www.bhspecialty.com
www.rpc.co.uk
COVID-19 AND THE IMPACT
ON UK CORPORATE INSOLVENCIES
INTRODUCTION
It has been just over two years since the World Health
Organisaon rst declared Covid-19 a pandemic, and
as the UK prepares to transion away from an era of
pandemic restricons and unprecedented government
intervenon, to a more ‘business-as-usual’ open
economy, it seems mely to consider the possible
legacies of this crisis on UK businesses. In doing so, we
look to consider:
1. How the impacts of Covid-19 may dier from
prior recessionary periods;
2. Whether the downturn will result in a period of
heightened corporate insolvencies, and;
3. Whether the government measures discussed in
this arcle, and the scale of the economic shock
experienced by the UK economy (and many
others), will lead to emerging risks and liability
exposures to which company directors (and the
providers of directors and ocers insurance)
should take heed.
To begin to address these quesons, we should rst
remind ourselves of the scale of the COVID-19 impact
over the last two years.
ECONOMIC IMPACT OF THE PANDEMIC
AND GOVERNMENT RESPONSE
The size of the economic shock caused by the pandemic,
and in parcular the impact of the Government
mandated closure of large swathes of the economy, was
huge. The Oce for Naonal Stascs records a drop in
GDP of 9.4% in 2020, comparing with a 4.2% drop in the
fall out of the Global Financial Crisis in 2008. This impact
required the Government to provide an unparalleled
level of smulus and support to the economy. At its
height, under these arrangements, the Government
assumed responsibility for paying the wages of nearly
9 million workers under the Coronavirus Job Retenon
Scheme at a taxpayer cost of c. £70 billion.
1
In addion, under the Bounce Back Loan, Coronavirus
Business Interrupon Loan and Coronavirus Large
Business Interrupon Loan Schemes approximately £79
billion of liquidity
2
was advanced to businesses impacted
by the pandemic, much of which was guaranteed by the
Government.
LEGISLATIVE INTERVENTIONS
In addion to these employee protecon and scal
measures, sweeping legislave intervenons were
introduced under the Corporate Insolvency and
Governance Act 2020 (CIGA) and the Coronavirus Act
2020. Under these emergency legislave arrangements,
several permanent new insolvency and restructuring
regimes were introduced to the UK statute books, and
temporary measures imposed, including the suspension
of director liability for wrongful trading.
(We discuss, further, the nature and scope of these
legislave reforms in the appendix to this arcle.)
Immediately prior to the pandemic, stascs published
by the Insolvency Service for Q4 2019
3
reveal that
corporate insolvencies increased to their highest annual
level since 2013. Furthermore, as illustrated in the
below Insolvency Service graph, the Q4 2019 corporate
insolvency stascs form part of a wider trend under
which the number of corporate insolvencies had been
trending upwards since 2015.
1
hps://www.gov.uk/government/stascs/coronavirus-job-retenon-scheme-stascs-4-november-2021/coronavirus-job-retenon-scheme-stascs-4-november-2021
2
hps://www.gov.uk/government/collecons/hm-treasury-coronavirus-covid-19-business-loan-scheme-stascs
3
hps://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/aachment_data/le/861187/Commentary_-_Company_Insolvency_Stascs_Q4_2019.pdf
With an experienced global claims team and a large, stable
balance sheet, BHSI has the ways and the means to help
customers successfully navigate even the most complex claims.
We also have a commitment to claims excellence, and to doing
the very best for each customer – so they can face down the
worst days with confidence and peace of mind.
Claim on.
www.bhspecialty.com
A review of the data from the UK Insolvency Service,
through the course of the pandemic, shows the total
number of company insolvencies registered in 2021 was
14,048, which was around 11% higher than the 12,634
in 2020, but remained below pre-pandemic levels.
However, what may be a more indicave stasc of
what to expect in 2022 is considering how the frequency
of company insolvency registraon has both evolved
over the course of 2021 and how it ended in December
2021, compared to pre-pandemic levels.
