Ed’s Tahoe Nugget Determination of Certified Base Data Eligibility July 17, 2020
13 | P a g e
when compared to the certified base data on the site. These differences between the
certified plans and the plans submitted by the applicant are listed below.
Type Plans Certified Data Difference
Cubic Volume 203,502 CF 200,462 CF +3,040 CF
Site Coverage 11,736 sq ft 11,560 sq ft +176 sq ft
Non Base Area 6,797 sq ft 6,661 sq ft +136 sq ft
Base Area 9,176 sq ft 9,461 sq ft -285 sq ft
Public Area 15,973 sq ft 16,122 sq ft -149 sq ft
Private Area 0 sq ft 0 sq ft 0 sq ft
Gaming Area 8,403 sq ft 8,773 sq ft -307 sq ft
Staff believes that the preliminary nature of this certified base data eligibility request and
the applicant’s limited access to the building are the main reasons behind the differences
between the plans submitted and certified base data. The Eds Tahoe Nugget certified
base data was approved the by the NTRPA in 1982. Given the age of the certified base
data and the advances in computer technology and architectural design in calculating
square footage and cubic volume, staff believes that it is reasonable to assume that
there would be some minor discrepancies in the data. In 2018, the NTRPA Governing
Board certified the cubic volume base data for the Cal Neva building in Crystal Bay. In its
approval of that request, the NTRPA Board found that the recertification request was
justified due to new analysis using industry-standard methodology as well as state of the
art technologies that were not available at the time of original certification.
Since 1996, there have been very few alternations to the Ed’s Tahoe Nugget building.
Given the building’s age staff believes there is a need to update or clean up the certified
base data on this site. If this request is approved by the NTRPA Governing Board, staff
is proposing Condition 1. Condition 1 requires that the applicant within 6 months after
purchasing the building to submit architectural floor plans and base data calculations for
the Eds Tahoe Nugget building to the agency. Staff believes that once the applicant has
purchased the building, they will be able to take detailed measurements of the building
and submit more accurate base data calculations for the site. With this new information,
the NTRPA will be able to clean up the certified base data on file and make an accurate
determination on whether a recertification request to the NTRPA Board will be
warranted. NTRPA staff proposes that if the architectural floor plans and base data
calculations are substantially in compliance with the certified base data for the site, than
staff will have the ability to sign off the plans for compliance and report back to the
NTRPA Governing Board. If the architectural floor plans and base data calculations are
not in compliance with the certified base data, then staff will schedule a recertification
request for the NTRPA Governing Board’s consideration.
Staff recommends that the board the approval of the requested determination of
eligibility of the certified base data on the Ed’s Tahoe Nugget site. In addition to the
findings above staff suggests the following condition:
Condition 1: Within 6 months after acquiring the property, the applicant will
submit detailed architectural floor plans and base data calculations for the Eds
Tahoe Nugget building to the NTRPA.