CELEBREX – data sheet Page 31 of 35
Cardiovascular Safety - Long-term Studies Involving Patients with Sporadic Adenomatous
Polyps
Two studies involving patients with sporadic adenomatous polyps were conducted with
celecoxib i.e. the APC trial (Adenoma Prevention with Celecoxib) and the PreSAP trial
(Prevention of Spontaneous Adenomatous Polyps). In the APC trial, there was a dose-related
increase in the composite endpoint of CV death, myocardial infarction, or stroke (adjudicated)
with celecoxib compared to placebo over 3 years of treatment. The PreSAP trial did not
demonstrate a statistically significant increased risk for the same composite endpoint.
In the APC trial, the hazard ratios compared to placebo for a composite endpoint of CV death,
myocardial infarction, or stroke (adjudicated) were 3.4 (95% CI 1.4 - 8.5) with celecoxib 400
mg BD and 2.8 (95% CI 1.1 - 7.2) with celecoxib 200 mg BD. Cumulative rates for this
composite endpoint over 3 years were 3.0% (20/671) and 2.5% (17/685) for the 400 mg BD
and 200 mg BD celecoxib treatment groups, respectively, compared to 0.9% (6/679) for the
placebo group. The increases for both celecoxib dose groups versus placebo were mainly
driven by myocardial infarction.
In the PreSAP trial, the hazard ratio compared to placebo for this same composite endpoint was
1.2 (95% CI 0.6 - 2.4) with celecoxib 400 mg OD. Cumulative rate for this composite endpoint
over 3 years was 2.3% (21/933) compared to 1.9% (12/628) for the placebo group.
When data from the APC and PreSAP trials were considered together, risk for CV
thromboembolic events was greater in celecoxib-treated patients with a history of
atherosclerotic CV disease, than in celecoxib-treated patients without such history.
Cardiovascular Safety - Long-term Study of Alzheimer's Disease Anti-inflammatory Prevention
Trial (ADAPT)
Data from the ADAPT study did not show a significantly increased CV risk with celecoxib
200 mg BD compared to placebo. The relative risk compared to placebo for a similar
composite endpoint (CV death, MI, stroke) was 1.14 (95% CI 0.61 – 2.15) with celecoxib
200 mg BD. The incidence of myocardial infarction was 1.1% (8/717 patients) with celecoxib
200 mg BD and 1.2% (13/1070 patients) with placebo.
Cardiovascular Safety - Meta-analysis from Chronic Usage Studies
No long-term controlled clinical study specifically designed to assess the CV safety of chronic
celecoxib dosing of any duration has been conducted. However, a meta-analysis of safety data
from 41 completed celecoxib clinical studies of up to 1 year duration has been conducted,
representing 44,308 patients (24,933 (56.3%) patients exposed to celecoxib, 13,990 (31.6%)
patients exposed to NSAIDs, 4057 (9.2%) patients exposed to placebo, and 1328 (3.0%)
patients exposed to rofecoxib).
In this analysis, the incidence of serious CV thromboembolic events (CV death, non-fatal
myocardial infarction and non-fatal stroke) was similar between Celebrex (N=19,773) and non-
selective NSAIDs (N=13,990) treatment (RR=0.84, 95% CI 0.63 - 1.13). This pattern of effect
was maintained with or without aspirin use (≤325 mg). The incidence of non-fatal myocardial
infarction trended higher (RR=1.49, 95% CI 0.82 - 2.70); however that of stroke was
significantly lower (RR=0.31, 95% CI 0.14 - 0.68), and that of CV death was comparable
(RR=0.72, 95% CI 0.37 - 1.39) for Celebrex compared to combined non-selective NSAIDs.
In this analysis, the incidence of serious CV thromboembolic events (CV death, non-fatal
myocardial infarction and non-fatal stroke) was 0.38% for celecoxib (N=7,462) and 0.27% for