RULE 1.310. DEPOSITIONS UPON ORAL EXAMINATION
(a) When Depositions May Be Taken. After commencement of the
action any party may take the testimony of any person, including a party, by
deposition upon oral examination. Leave of court, granted with or without notice,
must be obtained only if the plaintiff seeks to take a deposition within 30 days after
service of the process and initial pleading upon any defendant, except that leave is
not required (1) if a defendant has served a notice of taking deposition or otherwise
sought discovery, or (2) if special notice is given as provided in subdivision (b)(2)
of this rule. The attendance of witnesses may be compelled by subpoena as
provided in rule 1.410. The deposition of a person confined in prison may be taken
only by leave of court on such terms as the court prescribes.
(b) Notice; Method of Taking; Production at Deposition.
(1) A party desiring to take the deposition of any person upon oral
examination shall give reasonable notice in writing to every other party to the
action. The notice shall state the time and place for taking the deposition and the
name and address of each person to be examined, if known, and, if the name is not
known, a general description sufficient to identify the person or the particular class
or group to which the person belongs. If a subpoena duces tecum is to be served on
the person to be examined, the designation of the materials to be produced under
the subpoena shall be attached to or included in the notice.
(2) Leave of court is not required for the taking of a deposition by
plaintiff if the notice states that the person to be examined is about to go out of the
state and will be unavailable for examination unless a deposition is taken before
expiration of the 30-day period under subdivision (a). If a party shows that when
served with notice under this subdivision that party was unable through the
exercise of diligence to obtain counsel to represent the party at the taking of the
deposition, the deposition may not be used against that party.
(3) For cause shown the court may enlarge or shorten the time for
taking the deposition.
(4) Any deposition may be audiovisually recorded by videotape
without leave of the court or stipulation of the parties, provided the deposition is
taken in accordance with this subdivision.
(A) Notice. A party intending to videotapeaudiovisually
record a deposition shall state in the notice that the deposition is to be
videotapedaudiovisually recorded and shall give the name and address of the
operator. Any subpoena served on the person to be examined shall state the method
or methods for recording the testimony.
(B) StenographerCourt Reporter. VideotapedAudiovisually
recorded depositions shall also be recorded stenographicallytranscribed, unless all
parties agree otherwise.
(C) Procedure. At the beginning of the deposition, the officer
before whom it is taken shall, on camera: (i) identify the style of the action, (ii)
state the date, and (iii) swear the witness.
(D) Custody of TapeRecording and Copies. The attorney for
the party requesting the videotapingaudiovisual recording of the deposition shall
take custody of and be responsible for the safeguarding of the videotapeaudiovisual
recording, shall permit the viewing of it by the opposing party, and, if requested,
shall provide a copy of the videotapeaudiovisual recording at the expense of the
party requesting the copy.
(E) Cost of VideotapedAudiovisually Recorded Depositions.
The party requesting the videotapingaudiovisual recording shall bear the initial
cost of videotapingrecording.
(5) The notice to a party deponent may be accompanied by a
request made in compliance with rule 1.350 for the production of documents and
tangible things at the taking of the deposition. The procedure of rule 1.350 shall
apply to the request. Rule 1.351 provides the exclusive procedure for obtaining
documents or things by subpoena from nonparties without deposing the custodian
or other person in possession of the documents.
(6) In the notice a party may name as the deponent a public or
private corporation, a partnership or association, or a governmental agency, and
designate with reasonable particularity the matters on which examination is
requested. The organization so named shall designate one or more officers,
directors, or managing agents, or other persons who consent to do so, to testify on
its behalf and may state the matters on which each person designated will testify.
The persons so designated shall testify about matters known or reasonably
available to the organization. This subdivision does not preclude taking a
deposition by any other procedure authorized in these rules.
(7) On motion the court may order that the testimony at a
deposition be taken by telephone. The order may prescribe the manner in which the
deposition will be taken. A party may also arrange for a stenographic transcription
at that partys own initial expense.
(8) Any minor subpoenaed for testimony shall have the right to be
accompanied by a parent or guardian at all times during the taking of testimony
notwithstanding the invocation of the rule of sequestration of section 90.616,
Florida Statutes, except upon a showing that the presence of a parent or guardian is
likely to have a material, negative impact on the credibility or accuracy of the
minor’s testimony, or that the interests of the parent or guardian are in actual or
potential conflict with the interests of the minor.
