.--If a provider abandons its plans to construct or purchase a facility, the cost of
such plans is allowable if the planning was for the purpose of expanding, rebuilding, or relocating the
operations of the certified facility. (See § 2l55 for abandoned construction in-progress.) Plans are
deemed abandoned when there is no remaining discernible benefit to a provider. If a facility is
completed, all feasibility studies and preliminary plans related to the building project have a
discernible benefit to a provider since they are used as part of the decision-making process on
whether to build the facility. Thus, such plans, even if they are not directly used in the building of
the facility, are not considered abandoned. The costs of such plans should be included in the
historical cost of the facility when it is completed. (Effective for all cost reports open on or after
June 1, 1978.)
21-36.2 Rev. 386
9-76 COSTS RELATED TO PATIENT CARE 2l55
Providers have the option of including the cost of the abandoned plans in allowable cost either in the
year of abandonment or by amortizing them over a 3-year period. In addition, if a provider received
a restricted gift, grant, etc. for construction on purchase of a facility, both the principal and income
from such gift, grant, etc. must be offset against the allowable cost of abandoned plans. (See &
l2l8.ll for treatment of return on equity capital.)
B. Nonallowable.--Costs of abandoned plans are not allowed when:
l. A provider plans to continue to operate its present facility and plans to construction or
purchase a new facility which will be separately certified under the program. For example, if a
participating hospital plans to construct or purchase a skilled nursing facility and abandons such
plans, such costs are not allowable; or
2. Such costs are for the purchase of land to be used either for facilities or parking lots.
2l55. ABANDONMENT OF CONSTRUCTION-IN-PROGRESS
Where a provider begins construction of a new facility to expand, rebuild, or relocate its present
certified facility and then later abandons the partially completed asset, the cost of this abandoned
asset, excluding planning costs described in §§ l2l54ff, is an investment loss and is not allowable
under the Medicare program. If a provider abandons a partially constructed asset which would have
become a newly certified facility, the loss, including abandoned planning costs, is not allowable.
Rev. l67 2l-36.3
5-76 COSTS RELATED TO PATIENT CARE 2l56.2
2l56. ALLOWABLE COSTS OF GOVERNMENTAL SUPPORT SERVICES TO STATE
AND LOCAL GOVERNMENTAL PROVIDERS
Agencies and departments of State and local governments often furnish providers operated by such
government with facilities and services necessary to the operation of those providers. These facilities
and services included such items as motor pool, legal counsel, procurement personnel administration,
data processing payroll, maintenance and operation of plant, accounting, budgeting, auditing, and
mail and messenger services. The costs of such facilities and services are includable in the allowable
costs of the provider to the extent they are (l) reasonable, (2) related to patient care, (3) allowable
under Medicare regulations, and (4) allocated on an acceptable basis.
Allowable services may also include an allocable share of supportive and supervisory time directly
present in furnishing the service to the provider. They should not include supervision of a general
nature such as that of a department head or staff assistants not directly involved in specific
operations.
Any grants, Federal or private or gifts received by State and local government for operating expenses
must be offset against allowable costs.
2l56.l Unallowable Central Service Costs.--The following expenses are unallowable: (l) general
administrative costs of State and local governments-such as the general expenses of State and local
governments in carrying out the coordinating, fiscal and administrative functions of government, and
public services such as fire, police, sanitation, tax administration and collection, and water, (2) chief
executive officer's expenses-the salaries and expenses of the office of the Governor of a State or the
chief executive of a political subdivision, (3) legislative expenses--salaries and other expenses of the
State legislature or similar local governmental lawmaking bodies such as county supervisors, city
council, etc., and (4) tax anticipation warrants and property tax functions.
2l56.2 Allocation Bases.--Costs allocated to a provider from a servicing governmental unit must
fairly represent benefits received by the provider. Therefore, for the following types of services, the
following allocation bases are recommended:
TYPE OF SERVICE BASIS FOR ALLOCATION
Accounting Time spend on number of
transactions processed
Auditing Direct audit hours
Rev. l53 2l-36.5
2156.3 COSTS RELATED TO PATIENT CARE 5-76
Budgeting Direct hours of identifiable services of
employees of central budget
Data Processing Machine hours
Disbursing Service Machine hours
Employee Retirement System Dollar contributions to fund or
Administration number of employees contributing
Fidelity Bonding Program Employees subject to bond
Health Services Number of employees
Legal Services Direct hours
Local Telephone Number of telephone instruments
Mail and Messenger Service Number of documents handled or
employees serviced
Motor Pool Costs (including Miles driven or days used
automotive management)
Office Machine and Equipment Direct hours
Repairs
Office Space Use and Related Square foot of occupied space
Costs (i.e., janitorial
service, etc.)
Payroll Service Number of employees
Personnel Administration Number of employees or salaries
and wages
Printing and Reproduction Number of hours, job basis,
printed pages, etc.
Procurement Services Total dollar volume or number of
transactions processed
If a provider cannot use the above recommended bases, it may use alternative bases after obtaining
the approval of the intermediary. Costs of allowable services other than those listed maybe allocated
to providers on any reasonable allocation bases subject to prior intermediary approval.
2l56.3 Reporting Requirements.--Providers must attach a supporting schedule to their cost reports
listing the type of service, amount, allocation base, and the cost center to which the government
overhead cost is allocated.
2l-36.6 Rev. l53
04-83 COSTS RELATED TO PATIENT CARE 2160.2
2l60. LOSSES ARISING FROM OTHER THAN SALE OF ASSETS
A. General.--A provider participating in the Medicare program is expected to follow sound
and prudent management practices, including the maintenance of an adequate insurance program to
protect itself against likely losses, particularly losses so great that the provider's financial stability
would be threatened. Where a provider chooses not to maintain adequate insurance protection
against such losses, through the purchase of insurance, the maintenance of a self-insurance program
described in §2l6lB, or other alternative programs described in §2l62, it cannot expect the Medicare
program to indemnify it for its failure to do so. Where a provider chooses not to file a claim for
losses covered by insurance, the costs incurred by the provider as a result of such losses may not be
included in allowable costs.
If a provider is unable to obtain a particular type of insurance coverage, excluding malpractice and
comprehensive general liability coverage in conjunction with malpractice coverage or malpractice
liability coverage only (see §2l62A), and it sustains losses at a time of noninsured status, the cost of
such losses will be considered allowable costs where the provider submits evidence to establish the
unavailability of the coverage. If a provider is unable to obtain malpractice coverage, it must select
one of the self-insurance alternatives in §2l62 to protect itself against such risks. If one of these
alternatives is not selected and the provider incurs losses, the cost of such losses and related expenses
are not allowable.
B. The Deductible Clause.--Certain types of insurance policies are subject to a customary
deductible. To purchase these policies without the deductible feature would result in a substantially
higher premium and thus would not be in keeping with sound business practice. Therefore, losses
incurred for such amounts attributable to the customary deductible clause are considered allowable
costs under the Medicare program except for deductibles for malpractice and comprehensive general
liability in conjunction with malpractice coverage or for malpractice liability only or for
unemployment and workers' compensation insurance coupled with second injury coverage which are
subject to certain funding requirements as described in §2l62.5.
2l60.l Net Operating Losses.--Because operating losses are not costs, a net operating loss
sustained by a provider is not an allowable cost.
2l60.2 Liability Losses.--Liability damages paid by the provider , either imposed by law or
assumed by contract, which should reasonably have been covered by liability insurance, are not
allowable. Insurance against a provider's liability for such payments to others would include, for
example, automobile liability insurance; professional liability (malpractice, negligence, etc.); owners,
landlord and tenants liability; and workers' compensation. Any settlement negotiated by the provider
or award resulting from a court or jury decision of damages paid by the provider in excess of the
limits of the provider's policy, as well as the reasonable cost of any legal assistance connected with
Rev. 286 21-37
2160.3 COSTS RELATED TO PATIENT CARE 04-83
the settlement or award are includable in allowable costs, provided the provider submits evidence to
the satisfaction of the intermediary that the insurance coverage carried by the provider at the time of
the loss reflected the decision of prudent management. Also, the reasonable cost of insurance
protection, as well as any losses incurred because of the application of the customary deductible
feature of the policy, are includable in allowable costs.
Losses in excess of the limits of and/or related to the customary deductible feature of the provider's
policy, applicable to damages awarded by a court or amounts paid to an injured party for an out-of-
court settlement for an event that occurred prior to the provider's participation in the Medicare
program, where the actual liability was unknown and could not be determined at the time of the
event, are includable in allowable costs, provided the determination and actual payment of the
damages are made subsequent to the provider's entry into the program.
2l60.3 Theft Losses.--Protection against theft losses is generally covered by two types of
insurance--fidelity bonds and burglary insurance. Fidelity bonds provide protection against losses
resulting from all types of theft by employees and corporate officers. Burglary insurance protects
against losses resulting from thefts not involving employees. The costs of both types of theft
insurance are allowable costs, as are losses incurred because of the application of a customary
deductible feature.
Where a provider exercises prudent management by purchasing adequate theft insurance, theft losses
over and above the coverage limits of the insurance would be includable in allowable costs, subject
to the following conditions:
A. The provider must purchase an adequate amount of theft insurance based on the
amount of coverage recommended by insurance companies and based on the provider's theft loss
experience, if any. The premium must be at a competitive rate. The provider must support the
adequacy of its theft insurance with documentation which would include, but is not limited to,
written competitive bids from insurance companies, formulas used in computing the amount of
coverage, and a narrative of its theft loss experience;
B. The provider must maintain adequate internal controls against theft. These would
include, but are not limited to, the use of appropriate accounting controls and the maintenance of
appropriate physical security measures, e.g., guards, locks, and employee badges;
C. The provider must document the theft loss by including evidence such as, but not
limited to, insurance company reports and police reports.
This policy is effective with losses incurred in cost reporting periods beginning after December 3l,
l977.
21-38 Rev. 286
4-78 COSTS RELATED TO PATIENT CARE 2l60.5
2l60.4 Minor Losses.--In the ordinary course of operations, a provider may incur a number of
losses of minor equipment or supplies which are generally not covered by insurance because of their
low cost or the frequency of the occurrences of loss. These include such losses as the disappearance
of linen, supplies, food and silverware; the breakage of equipment, and the spoilage of drugs and
food. Where such losses are generally not insured, the program will recognized them as allowable
costs to the extent that the provider can establish proof of loss. Such minor losses are to be adjusted
in accordance with one of the three methods selected by the provider for writing off the cost of minor
equipment (see § l06). If there is evidence of theft and the items are covered by the provider's
insurance contract, the policy described in § 2l60.3 is applicable.
2l60.5 Casualty Losses - General.--For Medicare reimbursement purposes, a casualty is defined as
the complete or partial destruction of property resulting from an identifiable event of sudden,
unexpected or unusual
Rev. 20l 2l-38.l
l-75 COSTS RELATED TO PATIENT CARE 2l60.5(Cont.)
nature. Casualty losses include, but are not limited to, damage from a hurricane, tornado, storm, fire,
flood, accident, earthquake, and vandalism. A provider, as part of its insurance program, is expected
to protect its depreciable assets against casualty losses. As stated in the following sections, actual
losses sustained by a provider which are not compensated by insurance proceeds received, generally
are not included in allowable costs where the lack of insurance coverage reflects imprudent
management.
Losses which are not considered casualty losses, such as reduction in the value of property resulting
from a nearby disaster, etc., are not included in allowable costs.
EXAMPLE: A public bridge which provided the most direct access to the provider facility, was
completely destroyed by a flood. The bridge was not replaced because of the high cost of
reconstruction in view of its limited utility. The only other access to the facility involved a lengthy
and more circuitous route through undesirable areas. This inconvenience of access resulted in a
reduction in the economic value of the property, a loss which is not includable in allowance costs.
A. Special Deductible Clause.--A special type of deductible clause is written for earthquake
insurance, with the deductible being stated in terms of a percentage of the property rather than in a
dollar amount. In certain States, the form of the deductible clause contains a minimum mandatory
deductible of 5 percent of the insured value of the property, and ,for some buildings, the clause may
require a deductible as high as l5 percent. In these cases, even though the deductible is not a nominal
amount, the deductible clause is considered standard coverage in the particular area, and losses
resulting from the application of this deductible clause are included in allowable costs.
B. Coinsurance Clause.--The coinsurance feature of insurance policies was developed to
encourage the insuring of a high percentage of property value by offering a reduced rate to the
insured. The coinsurance clause stipulates that the insured maintain insurance equal to an agreed
percentage (usually 80 percent or more) of the replacement cost of the asset, regardless of the
undepreciated cost basis (book value) of the asset. If the insured fails to maintain insurance at the
agreed fixed percentage of the replacement cost of the property, the provider then becomes a
coinsurer with the insurance company and, in the event of loss, shall, to the extent of the deficit, bear
is proportion of the loss. Losses resulting from the application of the coinsurance clause are not
allowable costs to the extent that the provider has failed to maintain insurance at the agreed fixed
percentage of the value of the property to be considered fully insured.
EXAMPLE: A provider insures a piece of equipment for $3,000 but its replacement cost is
$5,000. The policy contains an 80 percent coinsurance feature. If the property sustains $l,000 worth
of damage, the
Rev. l09 2l-39
2l60.5(Cont.) COSTS RELATED TO PATIENT CARE l-75
provider receives only $750 from the insurance company, computed as follows:
amounts of insurance ($3,000) x loss ($l,000) = settlement ($750)
amount of insurance ($4,000)
required to meet 80
percent requirement
The provider sustains a $250 loss which is not allowable since it is due to the fact the provider has
underinsured its property. If the provider had maintained $4,000 insurance on the asset (80 percent
of the replacement cost), the settlement would have been $l,000.
C. Underinsurance.--A loss which is in excess of the amount of insurance carried by the
provider is considered to result from underinsurance and is not reimbursed by the program. For
example, if a provider insures an asset having a replacement cost of $l2,000 for $8,000 and the asset
is completely destroyed by fire, the provider receives $8,000 from the insurance company. Where
the undepreciated cost basis of the asset is $l0,000, the provider incurs a loss of $2,000 which cannot
be claimed as an allowable cost since it results from the asset being underinsured.
D. Excess Insurance.--Where a provider receives insurance proceeds in excess of the
undepreciated cost basis of the asset, the provider has a gain, which is treated in accordance with
instructions contained in § l32. If the insurance proceeds exceed the undepreciated cost basis of the
asset, the gain reduces the amount of allowable depreciation allowed for the asset under the program.
E. Extraordinary Casualty Losses.--Sound and prudent management practices include
purchasing adequate insurance to provide protection against losses from the usual casualties and
losses which would threaten the institution’s financial stability. However, coverage against every
possible type of loss would not be prudent or feasible. Thus, a provider may have an insurance
program which would be considered adequate to insure against those risks that the institution could
not afford to assume and yet sustain an uninsured loss from an unexpected quarter. This can occur
because the failure to purchase insurance coverage for a highly improbable type of loss, e.g.
earthquake insurance in an area where earthquakes seldom occur, would not be considered imprudent
management. Where such casualties occur, the amount of the casualty loss (see § l33.2 for
computation of the loss) less the amounts that were received from insurance and from local, State,
Federal grants or other sources, if any, will be recognized as a deferred charge to be amortized over
the expected subsequent useful life of the restored or replaced asset. If the decision is made that the
provision of patient care service through use of the asset should cease when the asset is damaged, no
amount of the loss is includable in allowable costs.
2l-40 Rev. l09
01-83 COSTS RELATED TO PATIENT CARE 2l6l
F. Total Casualty Losses.--Where an asset is entirely destroyed by fire or other casualty to the
point of being unrepairable, the loss is generally considered an unallowable cost for Medicare
reimbursement purposes, except where the loss related to the deductible factor of the insurance
policy or the loss was such that the risk would not ordinarily be insured in adequate insurance
programs. The provision of §l33.l, rather than §l32, applies when depreciable assets are totally lost
as a result of fire or other casualty.
G. Partial Casualty Losses.--Where an asset is partially destroyed or damaged as a result of
fire or other casualty, the loss, as in the case of the total casualty loss, is generally considered an
unallowable cost for Medicare reimbursement purposes, except where the loss relates to the
deductible factor of the insurance policy or the loss is such that it is not ordinarily insured against an
adequate insurance program. See §l33.3 for the procedure to follow in adjusting the cost basis of the
depreciable asset to reflect the amount of the casualty losses, even though the loss is not an allowable
cost for purposes of Medicare reimbursement.
2l6l. INSURANCE COSTS
A. Purchased Commercial Insurance.--The reasonable costs of insurance purchased from a
commercial carrier or a nonprofit service corporation and not from a limited purpose insurer (see
§2162.2) are allowable if the type, extent, and cost of coverage are consistent with sound
management practice. Insurance premiums reimbursement is limited to the amount of aggregate
coverage offered in the insurance policy.
(See §§2l22.5 and 2l62 regarding unemployment compensation insurance payments.) Generally, in
meeting these criteria, the following types of insurance are recognized;
l. Property Damage and Destruction.--This type of insurance covers losses due to
the damage to, or the destruction of, the provider's physical property. Coverage is available to insure
against losses resulting from fire or lightning, windstorm, earthquake, sprinkler leakage, water
damage, automobile damage, etc.
2. Liability.--This insurance includes professional liability (malpractice, error in
rendering treatment, etc.), unemployment compensation, worker's compensation, automobile
liability, etc. See §2l62 for alternatives to insurance for malpractice and comprehensive general
liability losses, as well as losses from unemployment and worker's compensation insurance coupled
with second injury coverage.
3. Consequential Loss or Indirect Loss.--There are various indirect losses a provider
may incur in connection with property damage or other occurrences which interrupt the normal
operation of the institution. The cost of business interruption or other similar insurance is allowable;
however, the premium cost for "guaranteeing profits" is not allowable.
Rev. 276 21-41
2l6l(Cont.) COSTS RELATED TO PATIENT CARE 01-83
4. Theft Insurance.--This generally includes fidelity bonds and burglary insurance. (See
§2l60.3.)
Where a provider has purchased insurance without the customary deductible feature and, as a result,
is charged a substantially higher premium, the amount of the insurance premium which exceeds the
insurance premium with the customary deductible clause is not an allowable cost.
5. Employee Health Care.--This type of insurance covers health care expenses of a
provider's employees. Premiums paid by the provider to purchase this coverage usually represent a
fringe benefit to the covered employees as specified in §2144.4.G.
If the health care services are rendered by a provider to its own employee and the provider is
remunerated for these services under the provisions of the purchased insurance plan, the provider
should not offset the reimbursement received from the insurance company against either the cost of
the services rendered to the employee or the premium cost incurred to purchase the insurance
coverage. Instead, the cost of services rendered by a provider to its own employee in this situation
will be excluded from Medicare reimbursement by requiring the provider to include the charges
and/or days related to the services rendered to its employee among total charges and/or days used to
apportion costs.
B. Self-Insurance.--Where a provider maintains a self-insurance program for other than
malpractice and comprehensive general liability coverage in conjunction with malpractice coverage,
as well as unemployment compensation and workers' compensation insurance coupled with second
injury coverage, or employee health-insurance coverage, provided it meets the requirements of
§2162.7, contributions to a self-insurance reserve fund referred to below are not includable in
allowable costs. (See §l2l8.9 for the effect on equity capital.) Although contributions to the self-
insurance reserve fund are not allowable, a reserve fund established under the conditions of this
section need not be considered available for patient care in determining the necessity of borrowing
under §202.2. However, where such a program meets the following conditions, any allowable loss
cannot exceed the amount of the fund as of the date of the loss; that is, the date a claim is actually
paid.
l. The provider must maintain a self-insurance reserve fund to meet any actual losses
that are sustained. In the event of a loss, the amount allowable will be limited to the balance in the
reserve fund at the date of the loss.
2. The provider must furnish to the intermediary pertinent details about the specific
assets that are to be covered by the self-insurance reserve fund.
3. The reserve must be maintained in a segregated account and the funds must not be
commingled with any other funds.
4. The self-insurance reserve must be sufficient to meet losses of the type and to the
extent that they would ordinarily be covered by insurance.
21-42 Rev. 276
08-98 COST RELATED TO PATIENT CARE 2162
5. Contributions to the reserve must be made not less frequently than annually.
6. The provider's total allowable interest expense under the Medicare program will
be offset by income earned by invested insurance reserve funds.
7. Where appropriate, the provider must demonstrate the ability to effectively
replace the inspection service, the loss-handling service, and the legal defense service of the
insurance companies.
8. The treatment of casualty losses sustained by the self-insurance fund shall follow
the procedure provided in §§l33ff.
2162. PROVIDER COSTS FOR MALPRACTICE AND COMPREHENSIVE GENERAL
LIABILITY PROTECTION, UNEMPLOYMENT COMPENSATION, WORKERS'
COMPENSATION, AND EMPLOYEE HEALTH CARE INSURANCE
A. General.--Where provider costs incurred for protection against malpractice and
comprehensive general liability, or for protection against malpractice liability only, unemployment
compensation, workers' compensation coupled with second injury coverage, and employee health
care insurance, do not meet the requirements of §2161.A, costs incurred for that protection under
other arrangements will be allowable under the conditions stated below. Costs incurred for
comprehensive general liability coverage not in conjunction with malpractice liability coverage are
allowable only under the provisions of §§2160 or 2161.
Usually coupled with workers' compensation laws are second injury laws which provide that the
employer shall be liable only for the disability resulting from an injury to an employee incurred
during his/her current employment without regard to a preexisting handicap. Where reference is
made to workers' compensation coverage, it also includes second injury coverage where such liability
is incurred by the provider.
