Base your answers to questions 68 through 73 on the information below and on your knowledge of chemistry.
Nuclear Waste Storage Plan for Yucca Mountain
In 1978, the U.S. Department of Energy began a study of Yucca Mountain which is
located 90 miles from Las Vegas, Nevada. The study was to determine if Yucca Mountain
would be suitable for a long-term burial site for high-level radioactive waste. A three-
dimensional (3-D) computer scale model of the site was used to simulate the Yucca
Mountain area. The computer model study for Yucca Mountain included such variables as:
the possibility of earthquakes, predicted water flow through the mountain, increased rain-
fall due to climate changes, radioactive leakage from the waste containers, and increased
temperatures from the buried waste within the containers.
The containers that will be used to store the radioactive waste are designed to last 10,000
years. Within the 10,000-year time period, cesium and strontium, the most powerful
radioactive emitters, would have decayed. Other isotopes found in the waste would decay
more slowly, but are not powerful radioactive emitters.
In 1998, scientists discovered that the compressed volcanic ash making up Yucca Mountain
was full of cracks. Because of the arid climate, scientists assumed that rainwater would move
through the cracks at a slow rate. However, when radioactive chlorine-36 was found in rock
samples at levels halfway through the mountain, it was clear that rainwater had moved
quickly down through Yucca Mountain. It was only 50 years earlier when this chlorine-36
isotope had contaminated rainwater during atmospheric testing of the atom bomb.
Some opponents of the Yucca Mountain plan believe that the uncertainties related to the
many variables of the computer model result in limited reliability of its predictions.
However, advocates of the plan believe it is safer to replace the numerous existing radio-
active burial sites around the United States with the one site at Yucca Mountain. Other
opponents of the plan believe that transporting the radioactive waste to Yucca Mountain
from the existing 131 burial sites creates too much danger to the United States. In 2002,
after years of political debate, a final legislative vote approved the development of Yucca
Mountain to replace the existing 131 burial sites.
68 State one uncertainty in the computer model that limits the reliability of this
computer model. [
1]
69 Scientists assume that a manufacturing defect would cause at least one of the waste
containers stored in the Yucca Mountain repository to leak within the first 1,000 years.
State one possible effect such a leak could have on the environment near Yucca
Mountain. [
1]
70 State one risk associated with leaving radioactive waste in the 131 sites around the
country where it is presently stored. [
1]
71 If a sample of cesium-137 is stored in a waste container in Yucca Mountain, how much
time must elapse until only of the original sample remains unchanged? [
1]
72 The information states “Within the 10,000-year time period, cesium and strontium, the
most powerful radioactive emitters, would have decayed.” Use information from
Reference Table N to support this statement. [
1]
73 Why is water flow a crucial factor in deciding whether Yucca Mountain is a suitable
burial site? [
1]