(c) Examination and Cross-Examination; Record of Examination;
Oath; Objections. Examination and cross-examination of witnesses may proceed
as permitted at the trial. The officer before whom the deposition is to be taken shall
put the witness on oath and shall personally, or by someone acting under the
officer’s direction and in the officer’s presence, record the testimony of the
witness, except that when a deposition is being taken by telephone, the witness
shall be sworn by a person present with the witness who is qualified to administer
an oath in that location. The testimony shall be taken stenographicallytranscribed
or recorded by any other means ordered in accordance with subdivision (b)(4) of
this rule. If requested by one of the parties, the testimony shall be transcribed at the
initial cost of the requesting party and prompt notice of the request shall be given
to all other parties. All objections made at time of the examination to the
qualifications of the officer taking the deposition, the manner of taking it, the
evidence presented, or the conduct of any party, and any other objection to the
proceedings shall be noted by the officer upon the deposition. Any objection
during a deposition shall be stated concisely and in a nonargumentative and
nonsuggestive manner. A party may instruct a deponent not to answer only when
necessary to preserve a privilege, to enforce a limitation on evidence directed by
the court, or to present a motion under subdivision (d). Otherwise, evidence
objected to shall be taken subject to the objections. Instead of participating in the
oral examination, parties may serve written questions in a sealed envelope on the
party taking the deposition and that party shall transmit them to the officer, who
shall propound them to the witness and record the answers verbatim.
(d) Motion to Terminate or Limit Examination. At any time during the
taking of the deposition, on motion of a party or of the deponent and upon a
showing that the examination is being conducted in bad faith or in such manner as
unreasonably to annoy, embarrass, or oppress the deponent or party, or that
objection and instruction to a deponent not to answer are being made in violation
of rule 1.310(c), the court in which the action is pending or the circuit court where
the deposition is being taken may order the officer conducting the examination to
cease forthwith from taking the deposition or may limit the scope and manner of
the taking of the deposition under rule 1.280(c). If the order terminates the
examination, it shall be resumed thereafter only upon the order of the court in
which the action is pending. Upon demand of any party or the deponent, the taking
of the deposition shall be suspended for the time necessary to make a motion for an
order. The provisions of rule 1.380(a) apply to the award of expenses incurred in
relation to the motion.
(e) Witness Review. If the testimony is transcribed, the transcript shall be
furnished to the witness for examination and shall be read to or by the witness
unless the examination and reading are waived by the witness and by the parties.
Any changes in form or substance that the witness wants to make shall be listed in
writing by the officer with a statement of the reasons given by the witness for
making the changes. The changes shall be attached to the transcript. It shall then be
signed by the witness unless the parties waived the signing or the witness is ill,
cannot be found, or refuses to sign. If the transcript is not signed by the witness
within a reasonable time after it is furnished to the witness, the officer shall sign
the transcript and state on the transcript the waiver, illness, absence of the witness,
or refusal to sign with any reasons given therefor. The deposition may then be used
as fully as though signed unless the court holds that the reasons given for the
refusal to sign require rejection of the deposition wholly or partly, on motion under
rule 1.330(d)(4).
(f) Filing; Exhibits.
(1) If the deposition is transcribed, the officer shall certify on each
copy of the deposition that the witness was duly sworn by the officer and that the
deposition is a true record of the testimony given by the witness. Documents and
things produced for inspection during the examination of the witness shall be
marked for identification and annexed to and returned with the deposition upon the
request of a party, and may be inspected and copied by any party, except that the
person producing the materials may substitute copies to be marked for
identification if that person affords to all parties fair opportunity to verify the
copies by comparison with the originals. If the person producing the materials
requests their return, the officer shall mark them, give each party an opportunity to
inspect and copy them, and return them to the person producing them and the
materials may then be used in the same manner as if annexed to and returned with
the deposition.
(2) Upon payment of reasonable charges therefor the officer shall
furnish a copy of the deposition to any party or to the deponent.
(3) A copy of a deposition may be filed only under the following
circumstances:
(A) It may be filed in compliance with Florida Rule of
Judicial Administration 2.425 and rule 1.280(f) by a party or the witness when the
contents of the deposition must be considered by the court on any matter pending
before the court. Prompt notice of the filing of the deposition shall be given to all
parties unless notice is waived. A party filing the deposition shall furnish a copy of
the deposition or the part being filed to other parties unless the party already has a
copy.
(B) If the court determines that a deposition previously taken
is necessary for the decision of a matter pending before the court, the court may
order that a copy be filed by any party at the initial cost of the party, and the filing
party shall comply with rules 2.425 and 1.280(f).
(g) Obtaining Copies. A party or witness who does not have a copy of
the deposition may obtain it from the officer taking the deposition unless the court
orders otherwise. If the deposition is obtained from a person other than the officer,
the reasonable cost of reproducing the copies shall be paid to the person by the
requesting party or witness.
(h) Failure to Attend or to Serve Subpoena; Expenses.
(1) If the party giving the notice of the taking of a deposition fails
to attend and proceed therewith and another party attends in person or by attorney
pursuant to the notice, the court may order the party giving the notice to pay to the
other party the reasonable expenses incurred by the other party and the other
party’s attorney in attending, including reasonable attorneys’ fees.