The following illustrates alternatives to full insurance coverage from commercial sources which
providers, acting individually or as part of a group or a pool, can adopt to obtain malpractice, and
comprehensive general liability, unemployment compensation, workers' compensation, and
employee health care insurance protection:
Rev. 406 21-42.1
2162 (Cont.) COSTS RELATED TO PATIENT CARE 08-98
1. Insurance purchased from a commercial insurance company which provides
coverage after a deductible or coinsurance provision has been met;
2. Insurance purchased from a limited purpose insurance company (captive);
3. Total self-insurance; or
4. A combination of purchased insurance and self-insurance.
The conditions for Medicare reimbursement stated below are for provider malpractice liability and
comprehensive general liability coverage in conjunction with malpractice coverage or for
malpractice liability coverage only, unemployment compensation, workers' compensation insurance,
and employee health care insurance, not for liability coverage costs such as automobile liability, fire,
theft, or general liability only.
B. Effect on Interns, Residents, and Other Provider-Based Physicians.--The cost of
malpractice coverage that a provider incurs for its employee interns and residents is allowable,
subject to the provisions of §2120. However, the cost of malpractice coverage incurred by a provider
for the personal risks of physicians other than interns and residents for direct medical care rendered
to patients is not allowable except where the provider incurs such cost for its hospital-based
physicians as described in Regulations No. 5, §405.480(f) and §2108ff of this manual. This cost
incurred by the provider for its hospital-based physicians must be considered part of the physicians'
total compensation. Regulations No. 5, §405.484, requires that this total physicians' compensation
must be apportioned between the services rendered to the institution (Part A) and the services
rendered to patients (Part B). The portion of the physicians' compensation for services rendered to
the institution is an allowable provider cost. The portion of the physicians' compensation for
services rendered to patients is reimbursed under the supplementary medical insurance program
through the appropriate billing or cost-apportionment mechanism.
C. Documentation Required Where Type of Insurance Changes.--A provider usually selects
the type of arrangement which is most reasonable and prudent, taking into account all pertinent facts
and circumstances related to its organization and operation. When a change is made from
commercial insurance as described in §2161 to one of the alternatives or from one alternative to
another, the provider must document a comparative analysis which shows that the provider's choice
results in a reasonable cost for the coverage offered and that the extent of coverage is consistent with
sound management practices. The provider's comparative analysis should be performed on a
periodic basis, usually every 3 to 5 years, to assure consistent application of the prudent buyer
principle and to properly monitor the cost effectiveness of the insuring method being applied. The
provider should retain these analyses to assist its intermediary in determining the reasonableness of
the insurance costs. These analyses should show the following information:
21-42.2 Rev. 406
08-98 COSTS RELATED TO PATIENT CARE 2162.2
o The administrative cost for the arrangements, including the cost for the maintenance
of a fund by a fiduciary, legal cost, cost of a risk management program, cost of claims management
program, actuarial costs, and other related costs.
o The necessary contributions to the fund based on an actuarial determination (as
described in §2162.7C) of anticipated losses for malpractice, comprehensive general liability
coverage in conjunction with malpractice, unemployment compensation, workers' compensation, and
employee health care insurance. The determination of necessary contributions to the fund may also
be made by a governmental agency for unemployment compensation and workers' compensation.
o The cost of any insurance to supplement self-insurance, like stop-loss insurance.
o The comparative commercial insurance premium.
2162.1 Insurance with a Deductible or Coinsurance Provision.--If you purchase an insurance
policy with a deductible or coinsurance provision from a commercial insurance company, the cost of
the insurance coverage for losses in excess of the deductible or coinsurance is an allowable cost, to
the extent that the amount of coverage is consistent with sound management practices. (See §2162.5
for the discussion of losses related to deductibles or coinsurance.)
2162.2 Insurance Purchased From a Limited Purpose Insurance Company.--
A. Premium Costs.--Some providers, groups of providers, and State hospital associations
have established limited purpose insurance companies (often known as captive insurance companies)
to insure themselves against malpractice and, in some instances, comprehensive general liability
losses as well as unemployment and workers' compensation insurance and employee health care
costs. The regular premiums (other than the supplemental premiums) paid to such companies for
provider malpractice and comprehensive general liability coverage in conjunction with malpractice
coverage, or for malpractice liability coverage only, as well as unemployment insurance costs paid to
the Federal Government and to the States, workers' compensation insurance costs paid to commercial
insurance companies, and employee health benefit premiums paid to such companies are allowable
costs if they are not in excess of the cost of available comparable commercial insurance premiums
and meet the reasonable cost provisions of §2100. If comparable insurance premiums are not
available, the captive insurance company must obtain an evaluation of the adequacy and
reasonableness of its insurance premium by an independent actuary, commercial insurance company,
or broker as described in §2162.7 C. The allowable premium may not exceed the amount which
such evaluation determines to be reasonable.
Rev. 406 21-42.3
2162.2 (Cont.) COST RELATED TO PATIENT CARE 08-98
In addition, supplemental premiums which are assessed by limited purpose insurers to build reserves
against contemplated losses, as distinguished from capital costs, are allowable costs if, when added
to the regular premium, the total premium costs do not exceed a commercial insurance premium for
comparable coverage. The supplemental premiums must have the essential characteristics of normal
insurance premiums, i.e., they must stand at risk against potential losses and must be available to
support losses. Any excess premiums are allowed in a subsequent cost reporting period to the extent
that, when added to premiums paid to the captive insurance company in that period for comparable
coverage, the total premium costs do not exceed the comparable commercial insurance premiums for
that period. Premiums paid to a limited purpose insurance company are recognized in your
allowable costs only if all of the conditions of this section are met.
Any funds returned to the insured by the insurer (rebates, distributions, etc.) must be offset against
the costs in the year you receive them. Such returned funds must be offset against the costs of the
Employee Health and Welfare Cost Center for employee health care and against the costs of the
Administrative and General Cost Center for other than employee health care. However, if a captive
insurance company is liquidated, no offset is required for the return of capitalization costs previously
paid by providers receiving the rebate. If payments are made to other than providers, e.g., the home
office of a chain organization, appropriate adjustment of your cost is still necessary. Proper
allocation of distributions by the home office to you must be made based on the appropriate facts in
each situation.
The premium paid by you for hospital-based physicians is subject to the requirements in §2162 B.
The captive insurance company must have an adequate claims management and risk management
program and, in cases where the captive insurance company is designed to cover employee health
care insurance, it is suggested that a coordination of benefits program be employed as described in
§2162.7 D. In cases where a limited purpose insurance company has both Medicare and non-
Medicare participating providers paying premiums, such premiums must be determined so that
Medicare providers do not share in premium costs that must be borne by the non-Medicare providers,
and non-Medicare providers do not share in premium costs that must be borne by Medicare
providers.
If a provider or group of providers is related to the insurer through ownership or control, as defined
in Chapter 10, the following additional provisions apply:
1. The captive insurance company must be established in and meet the appropriate
insurance laws of one of the United States, District of Columbia, or foreign government, if it is
formed offshore.
2. The excess of actuarially determined loss reserves and related operating expenses over
actual losses and related operating expenses and gains and losses from investments must be taken
into account in establishing reasonable premium levels which do not reflect a profit factor.
21-42.4 Rev. 406
03-11 COSTS RELATED TO PATIENT CARE 2162.2 (Cont.)
3. If you terminate from the Medicare program, you must obtain a final determination of
the adequacy of premium reserves as of the date of termination. This determination must be obtained
from an independent actuary, commercial insurance company or broker as described in §2162.7.
Any reserves that are deemed excessive at the date of termination must be offset against your
allowable costs in your final cost report. If reserves are deemed inadequate, additional premium
payments subsequent to the date of termination are not allowable provider costs.
4. RESERVED
5. Loans or any transfer of funds by the insurance company to policy holders, owners of
providers, or parties related to them are prohibited.
Rev. 444 21-42.5
2162.3 COSTS RELATED TO PATIENT CARE 03-11
B. Capitalization Costs.--The initial or any subsequent capital payments, as distinguished
from supplemental premiums as described in subsection A, made by you to establish or maintain
limited purpose (captive) insurance companies, including companies established by State hospital
associations or others, are not allowable under Medicare. Such payments include the purchase of
stock or surplus certificates (mutual insurance company), or other payments to establish
capitalization levels such as special dues assessments paid by you to a hospital association which
then establishes a captive insurance company.
2162.3 Self-Insurance.--You may believe that it is more prudent to maintain a total self-insurance
program (i.e., the assumption by you of the risk of loss) independently or as part of a group or pool
rather than to obtain protection through purchased insurance coverage. If such a program meets the
conditions specified in §2162.7, payments into such funds are allowable costs.
2162.4 Combination of Purchased Insurance and Self-Insurance.--You may believe it appropriate
to self insure some of the risk independently or as part of a group or pool and purchase insurance for
the remainder of the risk. Where you decide to fund all or some of the risk covered through self-
insurance, payments into a fiduciary fund are allowable costs if you or the pool sets up a program
which meets the conditions specified in §2162.7. The cost of the insurance is also an allowable cost
subject to the conditions of §2161.
2162.5 Allowability of Actual Losses Related to Deductibles or Coinsurance.--Where you, at your
option, are willing to commit your resources toward meeting first dollar losses through a deductible
(as defined below), losses relating to the deductible are allowable costs in the year paid without
funding if the aggregate deductible is no more than the greater of 10 percent of your (or, if
appropriate, a chain organization's) net worth--fund balances as defined for Medicare cost reporting
purposes--at the beginning of the insurance period or $100,000 per provider. The same rule applies
where you coinsure with an insurance carrier. This requirement is deemed a reasonable test as to
whether you are acting prudently in this regard. So long as you stay within the above limitations, you
can be assumed to be exercising sound judgment in deciding to meet first dollar losses or
coinsurance payments out of available resources. This requirement also permits you to pay
reasonable losses without incurring costs to fund such payments. If your deductible or coinsurance
exceeds the above requirements and the provider does not make payments into a fiduciary fund as
required by §2162.7, any losses paid by the provider in excess of the greater of 10 percent of the
provider's or, if applicable, a chain organization's net worth, or $100,000 per provider, are not
allowable.
21-42.6 Rev. 444
08-98 COSTS RELATED TO PATIENT CARE 2162.7
For purposes of this section, a "deductible" refers to the amount of first dollar losses not covered by a
purchased insurance policy, a funded self-insurance program, or a combination of both.
2162.6 Losses in Excess of Coverage.--Where a provider incurs losses which are in excess of
purchased commercial and/or limited purpose insurance coverage or actuarially determined funded
contributions to an approved self-insurance fund in meeting specified deductibles, coinsurance
provisions, or total self-insurance, such costs are allowable in the year paid where the provider
submits evidence to the satisfaction of the intermediary that the insurance coverage or funding levels
reflected the decisions of prudent management.
Losses in excess of coverage for events that occurred prior to the provider's participation in the
Medicare program, where the actual amount of the loss was unknown and could not be determined at
the time of the event, are allowable, provided the determination and actual payment of the losses are
made subsequent to the provider's entry into the program, and assuming that the required evidence of
prudent management in establishing insurance coverage or funding levels has been submitted.
2162.7 Conditions Applicable to Self-Insurance.--
A. Definition of Self-Insurance.--Self-insurance is a means whereby a provider(s),
whether proprietary or nonproprietary, undertakes the risk to protect itself against anticipated
liabilities by providing funds in an amount equivalent to liquidate those liabilities.
If a provider enters into an agreement with an unrelated party that does not provide for the shifting of
risk to the unrelated party, such an agreement shall be considered self-insurance. For example, any
agreement designed to provide administrative services only shall be considered self-insurance and
must meet the requirements specified below. If administrative services agreements do not meet these
requirements, any amounts funded as part of the agreement will not be allowed. Payments from the
fund, however, will be treated on a claim-paid basis as specified in §2162.3.
There may be situations in which there is a fine line between self-insurance and purchased or
commercial insurance. This is particularly true of "cost-plus" type arrangements. As long as there is
at least some shifting of risk to the unrelated party, even if limited to situations such as provider
bankruptcy or employee termination, the arrangement will not be considered self-insurance.
B. Self-Insurance Fund.--The provider or pool establishes a fund with a recognized
independent fiduciary such as a bank, a trust company, or a private benefit administrator. In the case
of a State or local governmental provider or pool, the State in which the provider or pool is located
may act as a fiduciary. The provider or pool and fiduciary must enter into a written agreement which
includes all of the following elements:
Rev. 406 21-42.7
2162.7 (Cont.) COSTS RELATED TO PATIENT CARE 08-98
1. General Legal Responsibility.--The fiduciary agreement must include the appropriate
legal responsibilities and obligations required by State laws.
2. Control of Fund.--The fiduciary must have legal title to the fund and be responsible
for proper administration and control. The fiduciary cannot be related to the provider either through
ownership or control as defined in Chapter 10, except where a State acts as a fiduciary for a State or
local governmental provider or pool. Thus, the home office of a chain organization or a religious
order of which the provider is an affiliate cannot be the fiduciary. In addition, investments which
may be made by the fiduciary from the fund are limited to those approved under State law governing
the use of such fund; notwithstanding this, loans by the fiduciary from the fund to the provider or
persons related to the provider are not permitted. Where the State acts as fiduciary for itself or local
governments, the fund cannot make loans to the State or local governments.
3. Payments by Fiduciary.--The agreement must provide that withdrawals must be for
malpractice and comprehensive general liability or unemployment or workers' compensation
insurance losses, or employee health benefits coverage only and those expenses listed in §2162.8.
Any rebates, dividends, etc., to the provider from the fund will be used to reduce allowable cost.
Furthermore, evidence of a practice of payments from the fund for purposes unrelated to the proper
administration of the fund may result in a withdrawal of recognition of the self-insurance fund by the
Medicare program. In such instances, payments into the fund will not be considered an allowable
cost. Intermediaries will submit incidents of impropriety to the appropriate regional office.
4. Termination.--The agreement must state that upon termination from the Medicare
program, the provider must obtain a determination of the adequacy of the fund balance as of the date
of termination from an independent actuary, insurance company, or broker (as defined in B below).
Any reserves that are deemed excessive must be offset against the provider's allowable costs in the
provider's final cost report. If the reserve fund is deemed inadequate, additional contributions to the
fund subsequent to the date of termination are not allowable.
5. Reporting.--The agreement must require that a financial statement be forwarded to the
provider or pool members by the fiduciary no later than 60 days after the end of each annual
insurance reporting period. This statement must
21-42.8 Rev. 406
04-83 COSTS RELATED TO PATIENT CARE 2162.7 (Cont.)
show the balance in the fund at the beginning of the period, current period contributions, and amount
and nature of final payments, including a separate accounting for claims management, legal
expenses, claims paid, etc., and the fund balance. This report and fiduciary's records must be
available for intermediary review and audit.
6. Income Earned.--The agreement must provide that any income earned by the fund
must become part of the fund and used in establishing adequate fund levels.
C. Soundness of the Fund.--The provider submits to the intermediary an annual certified
statement from an independent actuary, insurance company, or broker that has actuarial personnel
experienced in the appropriate field of medical malpractice and general liability insurance,
unemployment compensation, workers' compensation or employee health care insurance. To be
independent, there must not be any financial ownership or control, as defined in Chapter 10, either
directly or indirectly in the provider.
The actuary, insurance company, or broker shall determine the amount necessary to be paid into the
fund. The fund should include reserves for losses based on accepted actuarial techniques customarily
employed by the section of the insurance industry writing the type of insurance coverage the fund is
designed to provide, and expenses related to the self-insurance fund as specified in §2162.8. The
actuary, insurance company, or broker shall also provide for an estimate of the amounts in the fund
that are in excess of what is reasonably needed to support anticipated disbursements from the fund.
This excess amount must be treated as specified in §2162.10. Where funds have been established to
cover employee health care, the actuary, insurance company or broker must limit fund payments to
the cost of insurance premiums for comparable purchased coverage at the same level offered by the
fund. Fund payments exceeding this amount will be treated as excess payments.
The actuary, insurance company, or broker must state the actuarial basis and the coverage period
used in establishing reserve levels. Reserves will not be recognized as allowable Medicare costs for
losses specifically denied by other subsections of §§2160, 2161, and 2162. Thus, reserve payments
will not be recognized for items such as:
1. Losses in excess of the greater of 10 percent of a provider's net worth or $100,000 where a
provider elects to pay losses directly in lieu of establishing a funded self-
insurance fund (§2162.5);
2. Losses in excess of coverage levels which an intermediary deems do not reflect the decisions of
prudent management (§2162.6).
The actuary, insurance company, or broker must provide its workpapers to Medicare intermediaries
upon request.
There must be separate accountability to reflect all operations within each fund.
Rev. 286 21-42.9
2162.7 (Cont.) COSTS RELATED TO PATIENT CARE 04-83
D. Claims Management, Risk Management, and Coordination of Benefits Program. -A
provider or pool has an ongoing claims process and risk management program. The provider or pool
must demonstrate to the intermediary that it has an ongoing claims process to determine whether
malpractice and comprehensive general liability, unemployment and workers' compensation
insurance liabilities, and the liability for employee health care insurance exist, their causes where
applicable, and the cost of claims. A provider or pool may either utilize its qualified personnel or an
independent contractor, such as an insurance company, to adjust claims. In addition, a provider or
pool must obtain adequate legal assistance in carrying out its claims process. Each provider must
also have an adequate risk management program to examine the cause of losses and to take action to
reduce the frequency and severity of them. Such risk management program has the essential
characteristics of programs required by insurers which currently insure providers for these risks.
Therefore, a provider must have an ongoing safety program, professional and employee training
programs, etc., to minimize the frequency and severity of malpractice and comprehensive general
liability, as well as workers' compensation insurance incidents.
For funds established to cover employee health care, the provider, or its fiduciary, should consider
the institution of an effective coordination of benefits program. A program of this nature would seek
to determine whether any beneficiary of the fund is partly or fully covered by another insurance plan,
such as a family plan provided to a spouse as a fringe benefit of employment or a private insurance
plan held by the beneficiary with a commercial insurance company. A program of this type would
assure that each health plan pays its appropriate share of the expenses related to the beneficiary's
illness, thus reducing the liability for full payment by the provider's fund.
E. Trust Mechanism Applicable to Employee Health Care.--If the provider wishes, the
program will recognize the establishment of self-insurance funds for employee health care in
accordance with the provisions of §501(c)(9) of the Internal Revenue Code. This code section grants
a tax free exemption to funds established in trust, provided the funds are used to pay for life, sick,
accident or other employee benefits.
Application of this Internal Revenue procedure would allow a provider to establish its employee
health care self-insurance fund without relinquishing legal title to the fund to an independent
fiduciary. In addition, fund trustees may also be employees of the provider, as long as the employees
act independently in their administration of the trust. All other conditions applicable to self-insurance
elicited in this manual section, however, will be applicable to employee health care trusts established
under this Internal Revenue procedure, i.e., payments by fiduciary, termination, reporting, soundness
of the fund, etc.
2162.8 Expenses Related to Losses Paid Out of Self-Insurance Fund.--The following expenses will
be considered costs attributable to a self-insurance fund established by a provider or pool: expenses
of establishing the provider fund or pool, expenses for administering the claims management
program, expenses involved with maintenance of the fund by the fiduciary, legal expenses, actuarial
expenses, excess insurance coverage (if purchased by the fiduciary or pool), risk management (if
performed by the fiduciary or
21-42.10 Rev. 286
08-98 COSTS RELATED TO PATIENT CARE 2162.10
pool), and a coordination of benefits program (if performed by the fiduciary pool or provider) to the
extent that such expenses are related to the provider's self-insurance program. All other expenses
will not be considered costs attributable to the fund, but should be included in provider
administrative and general costs in the year incurred.
2162.9 Reimbursement Principles Where a Provider Has Self-Insurance.--
A. Medicare's participation in the fund contributions will be limited to actual funded
payments made by a provider into the fund and only to the extent of the amounts permitted by
§2162.7C. Accruals of payments to be made into the fund are allowable costs in the year of accrual
if paid within 75 days after the end of a provider's cost reporting period. Payments made after the
75th day will be deemed allowable in the reporting period paid, provided the total contributions
made in that period do not exceed the amount prescribed by the actuary as necessary for the
adequacy of the fund.
B. Total fund contributions for employee health care are included in the Employee Health and
Welfare Cost Center and for other than employee health care in the Administrative and General Cost
Center and allocated in the cost-finding process in the same manner as commercial insurance
premium costs.
C. Medicare's share of allowable contributions to a fund which meets the conditions in
§2162.7 will be included in the calculation of the regular interim reimbursement. The interim rate
will be based on the payments required by the actuary, insurance company, or broker for the current
year under the agreement setting up the fund.
D. Interim reimbursement for actual losses related to deductibles or coinsurance which are not
covered by a funded self-insurance program as described in §2162.5 will be based on the provider's
estimate of Medicare's share of total paid claims to be made the coming year. Factors such as the
provider's previous years' claims paid experience, claims pending, etc., should be used in establishing
the estimated losses for interim payment purposes.
2162.10 Treatment of Excess Reserves.--Contributions or pool payments for any period in excess of
the amount required by §2162.7C as needed to support disbursement are not allowable costs for such
period but may be allowed in the subsequent reporting period to the extent that, when added to
contributions paid in the subsequent year, the sum does not exceed the prescribed amount.
Rev. 406 21-42.11
2162.11 COSTS RELATED TO PATIENT CARE 08-98
2162.11 Effective Date and Retroactive Application.--
A. Malpractice and Comprehensive General Liability.--The provisions of this section are
effective with payments for malpractice and comprehensive general liability protection in
conjunction with malpractice protection or malpractice liability protection only, beginning April 1,
1977. If a provider did not have full coverage under commercial insurance after December 31, 1974,
and disbursed funds for such protection under alternative arrangements, such costs of protection are
allowable when:
1. The disbursement was made after December 31, 1974;
2. The intermediary determines that the arrangement and cost for securing such
protection were reasonable; and
3. The provider conforms to the provisions of this section before:
a. November 1, 1977, for arrangements other than through purchase of protection
from a captive insurance company; or
b. July 1, 1978, for protection purchased from a captive insurance company.
