International Research Journal of Engineering and Technology (IRJET) e-ISSN: 2395-0056
Volume: 06 Issue: 01 | Jan 2019 www.irjet.net p-ISSN: 2395-0072
© 2019, IRJET | Impact Factor value: 7.211 | ISO 9001:2008 Certified Journal | Page 173
1.1.4 Elbow tube has circular c/s at inlet & rectangular
at outlet:
it is circular in cross section at inlet ant rectangular
at exit of draft tube. Horizontal portion of tube is gradually
inclined upwards so that water leaves the tube almost at tail
race level. In this case cost and depth is also reduced. The
efficiency of these draft tube in the range of 60 % to 80 %. It
is also made with concrete.
2. DESIGN OF CONICAL DRAFT TUBE:-
In this paper we are focusing on conical draft tube,
as name suggest shape of conical is conical that is increasing
cross section from top to bottom. Taper angle of divergent
portion of tube is great importance. If taper angle, 2Ɵ is large
it will be cause separation of flow from wall of draft tube. In
case taper angle is small, length of draft tube needed long.
Angle Ɵ is always less than or equal to 10[1]. This type of
draft has more efficiency, that is 90%[1]
Conical draft tube Fig no. (2)
Height of draft tube is normally,
H= 4*d
From fig points 1, 2 & 3 have been consider at runner entry,
exit and at outlet end of draft tube respectively. By applying
Bernoulli’s equation between point 1 and 2 .
(P
2
/W) + (V
2
2
/2*g) + Z
2
= (P
3
/W)+(V
2
3
/2*g) + Z
3
+
h
F
But as we know,
(P
3
/W) = (P
A
/W) + h
Z
2
- Z
3
- h = H
s
(P
2
/W) = (P
A
/W) - [H
S
+ (V
2
2
-V
2
3
)/2*g] + h
f
Efficiency of draft tube,
Ƞ
d
= [(V
2
2
-V
2
3
)/2*g] - h
f
3. CONCLUSION
Draft tube is necessary part of Kaplan turbine.so
there are so many type of draft tube. But conical type of draft
is the best. Because, it gives higher efficiency about 90 % and
also construction % design is very simple.
REFERENCES
1. Shubham M. Harde, Shubham Thakare, Shubham A.
Shende, Swapnil Pardhikar, Prof. Shailendra Daf,
‘‘Effect of Draft tube on Hydraulic turbine’’, volume
1, ISSUE 4, ISSN : 2455-2631, April 2016.
2. Lekha Mourya, Rahul Mishra, Swapnil Jain,
‘‘Analysis on hydraulics performance of Kaplan
turbine based on elbow draft tube geometry’’,
volume 05, ISSUE 6, ISSN: - 2321-9653, JUNE 2017.
3. Sumeet J. Wadibhasme, Shubham Peshne, Pravin
Barapatre, Santosh Barade, Saurabh Dangore,
Shubham Harde, Prof. Shailendra Daf., ‘‘Hydraulic
turbine draft tube : literature review’’, volume 5,
ISSUE 5, ISSN :- 2278-7798, March 2016.
4. Vikas Rai, Nishant Vibhav saxena, ‘‘A Review on
advance in the design and analysis of draft tube for
reaction turbines’’, volume 5, issue 5, e-ISSN : 2395-
0056, p-ISSN : 2395-0072, May 2018.
5. D.S. Kumar, ‘ Fluid mechanics and fluid power
engineering’.
6. P.N. Modi and S.M. Seth, ‘Hydraulic and fluid
mechanics including Hydraulic machines’.
BIOGRAPHIES
SHELKE KRUSHNA VISHWAS, BE,
MECHANICAL ENGINEERING,
PRE’S,SVIT,NASIK,MH,INDIA
“PATIL MIT PRAKASH, BE,
MECHANICAL ENGINEERING,
PRE’S,SVIT,NASIK,MH,INDIA ‘’
“WARKE NILESH LATESH, BE,
MECHANICAL ENGINEERING,
PRE’S,SVIT,NASIK,MH,INDIA “