(2) If the party giving the notice of the taking of a deposition of a
witness fails to serve a subpoena upon the witness and the witness because of the
failure does not attend and if another party attends in person or by attorney because
that other party expects the deposition of that witness to be taken, the court may
order the party giving the notice to pay to the other party the reasonable expenses
incurred by that other party and that other party’s attorney in attending, including
reasonable attorneys’ fees.
Committee Notes
1972 Amendment. Derived from Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 30 as
amended in 1970. Subdivision (a) is derived from rule 1.280(a); subdivision (b)
from rule 1.310(a) with additional matter added; the first sentence of subdivision
(c) has been added and clarifying language added throughout the remainder of the
rule.
1976 Amendment. Subdivision (b)(4) has been amended to allow the taking
of a videotaped deposition as a matter of right. Provisions for the taxation of costs
and the entry of a standard order are included as well. This new amendment allows
the contemporaneous stenographic transcription of a videotaped deposition.
1988 Amendment. The amendments to subdivision (b)(4) are to provide for
depositions by videotape as a matter of right.
The notice provision is to ensure that specific notice is given that the
deposition will be videotaped and to disclose the identity of the operator. It was
decided not to make special provision for a number of days’ notice.
The requirement that a stenographer be present (who is also the person likely
to be swearing the deponent) is to ensure the availability of a transcript (although
not required). The transcript would be a tool to ensure the accuracy of the
videotape and thus eliminate the need to establish other procedures aimed at the
same objective (like time clocks in the picture and the like). This does not mean
that a transcript must be made. As at ordinary depositions, this would be up to the
litigants.
Technical videotaping procedures were not included. It is anticipated that
technical problems may be addressed by the court on motions to quash or motions
for protective orders.
Subdivision (c) has been amended to accommodate the taking of depositions
by telephone. The amendment requires the deponent to be sworn by a person
authorized to administer oaths in the deponent’s location and who is present with
the deponent.
1992 Amendment. Subdivision (b)(4)(D) is amended to clarify an
ambiguity in whether the cost of the videotape copy is to be borne by the party
requesting the videotaping or by the party requesting the copy. The amendment
requires the party requesting the copy to bear the cost of the copy.
1996 Amendment. Subdivision (c) is amended to state the existing law,
which authorizes attorneys to instruct deponents not to answer questions only in
specific situations. This amendment is derived from Federal Rule of Civil
Procedure 30(d) as amended in 1993.
2010 Amendment. Subdivision (b)(5) is amended to clarify that the
procedure set forth in rule 1.351 must be followed when requesting or receiving
documents or things without testimony, from nonparties pursuant to a subpoena.
The amendment is intended to prevent the use of rules 1.310 and 1.410 to request
documents from nonparties pursuant to a subpoena without giving the opposing
party the opportunity to object to the subpoena before it is served on the nonparty
as required by rule 1.351.
2011 Amendment. A reference to Florida Rule of Judicial Administration
2.425 and rule 1.280(f) is added to require persons filing discovery materials with
the court to make sure that good cause exists prior to filing discovery materials and
that certain specific personal information is redacted.
Court Commentary
1984 Amendment. Subdivision (b)(7) is added to authorize deposition by
telephone, with provision for any party to have a stenographic transcription at that
party’s own initial expense.
Subdivision (d) is changed to permit any party to terminate the deposition,
not just the objecting party.
Subdivision (e) is changed to eliminate the confusing requirement that a
transcript be submitted to the witness. The term has been construed as requiring the
court reporter to travel, if necessary, to the witness, and creates a problem when a
witness is deposed in Florida and thereafter leaves the state before signing. The
change is intended to permit the parties and the court reporter to handle such
situations on an ad hoc basis as is most appropriate.
Subdivision (f) is the committee’s action in response to the petition seeking
amendment to rule 1.310(f) filed in the Supreme Court Case No. 62,699.
Subdivision (f) is changed to clarify the need for furnishing copies when a
deposition, or part of it, is properly filed, to authorize the court to require a
deposition to be both transcribed and filed, and to specify that a party who does not
obtain a copy of the deposition may get it from the court reporter unless ordered
otherwise by the court. This eliminates the present requirement of furnishing a
copy of the deposition, or material part of it, to a person who already has a copy in
subdivision (f)(3)(A).
Subdivision (f)(3)(B) broadens the authority of the court to require the filing
of a deposition that has been taken, but not transcribed.
Subdivision (g) requires a party to obtain a copy of the deposition from the
court reporter unless the court orders otherwise. Generally, the court should not
order a party who has a copy of the deposition to furnish it to someone who has
neglected to obtain it when the deposition was transcribed. The person should
obtain it from the court reporter unless there is a good reason why it cannot be
obtained from the reporter.