Where a provider or group of providers included self-insured losses and related expenses in
allowable costs after December 31, 1974, and before April 1, 1977, in accordance with §2161.B,
such providers may request reopening and revision of cost reports for applicable cost reporting
periods to recognize reasonable disbursements for such protection in lieu of the costs previously
allowed, if the self-insurance arrangement met the provisions of this section before November 1,
1977. Such reopening and revision are not mandatory for periods prior to April 1, 1977.
If a provider has made payments to a self-insurance fund or a pool during the period after December
31, 1974, and before April 1, 1977, an independent actuary, insurance company, or broker must
review the adequacy of the payments made by the end of the cost reporting period ending on or after
November 1, 1977. If the actuary, insurance company, or broker believes that the payments made are
excessive, then reimbursement will be limited to the amount determined necessary by the actuary,
insurance company, or broker. Any excess amounts may be carried forward and included in the
subsequent year's contribution to the extent that, when added to contributions paid in the subsequent
year, they do not exceed the amount determined necessary by the actuary, insurance company, or
broker.
In a self-insurance or pool arrangement, contributions must be paid into the fund within 75 days after
the end of a cost reporting period for the contributions to be recognized as an allowable cost for that
cost reporting period. Any withdrawals from the fund for other than malpractice losses or
comprehensive general liability losses in conjunction with
21-42.12 Rev. 406
01-83 COSTS RELATED TO PATIENT CARE 2162.11 (Cont.)
malpractice coverage and related expenses must be offset against allowable contributions to the fund.
In addition, all income earned by the fund must become part of the fund and used to establish
adequate fund levels. Any income earned and used for other than this purpose must be offset against
allowable payments in the year earned.
B. Unemployment and Workers' Compensation Insurance Coupled with Second Injury
Coverage.--The provisions of this section are effective with payments for unemployment and
workers' compensation coupled with second injury coverage beginning January 1, l979. If a provider
did not have full coverage under commercial insurance for any cost report that can be reopened in
accordance with 42 CFR 405.1885 and disbursed funds for such protection under alternative
arrangements, such costs of protection are allowable when:
1. the disbursement applies to January 1, 1976, or later; and
2. the provider conforms to the provisions of this section before January l, 1980.
Where a provider or group of providers included self-insured losses and related expenses in
allowable costs in accordance with §§2161.B or 2122.5C for open years, such providers may request
reopening and revision of cost reports for applicable cost reporting periods to recognize reasonable
disbursements for such protection in lieu of the costs previously allowed if the self-insurance
arrangement meets the provisions of this section before January 1, 1980. Such reopening and
revisions are not mandatory.
Where a provider has made payments to a self-insurance fund or a pool during the period after
December 31, l975, and before January 1, 1979, an independent actuary, insurance company or
broker must review the adequacy of the payments made by the end of the first cost reporting period
ending on or after June 30, 1979. If the actuary, insurance company or broker believes that the
payments made are excessive, then reimbursement will be limited to the amount determined
necessary by the actuary, insurance company, or broker. Any excess amounts may be carried
forward and included in the subsequent year's contribution to the extent that, when added to
contributions paid in the subsequent year, they do not exceed the amount determined necessary by
the actuary, insurance company or broker.
In a self-insurance or pool arrangement, contributions must be paid into the fund within 75 days after
the end of the cost reporting period for the contributions to be recognized as an allowable cost for
that cost reporting period. Any withdrawals from the fund for other than unemployment or workers'
compensation premiums or claims and related expenses must be offset against allowable
contributions to the fund. In addition, all income earned by the fund must become part of the fund
and used to establish adequate fund levels. Any income earned and used for other than this purpose
must be offset against allowable payments in the year earned.
Rev. 276 21-42.13
2161.11 (Cont.) COSTS RELATED TO PATIENT CARE 01-83
C. Employee Health Care Insurance.--The provisions of this section related to insurance
purchased from a limited purpose insurance company (captive), total self-insurance or a combination
of purchased insurance and self-insurance are effective with cost reports settled on or after January
15, 1983, and cost reports under appeal as of or subsequent to January 15, 1983. Prior to this date,
payments made to a captive insurance company or to a self-insurance fund designed to provide
employee health care coverage shall not be considered an allowable cost at the time the payment was
made. Cost recognition for periods prior to the effective date shall be limited to the premium cost of
commercial insurance purchased to provide this coverage or to the actual cost of the health expenses
paid on behalf of the employee at the time such expenses were actually incurred.
2162.12 Buy-Out Cost to Convert from a State-Administered Fund to a Self-Insurance Fund for
Unemployment Compensation or Workers' Compensation Insurance.--The charge made by a
governmental agency for the cost of pending and expected claims of employees of a business entity
which discontinues purchasing insurance coverage from the governmental agency is considered a
buy-out cost. Where a provider or group of providers or chain of providers incurs a liability
representing a "buy-out" cost to enable those providers to set up their own self-insurance fund for
unemployment compensation or workers' compensation coverage, the liability is an allowable cost of
the year incurred to be proportionately spread among the providers which are part of the buy-out
arrangement in an amount directly related to the provider's claims to be assumed by the State. Where
the State permits payment over a period greater than 1 year and issues an annual assessment of the
amount due, then the amount to be included in allowable costs cannot exceed the assessment. This
assessment establishes the annual liability which the provider must pay to the State. See §2305
where the amount is accrued on the books.
2162.13 Absence of Coverage.--Where a provider, other than a governmental (Federal, State, or
local) provider, has no insurance protection against malpractice or comprehensive general liability in
conjunction with malpractice, either in the form of a limited purpose or commercial insurance policy
or a self-insurance fund as described in §2162.7, any losses and related expenses incurred are not
allowable.
2162.14 Governmental Providers.--For all governmental providers (Federal, State, or local),
Medicare will reimburse its proportionate share of actual losses in the year paid, without funding or
subject to the deductible provisions of §2162.5, but only if the provider demonstrates to its
intermediary that it has a claims management and risk management program as described in
§2162.7D.
21-42.14 Rev. 276
9-76 COSTS RELATED TO PATIENT CARE 2l76
2l76. ADMINISTRATIVE COST INCURRED AFTER PROVIDER TERMINATES
PARTICIPATION IN PROGRAM
When a provider terminates its participation in the program, either voluntarily or involuntarily, or a
change of ownership occurs (see Health Insurance Regulations section 405.626), administrative costs
associated with the preparation and settlement of costs reports with an intermediary and other third
parties will be incurred after the effective date of termination. The direct administrative costs that
are reasonable and related to the settlement of reimbursement for patient care rendered while the
provider was participating in the program and bad debts resulting form coinsurance and deductibles
billed to Medicare patients are allowable. Examples of allowable direct administrative costs are
salaries and those costs associated with such salaries, i.e., fringe benefits, workmen's compensation
insurance, and payroll taxes; accounting benefits, workmen's compensation insurance, and payroll
taxes; accounting and legal fees which are incurred for bill preparation, bill processing, and cost
report preparation; and, where applicable, hearing fees and expenses incurred for settlement with an
intermediary and other third parties (see exception below). However, legal fees and related costs
incurred in the sale of the facilities, costs incurred on or after the effective date of termination for the
operation or maintenance of closing of the facility are not allowable. (See § 24l4.2B for patient care
services rendered after the effective date of termination and § l32A for gains or losses incurred on the
disposal of depreciable assets within l year after the date of termination.)
EXCEPTION: When a provider terminates its participation in the program more than l month before
the end of its cost reporting year and continues to operate a health care facility for more than l month
beyond the effective date of termination, the costs incurred for the preparation and settlement of a
cost report that may be required by other third parties will not be allowable.
EXAMPLE:
Provider's cost reporting year 10/1 - 9/30
Effective date of termination 5/31
Provider continues to operate health care
facility after 6/30
Due date of Medicare cost report 7/15
In the above example, only the costs associated with the preparation and settlement of the Medicare
cost report and costs incurred for preparation of bills to be submitted to other third parties for
services rendered prior to the effective date of termination are all allowable. Such costs are to be
included in the cost reporting period ending 5/3l and are subject to cost allocation and
apportionment.
Rev. 166 21-43
2l76.1 COSTS RELATED TO PATIENT CARE 9-76
2176.1 Allowable Direct Administrative Costs to be Included in Final Cost Report.--The
allowable direct administrative costs, to the extent they are necessary, proper, and reasonable, are to
be included in the provider's final cost report for the period ending with the date of termination of its
participation in the program or change of ownership and are subject to cost allocation and
apportionment. The provider must maintain adequate records to enable the intermediary to identify
and verify such costs that are included in the final cost report. For the due date of the final cost
report, see § 24l3.
2l76.2 Allowable Direct Administrative Costs Incurred After Final Cost Report is Filed.--When
a provider incurs additional allowable direct administrative costs after filing a final cost report, the
provider should notify the intermediary. The intermediary may adjust the final cost report or
required the provider to file an amended cost report, depending on the materiality of the adjustments.
When a provider is required to fill an amended cost report, such report is due within 45 days after
the date of notification by the intermediary.
21-44 Rev. 166
07-84 COSTS RELATED TO PATIENT CARE 2180
2180. REIMBURSEMENT FOR COSTS INCURRED IN RELATION TO UNION
ACTIVITIES
2180.1 Labor Union Organizing Activities.--Reasonable costs incurred by providers in activities
consistent with the National Labor Relations Act (NLRA) may represent allowable costs of
operation, provided such costs are not directly related to influencing employees with respect to
unionization and further provided such costs are not unreasonable in amount. The NLRA imposes
responsibilities and limitations on both management and labor. Management must have the
knowledge and skill to deal with their employees and the wide range of labor relations issues in order
to maintain an effective working environment. These rights and responsibilities of management
encompass various activities such as written and oral communication with employees, consultations
with attorneys or management advisors, and collective bargaining with union representatives. Unless
the provider's activities are unauthorized or prohibited by the NLRA or these guidelines, or unless
the costs incurred for such activities are unreasonable in amount or unnecessary, they will be
allowable.
Reasonable costs incurred to keep employees informed of issues and to keep the lines of
communication open between employees and employers are usually necessary and proper as they are
part of normal personnel management and, therefore, may be allowable costs, provided such costs
are not directly related to influencing employees with respect to unionization.
Costs incurred for activities directly related to influencing employees respecting unionization or
related to attempts to coerce employees or otherwise interfere with or restrain the exercise of
employee rights under the NLRA are not allowable costs for program purposes. Such costs are
unallowable whether such activities are performed directly by the provider or through an independent
contractor, consultant or outside attorney.
With respect to allowable costs for services furnished, only the reasonable portion of the total costs
incurred will be considered for reimbursement purposes. Expenses which are extraordinary in
amount or kind, or unreasonably exceed expenditures common in the health care field for activities
related to unionization, are not allowable costs.
Example: Reasonable costs incurred to furnish literature to employees or management
personnel explaining their rights and responsibilities under the NLRA are
allowable costs. Costs incurred to furnish literature designed to influence
employees respecting unionization or to teach techniques for influencing
employees respecting unionization are not allowable costs.
Example: Consultants and/or attorneys retained by a provider may be needed at times to
familiarize supervisors and employees with labor laws. Therefore, reasonable costs
incurred by a provider in seeking legal advice or counsel specifically on union
activity matters, such as informing provider management and supervisory
personnel regarding their legal rights and responsibilities under the NLRA with
regard to union organizing, are a necessary part of operations and are allowable
costs.
Rev. 312 21-44.1
2180.3 COSTS RELATED TO PATIENT CARE 07-84
Example: Reasonable costs incurred by a provider in providing training to supervisory
personnel on union activity matters which is a part of normal personnel
management are necessary and proper as part of the business operations of a
provider and, therefore, are allowable costs, provided such training is not designed
or timed to influence employees with respect to unionization.
Example: Provider activities which impact on wage or benefit programs, because they are
designed to influence employees with respect to unionization are not related to
patient care and, therefore, are not allowable costs for Medicare program purposes.
2180.2 Collective Bargaining.--Reasonable expenses incurred by a provider for collective
bargaining and related activities, unless disallowed under §2180.1 are allowable costs, provided the
activities are permitted by the NLRA. Contract negotiations and any procedures which flow from
enforcement of contract terms, whether in a collective or individual setting, are necessary to maintain
the continued operation of the provider, and, thus, are a precondition for the delivery of health
services.
Example: The cost of the services of management's representative in good-faith collective
bargaining activities is an allowable cost.
Example: Consultants and/or attorneys fees associated with collective bargaining activities in
violation of the NLRA are not allowable costs.
2180.3 Unallowable or Allowable But Not Reasonable Costs in Relation to Union Activities.--
Costs incurred for activities directly related to influencing employees respecting unionization or
related to attempts to coerce employees or otherwise interfering with or restraining the exercise of
employee rights under the NLRA are not allowable costs for program purposes. Such costs are
unallowable whether such activities are performed directly by the provider or through an independent
contractor, consultant or outside attorney.
Example: Costs incurred for activities directly related to expressing management's opinions
for purposes of influencing employees not to organize and to form a union are not
allowable costs.
With respect to allowable costs for services furnished, only the reasonable portion of the total
incurred costs will be considered for payment purposes where expenses are extraordinary in amount
or in kind, or which unreasonably exceed expenditures common in the health care field for activities
related to unionization.
21-44.2 Rev. 312
09-88 COSTS RELATED TO PATIENT CARE 2182.3
2182. SERVICES OF PHYSICIANS IN PROVIDERS
(Effective for Services Performed On or After October 1, 1983)
2182.1 General.--These sections govern reimbursement for services physicians furnished in
providers of services, including hospitals, skilled nursing facilities and comprehensive outpatient
rehabilitation facilities. If the physicians are compensated for their services by the provider or
another entity, the compensation they receive must be allocated among the various types of services
they furnish. Payment for the services they furnish to the provider is made on either a reasonable
cost basis or as a component part of prospective payment. These payments are made by the Part A
intermediary. Reimbursement for the services physicians furnish to individual patients in providers
is made under Part B on a reasonable charge basis by the carrier. However:
A. Reimbursement for physician services furnished in teaching hospitals that elect cost
reimbursement for such services is made on a reasonable cost basis by the Part A intermediary.
(See §2148.)
B. Reimbursement for physician services furnished in teaching settings is subject to additional
conditions. (See §§2108.8, 2218, 2420.)
C. Reimbursement for the services of interns and residents, as well as physicians who are
licensed to practice only in the provider setting, is made on a reasonable cost basis by the Part A
intermediary. (See §2120.)
D. Services furnished by physicians to individual patients in providers must meet the criteria in
§2182.4 to be reimbursed on a reasonable charge basis.
E. Reimbursement for physician services in all-inclusive rate hospitals may be made by the Part
A intermediary on a Part B per diem basis. An all-inclusive rate hospital is a participating
hospital in which patients are charged a fixed all-inclusive rate, computed (for inpatients) on a
daily or other time basis, or (for outpatients) on a per visit basis applicable uniformly to each
patient without regard either to the extent of services required by the patient or the distinction
between physicians' and hospital services.
2182.2 Provider Defined.--For the purpose of these instructions, a provider of services is a
participating hospital, skilled nursing facility (SNF) or comprehensive outpatient rehabilitation
facility (CORF). However, these instructions also can be used to determine customary charges for
physicians' services in nonparticipating facilities, e.g., hospitals and other institutional settings in
which physicians are compensated for their services and the patients do not pay for the physicians'
services they receive on a charge basis. The carrier is responsible for obtaining the data necessary to
determine customary charges for the physicians' services furnished in nonparticipating facilities.
2182.3 Allocation of Physician Compensation.--
A. Definition.--For purposes of this instruction, "physician compensation costs" means
monetary payments, fringe benefits, deferred compensation and any other items of value (excluding
office space, billing and collection services) a provider or other organization furnishes a physician in
return for the physician's services to the provider. All costs incurred by the provider, both direct and
indirect, related to the physician's private practice must be excluded from physician compensation
costs.
Rev. 348 21-45
2182.3(Cont.) COSTS RELATED TO PATIENT CARE 09-88
Other organizations are entities "related to" the provider, or entities that furnish services for the
provider "under arrangements."
B. General Rule on Allocation of Physician Compensation Costs.--Except as provided in
paragraph D of this section, each provider that incurs physician compensation costs must allocate
those costs, in proportion to the percentage of total time that is spent in furnishing each category of
services, among:
o Physician services to the provider (as described in §2182.6);
o Physician services to patients (as described in §2182.4); and
o Activities of the physician, such as funded research, that are not reimbursable under
either Part A or Part B of Medicare.
C. Allowable Physician Compensation Costs.--Only compensation allocated to reimbursable
physician services to the provider (as described in §2182.6) are includable among provider costs.
Generally, the total compensation received by a physician will be allocated among all services
furnished by the physician, unless:
1. a. The provider certifies that the compensation is attributable solely to the
physician's services to the provider; and
b. The physician bills all of his or her patients for the physician services he or she
furnishes to those patients and personally receives the payment from such billings. If returned
directly or indirectly to the provider or an organization related to the provider, these payments are not
compensation for physician services to the provider; or
2. The provider and physician agree to accept the assumed allocation of all the
physician's services to direct services to individual patients. In this situation a written allocation
agreement is not required.
D. Determination and Payment of Allowable Physician Compensation Costs.--
1. The intermediary will reimburse the provider for physician compensation costs only
if:
a. The provider submits to the intermediary a copy of the allocation agreement
between the provider and the physician that specifies the respective amounts of time (these may be
expressed in percentages) the physician spends in furnishing services to the provider, services to
patients that meet the criteria of §2182.4; and services that are not reimbursable under either Part A
or Part B; and the compensation is reasonable in terms of the time devoted to these services as
compared to the applicable Reasonable Compensation Equivalent limit.
2. In the absence of a written allocation agreement, the intermediary will assume, for
purposes of determining reasonable costs of the provider, that 100 percent of the physician's
compensation cost is allocated to services to patients.
21-46 Rev. 348
09-88 COSTS RELATED TO PATIENT CARE 2182.3(Cont.)
NOTE: If a provider is not seeking reasonable cost reimbursement for costs incurred in
compensating provider-based physicians for services to the provider, an allocation
agreement is not required.
E. Provider Recordkeeping Requirements.--The intermediary must advise providers that:
1. While they have some discretion as to the types of records they maintain as to the
allocation of physicians' time to services, the allocations must be supported by adequate
documentation and must normally be comparable to previous allocations or to similar situations in
comparable providers. See §2182.13 for an example of a format that providers may use to
substantiate allocation agreements.
2. Except for the assumed allocation situations, they must:
o Maintain the data and information used to allocate physician compensation in a
form that permits validation by the intermediary and the carrier;
o Report the data or information on which the physician compensation allocation is
based to the intermediary and promptly notify the intermediary of any revisions to the compensation
allocation; and
o Retain each physician compensation allocation agreement, and the information
on which it is based, for at least 4 years after the end of each cost reporting period to which the
allocation applies.
3. Allocation agreements are to be submitted annually as part of the cost report filing
process. (See §2182.13 for allocation agreement formats.) Revisions from the prior allocation
agreement could occur where there is a significant change in the manner or extent to which services
are furnished, an increase in the number of physicians in the department, or an increase in a
physician's administrative or supervisory duties. While the allocation agreement represents a
reasonable depiction of the distribution of physician time among covered physician services to
patients and to providers, and to noncovered services in the individual case, it should not be
inconsistent with allocations representing the distribution of time for physicians who furnish services
in like departments in similar hospitals. If the carrier and the intermediary believe that an allocation
agreement is atypical, the physician and provider are given a reasonable opportunity to explain the
factors they considered in completing it. Such issues, however, must be resolved before the
agreement can serve as a basis for reimbursement. If the carrier and the intermediary cannot agree
regarding the acceptability of the allocation agreement, refer the matter to the regional office.
In determining whether these agreements are acceptable, the intermediary, for example, also
considers its knowledge of the providers and the experience gained about them in the administration
of its private business. If necessary, the carrier and the intermediary may impose an allocation, based
on experience in other hospitals, until an acceptable agreement is approved. If the hospital or its
physicians disagree with an imposed allocation, the matter is referred to the regional office.
Rev. 348 21-47
2182.3(Cont.) COSTS RELATED TO PATIENT CARE 09-88
4. While we do not require the maintenance of daily logs or time records to support
provider services rendered by physicians, adequate documentation must be maintained to support the
total hours for these services to permit application of the RCE limits. This includes work or teaching
schedules, workload counts, or other documentation to substantiate these hours.
5. Where providers decide to employ time study techniques to substantiate either the
allocation of physicians' time to services or the actual provider services hours figure used in the RCE
computation, the provider may choose to employ the methodology described in subsection 2313.2.E,
Special Applications, but the provider may not be required by the servicing intermediary to utilize
that specific methodology.
F. Effort Reports.--Effort reports generally are not acceptable as a proxy for a time allocation
because effort cannot be quantified. However, they may be used if the carrier and the intermediary
determine that program payments do not differ significantly by use of effort reports, i.e., that in the
individual case, effort can be equated to time. If the intermediary, however, determines that there is
a difference between reported effort and actual time that unreasonably increases reimbursement, time
must be used. When, for example, there is a question of allocating compensation between covered
and noncovered services, such as research, the intermediary must adjust the cost reports based on
time.
2182.4 Conditions for Reasonable Charge Payment for "Physicians' Services" to Patients in
Providers.--
A. General.--The carrier will pay for physicians' services to patients of providers on a
reasonable charge basis only if the following requirements are met:
1. The services are personally furnished for an individual patient by a physician;
2. The services contribute directly to the diagnosis or treatment of an individual patient;
3. The services ordinarily require performance by a physician; and
4. In the case of anesthesiology, radiology, or laboratory services, the additional
requirements in either §2182.7, §2182.9 or §2182.11 are met.
B. Services of Physicians to Providers.--If a physician furnishes services in a provider that do
not meet the requirements in section A but are related to patient care, the intermediary pays for those
services, if otherwise covered, on a reasonable cost basis, or as an element of prospective payment,
as appropriate.
