-bership’, ‘pride’ and ‘good works’. The whole of this
scene is a signifier. The giant gate is no doubt the gate of
heaven. It is a magnificent and awesome structure. It is
entirely plated with gold. The angel standing beside the
gate is the archangel of God. The big book in his hand is
the book of life in which all names of saints of God are
written. The man on his kneel in front of the gate is a
signifier of all those who pretend to be good Christians
but who live hypocritical lives. They may be anybody in
the church. They are found among pastors, choir,
workers, deacons, overseers etc. They live continuously
in sins which are not known to man but which are not
hidden from God who incidentally will be their judge at
the white throne Judgment. The box signifies all actions
of a man while on earth. It houses all sinful actions of a
person while on earth . Those materials coming out from
the box are the sins which were not repented while the
person was still alive.
A close study of this image reveals that the box arrives
before the owner. This means that works of man go
ahead of him to Judgment. Also, the pronouncement of
the angel is significant. It is important only to seal the
doom of this unrepentant sinner. One thing is also
significant in this image. The man did not say anything in
response to the angel’s pronouncement. His speech-
lessness means that he is completely guilty. He is fully
aware of his depraved condition just as he sees a
panoramic display of his sins. This man presumably must
have learnt about heaven as the abode of the righteous.
He knows through the several teachings he had
participated in that hell is the final destination of sinners.
He only succeeded in keeping his sins away from his
fellow man but not from God. From his speechlessness,
this man has accepted his faith with equanimity. He
stands condemned and through the angel’s pronoun-
cement, sentenced and banished to hell eternally. As
stated earlier, this image is a representation of an event
that will happen after this life. The man here signifies the
crop of debauched, depraved and hypocritical Christians
who will stand speechless on the Judgment day. Their
Judgment will not be anywhere different from what we
witness here. Hence, this image is a signifier of the
impeccability of the Judgment of God.
The monologue here is a linguistic feature employed to
reveal the mind of the angel and to express the eternal
fate of the man in our picture. It is a device employed by
the author to catch the attention of the readers and to
reveal the spiritual state of the man in Judgment.
Conclusion
Multimodal discourse analysis has made it possible to
account for the visual components of this study. This is
made possible by the theoretical framework we have
adapted in this study. However, it is instructive to note
that interpretation of images is by its very nature
subjective, and an image can carry multiple messages
Ayodeji 515
dependent upon the nature of the visually interpreting
culture. Just as Kress and Leeuwen suggest that
‘…social interactions and social relations can be encoded
in images so that we are instructed silently regarding a
set of implicit norms’ (Kress and Leuuwen, 1996). The
study is an exposѐ on the perceptions of Christian
towards the subjects of this paper; death and Judgment.
While many others have contrary perceptions of these
concepts, through the images analyzed, it is obvious that
Christians believe that ‘death’ does not end existence but
only opens an entrance into another sphere where existence
continues. ‘Judgment’ is believed to come after death and that
everybody will face it. For people who lived reckless lives
while on earth, they will be banned eternally to hell fire
after the final Judgment. Those who lived honest and
righteous lives will enjoy bliss forever. In all, we hope that
this study has contributed to an array of scholarly works
in religious discourse.
REFERENCES
Deeper Christian Life Ministry (2010). Christian Women Mirror
Magazine from January to October 2011: Lagos.
El Rafraie E (2003). Understanding Visual Metaphor: The Example of
Newspaper Cartoons in Visual Communication. London: Sage
Publication.
Douglas J (2000). A Semantic and Pragmatic Study of the Language of
Christian ills and Posters inEnglish. Unpublished M.A. Thesis.
University of Ibadan.
Jewitt C (2009). Routledge Handbook of Multimodal Analysis. London,
Routledge.
Keane W (1977): Religious Language Annual Rev. Anthropol. 26:47-
71.
Kress G, van Leeuwen T (1996). Reading images: the grammar of
visual design. London/NY: Routledge.
Kress G, van Leeuwen T (2001). Multimodal Discourse :The Modes
and Media of Contemporary Communications. London: Arnold.
Kress G, Van Leeuwen T (2002). “Colour as Semiotic Mode: notes for
a grammar of colour”. Visual Communication.1(3):343-368.
www.visculture.files.wordpress.com/2007/02.2011. Retrieved
12/07/2011.
Eilish O’ D (2007). “Between Image and Text: Tension in the Art of
Hans Hachke and Jenny Holzer”. Working Papers on Design 2
URLwww.herts.ac.uk/artdes1/research/papers/updesign/wpdvol2/vol
2.html Z ISSN 1470-5516 Retrieved 22/06/2011.
O’Halloran KL (2011). Multimodal Discourse Analysis. In: Hyland K &
Paltridge B. (Eds.), Companion to Discourse Analysis pp:120-137.
London: Continuum.
Olowu A (2011). A Multimodal Discourse Analysis of Selected Editions
of Christian Women Mirror Magazines. An unpublished M.A thesis.
Obafemi Awolowo University, Ile-Ife.
Snyder G (2006). The existence of stuttering in sign language and other
forms of expressive communication: Sufficient cause for the
emergence of a new stuttering paradigm? Unpublished manuscript,
University of Mississippi, University.
Taiwo R (2005). ‘Forms and Functions of Interrogation in Christian
Pulpit Discourse” Nebula 2(4):117-131.
Taiwo R (2006). “Response Elicitation in English-medium Christian
Discourse” Linguistic online 26(1/06):127-143.
The Holy Bible: Authorized King James Version (1916).
Thibault P (2000) ‘The Multimodal Transcription of a Television
Advertisement: Theory and Practice’, In: Baldry AP (ed.)
Multimodality and Multimediality in the Distance Learning Age,
pp.311-385. Campobasso: Palladino Editore.