Here, the number of company insolvencies in December
2021 was 33% higher than in the pre-pandemic
comparison month (December 2019) and has been
trending upwards over the course of 2021. Furthermore,
this negave trend can be ancipated to connue
through 2022, as evidenced by the latest February 2022
UK Insolvency stascs, which show the number of
company insolvencies in February 2022 were more than
double February 2021, and 13% higher than February
2020, pre pandemic. All of which are sll before
government support fully wanes and the eects of a
recongured economy begin to bite.
All of which leads us to the last of our three quesons,
and a gaze into the crystal ball.
LOOKING AHEAD: DIRECTOR LIABILITY
LANDSCAPE IN 2022
The reforms introduced under CIGA and the Coronavirus
Act 2020 provided heightened levels of protecons
to companies and directors, largely at the expense
of creditors’ rights. For example, the Governments
temporary suspension under CIGA of liability for
wrongful trading during the height of the pandemic
means that insolvency praconers will be denied an
important ground for challenging directors’ conduct,
and with the hope that an introducon of two new
permanent restructuring regimes could, in the long-
term, result in less insolvencies overall, as viable
companies are provided with alternave opons
through which to restructure.
Whilst these reforms have aorded some increased
protecons to directors, there are other areas of
insolvency related risks, beyond wrongful trading
liabilies, where protecon has not been enhanced.
And any adverse impact from Covid-19 on businesses
may result in directors facing increased exposure for
those addional risks, for example heightened scruny
on their authorisaon of transacons entered into by
companies in the period prior to any insolvency, as well
as claims for misfeasance and breach of duciary dues.
Although untested, it is possible that when assessing
directors’ conduct during the pandemic, the courts may
take some account of the unprecedented challenges
faced by directors at a me when the outcome of the
pandemic for wide secons of the UK economy was
unknown and survival was by no means certain. In these
circumstances, except in the most-clear cut cases, it
may be harder for claimants to successfully prosecute
claims. However, due to the lag between the occurrence
of potenally aconable events, a company entering
insolvency proceedings (which itself may be delayed
due to COVID-related Government intervenons), an
insolvency praconer conducng enquiries and nally
a claim being brought it may be some me before the
courts’ approach to these maers becomes apparent.
In addion, the Government’s key temporary statutory
protecons have since expired on 31 March 2022. The
relaxaon of these protecons may result in a sharp
upck in the number of corporate insolvencies, as the
pent-up demand of frustrated creditors is released
and the viability of businesses post-pandemic will be
tested and exposed, without the benet of Government
support. These factors, together with the prospect of
further interest rate increases to stave o inaon, the
challenges arising from Brexit, increasingly problemac
supply chain challenges and employee shortages
(exacerbated by the recent war in Ukraine), have led
some praconers to warn that UK businesses are sll
a long way from returning to prosperity and growth and
that the most challenging mes for many corporates
and their directors lie ahead. This pping point in Supply
Chain challenges has been vocalised by a number of UK
industry bodies, with MakeUK, the UK Manufacturing
body, warning prices are becoming unmanageable for
some manufacturers. “While the pot may not be at the
boiling point it has been over the last year, logiscs costs
remain a big part of the high cost temperature that
businesses face,” said Verity Davidge, director of policy
at MakeUK, adding it was dicult to predict when the
costs and disrupon would be resolved.
WHERE DOES D&O INSURANCE
(AND BHSI) FIT IN?
The environment described in the preceding secon
involves a level of uncertainty, and potenally increased
risk, which may well give cause for concern for directors.
Of course, one of the main protecons available to
company directors and execuve ocers is provided
under directors’ and ocers’ liability insurance. And
the engagement of D&O insurance policies oen
arises when companies enter insolvency. This is
because insolvency praconers have a statutory
duty to invesgate the circumstances leading up to
the insolvency of a company, including examining the
conduct of the directors and transacons entered into in
the period prior to insolvency.
