SO . . . WHAT ARE YOU SAYING HERE?
QUICK TIPS FOR WRITING EFFECTIVE CLAIMS
GET TO THE POINT:
A “claim” (also known as a “thesis statement” or “argument”) is the central
idea of your paragraph or essay and should appear in the first sentence.
Effective Claims are:
1. Assertive
2. Specific
3. Provable
AVOID GENERALIZATIONS, CLICHÉS, QUESTIONS, OR STATING THE OBVIOUS”:
Wishy-washy openings are the hallmark of an under-confident writer.
Pollution is bad for the environment.
Homelessness is a problem.
Should the Federal Reserve reduce the federal funds rate?
The future looks bright for companies developing vaccines.
WHAT MAKES ONE CLAIM MORE EFFECTIVE THAN THE OTHER?
Ask yourself these three simple questionswhen you can say yes to all, you have
an effective claim:
1. Have you asserted a position about a topic?
2. Is your assertion as specific as possible?
3. Can you prove your assertion with evidence?
In most cases,
writing ability
could be your
ticket in—or it
could be your
ticket out.
U.S. NATIONAL COMMISSION
ON WRITINGS SURVEY OF 120
MAJOR CORPORATIONS.
At least twenty-five percent of the federal
budget should be spent on upgrading
businesses to clean technologies,
researching renewable energy sources,
and planting more trees in order to
control or eliminate pollution.
Authors: Marjorie Celona, T Geronimo Johnson, Vickie Larsen, Jessica Renaud
Copyright © 2008. The Judith R. Frank Business Communications Center. All Rights Reserved.
page 17
SO . . . WHAT ARE YOU SAYING HERE?
QUICK TIPS FOR WRITING EFFECTIVE CLAIMS
Let’s put the three questions to the test:
CLAIM # 1:
Pollution is bad for the environment.
1. Assertive Have I asserted a position about a topic?
No. There’s nothing assertive about stating the
obvious.
2. Specific Is my assertion as specific as possible?
No. It’s vague.
3. Provable Can you prove your assertion with evidence?
Yes, but where would I start? There are so many
kinds of pollution and so much evidence about its
effects. I’m overwhelmed.
Authors: Marjorie Celona, T Geronimo Johnson, Vickie Larsen, Jessica Renaud
Copyright © 2008. The Judith R. Frank Business Communications Center. All Rights Reserved.
page 18
OH, YEAH? PROVE IT.
USING EVIDENCE TO DEFEND, STRENGTHEN, AND PROVE YOUR CLAIM
THREE TYPES OF EVIDENCE TO DEFEND, STRENGTHEN, AND PROVE
YOUR CLAIM
1. Testimonies or Statements from Established or
Trustworthy Authorities
2. Statistical Information (studies, analysis, scientific
experiments, investigation, or research)
3. Examples
a. Anecdotal (a story about a person or organization)
b. Analogical or Hypothetical (a comparison to a
more easily understood situation)
The following examples of types of evidence are taken from the essay “Morality as a
Community Affair,” by Amitai Etzioni:
1. Testimonies or Statements from Established or Trustworthy Authorities
We are each other’s keepers. As Common Cause founder, John Gardner*, writes:
“Families and communities are the ground-level generators and preservers of
values and ethics systems. No society can remain vital or even survive without a
reasonable base of shared values. . . . There are generated chiefly in the family,
schools, church, and other intimate settings in which people deal with another face
to face.”
*John William Gardner, (October 8, 1912–February 16, 2002), was President of the Carnegie
Corporation and Secretary of Health, Education, and Welfare under President Lyndon Johnson.
All o f the e videnc e in you r pa r agraph o r e ssay will relate
direc tly
to the c l aim , the reby de fendin g, s treng then ing, and
provin g the clai m.
The goal is to
convince the
audience that
the claim is
true based on
the evidence
provided.
EXAMPLE CLAIM:
OUR OWN MORALITY IS NOT INNATE; RATHER,
IT IS A PRODUCT OF THE COMMUNITY OR
COMMUNITIES IN WHICH WE WERE BORN,
RAISED, AND EDUCATED.
THE OWL AT
PURDUE
Authors: Marjorie Celona, T Geronimo Johnson, Vickie Larsen, Jessica Renaud
Copyright © 2008. The Judith R. Frank Business Communications Center. All Rights Reserved.
page 19
OH, YEAH? PROVE IT.
USING EVIDENCE TO DEFEND, STRENGTHEN, AND PROVE YOUR CLAIM
2. Statistical Information (studies, analysis, scientific experiments,
investigation, or research)
Sociologist M. P. Baumgartner found that in an American suburb he studied in the
1980s, people who observed minor violations of conduct often simply ignored
them rather than express their displeasure. If the violations were somewhat serious,
people tended to ostracize the offenders without explanation.
3. Examples
a. Anecdotal (a story about a person or organization)
I lived for a year on the Stanford University campus. Not far from the house I
rented was a four-way stop sign. Each morning I observed a fairly heavy flow of
traffic at the intersection. Still, the cars carefully waited their turns to move ahead,
as they were expected to. The driver rarely moved out of turn, and in those cases
when they did, the offenders often had out-of-state license plates. The main reason
for the good conduct: practically everyone in the community knew who was
behind the wheel. If someone rushed through, he or she could expect to be the
subject of some mild ribbing at the faculty club, supermarket, or local movie
theater (such as “You must have been in an awful rush this morning”).
b. Analogical or Hypothetical (a comparison to a more easily
understood situation)
During a conference on bone-marrow transplants, a psychiatrist argued that it was
not proper to ask one sibling for a bone-marrow donation for another sibling,
despite the fact that making such a donation does not entail any particular risk. His
reason was that the sibling who refused might feel guilty, especially if as a result
the brother or sister died. On the contrary, a Communitarian would argue that
siblings should be asked in no uncertain terms to come the rescue. If they refuse,
they should feel guilty.