C. Effect of Billing Charges for Physician Services to a Provider.--If services furnished by a
physician to a provider are paid on a reasonable cost basis by the intermediary, neither the provider
nor physician may seek charge payment from the carrier, the beneficiary, or a private insurer. If the
physician, the provider, or a private
21-48 Rev. 348
09-88 COSTS RELATED TO PATIENT CARE 2182.4 (Cont.)
entity bills the carrier, the beneficiary or another insurer for physician services to the provider, the
provider in which and to which the services were furnished is considered to have violated its
provider participation agreement, and that agreement may be terminated. The carrier refers any
situation in which this happens to the regional office unless it is clearly an isolated case of billing
error.
D. Effect of Assumption of Operating Costs.--If a physician or an entity enters into an
agreement (such as a lease or concession) with a provider, under which the physician (or entity)
assumes some or all of the operating costs of the provider department:
1. The carrier makes reasonable charge payments only for physicians' services to
individual patients as defined in Paragraph A.
Rev. 348 21-48.1
09-88 COSTS RELATED TO PATIENT CARE 2182.4 (Cont.)
2. The physician (or other entity) must make its books and records available to the
provider and the intermediary, as necessary, to verify the nature and extent of the costs of the
services furnished by the physician (or other entity).
3. The intermediary reimburses the provider on a reasonable cost basis, to the extent the
provider incurs a cost, or as an element of prospective payment, for the lessee's costs associated with
producing these services, including overhead, supplies and equipment costs and the costs of
employing nonphysician personnel.
E. Independent Laboratory Services.--Services, such as surgical pathology services, furnished
to a provider patient by an independent laboratory, including the laboratory of another hospital, that
meet the general conditions in §2182.4.A. and the additional requirements in §2182.11 must be
reimbursed as physicians' services on a reasonable charge basis. These services cannot be billed
under arrangements. Other services, such as clinical diagnostic laboratory services, furnished to
hospital inpatients by an independent laboratory are covered as inpatient hospital services and
reimbursable to the hospital on a reasonable cost basis or under the prospective payment system.
(However, see §2804 for provisions concerning laboratory tests furnished to inpatients of a hospital
with a waiver under 602(k) of the 1983 Amendments to the Social Security Act.) Clinical diagnostic
laboratory services furnished by an independent laboratory to other than a hospital inpatient are
generally reimbursable under the clinical laboratory fee schedule provision.
F. Other Services and Items Furnished by Outside Suppliers.--Some providers obtain items
and services for their patients from outside sources. All items and services, except physicians'
services that meet the conditions of §2182.4, must be furnished to hospital inpatients under
arrangements. (See §2182.8.C. for a limited exception and §2804 for hospitals with extensive direct
billing of nonphysician services under Part B.) For items and services furnished to hospital
outpatients and SNF patients, reimbursement may be made either by the carrier on a reasonable
charge basis or by the intermediary to the provider of services (as long as the service is otherwise
covered as a SNF service or outpatient service at a hospital) on a reasonable cost basis. Physicians'
services, however, can be paid only on a reasonable charge basis. Examples:
1. A radiology clinic furnishes CT scan services to hospital inpatients. The technical
components of these services must be furnished under arrangements by the hospital. The
interpretation component must be reimbursed by the carrier on a reasonable charge basis. The
intermediary pays for the technical component. Reimbursement is made in the same manner for the
two components of CT scan services furnished to hospital outpatients and SNF patients or, the full
service is reimbursed by the carrier on a reasonable charge basis.
2. A surgeon inserts a pacemaker which he furnishes the hospital inpatient. The
physician's surgical services are paid by the carrier on a reasonable charge basis. The pacemaker is
covered only as an item obtained under arrangements and the physician must, therefore, bill the
hospital for the item itself. The hospital is paid for the pacemaker by the intermediary.
3. A supplier furnishes an artificial limb for a hospital inpatient. The artificial limb is
covered only as an item obtained under arrangements and must, therefore, be billed to the hospital.
The hospital is paid for the artificial limb by the intermediary.
Rev. 348 21-49
2182.5 COSTS RELATED TO PATIENT CARE 09-88
2182.5 Determining Reasonable Charges for "Physicians' Services" in Providers.--
A. General.--The carrier determines reasonable charges for physicians' services to patients in
providers in accordance with the general instructions governing reasonable charge payment as well
as the additional rules in paragraphs B-F of this section.
B. Customary and Prevailing Charges for Physicians' Services in Provider Settings.-
1. Utilizing compensation data collected by the intermediary, the carrier calculates
customary and prevailing charges for physicians' services furnished to individual patients in
providers in the same way as for physicians' services furnished outside the hospital, separating, when
appropriate, charges for physicians' services furnished in provider-based practices and physicians'
services furnished in office-based practices. It applies the appropriate customary and prevailing
charge screens in determining reasonable charges for physicians' services considering the setting.
For example, in the provider setting, it pays only for EKG interpretations, never the complete
service which includes nonphysician and technical inputs. These EKG interpretations are similar to
EKG interpretations furnished outside the hospital and are subject to the same prevailing charge
screens. They are different, however, from the complete service, which when furnished to a patient
outside a provider, includes a technical component. Charges for these different kinds of services are
accumulated separately, and customary and prevailing charges are established for each. For this
purpose, the carrier must use interpretation-only codes, e.g., EKG, EEG, radiology, ultrasound, and
pulmonary function.
In developing customary charges for physicians' services furnished in providers by physicians
compensated for those services by the provider or a related organization, the carrier establishes a
schedule of charges related to that part of the physician's compensation that is allocated to physicians'
services to individual patients. (However, if the hospital and the leasing entity are not under
common ownership or control, and are closely related only by virtue of the lease, then this rule does
not apply.) Office space and billing and collection costs are excluded from the base on which
compensation-related charges are determined. Generally, the carrier uses the compensation paid to
the physician during the hospital's most recently ended cost reporting period for this purpose. If the
compensation information is unavailable from the hospital, the intermediary makes a reasonable
estimate of a fair compensation amount based on what is paid for similar services in another hospital
and reports this amount to the carrier.
The carrier develops compensation-related charges on an item-by-item basis, considering the
frequency with which the various services are furnished, and the relative values assigned to each
service in a relative value study. The intermediary obtains the frequency data from the provider for
the same period as the physician compensation was paid.
If the hospital does not maintain frequency data in a form acceptable to the carrier, the hospital must
count and code its charge for each service for which a charge is made during a designated month.
For this purpose it must use the carrier's coding system. This frequency data is annualized and used
to determine compensation-related customary charges. Customary charges are determined in this
way as long as the physician continues to be compensated by the provider for physicians' services to
any patients. Compensation-related customary charges are revised as part of the next reasonable
charge update. Prevailing charge screens for physicians' services to provider patients
21-50 Rev. 348
09-88 COSTS RELATED TO PATIENT CARE 2182.5(Cont.)
include both compensation-related customary charges as well as the customary charges of physicians
who practice in providers but are not compensated for physicians' services by a provider.
If a physician has compensation arrangements with several hospitals, and the compensation-related
charges are different in each hospital, a separate identification/billing number is assigned for use in
each setting and different customary charges determined in each setting.
2. Example to Illustrate the Development of Compensation-Related Customary
Charges.-
a. The radiologist receives $125,000 per year from the hospital for furnishing
diagnostic services, reimbursable on a reasonable charge basis under Part B. He/she is not
compensated for any provider services.
b. The hospital pays for the radiologist's malpractice expense and for the
radiologist's cost of continuing medical education. These amounts are $5,000 and $2,500
respectively.
Compensation-related customary charges are established as follows:
Compensation-
Radiological Frequency of Relative Value Related
Procedures Service Units (RVU) Product Charge
Chest x-ray single 1,200 4.0 4,800 11.80
view
Chest x-ray, two 1,000 6.0 6,000 17.80
views
Spine, Complete 800 10.0 8,000 29.60
Shoulder, Complete 400 6.0 2,400 17.80
Wrist, Complete 400 6.0 2,400 17.80
Hand, Complete 200 6.0 1,200 17.80
Hip, Complete 300 7.0 2,100 20.70
Abdomen, Single 500 4.0 2,000 11.80
Upper G.I. 700 14.0 9,800 41.40
Colon, Barium Enema 500 12.0 6,000 35.50
44,700
Compensation $ 125,000
Malpractice Expense 5,000
Continuing Education 2,500
Total Compensation $ 132,500
Compensation = $132,500 = $2.96/RVU
RVU 44,700
C. Changes in Compensation Agreements.--If a physician who has been compensated by or
through a provider (or other entity) for physicians' services to individual patients ends his or her
compensation agreement and, instead, bills all patients
Rev. 348 21-51
2182.5(Cont.) COSTS RELATED TO PATIENT CARE 09-88
directly for his or her services, i.e., no longer receives any compensation from the hospital or its
insurers, determine the physician's customary charges for services based on the 50th percentile of the
weighted customary charges used to establish the prevailing charge for the service. These customary
charges remain in effect until you have accumulated charge data from at least 3 months of the 12-
month period of July 1 through June 30 preceding the January 1 annual reasonable charge update.
Customary charges are revised only at the time of the annual reasonable charge update.
If a physician terminates a direct billing arrangement and enters into a compensation agreement with
a provider, the carrier determines compensation-related customary charges in accordance with
paragraph B, except that during the first year the total payments made on the basis of the
compensation-related charges may not exceed what the total payment for a comparable volume of
services would have been under the physician's former direct billing practice. The carrier makes this
determination on a prospective basis by using reasonable estimates.
D. Additional Criteria for Certain Specialties.--In determining the amount of payment for
anesthesiology, radiology or pathology services furnished by a physician to an individual patient,
also follow the rules in §2182.8, §2182.10 or §2182.11.
E. Customary Charges for Physicians' Services in Outpatient Settings--Combined Billing
Previously Used.--There may be some situations in which combined billing was used in hospital
outpatient settings, and the physician was compensated by the hospital for his/her services to patients
on the basis of either a schedule of charges or variable percentages of charges. In this case, the
carrier uses the schedule of charges or the percentage of the combined charge paid by the hospital to
the physician as the physician's customary charges. The intermediary obtains this information from
the provider and reports it to the carrier.
F. Customary Charges for Physicians' Services in Outpatient Settings.--Undifferentiated
Charges Billed to Patients.--In some cases, charges for physicians' services to patients and the
provider's charges associated with these services have been combined and billed to patients on a
reasonable charge basis. The provider component of these undifferentiated charges must be
identified and billed by the provider to its intermediary. The carrier bases reimbursement only on the
portion of the charge that is attributed to physicians' services to patients, i.e., services that meet the
criteria in §2182.4.A. The component of the formerly combined charges that represents the
physicians' charges for their services must be separately identified. These are the physicians'
customary charges. The intermediary obtains the schedule of charges for these physicians' services
from the provider and reports it to the carrier.
2182.6 Conditions of Payment for Costs of Physicians' Services to Providers--
A. General.--Costs a provider incurs for services of physicians are allowable only if:
o The services do not meet the conditions in §2182.4.A. for reasonable charge
reimbursement for physicians' services to individual patients of a provider;
o The services do not include physician availability services, except for reasonable
availability services furnished for emergency rooms; (see §2109);
21-52 Rev. 348
09-88 COSTS RELATED TO PATIENT CARE 2182.6 (Cont.)
o The provider has incurred a cost for the salary or other compensation it paid the
physician for the services; and
o The costs incurred by the provider for the services meet the requirements regarding
costs related to patient care.
These services include, for example, departmental administration, supervision and training of staff,
quality control activity, autopsies, clinical laboratory services including analysis (except clinical
laboratory consultations and services performed by a physician in personal administration of test
devices, isotopes, or other materials to an individual patient), respiratory therapy, tissue committee
work, disposal of radiation waste, nonimaging nuclear medicine services, supervision of anesthetists
and routine blood gas studies including analysis of routine blood gas studies. Analysis of clinical
laboratory services or routine blood gas studies, although performed by specialists and primary care
physicians, are not separately billed under Part B.
B. Payment Determinations.--The intermediary makes payment for these services either as an
element of prospective payment or on a reasonable cost basis. When reimbursement is made on a
reasonable cost basis, the allowable cost cannot exceed the lower of the actual cost or the reasonable
compensation equivalent (RCE).
C. Reasonable Compensation Equivalents (RCEs).--HCFA establishes the methodology for
determining RCEs by considering average physician income by specialty and type of location. The
best available data are used. If the level of physician compensation exceeds the RCE limit, Medicare
payment is based on the RCE. The RCE limit represents reasonable compensation for a full-time
physician. Full time is 2,080 hours per year, including a reasonable amount of time devoted to
vacation, sick leave and continuing education. The intermediary considers the general practice of the
hospitals it serves in determining the reasonableness of a hospital-compensated physician's time
devoted to vacation, sick leave and continuing education. It also considers that the need for
continuing education in any individual year may vary substantially based on medical specialty and
the needs of an individual physician. Consultation with its medical advisors is appropriate.
NOTE: As a result of the clinical lab fee schedule, clinical diagnostic laboratory tests furnished by
a hospital laboratory for its outpatients are reimbursed on the basis of fee schedules. If the
hospital compensates its pathologists for provider services, the portion of the physician's
compensation attributable to provider services to hospital outpatients is not reimbursed on
a reasonable cost basis and is not subject to the reasonable compensation equivalent if
payment for the hospital's diagnostic clinical laboratory services is made pursuant to the
clinical laboratory fee schedule. However, the portion of the physician's compensation
attributable to provider services to hospital outpatients is reimbursed on a reasonable cost
basis and is subject to the reasonable compensation equivalent limit if payment for the
hospital's outpatient laboratory services is not made pursuant to the clinical laboratory fee
schedule. An example of such services is anatomic pathology services, such as the
preparation of a surgical pathology slide for which the hospital has established a separate
charge.
Rev. 348 21-53
2182.6 (Cont.) COSTS RELATED TO PATIENT CARE 09-88
The RCE limits are always applied to the hospital's entire cost reporting year based on the calendar
year (CY) in which the cost reporting year begins. For example, the CY 1983 limits apply to an
entire cost reporting year beginning October 1, 1983. (The RCE limits are applicable for services
rendered on or after October 1, 1983.)
The RCE limits are based on a work year of 2,080 hours, i.e., a 40-hour work week. If the physician
devotes more or less time to furnishing provider services, the RCE is adjusted accordingly. Thus, a
physician who spends 60 hours a week in administration of a department is subject to 150 percent of
the applicable limit for a physician who devotes full time to departmental services.
The intermediary uses the RCE levels to compute reimbursement when the physician is compensated
by the provider or other related organization for administrative, supervisory and other provider
services that are reimbursable under Medicare. In applying the RCE limits, the intermediary assigns
each compensated physician to the most appropriate specialty category. Table I - Estimates of Full-
Time Equivalency (FTE) Annual Average Net Compensation Levels for 1983 and 1984, §2182.6.F,
depicts reasonable compensation levels for nine physician specialties plus a total or general category.
If no specialty category is indicated, the intermediary uses the RCE level for the "Total" category,
which is based on income data for all physicians. For example, the "Total" category is used in
determining the reasonable cost for full-time physician administration of an emergency room. The
intermediary determines the appropriate geographic area classification using the tables in paragraph
G.
If the physician's contractual compensation covers all duties, activities and services furnished to the
provider and to its patients and the physician is employed full time, the lower of the physician's
actual compensation or the appropriate specialty compensation limit is used and adjusted by the
physician's allocation agreement to arrive at the program's allowable costs for physician
compensation. In the absence of an allocation agreement, it is assumed that l00 percent of the
compensation was related to services reimbursable on a Part B reasonable charge basis, and that
there are no allowable costs for the physician's services to the provider.
If the physician's compensation from the provider represents payment only for administrative,
supervisory and other provider services (i.e., the physician bills fees for all physicians' services
furnished to individual patients), then the lower of the physician's actual compensation or the
appropriate specialty compensation limit is used to arrive at the program's allowable costs for
physician compensation.
Generally, it is intended that the RCEs are applied separately for each physician. However, an
aggregated application is permitted in larger hospital departments which have similar arrangements
with a number of physicians of the same specialty to facilitate administration and reduce paperwork.
Under this optional methodology, the provider services hours and compensation of each involved
physician is determined individually and then aggregated by specialty to determine total provider
services hours and compensation by specialty for all involved physicians. The applicable RCE limit
is then applied to the aggregated provider services hours and the result compared to the aggregated
provider services compensation to determine allowable provider services compensation costs by
specialty.
21-54 Rev. 348
09-88 COSTS RELATED TO PATIENT CARE 2182.6(Cont.)
Example:
Profes-
Provider sional Provider Provider
Compen- Services Services Total Services Services
Physician sation Hours Hours Hours Percentage Compensation
A $110,000 230 2070 2300 10% $ 11,000
B 90,000 480 1920 2400 20% 18,000
C 80,000 1715 735 2450 70% 56,000
D 85,000 2040 360 2400 85% 72,250
Totals $365,000 4465 5085 9550 $157,250
Total Provider
Services Hours X RCE Amount = Time Adjusted RCE Limit
Work Year Hours (1984 Total
RCE Nonmetro-
politan areas)
4465 X $88,600 = $190,490
2080
The aggregated provider services compensation amount of $157,250 is allowable since it does not
exceed the time adjusted RCE limit of $190,490. If the RCE limits were applied to the physicians'
provider services compensation individually, not all of the provider services compensation
attributable to Physicians A and B is allowable.
In determining the reasonable cost of physician compensation for services to the provider, the
intermediary is not limited to merely applying the RCE limit based on existing staffing, but also
considers the inherent reasonableness of the arrangement. For example, it generally is not reasonable
for a hospital to compensate physicians in a particular department for a number of
administrative/managerial hours greatly in excess of the hours utilized in comparable departments in
other hospitals.
D. Exceptions to the RCE Limits.--
1. The RCE limits do not apply to inpatient hospital services payable under the
prospective payment system (PPS) and are not used to limit such costs in the PPS base year.
2. Some hospitals, particularly but not exclusively small or rural hospitals, may be
unable to recruit or maintain an adequate number of physicians at a compensation level within the
prescribed limits. If a hospital is able to demonstrate to the intermediary its inability to recruit or
maintain physicians at a compensation level allowable under the RCE limits (as documented, e.g., by
unsuccessful advertising through national medical or health care publications), then the intermediary
may grant an exception to the reasonable compensation limits established under these rules, to the
extent reasonable. An exception might be justified in cases where a provider is located in a remote
location and needs to pay a premium because of extraordinary travel time.
Rev. 348 21-55
2182.6(Cont.) COSTS RELATED TO PATIENT CARE 09-88
The provider's request for an exception, together with substantiating documentation, must be
submitted to the intermediary each year, no later than 90 days after the close of its cost reporting
period. In doing so, it must specify (1) the dollar amount in excess of the limit that it paid its
physicians; (2) the name and social security number of the physician; and (3) the specific reasons
why an exception is necessary. The hospital must furnish with its request for an exception adequate
supporting documentation. The documentation must include, but is not limited to, evidence that it
has actively sought to secure the services of physicians by advertising in appropriate journals and
similar publications.
E. Adjustments to the RCE Limits.--Intermediaries may adjust the allowance for an individual
physician upward to take into consideration the provider's costs of physician membership in
professional societies and continuing education. This adjustment is limited to actual costs incurred
up to a maximum of 5 percent of the time adjusted RCE limit. The lesser of actual cost or the 5
percent limit is then added to the RCE limit.
An intermediary may also adjust the RCE limit to take into account the cost of malpractice
insurance. To the extent malpractice insurance is shown to be related to a physician's (or a group of
physicians') services to the provider, the intermediary may recognize as an upward adjustment to the
RCE limit the related physician malpractice expense incurred by the provider.
The lesser of actual cost or the RCE limit adjusted appropriately to reflect allowances for the costs of
membership in professional associations, continuing medical education and/or malpractice insurance
premiums represents the reasonable compensation cost.
Where a written agreement between a provider-based physician and a provider clearly stipulates that
a portion of the total compensation paid to the physician by the provider is intended to reimburse the
physician for the costs incurred by the physician for membership in professional associations,
continuing medical education and/or malpractice insurance relating to the physician's services to the
provider, intermediaries may adjust the RCE limit upward to take into consideration the provider's
additional costs subject to the limitations as described above.
Example A: A non-Prospective Payment System (PPS) hospital is located in a metropolitan area
having a population greater than one million and compensates its radiologist $120,000 for both
physician and provider services during its cost reporting period beginning October 1, 1983. The
hospital pays the physician's membership fees in professional societies and for the physician's
continuing medical education which amounts to $6,000. The hospital also pays the physician's
malpractice insurance of $8,000. The physician works a full-time equivalent year of 2,080 hours and
the allocation agreement is 50 percent provider services and 50 percent physicians' services.
The applicable RCE amount from the tables in §2182.6.F is $123,400. This amount is factored by
the ratio of provider services hours to FTE hours (50% of 2,080 = 1,040 :- 2,080 = .5 X $123,400 =
$61,700) to determine the time adjusted RCE limit of $61,700. The time adjusted RCE limit of
$61,700 is increased by $3,000 (i.e. 50% of $6,000 = $3,000) to account for the costs of membership
in professional societies and continuing medical
21-56 Rev. 348
09-88 COSTS RELATED TO PATIENT CARE 2182.6(Cont.)
education since this amount is lower than five percent of the time adjusted RCE limit (i.e. 5% of
$61,700 = $3,085). The time adjusted RCE limit with this adjustment, $64,700, is further adjusted
by the provider component percentage of the malpractice premium (i.e. 50% of $8,000 = $4,000).
The RCE limit with appropriate adjusters amounts to $68,700.
The physician's actual compensation cost, including the cost of continuing medical education,
professional membership fees, and malpractice expense amounts to $134,000 (i.e., $120,000 +
$6,000 + $8,000 = $134,000). The provider component compensation amounts to $67,000 (i.e.,
$134,000 x 50% = $67,000).
The allowable cost is the lower of the actual cost or the adjusted RCE limit (i.e., $67,000 or
$68,700). In this case, the allowable cost is $67,000.