BHSI is acve in providing capacity to nancially
distressed companies, as evidenced by the specic
soluons we provided for a number of our customers
who ulised the UK governments new restructuring
plan. We have a market leading management liability
porolio in London, with a team of underwriters and
claims handlers experienced in handling these complex
and evolving exposures. And equally important, a claims
oering that provides certainty and support when a
customer most needs it, all supported by a plaorm
with a long-term focus on providing sustainable and
consistent soluons for our customers, with the
backing of the Berkshire Hathaway Specialty Insurance’s
unmatched nancial strength.
FINANCIAL STRENGTH &
COMMITMENT
BHSI offers our customers a wide range of
coverages on a worldwide basis, all backed
by BHSI’s market commitment, underwriting
and claims expertise and financial strength.
Berkshire Hathaway’s National Indemnity group of
insurance companies hold financial strength ratings of
A++ from AM Best and AA+ from Standard & Poor’s
with $411.6 billion in total admitted assets and $250.6
billion in policyholder surplus*.
* Source: Balance sheets as of 30/09/2021 for the Berkshire Hathaway
National Indemnity group of insurance companies.
APPENDIX
WINDING-UP PETITIONS AND
WRONGFUL TRADING
The reforms introduced under CIGA and the Coronavirus
Act 2020 provided unprecedented levels of protecons
to companies and directors, largely at the expense of
creditors’ rights. Under CIGA creditors were inially
prohibited from presenng a winding-up peon
against a company based on either: (i) a statutory
demand that was served between 1 March 2020 and 30
September 2021 or (ii) during the same period, based
on a companys inability to pay its debts (including rent),
unless the creditor has reasonable grounds for believing
COVID-19 has not had a nancial eect on the company,
or that the companys debt issues would have arisen in
any event.
With eect from 1 October 2021 unl 31 March 2022
certain creditor restricons remained in place. Under
these legacy measures, winding-up peons may not
be made in respect of debts: (i) relang to unpaid rent
or other sums due under a lease of premises used for
business purposes where the debt is unpaid by reason
of a nancial eect of COVID-19; or (ii) of a value of less
than £10,000. In addion, creditors are required to give
21 days’ noce to the debtor of its intenon to present
a winding up peon and invite creditors to make a debt
payment proposal.
Under the wrongful trading provisions contained in the
Insolvency Act 1986, where a director of a company
knows, or ought to conclude that there is no reasonable
prospect that the company will avoid insolvency, they
must take every step that a reasonably diligent person
having the knowledge, skill and experience that may
reasonably be expected of a person carrying out the
directors funcons, and their own knowledge, skill, and
experience, would take with a view to minimising the
potenal loss to the company’s creditors. If the director
fails to take such steps, and the company becomes
insolvent, then the director may be ordered to make
such contribuon to the company’s assets as the court
considers appropriate. Such contribuons are oen
assessed as equang to the amount that the directors
acons contributed to the companys net balance sheet
deciency.
Inially under CIGA, and subsequently extended by
statutory instruments, the Government suspended
liability for wrongful trading between 1 March 2020
to 30 September 2020 and 26 November 2020 to 30
June 2021. These temporary measures brought about
a profound change in the risk prole to directors for
breach of duciary and/or directors’ dues during the
pandemic.
NEW INSOLVENCY REGIMES
In addion to making temporary amendments to
exisng insolvency rules and procedures, CIGA also
introduced permanent new insolvency regimes to
bolster the UK restructuring toolkit. These permanent
reforms included the introducon of the restructuring
plan and a freestanding moratorium procedure.
The restructuring plan develops and extends principles
and procedures of schemes of arrangement under
Part 26 of the Companies Act 2006 with the purpose
of assisng viable companies struggling with debt
obligaons through a court sanconed process that
binds creditors if it is “fair and equitable” and can be
imposed on dissenng creditors under a cross-class
cram down mechanism.
The moratorium procedure is a new “debtor-in-
possession” procedure which provides UK companies
with breathing space in which to pursue a rescue or
restructuring plan. During this moratorium no creditor
acon can be taken against the company without the
courts permission. The moratorium is overseen by a
monitor (an insolvency praconer) but responsibility
for the day-to-day running of the company remains with
the directors.