Authors: Marjorie Celona, T Geronimo Johnson, Vickie Larsen, Jessica Renaud
Copyright © 2008. The Judith R. Frank Business Communications Center. All Rights Reserved.
page 20
GET YOUR ACT TOGETHER
THE STRUCTURE AND ORGANIZATION OF PERSUASIVE PARAGRAPHS
A PARAGRAPH IS A COLLECTION OF RELATED SENTENCES DEALING WITH A SINGLE
TOPIC. -THE OWL AT PURDUE WRITING LABS
A quick formula for structuring persuasive paragraphs:
EFFECTIVE CLAIM
+ EXPLANATION
+ EVIDENCE
+ APPLICATION OF EVIDENCE TO CLAIM
= PROVEN CLAIM
Let’s walk through what a 4- to 5-sentence paragraph might look
like:
1. Your first sentence must contain your claim: the central idea of your
paragraph.
You must be able to prove your claim.
2. Your second sentence should fully explain your claim.
Define terms, use a concrete description, and add details to make sure your
reader fully understands your claim.
3. Your third sentence should contain evidence.
Provide additional evidence, logic, or reasoning that proves your claim.
Remember to cite your sources.
4. Your fourth sentence should explain how your evidence proves your
claim.
Evidence must be accompanied by an explanation of why or how the data
supports the claim.
5. If the paragraph stands alone (is not part of a larger essay), conclude by
returning to your claim.
NOT ALL PARAGRAPHS ARE 4 OR 5 SENTENCES LONG. THE IMPORTANT THING TO
NOTE ABOUT THIS STRUCTURE IS THAT ALL PERSUASIVE PARAGRAPHS:
start with a claim
explain the claim
provide evidence
explain to the reader how or why the claim has been proven
Business writing is
often about
persuading others –
persuading them to
buy, to invest, to be
patient, or simply to
have confidence in
a product or service.
SUSAN DE LA VERGNE,
PERSUASIVE BUSINESS
WRITING
Authors: Marjorie Celona, T Geronimo Johnson, Vickie Larsen, Jessica Renaud
Copyright © 2008. The Judith R. Frank Business Communications Center. All Rights Reserved.
page 21
GET YOUR ACT TOGETHER
THE STRUCTURE AND ORGANIZATION OF PERSUASIVE PARAGRAPHS
LETS TAKE A LOOK AT A SIMPLE, YET EFFECTIVE SIX-SENTENCE PARAGRAPH:
The opening sentence asserts a specific claim:
In an effort to reduce labor costs, employers are hiring guest workers without first
proving a shortage of domestic workers.
The second sentence explains the claim:
Industries, like manufacturing and hospitality, illegally escort available American
workers out the back door while welcoming low-wage guest workers in the front.
The third sentence provides testimonial evidence from an authoritative source
to defend the claim.
David Griffith, an anthropologist who has studied guest-worker programs for thirty
years, says,
“To low-wage seasonal industries, a shortage of labor is a lack of
surplus labor. . . . They like a surplus because it keeps wages down.
The fourth sentence interprets the evidence and relates it to the claim.
What Griffith calls “surplus labor” means simply extra bodies—guest workers who
are willing and able to work for less—ensuring that someone will always be
available to work below market wages.
The fifth sentence brings in additional testimonial evidence to strengthen the
claim.
Jill Foutz, a manager at an Ohio landscaping company, explains why she prefers
guest workers: “They’re hardworking, they’re dependable and they will work for
less.
The sixth and final sentence analyzes the evidence, explaining exactly how
both defend, strengthen, and prove the claim.
Foutzstatement does not imply a shortage of American workers, but rather a
preference for the qualities of guest workers: their work ethic and their willingness
to accept payment below market wages.
At no point did the writer veer off onto a new topic. The paragraph stays focused
and specific in order to fully support the initial claim.
Authors: Marjorie Celona, T Geronimo Johnson, Vickie Larsen, Jessica Renaud
Copyright © 2008. The Judith R. Frank Business Communications Center. All Rights Reserved.
page 22
GET YOUR ACT TOGETHER
THE STRUCTURE AND ORGANIZATION OF PERSUASIVE PARAGRAPHS
A BIT ABOUT SENTENCE ORGANIZATION AND REDUNDANCY
Sentence organization is about the relationship between ideas. Be on the lookout for
redundant sentences that could be better arranged into one, meaningful sentence.
Example 1:
I went to the store. I bought bread at the store. The bread was whole wheat. I like
whole grains.
What is the relationship between these ideas?
I bought whole wheat bread at the store because I like whole grains.
Example 2:
Reading gives knowledge. One gets knowledge about other cultures. One will
know about history and current events. One gains knowledge about human
nature.
Instead, try:
By reading about other cultures, history, and current events, we gain insight into
human nature.
FOWLER, H.R. “THE LITTLE, BROWN HANDBOOK
Authors: Marjorie Celona, T Geronimo Johnson, Vickie Larsen, Jessica Renaud
Copyright © 2008. The Judith R. Frank Business Communications Center. All Rights Reserved.
page 23