Example B: A non-PPS hospital is located in a nonmetropolitan area and compensates its
pathologist $75,000 for provider services which benefit both Medicare and non-Medicare patients
during its cost reporting period beginning October 1, 1983. The pathologist bills both Medicare and
non-Medicare patients directly for Part B physician services. The hospital pays the physician's
membership fees in professional societies and for the physician's continuing medical education
which amounts to $3,000. The hospital also pays the physician's malpractice insurance of $2,500.
During the cost reporting period, the physician spends l,300 hours or 62.5 percent of a full time
equivalent of 2,080 hours furnishing contracted provider services. The allocation agreement is 100
percent provider component.
1300
The time adjusted RCE limit is $71,188 (2080 X 113,900 = 71,188). This amount is increased by
$3,000, the actual costs incurred for membership in professional societies and continuing medical
education (Note: 5% of the time adjusted RCE limit is $3,559.) The time adjusted RCE limit with
this adjustment, $74,188, is further increased by the malpractice premium of $2,500 resulting in an
RCE limit of $76,688. Because the allocation is 100 percent provider component, the entire
malpractice expense is allowable.
The physician's compensation cost including the cost of continuing medical education, professional
membership fees and malpractice expense amounts to $80,500 (i.e., $75,000 + $3,000 + $2,500 =
$80,500).
The allowable cost is the lower of the actual cost or the adjusted RCE limit (i.e., $80,500 or
$76,688). In this case, the allowable cost is $76,688.
F. Table I--Estimates of Full-Time Equivalency (FTE) Annual Average Net
Compensation Levels for 1983 and 1984--The following compensation limits apply in the years
indicated. All figures are rounded to the nearest $100.
Rev. 348 21-57
2182.6(Cont.) COSTS RELATED TO PATIENT CARE 09-88
Table I.--ESTIMATES OF FTE ANNUAL AVERAGE NET COMPENSATION LEVELS FOR 1983
AND 1984
Non-Metropolitan Metropolitan area Metropolitan areas
Specialty Areas less than one greater than one
million million
1983 1984 1983 1984 1983 1984
Total 87,600 88,600 93,900 95,000 97,100 98,200
GP/FP 78,100 79,000 74,900 75,800 76,000 76,800
Int Med 82,300 83,200 83,200 84,400 90,700 91,800
Surgery 100,200 101,400 111,800 113,100 113,900 115,300
Pediatrics 71,700 72,600 83,300 84,300 77,000 77,900
OB/Gyn 109,700 111,000 106,600 107,800 107,600 108,800
Radiology 119,200 120,600 126,600 128,100 123,400 124,900
Psychiatry 76,000 76,800 78,100 79,000 84,400 85,400
Anesthesiology 91,800 92,800 109,700 111,000 109,700 110,000
Pathology 113,900 115,300 120,300 121,700 118,200 119,500
If a physician, such as a pathologist, bills all patients, except Medicare patients on a fee basis for covered
services that are payable under Medicare solely on a reasonable cost or PPS basis, program liability for these
services is a Medicare only cost.
G. Geographic Area and Classifications for RCE Limits.--As pointed out in paragraph C, RCE limits are
adjusted to account for differences in salary levels by location, as well as by specialty. In the limits set forth in
Table I, geographic areas are classified into three types: nonmetropolitan areas with populations of less than one
million, and metropolitan areas with populations of more than one million. Table II identifies by type of
location, geographic areas (Standard Metropolitan Statistical Areas) grouped into the latter two categories for
use with the 1983 RCE limits. Table III is similar except that Metropolitan Statistical Areas are utilized for use
with the 1984 RCE limits. All counties not listed and all other affected U.S. possessions and territories not part
of a State are considered nonmetropolitan areas.
21-57.1 Rev. 348
2182.6 (Cont.) COSTS RELATED TO PATIENT CARE 09-88
TABLE II
Type of Location
SMSA Counties Less than Greater
1 million than 1
million
Abilene, Texas Callahan, Jones, Taylor X
Akron, Ohio Portage, Summit X
Albany, Georgia Dougherty, Lee X
Albany, New York Albany, Montgomery, Rensselaer, X
Saratoga, Schenectady
Albuquerque, New Mexico Bernalillo, Sandoval X
Alexandria, Louisiana Grant, Rapides X
Allentown, Pennsylvania Pennsylvania--Carbon, Lehigh, X
Northampton, New Jersey--Warren
Altoona, Pennsylvania Blair X
Amarillo, Texas Potter, Randall X
Anaheim, California Orange X
Anchorage, Alaska 3rd Judicial Division X
Anderson, Indiana Madison X
Anderson, South Carolina Anderson X
Ann Arbor, Michigan Washtenaw X
Anniston, Alabama Calhoun X
Appleton, Wisconsin Calumet, Outagamie, Winnebago X
Arecibo, Puerto Rico Arecibo X
Asheville, North Carolina Buncombe, Madison X
Athens, Georgia Clarke, Madison, Oconee, Oglethorp X
Atlanta, Georgia Butts, Cherokee, Clayton, Cobb, X
Dekalb, Douglas, Fayette,
Forsyth, Fulton, Gwinnett,
Henry, Newton, Paulding,
Rockdale, Walton.
Atlantic City, New Jersey Atlantic X
Augusta, Georgia Georgia--Columbia, Richmond, X
South Carolina--Aiken
Austin, Texas Hays, Travis, Williamson X
Bakersfield, California Kern X
Baltimore, Maryland Anne Arundel, Baltimore, X
Baltimore City, Carroll,
Harford, Howard
Bangor, Maine Penobscot X
Baton Rouge, Louisiana Ascencion, East Baton Rouge, X
Livingston, West Baton Rouge
Battle Creek, Michigan Barry, Calhoun X
Bay City, Michigan Bay X
Beaumont, Texas Hardin, Jefferson, Orange X
Bellingham, Washington Whatcom X
21-58 Rev. 348
02-85 COSTS RELATED TO PATIENT CARE 2182.6(Cont.)
Type of Location
SMSA Counties Less than Greater
1 million than l
million
Benton Harbor, Michigan ................... Barrien, Cass ....................................X
Billings, Montana ................................ Yellowstone .....................................X
Biloxi, Mississippi .............................. Hancock, Harrison, Stone ................X
Binghamton, New York ...................... New York--Broome, Tioga, ............X
Pennsylvania--Susquehanna
Birmingham, Alabama ........................ Jefferson, Shelby, St. Clair, ..............X
Walker
Bismarck, North Dakota ..................... Burleigh, Morton ..............................X
Bloomington, Illinois .......................... McLean ............................................X
Bloomington, Indiana .......................... Monroe .............................................X
Boise, Idaho ........................................ Ada ...................................................X
Boston, Massachusetts ........................ Massachusetts--Essex, Middlesex, X
Norfolk, Plymouth, Suffolk,
New Hampshire--Rockingham
Bradenton, Florida .............................. Manatee ............................................X
Bremerton, Washington ...................... Kitsap ...............................................X
Bridgeport, Connecticut ...................... Fairfield ............................................X
Brownsville, Texas ............................. Cameron ...........................................X
Bryan, Texas ....................................... Brazos...............................................X
Buffalo, New York .............................. Erie, Niagara .................................... X
Burlington, North Carolina ................. Alamance .........................................X
Burlington, Vermont ........................... Chittenden ........................................X
Caguas, Puerto Rico ............................ Caguas ..............................................X
Canton, Ohio ....................................... Carroll, Stark ....................................X
Caspar, Wyoming ................................ Natrona .............................................X
Cedar Rapids, Iowa ............................. Linn ..................................................X
Champaign, Illinois ............................. Champaign .......................................X
Charleston, South Carolina ................. Berkeley, Charleston, Dorchester .....X
Charleston, West Virginia ................... Kanawaha, Putnam ...........................X
Charlotte, North Carolina .................... Gaston, Mecklenburg, Union ...........X
Charlottesville, Virginia ...................... Albemarle, Charlottesville, ..............X
Fluranna, Greene
Chattanooga, Tennessee ...................... Tennessee--Hamilton, Marion, ........X
Sequatchie, Georgia--Catoosa,
Dade, Walker
Cheyenne, Wyoming ........................... Laramie ............................................X
Chicago, Illinois .................................. Cook, Du Page, Kane, Lake, ............ X
McHenry, Will
Chico, California ................................. Butte .................................................X
Cincinnati, Ohio .................................. Ohio--Clermont, Hamilton, Warren .X
Indiana--Dearborn, Kentucky--
Boone, Campbell, Kanton
Clarksville, Tennessee ........................ Tennessee--Montgomery, Kentucky-X
Christian
Rev. 318 21-59
2182.6(Cont.) COSTS RELATED TO PATIENT CARE 02-85
Type of Location
SMSA Counties Less than Greater
1 million than l
million
Colorado Springs, Colorado ................ El Paso, Teller ................................... X
Columbia, Missouri ............................ Boone ................................................ X
Columbia, South Carolina ................... Lexington, Richland .......................... X
Columbus, Georgia ............................. Georgia--Chattahoochee, Muscogee . X
(or Columbus), Alabama
--Russell
Columbus, Ohio .................................. Delaware, Fairfield, Franklin, ........... X
Madison, Pickaway
Corpus Christi, Texas ......................... Nueces, San Patricio ......................... X
Cumberland, Maryland ....................... Maryland--Allegany, West ................ X
Virginia--Mineral
Dallas, Texas ....................................... Collin, Dallas, Denton, Ellis ............. X
Hood, Johnson, Kaufman,
Parker, Rockwall, Tarrant,
Wise
Danville, Illinois ................................. Vermillion ......................................... X
Danville, Virginia ............................... Pittsylvania ........................................ X
Davenport, Iowa .................................. Iowa--Scott, Illinois--Henry, ............. X
Rock Island
Dayton, Ohio ....................................... Greene, Miami, Montgomery, ........... X
Preble
Daytona Beach, Florida ....................... Volusia .............................................. X
Decatur, Illinois ................................... Macon................................................ X
Denver, Colorado ................................ Adams, Arapahoe, Boulder, Denver . X
Douglas, Gilpin, Jefferson
Des Moines, Iowa ............................... Polk, Warren ..................................... X
Detroit, Michigan ................................ Lapeer, Livingston, Macomb, ........... X
Oakland, St. Clair, Wayne
Dubuque, Iowa .................................... Dubuque ............................................ X
Duluth, Minnesota............................... Minnesota--St. Louis, Wisconsin ...... X
Douglas
Eau Claire, Wisconsin ......................... Chippewa, Eau Claire ....................... X
Elkhart, Indiana ................................... Elkhart ............................................... X
Elmira, New York ............................... Chemung ........................................... X
El Paso, Texas ..................................... El Paso .............................................. X
Enid, Oklahoma .................................. Garfield ............................................. X
Erie, Pennsylvania ............................... Erie .................................................... X
Eugene, Oregon ................................... Lane ................................................... X
Evansville, Indiana .............................. Indiana--Gibson, Posey, .................... X
Vanderburgh, Warrick,
Kentucky--Henderson
Fargo, North Dakota ........................... North Dakota--Cass ........................... X
Fayetteville, Arkansas ......................... Benton, Washington .......................... X
Fayetteville, N. Carolina ..................... Cumberland ....................................... X
Flint, Michigan .................................... Genesee, Shiawassee ......................... X
21-60 Rev. 318
02-85 COSTS RELATED TO PATIENT CARE 2182.6(Cont.)
Type of Location
SMSA Counties Less than Greater
1 million than l
million
Florence, Alabama .............................. Colbert, Lauderdale ..........................X
Florence, S. Carolina ........................... Florence ...........................................X
Fort Collins, Colorado ........................ Larimer .............................................X
Fort Lauderdale, Florida...................... Broward ............................................ X
Fort Meyers, Florida............................ Lee ....................................................X
Fort Smith, Arkansas .......................... Arkansas--Crawford, Sebastian,.......X
Oklahoma--Le Flore, Sequoyah
Fort Walton Beach, Florida ................. Okaloosa...........................................X
Fort Wayne, Indiana ............................ Adams, Allen, De Kalb, Wells .........X
Fresno, California ............................... Fresno ...............................................X
Gadsden, Alabama .............................. Etowah .............................................X
Gainesville, Florida ............................. Alachua ............................................X
Galveston, Texas ................................. Galveston .........................................X
Gary, Indiana ....................................... Lake, Porter ......................................X
Glens Falls, New York ........................ Warren, Washington ........................X
Grand Forks, North Dakota ................. North Dakota--Grand Forks, ............X
Minnesota--Polk
Grand Rapids, Michigan ..................... Kent, Ottawa ....................................X
Great Falls, Montana ........................... Cascade ............................................X
Greeley, Colorado ............................... Weld .................................................X
Green Bay, Wisconsin ......................... Brown ...............................................X
Greensboro, N. Carolina ..................... Davidson, Forsyth, Guilford, ...........X
Randolph, Stokes, Yadkin
Greenville, S. Carolina ........................ Greenville, Pickens, Spartanburg .....X
Hagerstown, Maryland ........................ Washington ......................................X
Hamilton, Ohio ................................... Butler ................................................X
Harrisburg, Pennsylvania .................... Cumberland, Dauphin, Perry ............X
Hartford, Connecticut ......................... Hartford, Middlesex, Tolland........... X
Hattiesburg, Mississippi ...................... Forrest, Lamar ..................................X
Hickory, N. Carolina ........................... Alexander, Catawba .........................X
Honolulu, Hawaii ................................ Honolulu ..........................................X
Houston, Texas ................................... Brazoria, Fort Bend, Harris, .............X
Liberty, Montgomery, Waller
Huntington, West Virginia .................. West Virginia--Cabell, Wayne, ........X
Kentucky--Boyd, Greenup,
Ohio--Lawrence
Huntsville, Alabama ........................... Limestone, Madison, Marshall .........X
Indianapolis, Indiana ........................... Boone, Hamilton, Hancock, ............. X
Hendricks, Johnson, Marion,
Morgan, Shelby
Iowa City, Iowa ................................... Johnson ............................................X
Jackson, Michigan ............................... Jackson .............................................X
Jackson, Mississippi ............................ Hinds, Rankin ..................................X
Jackson, Tennessee ............................. Madison ............................................X
Jacksonville, Florida ........................... Baker, Clay, Duval, Nassau, ............X
St. Johns
Rev. 318 21-61
2182.6(Cont.) COSTS RELATED TO PATIENT CARE 02-85
Type of Location
SMSA Counties Less than Greater
1 million than l
million
Jacksonville, N. Carolina .................... Onslow .............................................X
Jamestown, New York ........................ Chautauqua.......................................X
Janesville, Wisconsin .......................... Rock .................................................X
Jersey City, New Jersey ...................... Hudson .............................................X
Johnson City, Tennessee ..................... Tennessee--Carter, Hawkins, ...........X
Sullivan, Unicoi, Washington,
Virginia--Bristol, Scott,
Washington
Johnstown, Pennsylvania .................... Cambria, Somerset ...........................X
Joplin, Missouri .................................. Jasper, Newton .................................X
Kalamazoo, Michigan ......................... Kalamazoo, Van Buren ....................X
Kankakee, Illinois ............................... Kankakee ..........................................X
Kannapolis, N. Carolina ...................... Cabarrus, Rowan ..............................X
Kansas City, Missouri ......................... Missouri--Cass, Clay, Jackson, ........ X
Platte, Ray, Kansas--Johnson,
Wyandotte
Kenosha, Wisconsin ............................ Kenosha ............................................X
Killeen, Texas ..................................... Bell, Coryell .....................................X
Knoxville, Tennessee .......................... Anderson, Blunt, Knox, Union ........X
Kokomo, Indiana ................................. Howard, Tipton ................................X
LaCrosse, Wisconsin ........................... LaCrosse ...........................................X
Lafayette, Indiana ................................ Tippecanoe .......................................X
Lafayette, Louisiana ............................ Lafayette ...........................................X
Lake Charles, Louisiana ...................... Calcasieu ..........................................X
Lakeland, Florida ................................ Polk ..................................................X
Lancaster, Pennsylvania ...................... Lancaster ..........................................X
Lansing, Michigan .............................. Clinton, Eaton, Ingham, Ionia ..........X
Laredo, Texas ...................................... Webb ................................................X
Las Cruces, New Mexico .................... Dona Ana .........................................X
Las Vegas, Nevada .............................. Clark .................................................X
Lawrence, Kansas ............................... Douglas ............................................X
Lawton, Oklahoma .............................. Comanche.........................................X
Lewiston, Maine.................................. Androscoggin ...................................X
Lexington, Kentucky ........................... Bourbon, Clark, Fayette, ..................X
Jessamine, Scott, Woodford
Lima, Ohio .......................................... Allen, Auglaize, Putnam, Van Wert X
Lincoln, Nebraska ............................... Lancaster ..........................................X
Little Rock, Arkansas .......................... Pulaski, Saline ..................................X
Long Branch, New Jersey ................... Monmouth ........................................X
Longview, Texas ................................. Gregg, Harrison ................................X
Lorain, Ohio ........................................ Lorain ...............................................X
Los Angeles, California ...................... Los Angeles ...................................... X
Louisville, Kentucky ........................... Kentucky--Bullitt, Jefferson, ............X
Oldham, Indiana--Clark, Floyd
Lubbock, Texas ................................... Lubbock ...........................................X
Lynchburg, Virginia ............................ Amherst, Appomattox, Campbell ....X
21-62 Rev. 318
02-85 COSTS RELATED TO PATIENT CARE 2182.6(Cont.)
Type of Location
SMSA Counties Less than Greater
1 million than l
million
Macon, Georgia ................................... Bibb, Houston, Jones, Twiggs .........X
Madison, Wisconsin ............................ Dane .................................................X
Manchester, New Hampshire .............. Hillsborough.....................................X
Manitowoc, Wisconsin ....................... Manitowoc .......................................X
Mansfield, Ohio .................................. Richland ...........................................X
Marion, Indiana ................................... Grant.................................................X
Mayaguez, Puerto Rico ....................... Mayaguez .........................................X
McAllen, Texas ................................... Hidalgo .............................................X
Medford, Oregon ................................. Jackson .............................................X
Melbourne, Florida ............................. Brevard .............................................X
Memphis, Tennessee ........................... Tennessee--Shelby, Tipton, ..............X
Arkansas--Crittenden,
Mississippi--Desoto
Meridian, Mississippi .......................... Lauderdale ........................................X
Miami, Florida .................................... Dade ................................................. X
Michigan City, Indiana ........................ Laporte .............................................X
Midland, Texas ................................... Midland ............................................X
Milwaukee, Wisconsin ........................ Milwaukee, Ozaukee, Washington .. X
Waukesha
Minneapolis, Minnesota ...................... Minnesota--Anoka, Carver, .............. X
Chicago, Dakota, Hennepin,
Ramsey, Scott, Washington,
Wright, Wisconsin--St. Croix
Missoula, Montana .............................. Missoula ...........................................X
Mobile, Alabama ................................. Baldwin, Mobile...............................X
Modesto, California ............................ Stanislaus .........................................X
Monroe, Louisiana .............................. Quachita ...........................................X
Montgomery, Alabama ....................... Autagua, Elmore, Montgomery ........X
Muncie, Indiana .................................. Delaware ..........................................X
Muskegon, Michigan .......................... Muskegon, Oceana ...........................X
Nashville, Tennessee ........................... Cheatham, Davidson, Dickson, ........X
Robertson, Rutherford,
Sumner, Williamson, Wilson
Nassau, New York .............................. Nassau, Suffolk ................................ X
New Bedford, Massachusetts .............. Bristol ...............................................X
New Brunswick, New Jersey .............. Middlesex .........................................X
New Haven, Connecticut .................... New Haven .......................................X
New London, Connecticut .................. New London .....................................X
New Orleans, Louisiana ...................... Jefferson, Orleans, St. Bernard ........ X
St. Tammany
New York, New York ......................... Bronx, Kings, New York, Putnam ... X
Queens, Richmond, Rockland,
Westchester, New Jersey--
Bergen
Newark, New Jersey............................ Essex, Morris, Somerset, Union ......X X
Newark, Ohio ...................................... Licking .............................................X
Rev. 318 21-63
2182.6(Cont.) COSTS RELATED TO PATIENT CARE 02-85
Type of Location
SMSA Counties Less than Greater
1 million than l
million
Newburgh, New York ......................... Orange ..............................................X
Newport News, Virginia ..................... Gloucester, Hampton City, James ....X
City, Newport News, York
Norfolk, Virginia ................................. Virginia--Chesapeake,Nansemond, ..X
Norfolk, Portsmouth, Virginia
Beach City, North Carolina--
Currituck
N.E. Pennsylvania, Pa ......................... Lackawanna, Luzerne, Monroe ........X
Ocala, Florida ...................................... Marion ..............................................X
Odessa, Texas ..................................... Ector .................................................X
Oklahoma City, Oklahoma ................. Canadian, Cleveland, McClain, .......X
Oklahoma, Pottawatomie
Olympia, Washington ......................... Thurston ...........................................X
Omaha, Nebraska ................................ Nebraska--Douglas, Sarpy, Iowa ......X
--Pottawatomie
Orlando, Florida .................................. Orange, Osceola, Seminole ..............X
Owensboro, Kentucky ......................... Daviess .............................................X
Oxnard, California .............................. Ventura .............................................X
Panama City, Florida ........................... Bay ...................................................X
Parkersburg, W. Virginia .................... West Virginia--Wirt, Wood, ............X
Ohio--Washington
Pascagoula, Mississippi ...................... Jackson .............................................X
Paterson, New Jersey .......................... Passaic ..............................................X
Pensacola, Florida ............................... Escambia, Santa Rosa ......................X
Peoria, Illinois ..................................... Peoria, Tazewell, Woodford ............X
Petersburg, Virginia ............................ Dinwiddie, Prince George ................X
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania ................. Pennsylvania--Bucks, Chester, ......... X
Delaware, Montgomery,
Philadelphia, New Jersey--
Burlington, Camden, Gloucester
Phoenix, Arizona ................................ Maricopa .......................................... X
Pine Bluff, Arkansas ........................... Jefferson ...........................................X
Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania ..................... Allegheny, Beaver, Washington, ...... X
Westmoreland
Pittsfield, Massachusetts ..................... Berkshire ..........................................X
Pocatello, Idaho ................................... Bannock, Power ...............................X
Ponce, Puerto Rico .............................. Ponce ................................................X
Portland, Maine ................................... Cumberland, Sagadahoc ...................X
Portland, Oregon ................................. Oregon--Clackamas, Multnomah, .... X
Washington, Washington--Clark
Portsmouth, New Hampshire .............. New Hampshire--Rockingham,........X
Strafford Maine--York
Poughkeepsie, New York .................... Dutchess ...........................................X
Providence, Rhode Island ................... Bristol, Kent, Providence, ................X
Washington
Provo, Utah ......................................... Utah ..................................................X
21-64 Rev. 318
02-85 COSTS RELATED TO PATIENT CARE 2182.6(Cont.)