BEN BARKER
Head of Execuve and Professional Lines Claims, UK, BHSI
Ben.Barker@bhspecialty.com
Ben Barker is Head of Execuve and Professional Lines claims for Berkshire
Hathaway Specialty Insurance, UK. In nearly 20 years as an insurance professional
Ben has acquired a market leading experse in all Financial Lines products,
managing claims teams dealing with large, complex and high-prole losses across
mulple product lines.
THOMAS HARRIS
Senior Underwriter, Commercial Management Liability, UK, BHSI
Thomas.Harris@bhspecialty.com
Thomas Harris is a Senior Underwriter in the Commercial Management Liability
team for Berkshire Hathaway Specialty Insurance, UK. In nearly 14 years as an
insurance professional, Thomas has worked in both broking and underwring
capacies, acquiring signicant experse in underwring large, complex Directors
& Ocers Liability placements, and the broader Management Liability suite of
products.
PAUL BAGON
Partner, RPC
Paul Bagon is a partner at internaonal law rm RPC and advises stakeholders in
all aspects of cross-border and domesc insolvencies, nancial restructurings,
corporate turnarounds, group reorganisaons complex workouts and distressed
M&A and nancings. In recent years, Paul has advised boards of directors
of nancially distressed mulnaonal groups and insureds and worked on
restructurings in the retail, leisure, oil and gas and nancial services sectors. He is
a member of the R3 Associaon of Business Recovery Professionals, the Insolvency
Lawyers Associaon and INSOL.
JAMES WICKES
Partner, RPC
James Wickes is a partner at internaonal law rm RPC that specialises in advising
insurers and reinsurers in respect of claims under FI, PI, D&O, W&I and Crime /
Fidelity insurance.
James also regularly defends claims against nancial instuons/professionals and
directors & ocers, oen with an oshore or internaonal dimension, including
cross-border disputes.
James has been recognised as a Leading Individual for Insurance and Reinsurance
Ligaon and a Next Generaon Partner for Professional Negligence by The Legal
500 UK (2022). He has also been recognised as a Notable Praconer for Insurance:
Contenous Claims & Reinsurance in Chambers UK (2022).
AUTHORS
04/2022D
In Europe, Berkshire Hathaway Specialty Insurance (BHSI) trades under Berkshire Hathaway European Insurance DAC (BHEI) and Berkshire Hathaway International Insurance Limited (BHIIL). BHEI is an Irish domiciled
Designated Activity Company, Registration Number 636883 and Registered Office at 2nd Floor, 7 Grand Canal Street Lower, Dublin D02 KW81. Berkshire Hathaway International Insurance Limited (BHIIL), an
incorporated England and Wales limited liability company, Registration Number 3230337 and Registered Office at 8 Fenchurch Place, 4th Floor, London EC3M 4AJ, United Kingdom. BHEI and BHIIL are affiliates of
Berkshire Hathaway Specialty Insurance Company (BHSIC), a Nebraska USA domiciled corporation, which provides commercial property, casualty, healthcare professional liability, executive and professional lines,
transactional liability, surety, marine, travel, programs, accident and health, medical stop loss, homeowners, and multinational insurance. BHSIC, BHIIL and BHEI are subsidiaries of Berkshire Hathaway’s National
Indemnity group of insurance companies, which hold financial strength ratings of A++ from AM Best and AA+ from Standard & Poor’s. Based in Boston, BHSI has offices in Atlanta, Boston, Chicago, Houston, Indianapolis,
Irvine, Los Angeles, New York, San Francisco, San Ramon, Seattle, Stevens Point, Adelaide, Auckland, Brisbane, Cologne, Dubai, Dublin, Frankfurt, Hong Kong, Kuala Lumpur, London, Macau, Madrid, Manchester,
Melbourne, Munich, Paris, Perth, Singapore, Sydney and Toronto. For more information, contact info@bhspecialty.com.
The information contained herein is for general informational purposes only and does not constitute an offer to sell or a solicitation of an offer to buy any product or service. Any description set forth herein does not include
all policy terms, conditions and exclusions. Please refer to the actual policy for complete details of coverage and exclusions. For the latest Best’s Credit Rating, access www.ambest.com.