Type of Location
SMSA Counties Less than Greater
1 million than l
million
Pueblo, Colorado................................. Pueblo ..............................................X
Quincy, Illinois .................................... Adams ..............................................X
Racine, Wisconsin............................... Racine...............................................X
Raleigh, N. Carolina ........................... Durham, Orange, Wake....................X
Rapid City, South Dakota ................... Meade, Pennington ...........................X
Reading, Pennsylvania ........................ Berks ................................................X
Redding, California ............................. Shasta ...............................................X
Reno, Nevada ...................................... Washoe .............................................X
Richland, Washington ......................... Benton, Franklin ...............................X
Richmond, Virginia ............................. Charles City, Chesterfield, ...............X
Goochland, Hanover, Henrico,
Powhatan, Richmond
Riverside, California ........................... Riverside, San Bernardino ............... X
Roanoke, Virginia ............................... Botetourt, Craig, Roanoke ...............X
Rochester, Minnesota .......................... Olmsted ............................................X
Rochester, New York .......................... Livingston, Monroe, Ontario,...........X
Orleans, Wayne
Rockford, Illinois ................................ Boone, Winnebago ...........................X
Sacramento, California ....................... Placer, Sacramento, Yolo ................. X
Saginaw, Michigan.............................. Saginaw ............................................X
St. Cloud, Minnesota .......................... Benton, Sherburne, Stearns ..............X
St. Joseph, Missouri ............................ Andrew, Buchanan ...........................X
St. Louis, Missouri .............................. Missouri--Franklin, Jefferson, .......... X
St. Charles, St. Louis, St.
Louis City, Illinois--Clinton,
Madison, Monroe, St. Clair
Salem, Oregon ..................................... Marion, Polk ....................................X
Salisbury, N. Carolina ......................... Cabarries, Rowan .............................X
Salinas, California ............................... Monterey ..........................................X
Salt Lake City, Utah ............................ Davis, Salt Lake, Topele, Weber .....X
San Angelo, Texas .............................. Tom Green .......................................X
San Antonio, Texas ............................. Bexar, Comal, Guadalupe ................ X
San Diego, California .......................... San Diego .........................................X
San Francisco, California .................... Alameda, Contra Costa, Marin, .......X
San Francisco, San Mateo
San Jose, California ............................ Santa Clara .......................................X
San Juan, Puerto Rico ......................... Bayomen, Carolina, Catano, ............ X
Guaynalco, San Juan, Tru,
Jilo Alto
Santa Barbara, California .................... Santa Barbara ...................................X
Santa Cruz, California ......................... Santa Cruz ........................................X
Santa Fe, New Mexico ........................ Santa Fe ............................................X
Santa Rosa, California ........................ Sonoma ............................................X
Sarasota, Florida ................................. Sarasota ............................................X
Savannah, Georgia .............................. Bryan, Chatham, Effingham............. X
Seattle, Washington ............................ King, Snohomish .............................. X
Rev. 318 21-65
2182.6(Cont.) COSTS RELATED TO PATIENT CARE 02-85
Type of Location
SMSA Counties Less than Greater
1 million than l
million
Sharon, Pennsylvania .......................... Merier ...............................................X
Sheboygan, Wisconsin ........................ Sheboygan ........................................X
Sherman, Texas ................................... Grayson ............................................X
Shreveport, Louisiana ......................... Bossier, Caddo, Webster ..................X
Sioux City, Iowa ................................. Iowa--Woodbury, Nebraska-- ..........X
Dakota
Sioux Falls, S. Dakota ......................... Minnehaha ........................................X
South Bend, Indiana ............................ Marshall, St. Joseph .........................X
Spokane, Washington ......................... Spokane ............................................X
Springfield, Illinois ............................. Menard, Sangaman ...........................X
Springfield, Massachusetts ................. Hampden, Hampshire .......................X
Springfield, Missouri .......................... Christian, Greene .............................X
Springfield, Ohio ................................. Champaign, Clark ............................X
State College, Pa ................................. Centre ...............................................X
Steubenville, Ohio............................... Ohio--Jefferson, West Virginia ........X
Brooke, Hancock
Stockton, California ............................ San Joaquin ......................................X
Syracuse, New York............................ Madison, Onondaga, Oswego ..........X
Tacoma, Washington .......................... Pierce ................................................X
Tallahassee, Florida ............................ Leon, Wakulla ..................................X
Tampa, Florida .................................... Hillsborough, Pasco, Pineallas ......... X
Terre Haute, Indiana............................ Clay, Sullivan, Vermillion, ..............X
Vigo
Texarkana, Arkansas ........................... Arkansas--Little River, Miller ..........X
Texas--Bowie
Toledo, Ohio ....................................... Ohio--Fulton, Lucas, Ottawa, ...........X
Wood, Michigan--Monroe
Topeka, Kansas ................................... Jefferson, Osage, Shawnee ...............X
Trenton, New Jersey ........................... Mercer ..............................................X
Tuscon, Arizona .................................. Pima .................................................X
Tulsa, Oklahoma ................................. Creek, Mayes, Osage, Rogers, .........X
Tulsa, Wagoner
Tuscaloosa, Alabama .......................... Tuscaloosa ........................................X
Tyler, Texas ........................................ Smith ................................................X
Utica, New York ................................. Herkimer, Oneida .............................X
Vallejo, California ............................... Napa, Solano ....................................X
Victoria, Texas .................................... Victoria.............................................X
Vineland, New Jersey ......................... Cumberland ......................................X
Visalia, California ............................... Tulare ...............................................X
Waco, Texas ........................................ McLennan ........................................X
Washington, D.C. ................................ D.C.--District of Columbia .............. X
Maryland--Charles, Montgomery,
Prince Georges, Virginia--
Alexandria, Arlington, Fairfax,
Loudoun, Prince William
Waterloo, Iowa .................................... Black Hawk ......................................X
21-66 Rev. 318
09-88 COSTS RELATED TO PATIENT CARE 2182.6(Cont)
Type of Location
SMSA Counties Less than Greater
1 million than l
million
Wausau, Wisconsin Marathon X
West Palm Beach, Florida Palm Beach X
Wheeling, West Virginia West Virginia--Marshall, Ohio X
Ohio--Belmont
Wichita, Kansas Butler, Sedgwick X
Williamsport, Pennsylvania Lycoming X
Wilmington, Delaware Delaware--New Castle, Maryland, X
Cecil, New Jersey--Salem
Wilmington, N. Carolina Brunswick, New Hanover X
Worcester, Massachusetts Worcester X
Yakima, Washington Yakima X
York, Pennsylvania Adams, York X
Youngstown, Ohio Mahoning, Trumbell X
Yuba City, California Sutter, Yuba X
Rev. 348 21-67
2182.6(Cont.) COSTS RELATED TO PATIENT CARE 09-88
TABLE III
Type of Location
MSA Counties Less than Greater
1 million than l
million
Abilene, Texas Taylor X
Aquadilla, Puerto Rico Aquadilla X
Akron, Ohio Portage, Summit X
Albany, Georgia Dougherty, Lee X
Albany-Schnectady-Troy, Albany, Greene, Montgomery, X
New York Rensselaer, Saratoga, Schenectady
Albuquerque, New Mexico Bernalillo X
Alexandria, Louisiana Rapides X
Allentown-Bethlehem, Pennsylvania--Carbon, Lehigh, X
Pennsylvania-New Jersey Northampton, New Jersey--
Warren
Alton-Granite City, Jersey, Madison X
Illinois
Altoona, Pennsylvania Blair X
Amarillo, Texas Potter, Randall X
Anaheim-Santa Ana, Orange X
California
Anchorage, Alaska Anchorage X
Anderson, Indiana Madison X
Anderson, South Carolina Anderson X
Ann Arbor, Michigan Washtenaw X
Anniston, Alabama Calhoun X
Appleton-Oshkosh-Neenah, Calumet, Outagamie, Winnebago X
Wisconsin
Arecibo, Puerto Rico Arecibo X
Asheville, North Carolina Buncombe X
Athens, Georgia Clarke, Jackson, Madison, Oconee X
Atlanta, Georgia Barrow, Butts, Cherokee, Clayton, X
Cobb, Coweta, Dekalb,
Douglas, Fayette, Forsyth,
Fulton, Gwinnett, Henry,
Newton, Paulding, Rockdale,
Spalding, Walton
Atlantic City, New Jersey Atlantic, Cape May X
Augusta, Georgia--Columbia, McDuffie, X
Georgia-South Carolina Richmond, South Carolina--Aiken
Aurora-Elgin, Illinois Kane, Kendall X
Austin, Texas Hays, Travis, Williamson X
21-67.1 Rev. 348
09-88 COSTS RELATED TO PATIENT CARE 2182.6(Cont.)
TABLE III
Type of Location
MSA Counties Less than Greater
1 million than l
million
Bakersfield, California Kern X
Baltimore, Maryland Baltimore City, Anne Arundel, Baltimore, X
Carroll, Harford, Howard, Queen Annes
Bangor, Maine Penobscot X
Baton Rouge, Louisiana Ascension, East Baton Rouge, Livingston, X
West Baton Rouge
Battle Creek, Michigan Calhoun X
Beaumont-Port Arthur, Hardin, Jefferson, Orange X
Texas
Beaver County, Beaver X
Pennsylvania
Bellingham, Washington Whatcom X
Benton Harbor, Michigan Berrien, Michigan X
Bergen-Passaic, New Jersey Bergen, Passaic X
Billings, Montana Yellowstone X
Biloxi-Gulfport, Hancock, Harrison X
Mississippi
Binghamton, New York Broome, Tioga X
Birmingham, Alabama Biount, Jefferson, Saint Clair, Shelby, X
Walker
Bismarck, North Dakota Burleigh, Morton X
Bloomington, Indiana Monroe X
Bloomington-Normal, McLean X
Illinois
Boise City, Idaho Ada X
Boston-Lawrence-Salem- Essex, Middlesex, X
Lowell-Brockton, Norfolk, Plymouth, Suffolk
Massachusetts
Boulder-Longmont, Boulder X
Colorado
Bradenton, Florida Manatee X
Brazoria, Texas Brazoria X
Bremerton, Washington Kitsap X
Bridgeport-Stamford- Fairfield X
Norwalk-Danbury,
Connecticut
Brownsville-Harlingen, Cameron X
Texas
Bryan-College Station Brazos X
Texas
Rev. 348 21-67.2
2182.6(Cont.) COSTS RELATED TO PATIENT CARE 09-88
TABLE III
Type of Location
MSA Counties Less than Greater
1 million than l
million
Buffalo, New York Erie X
Burlington, North Carolina Alamance X
Burlington, Vermont Chittenden, Grande Isle X
Caguas, Puerto Rico Caguas X
Canton, Ohio Carroll, Stark X
Casper, Wyoming Natrona X
Cedar Rapids, Iowa Linn X
Champaign-Urbana-Rantoul, Champaign X
Illinois
Charleston, South Carolina Berkeley, Charleston, Dorchester X
Charleston, West Virginia Kanawaha, Putnam X
Charlotte-Gastonia-Rock Hill North Carolina--Cabarrus, Gaston, X
North Carolina- Lincoln, Mecklenberg, Rowan,
South Carolina Union, South Carolina--York
Charlottesville, Virginia Albemarle, Charlottesville City, X
Fluranna, Greene
Chattanooga, Tennessee- Georgia--Catoosa, Dade, Walker, X
Georgia Tennessee--Hamilton, Marion
Sequatchie
Chicago, Illinois Cook, DuPage, McHenry X
Chico, California Butte X
Cincinnati, Ohio-Kentucky- Indiana--Dearborn, Kentucky--Boone, X
Indiana Campbell, Kanton, Ohio--Clermont,
Hamilton, Warren
Clarksville-Hopkinsville, Kentucky--Christian, Tennessee-- X
Tennessee-Kentucky Montgomery
Cleveland, Ohio Cuyahoga, Geauga, Lake, Medina X
Colorado Springs, Colorado El Paso X
Columbia, Missouri Boone X
Columbia, South Carolina Lexington, Richland X
Columbus, Georgia-Alabama Alabama--Russell, Georgia-- X
Chattahoochee, Muscogee
Columbus, Ohio Delaware, Fairfield, Franklin, Licking, X
Madison, Pickaway, Union
Corpus Christi, Texas Nueces, San Patricio X
Cumberland, Maryland- Maryland--Allegheny, West Virginia-- X
West Virginia Mineral
21-67.3 Rev. 348
09-88 COSTS RELATED TO PATIENT CARE 2182.6(Cont.)
TABLE III
Type of Location
MSA Counties Less than Greater
1 million than l
million
Dallas, Texas Collin, Dallas, Denton, Ellis, X
Kaufman, Rockwall
Danville, Virginia Danville City, Pittsylvania X
Davenport-Rock Island- Iowa--Scott, Illinois--Henry, X
Moline, Iowa-Illinois Rock Island
Dayton-Springfield, Ohio Clarke, Greene, Miami, Montgomery X
Daytona Beach, Florida Volusia X
Decatur, Illinois Macon X
Denver, Colorado Adams, Arapahoe, Denver, Douglas, X
Jefferson
Des Moines, Iowa Dallas, Polk, Warren X
Detroit, Michigan Lapeer, Livingston, Macomb, Monroe, X
Oakland, Saint Clair, Wayne
Dothan, Alabama Dele, Houston X
Dubuque, Iowa Dubuque X
Duluth, Minnesota- Minnesota--St. Louis, Wisconsin-- X
Wisconsin Douglas
East St. Louis-Belleville, Clinton, St. Clair X
Illinois
Eau Claire, Wisconsin Chippewa, Eau Claire X
El Paso, Texas El Paso X
Elkhart-Goshen, Indiana Elkhart X
Elmira, New York Chemung X
Enid, Oklahoma Garfield X
Erie, Pennsylvania Erie X
Eugene-Springfield, Oregon Lane X
Evansville, Indiana- Indiana-Posey, Vanderburgh, X
Kentucky Warrick, Kentucky, Henderson
Fargo-Moorhead, North Minnesota--Clay, North Dakota--Cass X
Dakota-Minnesota
Fayetteville, North Cumberland X
Carolina
Fayetteville-Springdale, Washington X
Arizona
Flint, Michigan Genesee X
Florence, Alabama Colbert, Lauderdale X
Florence, South Carolina Florence X
Fort Collins-Loveland, Larimer X
Colorado
Rev. 348 21-67.4
2182.6(Cont.) COSTS RELATED TO PATIENT CARE 09-88
TABLE III
Type of Location
MSA Counties Less than Greater
1 million than l
million
Fort Lauderdale-Hollywood- Broward X
Pompano Beach, Florida
Fort Myers, Florida Lee X
Fort Pierce, Florida Martin, St. Lucie X
Fort Smith, Arkansas- Arkansas--Crawford, Sebastian, X
Oklahoma Oklahoma--Sequoyah
Fort Walton Beach, Florida Okaloosa X
Fort Wayne, Indiana Allen, De Kalb, Whitley X
Fort Worth-Arlington, Johnson, Parker, Tarrant X
Texas
Fresno, California Fresno X
Gadsden, Alabama Etowah X
Gainesville, Florida Alachua, Bradford X
Galveston-Texas City, Galveston X
Texas
Gary-Hammond, Indiana Lake, Porter X
Glens Falls, New York Warren, Washington X
Grand Forks, North Dakota Grand Forks X
Grand Rapids, Michigan Kent, Ottawa X
Great Falls, Montana Cascade X
Greeley, Colorado Weld X
Green Bay, Wisconsin Brown X
Greensboro-Winston-Salem- Davidson, Davis, Forsyth, Guilford, X
HighPoint, North Carolina Randolph, Stokes, Yadkin
Greenville-Spartanburg, Greenville, Pickens, Spartanburg X
South Carolina
Hagerstown, Maryland Washington X
Hamilton-Middletown, Ohio Butler X
Harrisburg-Lebanon- Cumberland, Dauphin, Lebanon, Perry X
Carlisle, Pennsylvania
Hartford-Middletown- Hartford, Lichtfield, Middlesex, Tolland X
New Britain-Bristol,
Connecticut
Hickory, North Carolina Alexander, Burke, Catawba X
Honolulu, Hawaii Honolulu X
Houma-Thibodaux, Lafourche, Terrebonne X
Louisiana
Houston, Texas ............................. Fort Bend, Harris, Liberty, Montgomery, .. X
Waller
Huntington-Ashland, Kentucky--Boyd, Carter, Greenup, X
West Virginia-Kentucky- Ohio--Lawrence, West Virginia--Cabell,
Ohio Wayne
21-67.5 Rev. 348
09-88 COSTS RELATED TO PATIENT CARE 2182.6(Cont.)
TABLE III
Type of Location
MSA Counties Less than Greater
1 million than l
million
Huntsville, Alabama Madison X
Indianapolis, Indiana Boone, Hamilton, Hancock, Hendricks, X
Johnson, Marion, Morgan, Shelby
Iowa City, Iowa Johnson X
Jackson, Michigan Jackson X
Jackson, Mississippi Hinds, Madison, Rankin X
Jacksonville, Florida Clay, Duval, Nassau, St. Johns X
Jacksonville, North Carolina Onslow X
Janesville-Beloit, Rock X
Wisconsin
Jersey City, New Jersey Hudson X
Johnson City-Kingsport- Tennessee--Carter, Hawkins, Sullivan, X
Bristol, Tennessee- Unicoi, Washington, Virginia--Bristol
Virginia City, Scott, Washington
Johnstown, Pennsylvania Cambria, Somerset X
Joliet, Illinois Grundy, Will X
Joplin, Missouri Jasper, Newton X
Kalamazoo, Michigan Kalamazoo X
Kankakee, Illinois Kankakee X
Kansas City, Kansas Johnson, Leavenworth, Miami, Wyandotte X
Kansas City, Missouri Cass, Clay, Jackson, Lafayette, Platte, X
Ray
Kenosha, Wisconsin Kenosha X
Killeen-Temple, Texas Bell, Coryell X
Knoxville, Tennessee Anderson, Blount, Grainger, Jefferson, X
Knox, Sevier, Union
Kokomo, Indiana Howard, Tipton X
LaCrosse, Wisconsin LaCrosse X
Lafayette, Louisiana Lafayette, St. Martin X
Lafayette, Indiana Tippecanoe X
Lake Charles, Louisiana Calcasieu X
Lake Country, Illinois Lake X
Lakeland-Winterhaven, Polk X
Florida
Lancaster, Pennsylvania Lancaster X
Lansing-East Lansing, Clinton. Eaton, Ingham X
Michigan
Laredo, Texas Webb X
Las Cruces, New Mexico Dona Ana X
Las Vegas, Nevada Clark X
Lawrence, Kansas Douglas X
Lawton, Oklahoma Comanche X
Lewiston-Auburn, Maine Androscogin X
Rev. 348 21-67.6
2182.6(Cont.) COSTS RELATED TO PATIENT CARE 09-88
TABLE III
Type of Location
MSA Counties Less than Greater
1 million than l
million
Lexington-Fayette, Bourbon, Clark, Fayette, Jessamine X
Kentucky Scott, Woodford
Lima, Ohio Allen, Auglaize X
Lincoln, Nebraska Lancaster X
Little Rock-North Little Faulkner, Lonoke, Pulaski, Saline X
Rock, Arkansas
Longview-Marshall, Texas Gregg, Harrison X
Lorain-Elyria, Ohio Lorain X
Los Angeles-Long Beach, Los Angeles X
California
Louisville, Kentucky- Indiana--Clark, Floyd, Harrison, X
Indiana Kentucky--Bullitt, Jefferson, Oldham,
Shelby
Lubbock, Texas Lubbock X
Lynchburg, Virginia Amherst, Campbell, Lynchburg City X
Macon-Warner Robins, Bibb, Houston, Jones, Peach X
Georgia
Madison, Wisconsin Dane X
Manchester-Nashua, Hillsboro, Merrimack X
New Hampshire
Mansfield, Ohio Richland X
Mayaguez, Puerto Rico Mayaguez X
McAllen-Edinburg-Mission, Hidalgo X
Texas
Medford, Oregon Jackson X
Melbourne-Titusville-Palm Brevard X
Bay, Florida
Memphis, Tennessee- Arkansas--Crittenden, Mississippi-- X
Arkansas-Mississippi De Soto, Tennessee--Shelby, Tipton
Miami-Hialeah, Florida Dade X
Middlesex-Somerset- Hunterdon, Middlesex, Somerset X
Hunterdon, New Jersey
Midland, Texas Midland X
Milwaukee, Wisconsin Milwaukee, Ozaukee, Washington, Waukesha X
Minneapolis-St. Paul, Minnesota--Anoka, Carver, Chicago, Dakota X
Minnesota-Wisconsin Hennepin, Isanti, Ramsey, Scott,
Washington, Wright, Wisconsin--St. Croix
Mobile, Alabama Baldwin, Mobile X
Modesto, California Stanislaus X
Monmouth-Ocean, Monmouth, Ocean X
New Jersey
Monroe, Louisiana Quachita X
21-67.7 Rev. 348
09-88 COSTS RELATED TO PATIENT CARE 2182.6(Cont.)
TABLE III
Type of Location
MSA Counties Less than Greater
1 million than l
million
Montgomery, Alabama Autauga, Elmore, Montgomery X
Muncie, Indiana Delaware X
Muskegon, Michigan Muskegon X
Nashville, Tennessee Cheatham, Davidson, Dickson, Robertson X
Rutherford, Sumner, Williamson, Wilson
Nassau-Suffolk, New York Nassau, Suffolk X
New Bedford-Fall River- Bristol X
Attlebor, Massachusetts
New Haven-Waterbury- New Haven X
Meriden, Connecticut
New London-Norwich, New London X
Connecticut
New Orleans, Louisiana Jefferson, Orleans, St. Bernard, X
St. Charles, St. John the Baptist,
St. Tammany
New York, New York Bronx, Kings, New York City, Putnam, X
Queens, Richmond, Rockland, Westchester
Newark, New Jersey Essex, Morris, Sussex, Union X
Niagara Falls, New York Niagara X
Norfolk-Virginia Beach- Chesapeake City, Gloucester, Hampton City X
NewPort News, Virginia James City Co., Newport News City,
Norfolk City, Poquoson, Portsmouth City,
Suffolk City, Virginia Beach City,
Williamsburg City, York
Oakland, California Alameda, Contra Costa X
Ocala, Florida Marion X
Odessa, Texas Ector X
Oklahoma City, Oklahoma Canadian, Cleveland, Logan, McClain, X
Oklahoma, Pottawatomie
Olympia, Washington Thurston X
Omaha, Nebraska-Iowa Iowa--Pottawatamie, Nebraska--Douglas, X
Sarpy, Washington
Orange County, New York Orange X
Orlando, Florida Orange, Osceola, Seminole X
Owensboro, Kentucky Daviess X
Oxnard-Ventura, California Ventura X
Panama City, Florida Bay X
Parkersburg-Marietta, Ohio--Washington, West Virginia--Wood X
West Virginia-Ohio
Pascagoula, Mississippi Jackson X
Pensacola, Florida Escambia, Santa Rosa X
Peoria, Illinois Peoria, Tazewell, Woodford X
Rev. 348 21-67.8
2182.6(Cont.) COSTS RELATED TO PATIENT CARE 09-88
TABLE III
Type of Location
MSA Counties Less than Greater
1 million than l
million
Philadelphia, New Jersey--Burlington, Camden X
Pennsylvania-New Jersey Gloucester, Pennsylvania--Bucks,
Chester, Delaware, Montgomery,
Philadelphia
Phoenix, Arizona Maricopa X
Pine Bluff, Arkansas Jefferson X
Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania Alleghany, Fayette, Washington, X
Westmoreland
Pittsfield, Massachusetts Berkshire X
Ponce, Puerto Rico Ponce X
Portland, Maine Cumberland, Sagadahoc, York X
Portland, Oregon Clackamas, Multnomah, Washington, X
Yamhill
Portsmouth-Dover- Rockingham, Strafford X
Rochester, New Hampshire
Poughkeepsie, New York Dutchess X
Providence-Pawtucket- Bristol, Kent, Newport, Providence, X
Woonsocket, Rhode Island Washington
Provo-Orem, Utah Utah X
Pueblo, Colorado Pueblo X
Racine, Wisconsin Racine X
Raleigh-Durham, Durham, Franklin, Orange, Wake X
North Carolina
Reading, Pennsylvania Berks X
Redding, California Shasta X
Reno, Nevada Washoe X
Richland-Kennewick-Pasco, Benton, Franklin X
Washington
Richmond-Petersburg, Charles City County, Chesterfield, X
Virginia Colonial Heights City, Dinwiddie,
Goochland, Hanover, Henrico, Hopewell
City, New Kent, Petersburg City, Powhatan,
Prince George, Richmond City
Riverside-San Bernardino, Riverside, San Bernardino X
California
Roanoke, Virginia Botetourt, Roanoke, Roanoke City, X
Salem City
Rochester, Minnesota Olmsted X
Rochester, New York Livingston, Monroe, Ontario, Orleans, X
Wayne
Rockford, Illinois Boone, Winnebago X
21-67.9 Rev. 348
09-88 COSTS RELATED TO PATIENT CARE 2182.6(Cont.)
TABLE III
Type of Location
MSA Counties Less than Greater
1 million than l
million
Sacramento, California Eldorado, Placer, Sacramento, X
Yolo
Saginaw-Bay City-Midland, Bay, Midland, Saginaw X
Michigan
St. Cloud, Minnesota Benton, Sherburne, Stearns X
St. Joseph, Missouri Buchanan X
St. Louis, Missouri- Illinois--Monroe, Missouri--Franklin, X
Illinois Jefferson, St. Charles, St. Louis,
St. Louis City
Salem, Oregon Marion, Polk X
Salinas-Seaside-Monterey, Monterey X
California
Salt Lake City-Ogden, Utah Davis, Salt Lake, Weber X
San Angelo, Texas Tom Green X
San Antonio, Texas Bexar, Comal, Guadalupe X
San Diego, California San Diego X
San Francisco, California Marin, San Francisco, San Mateo X
San Jose, California Santa Clara X
San Juan, Puerto Rico Fajardo, San Juan X
Santa Barbara-Santa Maria- Santa Barbara X
Lompoc, California
Santa Cruz, California Santa Cruz X
Santa Rosa-Petaluma, Sonoma X
California
Sarasota, Florida Sarasota X
Savannah, Georgia Chatham, Effingham X
Scranton-Wilkes Barre, Columbia, Lackawanna, Luzerne, X
Pennsylvania Monroe, Wyoming
Seattle, Washington King, Snohomish X
Sharon, Pennsylvania Mercer X
Sheboygan, Wisconsin Sheboygan X
Sherman-Denison, Texas Grayson X
Shreveport, Louisiana Bossier, Caddo X
Sioux City, Iowa-Nebraska Iowa--Woodbury, Nebraska--Dakota X
Sioux Falls, South Dakota Minnehaha X
South Bend-Mishawaka, St. Joseph X
Indiana
Spokane, Washington Spokane X
Springfield, Illinois Menard, Sangamon X
Springfield, Missouri Christian, Greene X
Springfield, Massachusetts Hampden, Hampshire X
State College, Pennsylvania Centre X
Rev. 348 21-67.10
2182.6(Cont.) COSTS RELATED TO PATIENT CARE 09-88
TABLE III
Type of Location
MSA Counties Less than Greater
1 million than l
million
Steubenville-Weirton, Ohio--Jefferson, West Virginia-- X
Ohio-West Virginia Brooke, Hancock
Stockton, California San Joaquin X
Syracuse, New York Madison, Onondaga, Oswego X
Tacoma, Washington Pierce X
Tallahassee, Florida Gadsden, Leon X
Tampa-St. Petersburg- Hernando, Hillsborough, Pasco, Pinelles X
Clearwater, Florida
Terre Haute, Indiana Clay, Vigo X
Texarkana, Texas-Arkansas Arkansas--Miller, Texas--Bowie X
Toledo, Ohio Fulton, Lucas, Wood X
Topeka, Kansas Shawnee X
Trenton, New Jersey Mercer X
Tucson, Arizona Pima X
Tulsa, Oklahoma Creek, Osage, Rogers, Tulsa, Wagoner X
Tuscaloosa, Alabama Tuscaloosa X
Tyler, Texas Smith X
Utica-Rome, New York Herkimer, Oneida X
Vallejo-Fairfield-Napa, Napa, Solano X
California
Vancouver, Washington Clark X
Victoria, Texas Victoria X
Vineland-Millville-Bridgeton, Cumberland X
New Jersey
Visalia-Tulare-Porterville, Tulare X
California
Waco, Texas McLennan X
Washington, DC-Maryland- DC--District of Columbia, Maryland-- X
Virginia Calvert, Charles, Frederick,
Montgomery, Prince Georges,
Virginia--Alexandria, Arlington,
Fairfax, Fairfax City, Falls Church
City, Loudoun, Manassas City,
Manassas Park City, Prince William,
Stafford
Waterloo-Cedar Falls, Iowa Black Hawk, Bremer X
Wausau, Wisconsin Marathon X
West Palm Beach-Boca Raton- Palm Beach X
Delray Beach, Florida
Wheeling, West Virginia-Ohio Ohio--Belmont, West Virginia--Marshall, X
Ohio
21-67.11 Rev. 348
09-88 COSTS RELATED TO PATIENT CARE 2182.6(Cont.)
TABLE III
Type of Location
MSA Counties Less than Greater
1 million than l
million
Wichita, Kansas Butler, Sedgwick X
Wichita Falls, Texas Wichita X
Williamsport, Pennsylvania Lycoming X
Wilmington, Delaware- Delaware--New Castle, Maryland--Cecil, X
New Jersey-Maryland New Jersey--Salem
Wilmington, North Carolina New Hanover X
Worcester-Fitchburg- Worcester X
Leominster, Massachusetts
Yakima, Washington Yakima X
York, Pennsylvania Adams, York X
Youngstown-Warren, Ohio Mahoning, Trumbull X
Yuba City, California Sutter, Yuba X
2182.7 Conditions for Payment of Charges--Anesthesiology Services.-
A. General.--Anesthesiology services personally furnished by a physician are reimbursed on a
reasonable charge basis. A physician may also be reimbursed on a reasonable charge basis for the personal
medical direction he/she furnishes to a qualified anesthetist, e.g., certified registered nurse anesthetist
(CRNA), anesthesia assistant (AA) and interns or residents.
B. Concurrent Procedures--Medical Direction.--
1. The direction of not more than four concurrent anesthesia procedures may be a physician
service reimbursable on a reasonable charge basis if the physician does not perform any other services
(except as provided in paragraph C) during the same period of time. In all cases in which medical direction
is furnished, the physician must be physically present in the operating suite.
2. The carrier reimburses a physician for concurrent anesthesiology services furnished to
patients in a provider on a reasonable charge basis only if the services meet the conditions for reasonable
charge payment in §2182.4.A, and the physician:
a. Performs a pre-anesthetic examination and evaluation;
b. Prescribes the anesthesia plan;
c. Personally participates in the most demanding procedures in the anesthesia plan,
including induction and emergence;
d. Ensures that any procedures in the anesthesia plan that he or she does not perform are
performed by a qualified individual;
Rev. 348 21-67.12
2182.7(Cont.) COSTS RELATED TO PATIENT CARE 09-88
e. Monitors the course of anesthesia administration at frequent intervals;
f. Remains physically present and available for immediate diagnosis and treatment of
emergencies; and
g. Provides indicated post-anesthesia care.
3. If anesthesiologists are in a group practice, one physician member may provide the pre-
anesthesia examination and evaluation and another fulfill the other criteria. Similarly, one physician
member of the group may provide post-anesthesia care while another member of the group furnishes the
other component parts of the anesthesia service. However, the medical record must indicate that the services
were furnished by physicians and identify the physicians who rendered them.
C. Other Services Furnished by the Physician While Directing Concurrent Procedures.--A physician
who is concurrently directing the administration of anesthesia to not more than four surgical patients is
ordinarily not involved in furnishing additional services to other patients. However, addressing an
emergency of short duration in the immediate area, or administering an epidural or caudal anesthetic to ease
labor pain, or periodic, rather than continuous, monitoring of an obstetrical patient does not substantially
diminish the scope of control exercised by the physician in directing the administration of anesthesia to the
surgical patients and does not constitute a separate service for the purpose of determining whether the
medical direction criteria are met. Further, a physician may receive patients entering the operating suite for
the next surgery while directing concurrent anesthesia procedures or check or discharge patients in the
recovery room and handle scheduling matters without affecting reasonable charge reimbursement.
However, if the physician leaves the immediate area of the operating suite for other than short durations,
devotes extensive time to an emergency case or is otherwise not available to respond to the immediate needs
of the surgical patients, the physician's services to the surgical patients are supervisory in nature and the
carrier does not make reasonable charge payment.
Example: A physician is directing CRNAs during three concurrent procedures. A medical emergency
develops in one case that demands the physician's personal continuing involvement. Since the physician is
no longer able to personally respond to the immediate needs of the other two surgical patients, medical
direction ends in those two cases.
D. Concurrent Procedures--Supervision.--When the physician does not fulfill the criteria in
§§2182.7.B.1. and 2182.7.B.2. or is involved in furnishing more than four procedures concurrently, the
concurrent anesthesia services are physician services to the provider in which the procedures are performed.
In such cases, the physician is not required to meet the criteria of §§2182.7.B.2.c and 2182.7.B.2.g
personally, but must ensure that a qualified individual performs any procedure in which he/she does not
personally participate. In these cases, the intermediary will pay for the services the physician furnished, i.e.,
the services are not physicians' services reimbursable on a reasonable charge basis.
21-68 Rev. 348
05-85
COSTS RELATED TO PATIENT CARE
2182.8
2182.8 Determining Reasonable Charges for Anesthesia Services.--
A. General.--The large majority of anesthesiologists use relative value schedules and dollar
conversion factors to set their fees. The relative value schedules generally assign procedure-
specific base unit values, and provide for additional units to take into account such factors as time,
risk and age of the patient. Time units represent the elapsed period of time from when the
physician prepares the patient for induction and ends when the physician or anesthetist is no longer
in personal attendance with the patients.
Reasonable charges for anesthesia services are, therefore, based on a combination of such unit
values, to which dollar conversion factors are applied.
B. Procedure Personally Performed by a Physician.--If the anesthesia procedure is furnished
by a physician, the carrier determines reasonable charges by allowing no more than one time unit
for each 15-minute interval, or fraction thereof, beginning from the time the physician begins to
prepare the patient for induction and ending when the patient may be safely placed under post-
operative supervision and the physician is no longer in personal attendance. The same computation
is made if an anesthetist assists the physician in the care of a single patient.
C. Medical Direction--Inpatient Hospital Anesthesia.--The carrier determines reasonable
charges for the physician's concurrent services, i.e., medical direction, by allowing no more than
one time unit for each 30-minute interval, or fraction thereof, beginning from the time the physician
or anesthetist begins to prepare the patient for induction and ending when the patient may be safely
placed under post-operative supervision and the physician and anesthetist are no longer in personal
attendance.
Exception:
Cost Reporting Periods Beginning After September 30, 1983 and Before October 1, 1984 -If it was
the physician's practice to employ CRNAs and include charges for their services in his/her bills for
anesthesiology services as of the last day of the hospital's most recent cost reporting period (of at
least l2 months) ending before September 30, 1983, determine payment under paragraph E.l.
Cost Reporting Periods Beginning on or After October 1, 1984 - If it is the physician's practice to
employ CRNAs and other qualified anesthetists and to include charges for their services in his/her
bills for anesthesiology services, determine payment under paragraph E.l. This billing practice
applies to existing and new employment relationships between physicians and anesthetists effective
with hospital cost reporting periods beginning on or after October 1, 1984 and before October 1,
1987.
D. Attending Anesthesiologist Services.--If an anesthesia procedure is furnished in a
teaching setting and an attending physician relationship is established, the carrier determines
reasonable charges in accordance with paragraph B. In such cases, the attending physician is
usually with the resident for the entire procedure, although there may be cases in which 15-minute
time units may be paid for two concurrent procedures.
Rev. 325 21-69
2182.8 (Cont.) COSTS RELATED TO PATIENT CARE 05-85
E. Medical Direction--Other Settings.--
1. When the anesthetists are employees of the physician, the carrier determines
reasonable charges for the physician's services, i.e., medical direction, by allowing no more than
one time unit for each 15-minute interval, or fraction thereof, beginning from the time the physician
or anesthetist begins to prepare the patient for induction and ending when the patient may be safely
placed under post-operative supervision and the physician and anesthetist are no longer in personal
attendance.
2. When the anesthetists are not the employees of the physician, all the aspects in the
preceding paragraph are the same except that the carrier will allow no more than one time unit for
each 30-minute interval, or fraction thereof.
F. "Standby" Anesthesia Services.--Reasonable charge payment may be made for a
physician's "standby" anesthesia services when a physician is physically present in an operating
suite monitoring the patient's condition, making medical judgments regarding the patient's
anesthesia needs and ready to furnish anesthesia services as necessary to a specific patient who is
known to be in potential need of such services. For example, when a patient is given a local
anesthetic for performance of a surgical procedure because of the general state of his or her health,
it is also recognized that it may become necessary to administer general anesthesia during the
operation, and an anesthesiologist may be physically present in the operating suite and standing by
to furnish the services as needed. The carrier determines "standby" services the same as any other
anesthesia procedure, i.e., it makes reasonable charge reimbursement for up to four concurrent
procedures.
G. Supervision of More Than Four Procedures Concurrently.--If the physician is involved in
furnishing more than four procedures concurrently, or is performing other services while directing
the concurrent procedures, the concurrent anesthesia services are physician services to the provider
in which the procedures are performed. In such cases, the physician is not required to meet the
criteria of §2182.7.B. personally but must ensure that a qualified individual performs any procedure
in which the physician does not personally participate. In these cases, the intermediary will pay for
the concurrent services on either a reasonable cost basis or as a component part of prospective
payments for physician services to providers. Payment on a reasonable charge basis is appropriate
for pre-anesthesia services above when personally furnished by the physician. Payment is based
on base value units plus one time unit for induction.
H. Claims for Payment.--To determine the reasonable charge for concurrently furnished
anesthesiology services, the bill or claim for payment must indicate whether the anesthetists were
employees of the physician, the number of concurrent services and the duration of the procedure.
When the physician personally furnished the full service, this should be indicated along with the
duration. If this information is not furnished, the carrier will assume that the physician supervised
an anesthetist and determine the reasonable charge using the base units only, i.e., for the pre-
operative and post-operative physician services.
21-70 Rev. 325
05-85 COSTS RELATED TO PATIENT CARE 2182.9
2182.9 Conditions for Payment of Reasonable Charges--Radiology Services.--
A. Services to Patients.--The carrier reimburses radiology services furnished by a physician
to an individual patient on a reasonable charge basis only if the services meet the conditions for
reasonable charge payment in §2182.4.A and are identifiable, direct, and discrete diagnostic or
therapeutic services to an individual patient, such as of x-ray films, angiograms, myelograms,
pyelograms, nuclear medicine procedures and ultrasound procedures.
B. Services to Providers.--The carrier does not pay on a reasonable charge basis for
physician services to the provider (for example, administrative or supervisory services) or for
provider services needed to produce the x-ray films or other items that are interpreted by the
radiologist. However, allowable costs for such services will be paid to the provider by the
intermediary. (See §2182.4.D for costs borne by a physician, such as under a lease or concession
agreement.)
Rev. 325 21-70.1
02-85 COSTS RELATED TO PATIENT CARE 2182.10
2182.10 Determining Reasonable Charges for Radiology Services.--
A. General Rule.--In determining payment for radiology services that meet the conditions for
payment of charges in §2182.4.A, the carrier follows the rules in paragraphs B or C of this section.
B. Services Not Furnished in Providers.--If the services are furnished in a radiologist's
office, a freestanding radiology clinic, or any other setting that is not part of a provider, the carrier
determines the amount of payment for the services under the general reasonable charge rules.
However, if the services are furnished to a hospital inpatient, it follows the rules in paragraph C.
C. Services Furnished in Providers.--If the services are furnished in a hospital radiology
department or any setting that is part of a provider, the carrier applies the following rules:
1. Determine the amount of payment under the reasonable charge rules for physician
services in providers in §2182.5 and the general reasonable charge rules.
2. The reasonable charge for a radiology service furnished in a provider or furnished
by a physician outside the hospital to a hospital inpatient shall not exceed 40 percent of the
prevailing charge level for the same service ("sameness" will be determined by the procedure code
used) furnished in a nonprovider setting. Apply this limitation to all radiological services
(diagnostic and therapeutic) furnished in a provider setting (or furnished by an outside source, e.g.,
a radiology clinic to a hospital inpatient) if such services are available in a nonprovider setting in
the locality (using existing carrier locality designations) in which the hospital is located. As long as
there is a prevailing charge for the procedure code based on actual charge data (rather than a "gap
filling" technique) in the locality in which the hospital is situated, assume that the service is
presently available in nonprovider settings in the area. This assumption can be rebutted by
documentation showing that the service is not otherwise available in the locality.
3. Apply the 40 percent limitation to the prevailing charge (after application of the
economic index) for the total service furnished in a nonprovider setting, i.e., the complete service
comprising both the technical and the physician inputs. There may be instances in which there is
no complete service prevailing charge for a service furnished in a nonprovider setting. This could
happen where, in the past, the service was furnished exclusively in provider settings with
interpretation--only fees billed. In such cases, the 40 percent limitation does not apply. Where the
service is actually furnished outside the provider setting, establish a complete service prevailing
charge based on actual charge data. Use this new prevailing charge both for purposes of the 40
percent limitation and for the general application of prevailing charge limits.
4. In applying the 40 percent limitation, use specialty prevailing charge screens if you
have one and if a specialist furnishes the service. In other cases, use the nonspecialty screen.
5. The carrier uses existing locality designations for the purpose of applying the 40
percent limitation.
Rev. 318 21-71
2182.11 COSTS RELATED TO PATIENT CARE 02-85
6. The beneficiary's coinsurance liability is applied in the following manner:
$100.00 = office prevailing charge after economic index applied
x .40 = limitation factor
$40.00 = reasonable charge
x .20 = coinsurance
$8.00 = beneficiary coinsurance
$32.00 = amount payable
D. Leased Departments.--When the radiology department is leased, i.e., the technicians are
employees of the physicians who own the equipment and bear the operating costs and the patient is
neither an inpatient nor an outpatient of any hospital, e.g., the patient is referred by a physician
outside a hospital for an x-ray and is not registered as a hospital outpatient, reimbursement is not
subject to the limitation described in paragraph C or in §2182.4.D.
2182.11 Conditions for Payment of Charges--Physician Laboratory Services.--
A. Physician Laboratory Services.--The carrier reimburses laboratory services furnished by a
physician to an individual patient on a reasonable charge basis only if the services meet the
conditions for reasonable charge payment in §2182.4.A and are:
1. Anatomic pathology services;
2. Consultative pathology services that meet the requirements in paragraph C of this
section; or
3. Services performed by a physician in personal administration of test devices, isotopes,
or other materials to an individual patient.
B. Anatomic Pathology Services.--The following categories of services are included in
anatomic pathology and qualify for Part B reasonable charge reimbursement when they meet the
definition of "physician services," particularly the criterion that they require performance by a
physician. (§2182.4.A.1-3.)
1. Histopathology (Surgical Pathology), is the gross and microscopic examination of
organ tissue and is the most commonly furnished anatomic laboratory service. Surgical pathology
always requires performance by a physician and is billable on a reasonable charge basis, except for
autopsies which are only reimbursable through the hospital.
2. Cytopathology, is the examination of cells, from fluids, washings, brushings or smears,
including cytogenetics but generally excluding hematology. Cervical and vaginal smears are the
most common service in cytopathology. Routine cervical and vaginal smears, like all routine
examinations, are not Medicare covered services. However, if the patient's history or diagnosis
indicate the smear is necessary for
21-72 Rev. 318
02-85 COSTS RELATED TO PATIENT CARE 2182.11(Cont.)
diagnostic or treatment purposes, it may be a covered service. Cervical and vaginal smears do not
require interpretation by a physician unless the results are or appear to be abnormal. In such cases,
a physician personally conducts a separate microscopic evaluation to determine the nature of the
abnormality. This microscopic evaluation does ordinarily require performance by a physician.
When medically necessary and when furnished by a physician, it is reimbursed under Part B on a
reasonable charge basis.
4. Hematology is, for the purposes of this instruction, an anatomic pathology service
only when a physician is required to perform a service. This includes microscopic evaluation of
bone marrow aspirations and biopsies. It also includes those limited number of peripheral blood
smears which need to be referred to a physician to evaluate the nature of an apparent abnormality
identified by the technologist. The carrier's medical advisor should be consulted if appropriate to
verify which situations require performance by a physician.
5. Blood Banking Services of hematologists and pathologists are anatomic pathology
services billable on a reasonable charge basis when analyses are performed of donor and/or patient
blood to determine compatible donor units for transfusion where cross-matching is difficult or
where contamination with transmissible disease of donor blood is suspected.
C. Consultative Clinical Pathology Services.--
1. General.--For purposes of this section, consultative pathology services must--
a. be requested by the patient's attending physician;
b. relate to a test result that lies outside the clinically significant normal or expected
range in view of the condition of the patient;
c. result in a written narrative report included in the patient's medical record; and
d. require the exercise of medical judgment by the consultant physician.
Routine conversations a laboratory director has with attending physicians about test orders or
results are not consultations unless all four requirements are met. Laboratory personnel, including
the director, may from time to time contact attending physicians to report test results or to suggest
additional testing or be contacted by attending physicians on similar matters. This is an activity
that is among the routine responsibilities of nonphysician laboratory directors. These contacts do
not constitute consultations. If in the course of such a contact, the attending physician requests a
consultation from the pathologist, and if that consultation meets the other criteria and is properly
documented, it is reimbursable on a reasonable charge basis.
For purposes of this instruction, clinical pathology consultations generally consist of two types.
One type would involve a review of a patient's history and medical records along with the
laboratory test results.
Example: A pathologist telephones a surgeon about a patient's suitability for surgery based on the
results of clinical laboratory test results. During the course of their
Rev. 318 21-73
2182.11(Cont.) COSTS RELATED TO PATIENT CARE 02-85
conversation, the surgeon asked the pathologist whether, based on test results, and the patient's
history and medical records, the patient should be considered a candidate for surgery. The
surgeon's request required the pathologist to render a medical judgment and provide a consultation.
The pathologist should follow-up his oral advice with a written report and the surgeon should note
in the patient's medical record that he/she requested a consultation.
Another type would be an interpretive consultation which is a consultation of limited duration
requiring the exercise of medical judgment in interpreting test findings and furnishing information
directly related to the condition of the patient to the attending physician, which ordinarily cannot be
furnished by a nonphysician laboratory specialist. This would generally take place when a patient's
attending physician consults with a pathologist about the meaning of the results of new or
unfamiliar tests or groupings of tests when they are new or unfamiliar to the attending physician or
when they reveal an unanticipated test result. At times, interpretive consultations may also be
appropriate in emergency situations when a patient has an acute condition that requires immediate
attention and the interpretation requires performance by a physician. An interpretive consultation
must be requested by the attending physician. This can be requested at the time the testing is
ordered or can be noted on the patient's chart after the consultation. In either event, the consultation
would be reimbursable under Part B on a reasonable charge basis. In any case, if the information
could ordinarily be furnished by a nonphysician laboratory specialist, the service of the physician is
not a consultation payable on a reasonable charge basis under Part B.
2. Determining Reasonable Charges for Clinical Pathology Consultations.--The carrier
reimburses for laboratory services that meet the conditions for reasonable charge reimbursement by
applying the rules in §2182.5.
The carrier should use one code for the interpretive, i.e., the brief consultation, and another for the
more comprehensive consultation which usually involves several test results, requires review of the
patient's history and generally requires greater physician inputs.
3. Documentation Requirements.--It is not necessary to require that pathologists or
hematologists routinely submit a copy of the attending physician's request for a consultation and a
copy of the consultation report with every claim. However, carriers may request such
documentation on a sample basis and, they should, as they would in other cases, conduct post-
payment reviews onsite at hospitals to determine whether the services furnished were medically
necessary and meet the applicable criteria. In the course of the reviews, carriers may ask for copies
of requests from attending physicians, but if the laboratory physician indicates that the request
initially was made orally, the carrier will rely on timely entries made by the attending physician in
the patient's medical records to indicate that a request was made.
Consultation reports should be in the form or format that meets the hospital's requirements if it
represents good medical practice and should be tailored to the nature of the consultation performed.
Because of the unique nature of interpretive pathology consultations, the report can be abbreviated
since the patient's history and medical records ordinarily would not be reviewed. It must, however,
be made part of the patient's medical record and contain adequate information to demonstrate that
the consultant furnished medical judgment rather than the type of information ordinarily furnished
by a
21-74 Rev. 318
09-88 COSTS RELATED TO PATIENT CARE 2182.13
technologist. The comprehensive clinical consultation, however, requires a complete narrative
report explaining the test results in light of the patient's history and medical records.
2182.12 Blood Gas Studies.--Routine blood gas analyses are ordinarily performed by
nonphysician personnel and are not recognized as a service payable on a reasonable charge basis.
Even where the blood gas analysis is performed by a physician, the service is not covered as a Part
B physicians' service since the criterion in §2182.4.A.3. is not met. The interpretation of routine
blood gas studies by a physician specialist or a primary care physician cannot be billed or paid
separately under Part B. Such studies and their interpretation are among the many clinical
procedures used by an attending physician in arriving at a diagnosis and initiating appropriate
treatment. However, payment is made on a reasonable charge basis for blood gas studies
performed as a part of more complete pulmonary function testing provided the conditions in
§2182.4 are met. In addition, where medically necessary, payment is made for a consultation by a
specialist requested by the attending physician because the latter requires assistance in interpreting
the results of blood gas studies, e.g., the results fall outside the expected range in light of the
patient's history and medical records.
2182.13 Exhibits.--Exhibit I is an interim standard physician-provider allocation agreement that
stays in effect until a cost report is filed for a year ending February 28, 1984. Complete this exhibit
and submit it to your intermediary. The intermediary indicates whether it is acceptable and sends a
copy to the carrier for concurrence. The criteria in §2182.3 must be used. Providers who file cost
reports after February 28, 1984, are required to complete Form HCFA-339 Provider Cost Report
Reimbursement Questionnaire. The Provider Cost Report Reimbursement Questionnaire includes
the Provider-Based Physician Questionnaire which is a series of schedules collecting information
on provider-based physician allocation agreements, compensation agreements, and billing
agreements. Schedule 3 of the HCFA-339, Allocation of Physician Compensation, is similar to
Exhibit I and produces the information on the physician's professional component percentage.
Therefore, where Schedule 3 of the HCFA-339 is submitted to the intermediary, the intermediary
sends this copy, rather than Exhibit I, to the carrier.
Completion of Exhibit I--Allocation of Physician Compensation.--
Line l Indicate the name of the provider, the provider's Medicare identification number and
the provider department. Indicate the name of each physician or the name of the physician group if
there is an agreement between the head of the physician group and the hospital, and the allocation
agreement is a departmental allocation agreement, i.e., it applies to all physicians in the department.
Line 2 Indicate the basis for the allocation agreement, whether it is based on estimate, time
studies, or other factors.
Line 3 Indicate the total actual hours the physician or physician group works per week.
Line 4 Indicate the percentages of total time the physician or physician group spends in the
various listed activities. Add these individual percentage amounts and list the amount in the Total
block.
Rev. 348 21-75
2182.13(Cont.) COSTS RELATED TO PATIENT CARE 09-88
Line 4A Indicate the percentage of total time the physician or physician group spends in the
various listed activities. Add these individual percentage amounts and list the amount in the Total
block.
Line 4B Indicate the percentage of total time the physician or physician group spends in
furnishing medical or surgical services to individual patients.
Line 4C Indicate the percentage of total time the physician or physician group spends in
noncovered Medicare activities, such as research.
At the bottom of the exhibit, the provider's representative and one physician or the head of the
physician group signs and dates the agreement.
21-76 Rev. 348
09-95 COST RELATED TO PATIENT CARE 2182.13 (Cont.)
EXHIBIT I
ALLOCATION OF PHYSICIAN COMPENSATION
1. Provider Name: ______________ 2. Basis of Allocation:
Number: ______________ /__/ Estimate
Department: ______________ /__/ Time Study
Name of Physician______________ /__/ Other (explain):_____
or Group: ________________ ______
____________ __________
________________________________ __________
3. Total hours per week (average) /___/
4. Percentages of Total Time /100%/
A. Supervision of technicians, nurses etc, /___/
Utilization review, other committee work /___/
Administration /___/
Supervision of Interns/Residents /___/
Teaching /___/
Quality Control /___/
Autopsies /___/
Other /___/
Total /___/
B. Medical and surgical services to individual
Patients /___/
C. Noncovered activities, e.g., research /___/
________________________________ _ __ _______________________ _____
Signature--Provider Representative Date Signature--Physician(s) Date
Rev. 385 21-77
2183 COSTS RELATED TO PATIENT CARE 09-95
2183. LEGAL FEES AND OTHER RELATED COSTS
Legal fees and related costs incurred by a provider are allowable if related to the provider's
furnishing of patient care, e.g., legal fees incurred in appeals to the Provider Reimbursement
Review Board and, if applicable, further appeals subsequent to a Board decision. However, legal
fees and related costs incurred by a provider related to alleged civil fraud or indictment for a
criminal act by the provider or its owners, employees, directors, etc., or legal fees for certain anti-
union activities (see §2180), are not related to the furnishing of patient care and, therefore, are
unallowable provider costs.
21-78 Rev. 385
08-81 APPENDIX - CHAPTER 21
Maximum Allowable Cost (MAC) Determinations for Drugs
NOTE: THESE MACs DO NOT APPLY TO UNIT DOSE PACKAGING FOR
INSTITUTIONAL USE.
Drug Strength MAC Effective Date
Acetaminophen
w/codeine tablets 30 mg. $0.0780 per tablet January 25, 1979
Acetaminophen
w/codine tablets 60 mg. $0.1545 per tablet January 25, l979
The most common brand names of these two strengths of Acetaminophen w/codeine are:
Empracet w/codeine
Tylenol w/codeine
__________________________________________________________________________
Amoxicillin capsules 250 mg. $0.2108 per capsule June 28, 1979
Amoxicillin capsules 500 mg. $0.3942 per capsule June 28, 1979
The most common brand names of these forms and strengths of Amoxicillin are:
Amoxil Larotid Polymox
____________________________________________________________________________
Ampicillin
capsules 250 mg. $0.0725 per capsule June 27, 1977
through
January 24, 1979
Ampicillin
capsules 250 mg. $0.0595 per capsule January 25, 1979
Ampicillin
capsules 500 mg. $0.1390 per capsule June 27, 1977
through
January 24, 1979
Ampicillin
capsules 500 mg. $0.1103 per capsule January 25, 1979
The most common brand names of these two strengths of Ampicillin capsules are:
Amcill Omnipen Pen-A
Penbritin Pensyn Polycillin
Principen QID Amp SK-Ampicillin
Supen Totacillin
____________________________________________________________________________
Rev. 257
APPENDIX - CHAPTER 21 08-81
Drug Strength MAC Effective Date
Ampicillin oral 125 mg./
suspension 5 ml. $0.0145 per ml. October 25, 1977
Ampicillin oral 250 mg./
suspension 5 ml. $0.0205 per ml. October 25, 1977
The most common brand names of these two strengths of Ampicillin oral suspension are:
Alpen Amcill Omnipen
Pen-A Penbritin Pensyn
Polycillin Principen SK-Ampicillin
Supen Totacillin
____________________________________________________________________________
Chlordiazepoxide HCL
capsules 5 mg. $0.0270 per capsule May 12, 1978
through
October 14, 1979
Chlordiazepoxide HCL
capsules 5mg. $0.0140 per capsule October 15, 1979
Chlordiazepoxide HCL
capsules 10 mg. $0.0378 per capsule May 12, 1978
through
October 14, 1979
Chlordiazepoxide HCL
capsules 10 mg. $0.0211 per capsule October 15, 1979
Chlordiazepoxide HCL
capsules 25 mg. $0.0640 per capsule May 12, 1978
through
October 14, 1979
Chlordiazepoxide
capsules 25 mg. $0.0438 per capsule October 15, 1979
The most common brand names of these strengths of Chlordiazepoxide are:
Diazachel Librium SK-Lygen A-Poxide
____________________________________________________________________________
Rev. 257
08-81 APPENDIX - CHAPTER 21
Drug Strength MAC Effective Date
Dicloxacillin Sodium
oral capsules 250 mg. $0.2690 per capsule December 8, 1980
The most common brand names of this form and strength of Dicloxacillin Sodium are:
Dynapen Pathocil Veracillin
__________________________________________________________________________
Diphenoxylate hydrochloride/
atropine sulfate
tablets 2.5 mg./
0.025 mg. $0.0491 per tablet October 15, 1979
The most common brand names of this strength of Diphenoxylate hydrochloride/
atropine sulfate are:
Lomotil Colonil
____________________________________________________________________________
Doxepin HCL capsules 10 mg. $0.0950 per capsule January 25, 1979
Doxepin HCL capsules 25 mg. $0.1161 per capsule January 25, 1979
Doxepin HCL capsules 50 mg. $0.1765 per capsule January 25, 1979
Doxepin HCL capsules 100 mg. $0.2900 per capsule October 15, 1979
The most common brand names of these strengths of Doxepin are:
Sinequan Adapin
________________________________________________________________________
Erythromycin Stearate
tablet 250 mg. $0.0697 per tablet January 25, 1979
Erythromycin Stearate
tablet 500 mg. $0.1250 per tablet January 25, 1979
The most common brand names of these strengths of Erythromycin Stearate are:
Erythrocin Stearate Ethril Pfizer-E
Bristamycin SK-Erythromycin Wyamycin-S
________________________________________________________________________
Rev. 257
APPENDIX - CHAPTER 21 08-81
Drug Strength MAC Effective Date
Glutethimide
oral tablet 500 mg. $0.0432 per tablet August 28, 1981
The most common brand names of this form and strength of Glutethimide are:
Doriden Dormtabs
_________________________________________________________________________
Hydralazine
HCL tablet 25 mg. $0.0279 per tablet March 31, 1980
Hydralazine
HCL tablet 50 mg. $0.0384 per tablet March 31, 1980
The most common brand names of these strengths of Hydralazine HCL are:
Apresoline Dralzine Rolazine
________________________________________________________________________
Hydrochlorothiazide
tablet 25 mg. $0.0250 per tablet June 28, 1979
through
December 7, 1980
Hydrochlorothiazide
tablet 25 mg. $0.0152 per tablet December 8, 1980
Hydrochlorothiazide
tablet 50 mg. $0.0306 per tablet June 28, 1979
through
December 7, 1980
Hydrochlorothiazide
tablet 50 mg. $0.0194 per tablet December 8, 1980
The most common brand names of these strengths of Hydrochlorothiazide are:
Esidrix Hydrodiuril Oretic
__________________________________________________________________________
Rev. 257
08-81 APPENDIX - CHAPTER 21
Drug Strength MAC Effective Date
Meprobamate
tablet 200 mg. $0.0108 per tablet January 25, 1979
Meprobamate
tablet 400 mg. $0.0117 per tablet January 25, 1979
The most common brand names of these two strengths of Meprobamate are:
Miltown Equanil
__________________________________________________________________________
Methocarbamol
tablet 500 mg. $0.0496 per tablet October 15, 1979
Methocarbamol
tablet 750 mg. $0.0640 per tablet October 15, 1979
The most common brand name of these strengths of Methocarbamol is:
Robaxin
__________________________________________________________________________
Oxyphenbutazone
tablet 100 mg. $0.0847 per tablet October 15, 1979
through
September 30, 1980
The most common brand names of this strength of Oxyphenbutazone are:
Tandearil Oxalid
_______________________________________________________________________
Rev. 257
APPENDIX - CHAPTER 21 08-81
Drug Strength MAC Effective Date
Penicillin VK oral 125 mg./
suspension 5 ml. $0.0120 per ml. October 25, 1977
Penicillin VK oral
suspension 250 mg./
5 ml. $0.0160 per ml. October 25, 1977
Penicillin VK tablets 250 mg. $0.0535 per tablet October 25, 1977
Penicillin VK tablets 500 mg. $0.1025 per tablet October 25, 1977
The most common brand names of these forms and strengths of Penicillin VK
are:
Beta-pen VK Ledercillin VK QID Pen VK SK-Penicillin VK
Compocillin VK Penapar VK Repen VK Uticillin VK
Deltapen VK Pen-Vee K Robicillin VK V-Cillin K
Kesso-pen VK Pfizerpen VK Ro-Cillin VK Veetids
_________________________________________________________________________
Penicillin G
Potassium tablet 400 mu. $0.0237 per tablet October 15, 1979
Penicillin G
Potassium tablet 800 mu. $0.0640 per tablet October 15, 1979
The most common brand names of these strengths of Penicillin G Potassium are:
Pentids Pfizerpen G SK-Penicillin-G
__________________________________________________________________________
Phenylbutazone tablet 100 mg. $0.0750 per tablet January 25, 1979
through
September 30, 1980
The most common brand names of this form and strength of Phenylbutazone are:
Butazolidin Azolid
___________________________________________________________________________
Rev. 257
08-81 APPENDIX - CHAPTER 21
Drug Strength MAC Effective Date
Phenylbutazone Alka
capsule 100 mg. $0.0940 per capsule January 25, 1979
through
September 30, 1980
The most common brand names for this form and strength of Phenylbutazone Alka are:
Azolid-A Butzaolidin Alka
____________________________________________________________________________
Potassium Chloride
liquid 10% $0.0030 per ml. December 8, 1980
The most common brand names of this strength of Potassium chloride are:
Klorvess Kaochlor Kay Ciel
____________________________________________________________________________
Probenecid tablet 0.5 gm. $0.0644 per tablet January 25, 1979
The most common brand names of this strength of Probenecid are:
Benemid Probalan
____________________________________________________________________________
Procainamide HCL
capsules 250 mg. $0.0383 August 28, 1981
Procainamide HCL
capsules 375 mg. $0.0505 August 28, 1981
Procainamide HCL
capsules 500 mg. $0.0585 August 28, 1981
The most common brand names of these strengths of Procainamide are:
Pronestyl Procapan Procamide
____________________________________________________________________________
Rev. 257
APPENDIX - CHAPTER 21 08-81
Drug Strength MAC Effective Date
Propantheline Bromide
oral tablet 15 mg. 0.0235 August 28, 1981
The most common brand names of this form and strength of Propantheline Bromide are:
Probanthine Norpanth
________________________________________________________________________
Propoxyphene HCL
capsules 65 mg. $0.0317 per capsule April 24, 1978
The most common brand names of this form and strength of Propoxyphene are:
Darvon Dolene SK-65
Propoxyphene HCL
with APC capsules 65 mg. $0.0330 per capsule April 24, 1978
The most common brand names of this form and strength of Propoxyphene are:
Darvon Compound-65 SK-65 Compound
Dolene Compound-65 ICN-65 Compound
___________________________________________________________________________
Quinidine Sulfate
oral tablet 200 mg.
(3 grain) $0.0688 per tablet December 8, 1980
The most common brand names of this strength of Quinidine Sulfate are:
Quinidine Sulfate Cin-Quin Quinora
___________________________________________________________________________
Rev. 257
08-81 APPENDIX - CHAPTER 21
Drug Strength MAC Effective Date
Sulfisoxazole tablet 500 mg. $0.0273 per tablet October 15, 1979
The most common brand names of this strength of Sulfisoxazole are:
Gantrisin S-K - Soxazole
___________________________________________________________________________
Tetracycline HCL
capsules 250 mg. $0.0250 per capsule April 10, 1978
Tetracycline HCL
capsules 500 mg. $0.0465 per capsule April 10, 1978
Tetracycline HCL
syrup 125 mg./
5 ml. $0.0104 per ml. October 15, 1979
The most common brand names of these forms and strengths of Tetracycline are:
Achromycin V Cyclopar Robitet Tetracyn
Amtet Panmycin SK Tetracycline Tetram
Bristacycline Retet Sumycin
___________________________________________________________________________
Rev. 257